Brale Claims New Protocol Could Eliminate a Major Bottleneck for Scaling Branded Tokens

cryptonews.ruPublicado em 2026-07-30Última atualização em 2026-07-30

Resumo

Stablecoin infrastructure firm Brale is launching the ION protocol, a new interoperability solution designed to address a major scaling bottleneck: moving the rapidly growing number of custom-branded stablecoins across different blockchains. The protocol uses a burn-and-mint model, allowing stablecoins to move between chains without requiring pre-funded liquidity pools in each supported network. The $300 billion stablecoin market is dominated by Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC), but new entrants like banks, fintechs, and asset managers are increasingly issuing their own tokens for payments and settlements. With over 350 asset-pegged coins tracked, the ecosystem is becoming fragmented. Brale's founder, Ben Milne, states that liquidity between stablecoin programs is the number one barrier to scaling individual stablecoins, as there isn't enough global capital to fund deep liquidity pools for every token on every blockchain. The ION protocol, similar to Circle's CCTP but open to multiple issuers, aims to solve this by eliminating the locked capital requirement of traditional bridges. Initial partners include Monad, Rain, and Coinflow, with a rollout planned from testnet to wider adoption.

Brale, a stablecoin infrastructure firm, is implementing a compatibility protocol designed to put an end to what it says is a bottleneck in the industry's development: moving the rapidly growing number of branded stablecoins across blockchains.

Called the ION protocol, it allows participating stablecoins to move between blockchains by burning tokens on one network and minting an equivalent amount on another. Unlike most blockchain bridges, this model does not require pre-funding liquidity pools in each supported blockchain.

The $300 billion stablecoin market is dominated by Tether (USDT) and Circle ($USDC), but new entrants are emerging. Banks, fintech companies, crypto firms, and asset managers are increasingly issuing their own branded tokens for payments, settlements, and tokenized assets.

Data provider CoinGecko already tracks over 350 coins pegged to a real-world asset like a fiat currency, highlighting the growing need for infrastructure to connect the increasingly fragmented ecosystem. Brale argues that today's interoperability model will not scale as more issuers introduce their own versions.

The Stablecoin Scaling Problem

"The company supports over 100 stablecoin programs across more than 30 blockchains", Brale founder and CEO Ben Milne reported.

Many of its clients process billions of dollars in monthly payments while maintaining relatively small stablecoin balances, as their tokens are designed for transactions, not investments.

Moving assets between blockchains typically relies on liquidity pools or wrapped tokens, which requires locking up capital in each supported network. As the number of stablecoins and blockchains grows, so does the capital requirement.

"Liquidity between stablecoin programs is barrier No. 1 to scaling individual stablecoins," Milne said. "There isn't enough capital in the world to solve this."

Due to insufficient capital to create deep liquidity pools for every stablecoin on every blockchain, the current model becomes unsustainable as issuance accelerates. Instead, ION employs a "burn and mint" approach, similar to issuer Circle's ($USDC) Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP), extending the model to any participating stablecoin issuer, not just a single token.

The protocol is launching with partners including Monad, Rain, Coinflow, Turnkey, Etherfuse, Spark, and Canton, first on a testnet and then more broadly.

end-content

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main problem in the stablecoin industry that Brale's new protocol aims to solve?

ABrale's new protocol aims to solve the problem of moving the rapidly growing number of custom stablecoins across different blockchains, which is seen as a bottleneck for the industry's growth. The current cross-chain liquidity model is considered unsustainable.

QHow does Brale's ION protocol differ from most blockchain bridges for transferring stablecoins?

AUnlike most blockchain bridges, Brale's ION protocol uses a 'burn-and-mint' model. It burns tokens on one blockchain and mints an equivalent amount on another, eliminating the need for pre-funded liquidity pools in each supported blockchain.

QAccording to Brale's CEO, what is the number one barrier to scaling individual stablecoins?

AAccording to Ben Milne, Brale's founder and CEO, liquidity between stablecoin programs is the number one barrier to scaling individual stablecoins. He states there isn't enough capital in the world to solve this problem with the current model.

QWhat does the article cite as evidence of the growing need for infrastructure to connect the stablecoin ecosystem?

AThe article cites data from CoinGecko, which tracks over 350 coins pegged to a real-world asset like a fiat currency, as evidence highlighting the growing need for infrastructure to connect the increasingly fragmented ecosystem.

QWhich protocol's approach is Brale's ION similar to, and how does ION expand on it?

ABrale's ION protocol is similar to Circle's Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP), which also uses a burn-and-mint approach. ION expands this model to work with any participating stablecoin issuer, rather than being limited to a single token like USDC.

Leituras Relacionadas

Bernstein Reveals Details of Core Scientific's $14 Billion Deal with AMD

Analysts from Bernstein revealed details of a deal between Core Scientific and AMD with a potential total value of over $14 billion. According to the report, initial contracts for 530 MW of capacity could generate this revenue over 15 years, with AMD acting as a credit guarantor for part of the bitcoin miner's infrastructure. The partnership, announced on July 28, has the potential to allocate up to 2.5 GW of data center capacity for AI. Bernstein broke down the 530 MW into 377 MW of direct triple-net lease for AMD and 152 MW for an unnamed cloud provider backed by AMD's credit. This structure is seen as lowering financing costs and counterparty risk. AMD also received warrants to buy 30 million Core Scientific shares at $23.47 each, which vest upon reaching the 2.5 GW target. Average annual revenue from the deal is estimated at around $0.9 billion, or about $1.8 million per megawatt, which is 5-25% below recent AI hosting deals by other miners. However, the 377 MW triple-net lease for AMD carries a margin close to 100%. Core Scientific expects capital expenditures for the deal to be $11-12 million per MW, totaling about $6 billion. Bernstein views this partnership as a new phase in the transformation of former bitcoin miners into AI infrastructure operators, with AI chipmakers like AMD now acting as direct anchor tenants. Recent similar deals include Hut 8 allocating 704 MW to a tenant believed to be Nvidia, and AMD reserving 200 MW with Riot Platforms. Core Scientific also paid Block $41.9 million to terminate a mining chip supply contract as part of its accelerated diversification into AI.

cryptonews.ruHá 42m

Bernstein Reveals Details of Core Scientific's $14 Billion Deal with AMD

cryptonews.ruHá 42m

Trading

Spot
活动图片