Starknet TVL reclaims $300m for first time since 2024 as on-chain activity recovers

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-01-14Última atualização em 2026-01-14

Resumo

Starknet's total value locked (TVL) has rebounded to over $300 million for the first time since early 2024, signaling a recovery in on-chain activity and capital deployment after a prolonged decline. The TVL reached $302.12 million, nearing its all-time high of $307 million. This resurgence is supported by a record stablecoin market cap of approximately $248 million and an average of 65,000 daily active users, ranking Starknet fifth among Layer-2 networks. Despite trailing behind competitors like Base and Arbitrum, the network shows signs of stabilization and renewed user confidence, moving past outdated narratives and into a phase of measurable recovery.

Starknet’s total value locked [TVL] has climbed back above $300 million for the first time since 2024, according to data from DeFiLlama. The climb marks a notable recovery in capital deployed across the Ethereum Layer-2 network after more than a year of decline.

The rebound follows a prolonged drawdown that saw Starknet’s TVL decline sharply throughout 2024 amid weak Layer-2 sentiment and a decrease in on-chain activity.

While the network remains well below its historical peak, the return to the $300 million level represents its strongest capital position in over a year.

Starknet TVL returns to levels last seen in early 2024

DeFiLlama data shows Starknet’s TVL has risen steadily in recent weeks, reversing losses accumulated during the second half of 2024. As of this writing, the TVL was $302.12 million.

The recovery places the network back at capital levels last observed in early 2024, when it reached its all-time high of $307 million, before liquidity thinned out.

The move suggests renewed confidence among users deploying assets on Starknet, even as competition among Layer-2 networks remains intense.

Alongside rising TVL, Starknet has also seen a significant increase in stablecoin liquidity. DeFiLlama data shows the network’s stablecoin market capitalization has climbed to approximately $248 million, its highest point ever.

Growing stablecoin balances are often viewed as a key indicator of deeper DeFi participation.

Starknet user activity shows signs of stabilization

The TVL recovery is being supported by improving usage metrics. Data from Token Terminal indicates Starknet currently averages around 65,000 daily active users.

Additionally, it ranks fifth among Layer-2 blockchains in terms of daily activity.

While that figure remains below the network’s highs from 2023, it marks a sustained improvement from mid-2024

Outdated narratives quashed as data shifts

The recovery comes with a recent sarcastic social media post from Solana that resurfaced a widely shared 2024 post. The 2024 post suggested that Starknet had eight daily active users, which was also due to lapsed data.

Current on-chain data show that Starknet’s activity today is orders of magnitude higher than those claims imply, even if it continues to trail leading Layer-2 networks such as Base and Arbitrum.

Recovery remains relative amid Layer-2 competition

Despite reclaiming the $300 million TVL level, Starknet remains well below its historical highs and continues to face strong competition from newer Layer-2 platforms.

Still, the combination of rising TVL, expanding stablecoin liquidity, and stabilizing user activity indicates Starknet has moved out of its 2024 trough and into a phase of measurable recovery.

Whether that recovery can be sustained will depend less on social narratives and more on continued capital deployment and real on-chain usage.


Final Thoughts

  • Starknet’s return above $300 million in TVL marks its strongest on-chain recovery since 2024, supported by rising stablecoin liquidity and improving user activity.
  • While activity remains below historical highs, current data challenges outdated narratives and suggests capital is gradually returning to the network.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current Total Value Locked (TVL) on Starknet according to DeFiLlama?

AThe current TVL on Starknet is $302.12 million.

QWhat key metric, besides TVL, has reached its highest point ever on Starknet, indicating deeper DeFi participation?

AThe network's stablecoin market capitalization has climbed to approximately $248 million, its highest point ever.

QHow many daily active users does Starknet currently average, and what is its rank among Layer-2 blockchains in daily activity?

AStarknet currently averages around 65,000 daily active users and ranks fifth among Layer-2 blockchains in terms of daily activity.

QWhat outdated social media claim about Starknet's user activity from 2024 was recently resurfaced and contradicted by current data?

AA 2024 social media post sarcastically suggested that Starknet had only eight daily active users, a claim that is orders of magnitude lower than the current on-chain data shows.

QWhat was Starknet's all-time high TVL, and when was it reached before the recent decline?

AStarknet reached its all-time high TVL of $307 million in early 2024 before liquidity thinned out.

Leituras Relacionadas

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHá 22m

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHá 22m

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHá 1h

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHá 1h

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbitHá 2h

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片