SpaceX Prospectus Reveals: Huge Loss of 49 Billion, Musk Controls 85% Voting Rights

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-21Última atualização em 2026-05-21

Resumo

SpaceX has filed for a historic IPO, potentially making Elon Musk the world's first trillionaire. The 2025 financials reveal $18.7B in revenue but a net loss of $4.9B, with Q1 2026 losses deepening to $4.3B. The filing outlines three core businesses: Space (loss-making due to heavy Starship investment), Connection (profitable, driven by Starlink's 10.3M users), and AI (the largest loss driver with massive capital expenditure). Following its merger with xAI, the AI unit faces regulatory scrutiny over Grok and relies heavily on ground-based data centers for now, with orbital AI computing targeted for 2028. Musk will retain ~85% voting post-IPO. The company's valuation thesis hinges on future growth from AI and space infrastructure, despite current steep losses and a high prospective price-to-sales multiple. Proceeds will repay debt and fund expansion.

Original Author: Bao Yilong

Original Source: Wall Street CN

SpaceX has formally submitted its prospectus to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, marking what will be the largest IPO in history and potentially making founder Elon Musk the world's first individual with a net worth exceeding one trillion dollars.

The prospectus dated May 20th shows that SpaceX generated full-year 2025 revenue of $18.7 billion, a 33% year-over-year increase, but with a net loss of $4.9 billion. First-quarter 2026 revenue was approximately $4.7 billion, with a net loss of $4.3 billion.

The prospectus did not disclose the planned fundraising size; details such as pricing range will be announced in subsequent filings.

The company intends to use the IPO proceeds primarily to repay a $20 billion interim bridge loan and to expand AI computing infrastructure, upgrade launch platforms, and scale its satellite constellation.

As mentioned by Wall Street CN, the core highlights of this listing lie in SpaceX's space launch, Starlink satellite broadband, and the integrated AI business following the acquisition of xAI.

The prospectus shows that the Connectivity business has achieved scale profitability, but the AI segment remains in a phase of heavy investment losses, with its capital expenditure far exceeding the sum of the other two segments.

Simultaneously, Musk will hold approximately 85.1% of voting rights post-IPO. According to Bloomberg data, Musk's current net worth is about $667 billion. If SpaceX ultimately lists with a $2 trillion valuation, combined with his Tesla holdings, his personal wealth could surpass the $1 trillion mark for the first time.

Starlink Supports Revenue Base, AI Investment Drags Profitability

SpaceX divides its business into Space, Connectivity, and AI segments, with financial performance showing significant divergence.

The Connectivity segment, centered on the Starlink satellite internet service, is currently the company's only profitable business.

In the first quarter of this year, Starlink achieved revenue of $3.26 billion, accounting for 69% of total company revenue, with operating profit reaching $1.19 billion.

As of the prospectus filing, Starlink had reached 10.3 million global users, doubling from 5 million a year ago. However, the company also noted that with an increasing proportion of users outside North America and the promotion of lower-priced plans, the Average Revenue Per User is declining.

The Space segment reported a Q1 operating loss of $619 million. The prospectus shows that SpaceX has cumulatively invested over $15 billion in the Starship heavy-lift rocket, with approximately $3 billion spent in 2025 alone. The 12th test flight of Starship is expected to occur this week.

The AI segment incurred a Q1 operating loss of $2.5 billion, becoming the biggest factor dragging down the company's overall profitability. In the first quarter of this year, AI-related capital expenditures reached $7.7 billion, accounting for over 75% of the company's total $10.1 billion capex. Full-year 2025 AI capex was about $12.7 billion, nearly doubling year-over-year.

Ground Data Centers Remain Main Battleground, Orbital Compute Still on the Blueprint

When Musk merged xAI into SpaceX in February this year, he cited solar-powered orbital data centers as one of the core rationales, claiming that the cost of operating compute in space would be lower than on Earth within three years.

However, the prospectus reveals that xAI is currently still massively expanding ground-based facilities powered by natural gas turbines, including a transaction valued at approximately $2 billion.

The prospectus clearly states that SpaceX's ability to expand data center infrastructure depends on turbine supply, natural gas access, and regulatory permits.

Nevertheless, SpaceX still positions orbital AI computing satellites as the next major growth engine in the prospectus, with plans to begin deployment as early as 2028.

The company wrote in the prospectus:

Orbital AI computing is an extremely challenging technological problem. We believe we are the only company with a commercially viable path to build orbital AI computing capabilities at scale.

The prospectus indicates that achieving this goal crucially depends on the Starship rocket achieving its stated performance objectives to enable economically viable orbital deployment.

SpaceX has applied to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission for permission to launch up to 1 million satellites. These satellites would be equipped with GPUs and powered by solar energy, forming a space-based data center network serving AI projects.

The company estimates the total addressable market to be as high as $28.5 trillion, with the AI opportunity accounting for approximately $26.5 trillion, spanning multiple directions such as space-based data centers, consumer subscriptions, digital advertising, and enterprise applications.

xAI Integration Reshapes AI Landscape, Grok Mired in Regulatory Risk

SpaceX completed its merger with Musk's AI startup xAI in February this year, with a post-merger valuation of $1.25 trillion.

The prospectus notes in the risk factors section that Grok is facing "investigations and inquiries" from multiple regulatory and law enforcement agencies regarding pornographic deepfake content, which could lead to legal liability, negative publicity, or other sanctions.

Reports indicate that eight law enforcement and regulatory agencies have confirmed that investigations are still ongoing. Musk himself has acknowledged that xAI's technology was "not built correctly from the start" and needs to be "rebuilt from the ground up."

Regarding AI commercialization, SpaceX signed a $40 billion compute cooperation agreement with Anthropic this month, whereby the latter will lease the entire compute capacity of SpaceX's Colossus 1 data center in Memphis, Tennessee, at a price of $1.25 billion per month, with the agreement lasting until May 2029.

However, this agreement comes with an unusual clause. Both parties can unilaterally cancel the contract with 90 days' notice, an arrangement extremely rare for a compute agreement of this magnitude, making it difficult for investors to incorporate it as a stable revenue stream into valuation models.

Additionally, SpaceX plans to acquire code editing tool startup Cursor for $60 billion in stock, a transaction expected to proceed after the IPO. If the acquisition fails to materialize, Cursor would receive a $1.5 billion termination fee and $8.5 billion in deferred service fees.

Massive Related-Party Transactions, Mutual Support Within Musk's Empire

The prospectus discloses for the first time, with concrete numbers, the scale of related-party transactions between SpaceX and other companies under Musk's control.

In 2025, SpaceX purchased $131 million worth of Cybertrucks from Tesla at suggested retail price and also bought $506 million worth of Tesla Megapack energy storage products.

From early 2024 to February 2026, xAI cumulatively paid Tesla approximately $731 million.

Collaboration among the companies goes beyond purchasing. SpaceX and Tesla are jointly advancing a large-scale chip factory project named "Terafab" and an AI cooperation project called "Macrohard."

Tesla is mentioned 87 times in the prospectus, which also states that "we plan to explore more strategic collaboration areas with Tesla in the future."

Musk Firmly Controls Voting Rights, Compensation Tied to Mars Colonization

The prospectus provides the first comprehensive disclosure of SpaceX's ownership structure and governance.

Musk holds 849.5 million Class A shares and 5.57 billion Class B shares (10 votes per share), collectively controlling 85% of the company's voting rights, ensuring absolute control post-IPO.

Apart from Musk, no individual or institution holds more than 5% of shares. Among them, private equity firm Valor Entities holds 7.3% of common shares, making it the second-largest shareholder.

Musk's latest compensation package at SpaceX consists of two astronomically-sized option-based bets, with no time limit, directly linked to Mars and AI infrastructure:

  • The Mars colonization package vests when SpaceX's market cap reaches $7.5 trillion
  • The orbital data center package vests when the company's market cap reaches $6.6 trillion

Aside from a basic annual salary of $54,000, Musk will receive nothing if these technological and market cap milestones are not met.

The company's board members are also publicly disclosed for the first time. In addition to Musk serving as Chairman, President and Chief Operating Officer Gwynne Shotwell, Chief Financial Officer Bret Johnsen, and several venture capital and private equity executives have joined the board, with Google executive Donald Harrison also among them.

Deep Financial Losses, Valuation Logic Tests Investors

SpaceX's financial condition appears particularly unique among ultra-large cap tech companies preparing to go public.

In 2025, the company achieved revenue of approximately $18.7 billion, but reported a net loss of $4.9 billion. In comparison, Meta, with a valuation in the same ballpark, had revenue last year more than 11 times that of SpaceX and net income of $60 billion.

If the IPO valuation ultimately settles above $1.5 trillion, SpaceX's price-to-sales ratio would be around 80x, while the combined price-to-sales ratio for the top 15 U.S. companies by market cap is only about 7x.

This pricing logic is quite similar to another Musk-led company, Tesla, which, due to massive investments in AI, humanoid robots, and Robotaxi, reported extremely thin profits in 2025 yet trades at a forward P/E ratio of nearly 400x.

Analysis suggests that investors betting on SpaceX or Tesla are essentially betting that Musk can translate today's massive investments into enormous value in the distant future.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are SpaceX's major business segments according to its filing, and which one is currently profitable?

AAccording to the filing, SpaceX divides its business into three major segments: Space (launch services), Connection (Starlink satellite internet), and AI (from the xAI integration). Currently, the Connection segment, centered on Starlink, is the only profitable business, generating an operating profit of $11.9 billion in Q1 2026.

QHow will the proceeds from SpaceX's IPO be primarily used?

AThe proceeds from SpaceX's IPO will primarily be used to repay a $20 billion transitional bridge loan and to fund the expansion of AI computing infrastructure, upgrade launch platforms, and scale the satellite constellation.

QWhat is Elon Musk's voting control in SpaceX after the IPO?

AAfter the IPO, Elon Musk will hold approximately 85.1% of the voting rights in SpaceX. This control is achieved through his holdings of Class A and Class B shares (with the latter carrying 10 votes per share).

QWhat is the key condition for Musk's compensation plan linked to the 'Mars colonization' milestone?

AThe 'Mars colonization' compensation milestone for Elon Musk is tied to SpaceX achieving a market capitalization of $7.5 trillion. If this and other specified market cap and technical milestones are not met, he will receive no compensation beyond a base salary of $54,000.

QWhat major risk factor concerning its AI product does SpaceX disclose in the filing?

AThe filing discloses that Grok, its AI product, is facing 'investigations and inquiries' from multiple regulatory and law enforcement agencies concerning pornographic deepfake content. These investigations could lead to legal liability, negative publicity, or other sanctions.

Leituras Relacionadas

When Hyperliquid Takes Away Solana's "Internet Capital Markets" Script

The article discusses how Solana's vision of becoming the "Internet Capital Markets" is being challenged, primarily by the rise of Hyperliquid. While Solana positioned itself as a high-performance blockchain for tokenizing all global assets, its native token SOL has significantly underperformed, and its core narrative faces pressure. Hyperliquid, initially a perpetual contracts platform, has evolved into a specialized Layer 1 financial network. Its focused, trading-optimized design is attracting users and capital, suggesting a vertical L1 may be better suited for a core capital market than a general-purpose chain like Solana. This external competition was compounded by an internal $200M+ exploit on Solana's key derivatives protocol, Drift, creating a strategic vacuum. In response, Solana founder Anatoly Yakovenko heavily promoted the Phoenix protocol as a decentralized, composable alternative. However, Phoenix's trading volume remains far behind leading platforms. Solana supporters also launched critiques against Hyperliquid's decentralization, citing its limited validators and closed-source code. Critics countered that Solana's own decentralization metrics have weakened, and the foundation's overt backing of Phoenix caused friction with other ecosystem builders. The piece concludes that Solana risks losing the "Internet Capital Markets" race if it cannot regain dominance in derivatives, potentially remaining a meme coin hub rather than achieving its grand ambition of hosting all global assets.

marsbitHá 1h

When Hyperliquid Takes Away Solana's "Internet Capital Markets" Script

marsbitHá 1h

Trump Signs Executive Order, Kraken, Coinbase and Others May Gain Access to Fed Payment Channels

