Stablecoin payments below $200 can go tax-free: If Congress agrees

ambcryptoPublicado em 2025-12-21Última atualização em 2025-12-21

Resumo

In a renewed bipartisan effort, U.S. lawmakers Max Miller and Steven Horsford have proposed a tax exemption for stablecoin transactions valued at $200 or below, aiming to provide clarity and consumer protection. This follows a previous failed attempt by Senator Cynthia Lummis in 2025 to introduce a similar exemption. Currently, the IRS treats cryptocurrency as property, subjecting it to capital gains tax. Meanwhile, banking lobbyists oppose the high yields offered by crypto exchanges on stablecoin deposits, arguing it threatens traditional banks. Industry leaders, including Gemini's co-founder, are defending the GENIUS Act against what they call anti-competitive overreach by banks. The outcome of both the tax proposal and the stablecoin yield debate remains uncertain.

The U.S. Congress is making another attempt at tax relief for low stablecoin transfers and crypto staking.

In a recent House proposal, lawmakers Max Miller (Ohio) and Steven Horsford (Nevada) sought tax exemptions for stablecoins valued at $200 or below.

Part of the draft read,

“The provision is intended to establish a per-transaction de minimis threshold of $200, consistent with the foreign currency transaction exception under section 988.”

In a statement, Rep. Miller said that the legislation was a “bipartisan effort” to ensure consumer protection.

“This bill would protect consumers making everyday purchases, ensure the rules are clear for innovators and investors, and strengthen compliance so everyone plays by the same rules.”

However, this was not the first time Congress had tried to push for U.S. crypto tax clarity.

Senator Lummis’ failed crypto tax plan

In July 2025, pro-Bitcoin Senator Cynthia Lummis floated a similar tax proposal that included a $300 exemption for small transactions.

She also advocated for tax deferral for staking and mining rewards during the amendment process of President Donald Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill. The exemption was to have an annual cap of $5,000 on crypto gains to avoid abuse.

However, the provisions didn’t make it to the final version of the bill after failing to reach the voting threshold. Some Democrats also opposed the proposal, arguing that it would result in a loss of government revenue.

Currently, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) treats cryptocurrency as property, which can attract capital gains tax rates ranging from 10% to 37%.

For long-term investors, the tax rates are relatively favorable, ranging from 0% to 20%.

It remains to be seen whether the latest tax proposals will be included in the crypto market structure bill.

Stablecoin yield fight

Even so, the stablecoin yield paid out by crypto exchanges like Gemini and Coinbase, among others, continues to be opposed by the banking lobby.

According to them, it threatens community banks. They argued that deposit capital will shift to stablecoins in search of the 3%-4% rewards, rather than banks’ less than 1% yield on average checking accounts.

However, Gemini co-founder Tyler Winklevoss and other industry players are also pushing back against the banksters’ anti-competitive ‘overreach.’

Reacting to a collective industry letter to Congress to defend the stablecoin law GENIUS Act, Winklevoss stated,

“We are not going to let them (banks) get away with this. That’s why we signed onto this letter with 125+ other companies to defend the GENIUS Act as it is written.”


Final Thoughts

  • Congress has revived the crypto tax exemptions for low stablecoin transfers.
  • However, the fight against stablecoin rewards issued by exchanges continues.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the proposed de minimis threshold for tax exemptions on stablecoin transfers in the recent House proposal?

AThe proposed de minimis threshold is $200 or below for stablecoin transfers.

QWhich two lawmakers are behind the recent proposal for tax exemptions on small stablecoin transactions?

AThe lawmakers are Max Miller from Ohio and Steven Horsford from Nevada.

QWhat was the outcome of Senator Cynthia Lummis's similar crypto tax proposal in July 2025?

ASenator Lummis's proposal, which included a $300 exemption for small transactions and tax deferral for staking and mining rewards, failed to reach the voting threshold and was not included in the final version of the bill.

QWhy are banking lobbies opposing the stablecoin yields offered by exchanges like Gemini and Coinbase?

ABanking lobbies argue that stablecoin yields threaten community banks because deposit capital may shift to stablecoins seeking 3%-4% rewards, compared to banks' average checking account yields of less than 1%.

QHow does the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) currently treat cryptocurrency for tax purposes?

AThe IRS treats cryptocurrency as property, which can attract capital gains tax rates ranging from 10% to 37% for short-term gains and 0% to 20% for long-term gains.

Leituras Relacionadas

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

The AI employee Viktor, developed by a team with DeepMind background, has achieved $20 million in annual revenue without a traditional sales team, serving over 30,000 companies. Its core innovation lies in positioning itself as a "Tier 3 AI Coworker" capable of "end-to-end execution and delivery of results," moving beyond the "draft and wait for human completion" model of typical AI assistants. Users can simply mention Viktor in Slack or Microsoft Teams using natural language commands, and it autonomously performs tasks like pulling sales data from a CRM, generating reports, or even cross-tool operations like creating board meeting PPTs by aggregating data from six different sources. Key to its growth is a pure Product-Led Growth (PLG) model, eliminating complex implementation cycles and per-seat licensing. Instead, it charges based on task credits or consumption, lowering the trial barrier with a $100 free credit offer and no credit card required. This enabled viral, bottom-up adoption within organizations. Viktor's interaction paradigm removes the barrier of prompt engineering, allowing non-technical employees to delegate complex workflows seamlessly. It also features proactive, automated task execution (e.g., overnight bookkeeping, scheduled reports) based on triggers, effectively embedding AI as an automated "process layer" within business operations. However, its expansion into Microsoft Teams—a platform with 320 million users—highlights challenges. Large enterprises require stringent IT compliance, security reviews (e.g., SOC 2), and governance, potentially hindering the frictionless, user-driven adoption that succeeded in Slack. Additionally, the "black box" nature of its autonomous decision-making raises concerns about operational risks, data integrity, and the need for robust audit logs and permission controls. Balancing efficiency gains with security and trust remains a critical hurdle for Viktor and similar AI agents aiming to become core enterprise infrastructure.

marsbitHá 1m

No Sales Team, $20 Million in Revenue: How Did AI Employee Viktor Win Over 30,000 Companies?

marsbitHá 1m

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

According to a report by The Information, early Chinese investors of Manus, including Tencent, Sequoia Capital China, and ZhenFund, are planning to repurchase the company from Meta for $2 billion—the same price Meta paid in its acquisition last December. This move is a direct response to the Chinese government's prohibition of the foreign acquisition in April. As part of the repurchase plan, Manus is considering establishing a Sino-foreign joint venture within China. This structure is seen as a way to ensure regulatory compliance for its Chinese investors and to pave the way for a future IPO in Hong Kong. Notably, U.S. investor Benchmark will not participate in the buyback, which will concentrate ownership even more among Chinese capital. Since its acquisition by Meta, Manus's business has grown rapidly, with its annualized revenue run rate reportedly increasing four-to-fivefold to $400-$500 million in roughly six months. This strong growth underpins the investors' willingness to repurchase at the original price. Financially, the forced unwinding of the deal may benefit the early investors, allowing them to regain equity at a cost far below the company's current implied valuation, with the added prospect of an independent future listing. However, specific terms of the repurchase, including funding proportions and the joint venture's equity structure, are still under negotiation. This "repurchase-joint venture-Hong Kong IPO" approach could serve as a reference model for other Chinese AI startups navigating cross-border M&A regulations.

marsbitHá 28m

Manus Buyback Plan Emerges: Chinese Investors Plan to Repurchase Equity with $2 Billion, Path to Hong Kong IPO Becomes Clearer

marsbitHá 28m

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

The article discusses the significant and concerning depegging of MicroStrategy's (MSTR) preferred stock, STRC. Designed to trade near its $100 target par value, STRC has recently fallen sharply, reaching a low of $83.26 and closing at $88.59, representing an over 11% discount. STRC is a core component of MicroStrategy's financial strategy. As a perpetual preferred stock, it allows the company to raise capital through an "at-the-market" (ATM) issuance program without diluting common shareholders (MSTR). This capital is primarily used to purchase Bitcoin, creating a "capital flywheel": issuing STRC → raising cash → buying BTC → increasing net assets → supporting STRC's value. The flywheel's operation depends on STRC maintaining its $100 price. To enforce this, MicroStrategy employs a dynamic dividend mechanism, recently raising the rate to 11.5% and increasing payout frequency. However, this has failed to halt the depegging, indicating market concerns extend beyond yield. Analysts cite two main reasons. First, technical factors like forced liquidations from leveraged arbitrage trades may have exacerbated the sell-off. Second, and more fundamentally, is waning confidence in MicroStrategy's financial resilience. A JPMorgan report highlighted the company's limited cash relative to its ~$1.7 billion annual dividend obligation, raising liquidity concerns. While MicroStrategy counters that its massive Bitcoin holdings provide decades of coverage, this argument relies on the potential need to sell BTC—a departure from its long-standing "never sell" narrative. The company's recent sale of a small amount of Bitcoin for "testing," despite being framed as minor, has intensified these fears. The persistent depegging threatens to cripple MicroStrategy's primary funding channel. If STRC remains discounted, the company's ability to fund further Bitcoin purchases weakens. Should cash reserves dwindle while financing is constrained, the market may increasingly price in the risk of MicroStrategy becoming a forced seller of Bitcoin to meet obligations. This shift from a major marginal buyer to a potential seller could pose significant downside risk to the broader Bitcoin market.

链捕手Há 36m

STRC Loses Peg by 11%, Can Strategy's Perpetual Motion Machine Keep Running?

链捕手Há 36m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片