The Door to Offshore Stablecoins Quietly Closes Amid the Vision of RMB Internationalization

比推Publicado em 2026-02-12Última atualização em 2026-02-12

Resumo

China's recent regulatory crackdown has effectively closed the door on offshore issuance of yuan-pegged stablecoins, dealing a significant blow to Hong Kong’s ambitions to become a digital asset hub. The new rules, announced on February 7, explicitly prohibit domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas without approval, citing concerns over monetary sovereignty. This move dashes earlier market expectations of a policy thaw in China’s stance toward digital assets, particularly after PBOC Governor Pan Gongsheng’s earlier comments about the yuan challenging dollar dominance. Industry observers note that the tightening was foreshadowed as early as August 2024, when Chinese authorities began restricting stablecoin-related research and promotional events. The latest policy removes any ambiguity around private yuan stablecoin issuance and reinforces capital control priorities. As a result, firms that had planned to apply for stablecoin licenses in Hong Kong—including Ant Group and JD.com—are now expected to focus solely on Hong Kong dollar-pegged stablecoins, if they proceed at all. Market data reflects the dampening effect: open interest in Bitcoin perpetual futures has fallen roughly 50% since October, and investors have withdrawn approximately $3.3 billion from U.S. Ethereum ETFs since last fall. The regulatory shift underscores the fundamental tension between China’s capital controls and the borderless nature of crypto innovation, forcing industry players to con...

Author: Suvashree Ghosh, Bloomberg

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News

Editor's Note: Recently, the global cryptocurrency market has continued to slump, and China has once again tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and stablecoins, explicitly prohibiting the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins overseas without approval, directly impacting the progress of Hong Kong's digital asset hub construction. This article focuses on the market reaction and industry impact after the policy implementation, revealing the core contradiction between capital controls and crypto innovation. Against the backdrop of intensified industry reshuffling and accelerated capital withdrawal, the crypto sector is returning to pragmatic development. The regulatory boundaries and future direction are worth continuous attention.

November 26, 2025, a cryptocurrency exchange storefront in Hong Kong. Photo: Lam Yik/Bloomberg

Setback in the Digital Realm

Last year, an increasing number of crypto industry commentators believed that China's stance on the digital asset sector might be softening.

After People's Bank of China Governor Pan Gongsheng proposed the vision that the RMB has the potential to challenge the dominance of the US dollar, market talk of a "policy thaw" kept emerging.

But on February 7th, all these expectations came to an abrupt halt.

Amid the latest round of cryptocurrency crash, China tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and the tokenization of physical assets, prohibiting domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas and banning the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins abroad without approval. Officials stated this move was to prevent monetary sovereignty risks.

Angela Ang, Head of APAC Policy and Strategic Partnerships at blockchain intelligence firm TRM Labs, said: "China's attitude towards stablecoins has been tentative at best and has cooled significantly in recent months."

She stated that the central bank's latest announcement "completely dashes any hope for the launch of an offshore RMB stablecoin in the short term — certainly not in Hong Kong, and most likely not elsewhere either."

For Hong Kong and its years-long goal of building a digital asset hub, this is a major setback.

In June last year, Hong Kong's Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury, Christopher Hui, had said that, subject to regulatory requirements, the possibility of pegging Hong Kong stablecoins to the RMB was not ruled out. It is now widely believed that he will shut this door completely.

Surge in USD Stablecoin Supply During Trump Administration

Source: Artemis Analytics

As Angela Ang mentioned, signals of this regulatory tightening had already emerged.

As early as last August, China had required local securities firms and related institutions to stop publishing stablecoin research reports and hosting related promotional seminars to curb overheated market sentiment.

Patrick Tan, General Counsel at blockchain intelligence firm ChainArgos, said last week's policy announcement "removes the uncertainty hanging over the market regarding the private issuance of RMB stablecoins. Issuers now know exactly where the red lines are."

Entities applying for licenses can only focus on issuing stablecoins pegged to the Hong Kong dollar.

Bloomberg News previously reported that up to 50 companies in Hong Kong planned to apply for stablecoin licenses last year, including tech giants Ant Group and JD.com. But according to an October report by the Financial Times, these companies were forced to suspend their stablecoin plans after intervention from Beijing.

Ant Group and JD.com did not respond to requests for comment.

As of this Tuesday, Hong Kong had issued licenses to 11 cryptocurrency exchanges, while approving 62 companies to conduct digital asset trading for clients. The list includes China-backed institutions such as CMB International Securities Limited, Guotai Junan Securities (Hong Kong) Limited, and Tinful Futures Limited.

But industry players worry that without access to the RMB, the entire setup might be in vain.

"The issue was never about Hong Kong's regulatory framework, but always about whether China would tolerate RMB-denominated instruments circulating outside its control," Patrick Tan said, adding, "Capital controls and stablecoin liberalization are fundamentally incompatible."

Market Data Continues to Weaken

Bitcoin Perpetual Futures Open Interest Continues to Decline

Source: Coinglass

Bitcoin perpetual futures open interest has failed to rebound since starting to decline last October, highlighting the lack of confidence supporting this rally. Data from Coinglass shows it has fallen by about 50% from the October high.

Capital Outflow: $3.3 Billion

Data compiled by Bloomberg Intelligence shows that investors have withdrawn approximately $3.3 billion from US Ethereum ETFs since the crash in early October, with over $500 million withdrawn this year. Data shows that Ethereum ETF assets have fallen below $13 billion, the lowest level since last July.