President Trump has signed an executive order, "Incorporating Financial Technology Innovation into the Regulatory Framework," pressuring the Federal Reserve to reassess its rules on granting non-bank financial companies—including crypto and fintech firms—access to its payment systems, specifically master accounts that connect to the Fedwire settlement system. Currently, such accounts are primarily reserved for depository institutions. The order mandates a review to determine if broader access is permissible and to establish an application process. This move, supported by figures like Senator Cynthia Lummis, aims to reduce barriers to innovation and lower public payment costs by fostering fairer competition. It does not grant immediate access but could pave the way for companies like Kraken, Coinbase, Ripple, and Circle to reduce reliance on intermediary banks, lowering costs and speeding up settlements. A key precedent is the Kansas City Fed granting Kraken's parent company a restricted master account in March, offering limited payment services without interest or credit privileges. This model is seen as a potential template for allowing controlled access while mitigating systemic risk. Other firms like Anchorage, Paxos, and BitGo, which hold specialized banking charters, are also well-positioned to apply. The banking industry, represented by the American Bankers Association, opposes easing access, arguing any institution handling bank-like payments must meet the same stringent regulatory, consumer protection, and risk-management standards as traditional banks. Their core concerns include potential systemic risks, compliance gaps in areas like anti-money laundering, and the diversion of liquidity from the traditional banking system. The outcome of the Fed's review will be crucial in determining whether and how crypto and fintech firms can integrate more directly into the core U.S. financial infrastructure, balancing innovation with financial stability.

marsbitHá 1h

Trump Signs Executive Order, Kraken, Coinbase and Others May Gain Access to Fed Payment Channels

marsbitHá 1h

The First Large-Scale Strike in the AI Era Comes from the Factories That Build AI

The article describes a potential large-scale strike at Samsung Electronics, narrowly averted in May 2026 after a temporary agreement. The strike, planned by the company's union, would have been the first major labor action in the AI era targeting a core AI supply chain player. Samsung, alongside SK Hynix, produces roughly two-thirds of the world's memory chips, critical components for AI training and data centers like HBM. An 18-day strike could have disrupted global supply, affecting prices and production for tech companies and cloud providers. For South Korea, where semiconductors constitute about 35% of exports and Samsung represents a quarter of the stock market's value, such an action threatens national economic stability. The union's demands include a 7% base wage increase and, crucially, a clear, substantial profit-sharing model. They want 15% of annual operating profit as an employee bonus pool and the removal of the existing cap (about 50% of annual salary). This frustration is amplified by seeing rival SK Hynix successfully negotiate a deal granting employees 10% of operating profit as bonuses, with reports suggesting some workers could receive bonuses equivalent to hundreds of thousands of dollars. The conflict stems from deeper issues in South Korea's chaebol (conglomerate) system, where rapid national industrialization often prioritized corporate growth over labor rights. Samsung long maintained a "no union" policy until a 2020 apology from its leader. The article argues this strike highlights a fundamental tension in the AI age: as technology advances and corporate profits soar—often driven by AI—the workers who build the infrastructure are demanding a fair share and dignity, rejecting the notion that they are mere expendable components in a machine that "must not stop." The piece concludes that the true test of the AI era isn't just computational power, but whether the people who build the future can secure a stable and valued place within it.

marsbitHá 2h

The First Large-Scale Strike in the AI Era Comes from the Factories That Build AI

marsbitHá 2h

Ripple’s Fed Master Account Bid Gains Momentum After Trump Order

President Donald Trump has signed an executive order directing financial regulators and the Federal Reserve to review expanding fintech and crypto firms' access to core payment infrastructure. This order significantly advances the industry's push for direct Fed connectivity, a central issue for Ripple. The company has been seeking a Federal Reserve master account as part of its strategy for its RLUSD stablecoin, which would allow it to hold reserves directly with the central bank and access its payment rails. The order, titled "Integrating Financial Technology Innovation into Regulatory Frameworks," mandates a Fed review within 120 days on allowing access for entities like uninsured depository institutions and non-bank financial companies, including those in digital assets. This creates a formal policy timeline for resolving whether crypto payment firms must rely on traditional bank intermediaries. Ripple's application for a national bank charter and a master account is part of this broader landscape. The issue gained precedent when Kraken Financial received a limited-purpose master account, while Custodia Bank's application was denied after a legal battle. The Fed has also proposed a more restricted "payment account" option. Trump's order does not guarantee approval for Ripple but forces a high-level examination of the regulatory barriers, bringing the company's long-running effort to the forefront of Washington's financial policy agenda.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Ripple’s Fed Master Account Bid Gains Momentum After Trump Order

bitcoinistHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片