The Economist: In Asia, Stablecoins Are Becoming the New Financial Infrastructure

marsbitPublicado em 2026-02-22Última atualização em 2026-02-22

Resumo

Stablecoins are rapidly emerging as a new financial infrastructure across Asia, driven by real-world needs for efficient and low-cost transactions. Despite cautious or strict regulatory stances in countries like India, cryptocurrency adoption continues to thrive. India, which imposes heavy taxes and transaction fees, still leads the global crypto adoption index, with inflows reaching approximately $338 billion from mid-2024 to 2025. A key application is cross-border remittances. With 24 million migrant workers in Southeast Asia, traditional remittance fees averaging 6.5% per $200 transfer pose a significant burden. Stablecoins, unlike volatile cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, offer a stable, fast, and accessible alternative. From January to July last year, global stablecoin transfers exceeded $4 trillion. Businesses are also adopting stablecoins to streamline payments, reducing intermediaries, delays, and costs. Monthly stablecoin transactions between enterprises surged from under $100 million in early 2023 to over $6 billion by mid-2025. Additionally, Asia’s vast gig economy—over 210 million workers—benefits from instant salary settlements via stablecoins, bypassing traditional banking delays. However, the same features that benefit legitimate transactions—speed, low cost, and accessibility—also risk being exploited for illicit activities. The future of stablecoins in Asia will depend on how effectively regulators balance innovation with oversight. Success could reshape glo...

For everyone from freelance software developers in Lahore to domestic helpers in Manila, smartphones have become crypto banks. Instead of paying a day's wages in wire transfer fees, they can send and receive stablecoins at low cost and instantly.

This real demand explains why cryptocurrencies continue to thrive in Asia even as official attitudes remain cautious, even in countries with the toughest regulations like India. India imposes a 30% tax on crypto gains and deducts fees of up to 1% per transaction. According to data analytics firm Chainalysis, from mid-2024 to 2025, the scale of crypto fund inflows into India reached approximately $338 billion, ranking it first on the Global Crypto Adoption Index for the third consecutive year.

Nine of the top 20 countries on Chainalysis's Global Crypto Adoption Index are from Asia, including Pakistan (3rd), Vietnam, and developed economies like Japan and South Korea. Speculative trading remains popular, but the region's dominance mainly reflects a shift in the use of cryptocurrencies: it is no longer just a tool for speculation but has become a new type of financial infrastructure. "Cryptocurrency is solving real-world problems," says Chengyi Ong of Chainalysis.

Cross-border remittances are a core application. Southeast Asia has about 24 million migrant workers. World Bank data shows that in 2025, the average cost to send $200 was 6.5%. This is a heavy burden for migrant workers, especially in countries like the Philippines, where remittances account for 9% of GDP. Stablecoins are the solution; unlike Bitcoin, their price is hardly volatile. Ong says stablecoins are "becoming the backbone of crypto activity."

From January to July last year, the global volume of stablecoin transfers exceeded $4 trillion. Although this still represents a small share of the total annual cross-border payments, while highly volatile assets like Bitcoin grab global headlines, stablecoins are quietly taking on the role of real payments.

The advantages of stablecoins are also driving corporate adoption. In traditional cross-border payments, each participating bank adds fees, delays, markups, and compliance checks. A Vietnamese company paying a Thai supplier typically needs to go through a bank for currency exchange; stablecoin transactions settle faster with fewer intermediaries. According to crypto analytics firm Artemis, the monthly volume of inter-company stablecoin transactions soared from less than $100 million in early 2023 to over $6 billion by mid-2025.

Asia's vast freelance community is also bypassing traditional banks. The World Bank says the region has over 210 million gig economy workers, about half of the global total. Traditional payment systems often delay payments to drivers and delivery riders, while stablecoins enable instant settlement. Visa is testing a system that can send payments directly to users' stablecoin wallets. Pakistan has about 2 million freelancers and receives $38 billion in annual remittances. Many choose to receive payments in stablecoins and then convert them into local currency via exchanges or local merchants, with fees typically only 1%–3%, about half of traditional channels.

Whether stablecoins become legitimate financial infrastructure or a tool for fraud will largely depend on Asia. The very features that attract Filipino nurses for cross-border transfers (speed, low cost, no bank account needed) could also be exploited by criminal groups in Myanmar and Cambodia. Asia has the market size, real demand, and regulatory resolve to resolve this contradiction. If successful, stablecoins will reshape global capital flows; if they fail, cryptocurrencies will have found their long-awaited real-world use case, but an illegitimate one.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, why is cryptocurrency thriving in Asia despite cautious official attitudes?

AIt is thriving due to real-world demand, such as the need for low-cost, instant cross-border remittances, which stablecoins provide as a solution. This utility is driving adoption even in countries with strict regulations like India.

QWhat is the primary use case for stablecoins in Asia that is driving their adoption, as mentioned in the text?

AThe core application is cross-border remittances. With around 24 million migrant workers in Southeast Asia, stablecoins offer a solution to the high costs (averaging 6.5% for sending $200) and delays associated with traditional money transfers.

QHow does the article contrast the use of stablecoins with traditional banking for corporate payments?

ATraditional cross-border corporate payments involve multiple intermediary banks, each adding fees, delays, markups, and compliance checks. In contrast, stablecoin transactions settle faster with fewer intermediaries, as evidenced by corporate stablecoin volume surging from under $100 million to over $6 billion monthly between 2023 and mid-2025.

QWhat advantage do stablecoins offer to Asia's vast gig economy workforce, according to The Economist?

AStablecoins enable instant settlement of payments for gig workers, such as drivers and delivery riders, who often face delays in receiving their earnings through traditional payment systems. This allows them to bypass traditional banks and receive funds directly into their wallets.

QWhat does the article suggest is the key factor that will determine whether stablecoins become legitimate financial infrastructure or a tool for fraud?

AThe outcome largely depends on Asia, which has the market size, real demand, and regulatory resolve to manage this duality. The same features that benefit legitimate users (speed, low cost, no bank account needed) can also be exploited by criminal groups. Success would mean reshaping global money flows; failure would mean a legitimate use case exists but operates outside the law.

Leituras Relacionadas

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbitHá 3h

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbitHá 3h

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手Há 3h

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手Há 3h

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbitHá 5h

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbitHá 5h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片