Industry Perspectives

"The market is consolidating around what actually works. Even well-funded crypto-native VCs are pivoting heavily into fintech, stablecoin businesses, and prediction markets; it's hard to get attention for anything else."

— Santiago Roel Santos, Founder and CEO of crypto private equity firm Inversion

Venture capital funds in the crypto industry are shifting their focus to better-performing areas, such as stablecoin infrastructure, on-chain prediction markets, and expanding into related adjacent fields.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7611508

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the key regulatory change announced by China regarding stablecoins on February 7th?

AChina tightened regulations on cryptocurrencies and tokenization of real-world assets, prohibiting domestic institutions from issuing digital tokens overseas and banning the issuance of RMB-pegged stablecoins abroad without approval to prevent monetary sovereignty risks.

QHow did Angela Ang from TRM Labs describe China's attitude towards stablecoins and the possibility of offshore RMB stablecoins?

AAngela Ang stated that China's attitude towards stablecoins was tentative at best and had cooled in recent months, and the announcement completely dashed any hopes of launching offshore RMB stablecoins in the near future, especially in Hong Kong and likely elsewhere.

QWhat impact did the new regulations have on Hong Kong's ambitions to become a digital asset hub?

AThe new regulations were a significant setback for Hong Kong's goal of becoming a digital asset hub, as they effectively closed the door on the possibility of issuing RMB-pegged stablecoins, forcing companies to focus only on Hong Kong dollar-pegged stablecoins.

QAccording to Patrick Tan from ChainArgos, what is the fundamental conflict between capital controls and stablecoin liberalization?

APatrick Tan stated that capital controls and stablecoin liberalization are fundamentally incompatible, as the issue was never about Hong Kong's regulatory framework but whether China would tolerate RMB-denominated instruments circulating outside its control.

QWhat trend did Santiago Roel Santos, CEO of Inversion, observe in crypto venture capital investments?

ASantiago Roel Santos noted that crypto-native venture capital firms are consolidating around areas that actually work, such as stablecoin infrastructure and on-chain prediction markets, and are expanding into adjacent areas, while other sectors struggle to attract attention.

Leituras Relacionadas

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbitHá 41m

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbitHá 41m

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbitHá 43m

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbitHá 43m

Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

CoreWeave's Q1 2026 earnings report has intensified the ongoing bull-bear battle over the AI infrastructure stock. While revenue doubled year-over-year to $2.08B and the firm's remaining performance obligation (RPO) surged to nearly $100B, its net loss more than doubled to $740M. The critical point of contention is profitability: while adjusted EBITDA margin was a robust 56%, the adjusted operating margin collapsed to just 1% due to soaring infrastructure and sales costs. A weaker-than-expected Q2 revenue guidance further triggered an 11.4% single-day stock drop. The bull thesis hinges on CoreWeave's massive order backlog, deep strategic ties with NVIDIA (as a customer, investor, and key supplier), and a diversified client base now including Anthropic and Meta. The bear case focuses on the "scale at all costs" model, where expanding revenue leads to wider losses, ballooning debt ($25B), and massive capital expenditures ($6.8B in Q1). Insider selling by executives contrasts with a notable new investor: Chinese investor Duan Yongping initiated a small position (0.12% of his portfolio) in Q4 2025 near the stock's lows. The coming Q2 report is seen as a key test for management's promise of a profit margin recovery.

marsbitHá 49m

Duan Yongping's Bottom-Fishing in CoreWeave Is Turning into a Battleground for Bulls and Bears

marsbitHá 49m

China's Version of 'Tech Burning Man' Debuts in Shanghai, muShanghai Creates a Global Geek 'Pop-up City'

From May 10 to June 6, 2026, the inaugural muShanghai "Pop-up City" experiment, dubbed China's version of a "tech Burning Man," launched in Shanghai. Co-organized by the international open-source community The Mu and the Hongqiao Alibaba Center, this 28-day event aimed to build a global "parallel city" for geeks, attracting over 800 participants from more than 50 countries, including former OpenAI engineers and startup founders. The program featured four themed weeks: AI Week, Biotech Week, Robotics Week, and Culture Week, hosting nearly 100 sessions like ClawCon 2026. Activities ranged from discussions on AI safety and consumer apps to robot battles and cyberpunk culture, culminating in large outdoor "Innovator Marketplaces." A core principle was "Build in Public," encouraging open sharing of projects and progress. Hongqiao Alibaba Center served as the co-host and primary venue, positioning itself as a first-stop hub for international talent in China. The event marks a significant step for The Mu community, which has previously organized similar pop-up cities in Argentina and San Francisco, in bringing its model of immersive, collaborative innovation to China. It aims to be a key window for global科创 (scientific and technological innovation) exchange.

marsbitHá 49m

China's Version of 'Tech Burning Man' Debuts in Shanghai, muShanghai Creates a Global Geek 'Pop-up City'

marsbitHá 49m

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

US banking trade groups are urging revisions to the stablecoin yield compromise in the upcoming CLARITY Act ahead of a key committee markup. The Act currently aims to ban all passive, deposit-like interest on stablecoins to prevent competition with traditional bank savings, while allowing rewards tied to active uses like staking or transactions. In a letter, groups including the American Banking Association and Bank Policy Institute proposed stricter language to eliminate perceived loopholes for passive yield and prevent deposit flight from banks. However, these efforts are reportedly viewed as minor by some lawmakers. The Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to mark up the bill on May 14, a critical step before it can advance through Congress.

bitcoinistHá 14h

CLARITY Act: Banking Trade Groups Push For Yield Agreement Revision – Details

bitcoinistHá 14h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow