Ripple Plans BC Payments Acquisition to Expand in Australia

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-11Última atualização em 2026-03-11

On March 10, Ripple publicised that it has plans to acquire BC Payments to have an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) as it looks to expand its presence in the Asia Pacific region.

In the statement, Ripple added that having the AFSL via the acquisition will help the firm to provide Ripple Payments, an end-to-end payments platform that handles the “full lifecycle” of a transaction and amalgamates both traditional banking and crypto services.

The managing director at APAC Ripple mentions that Australia remains the prominent market for Ripple and an AFSL makes the ability of scaling Ripple Payments across the region possible.

The statement does not give any hint regarding the financial terms of the BC Payments acquisition. Ripple mentioned that currently it has more than 75 regulatory licences around the world, which positions the firm in a strong position to work with institutions looking to expand into digital asset solutions and infrastructure.

The Robust Position of Ripple in the Industry

In February, Ripple got a full EU electronic money institution licence in Luxembourg. At the end of 2025, the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency gave Ripple a conditional approval to become a national trust bank charter.

Ripple’s creation and highly promoted token XRP is now the fifth-largest crypto asset in the world, having $85.1 billion in market capitalisation. At the time of writing, it was trading at $1.38, up 1.24% in the last 24 hours and 4.01% down in the past month, as per CoinMarketCap.

At the same time Ripple’s dollar-pegged stablecoin, RLUSD, has about $1.6 billion in market cap, positioning it as the 10th-biggest stablecoin. Recently, it was also reported that the stablecoins generated around $33 trillion in 2025.

In January 2026, Ripple also secured a great collaboration with LMAX Group to widen the institutional usage of RLUSD.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Pump.fun Price Analysis: PUMP Holds Near $0.00207 as Platform Seeks Lawsuit Dismissal

TagsAustraliaLicenseRipple

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason Ripple plans to acquire BC Payments in Australia?

ARipple plans to acquire BC Payments to obtain an Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL), which will help the company expand its presence in the Asia Pacific region and scale its Ripple Payments platform.

QHow many regulatory licenses does Ripple currently hold worldwide according to the statement?

ARipple currently holds more than 75 regulatory licenses around the world.

QWhat significant license did Ripple obtain in Luxembourg in February?

AIn February, Ripple obtained a full EU electronic money institution license in Luxembourg.

QWhat is the market capitalization of Ripple's XRP token and its current ranking?

ARipple's XRP token has a market capitalization of $85.1 billion, making it the fifth-largest crypto asset in the world.

QWhich stablecoin does Ripple issue and what is its approximate market cap?

ARipple issues a dollar-pegged stablecoin called RLUSD, which has a market cap of about $1.6 billion, making it the 10th-largest stablecoin.

Leituras Relacionadas

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

Marvell Technology's stock price surged from under $10 in 2016 to a record $290 in June 2026, fueled not by making GPUs, but by dominating AI infrastructure connectivity. This analysis argues the market misvalues MRVL as merely a smaller Broadcom in custom AI chips, overlooking its true, unique position. Marvell's core strength lies in enabling high-speed data flow for AI clusters through three interconnected businesses. First, it holds a commanding ~70% market share in high-speed optical DSPs (essential for data center light modules), a deep-moat business with accelerating growth. Second, its custom AI chip design business serves hyperscalers like AWS, Microsoft, and Google, with a significant revenue pipeline despite lower margins. Third, stable cash flows come from Ethernet switch chips and enterprise storage controllers. Together, they form a full-stack "AI data movement" platform. CEO Matt Murphy's transformative leadership since 2016, involving strategic divestments, key acquisitions (like Inphi for optical DSPs), and securing long-term agreements with major cloud providers, repositioned the company. A pivotal $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA in 2026 underscored Marvell's critical role in the AI ecosystem, particularly through collaborations like NVLink Fusion. While Marvell faces risks—including client concentration (losing the Amazon Trainium3 design), lower-margin business mix, competitive threats, insider selling, and complex supply chains—its fundamentals remain strong. The optical interconnect moat is widening with the acquisition of Celestial AI (photonics fabric), and financial metrics show accelerating revenue growth and operating leverage. With a PEG ratio suggesting undervaluation relative to its growth, the thesis is that the market undervalues Marvell's monopolistic position in AI "plumbing" while overemphasizing its competitive custom chip segment. The story transcends investing, symbolizing how in any complex system—from the internet to AI—the value of "connection" ultimately surpasses that of individual "nodes."

marsbitHá 22m

Ten-Thousand-Word Analysis: From $10 to $290, MRVL Wins the Entire AI Era by 'Not Making GPUs'

marsbitHá 22m

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

A discussion on Zhihu about "AI relay stations" shifted the niche developer topic of "cheap tokens" into broader user awareness. Users moved beyond simply questioning the legitimacy of these services to focus on practical concerns: Where do cheap tokens truly come from? Is the model being accessed the real one? Can relay stations see prompts, code, and API keys? For occasional users, are the risks worth it? The core debate centered less on price and more on trust. A primary worry is model authenticity—the risk of "model swapping," where users paying for a premium model might be routed to a cheaper one, creating an information asymmetry. Others argued that cost comparisons matter; while cheaper than official pay-as-you-go APIs, relay stations may not be the lowest-cost option versus subscriptions, domestic models, or free tiers, making user needs assessment crucial. Speculation about token sources ranged from legitimate bulk discounts to gray-area methods like account sharing or exploiting regional pricing. This opacity makes risk assessment difficult for users. Data security emerged as a critical concern, especially for enterprise use. When processing sensitive information like code, contracts, or client data, the inability to verify a relay station's data handling, retention, or access policies poses significant compliance and confidentiality risks. The evolving consensus suggests relay stations can be used cautiously for low-sensitivity, disposable tasks (e.g., summarizing public info, simple translation). However, they should not be the default for sensitive, professional, or production workflows involving proprietary data, Agents, or automated systems. Recommendations include avoiding large prepayments, not relying on a single service, using test prompts to monitor quality, anonymizing data where possible, and keeping official channels as backups. Ultimately, the discussion framed tokens not just as a billing unit but as a measure of real cost encompassing price, model integrity, data security, and service stability. The popularity of relay stations highlights user demand for affordable access, but the debate underscores a key trade-off: the savings from cheap tokens may come at the price of trust, transparency, and control over one's data and AI experience.

marsbitHá 52m

AI Relay Stations Spark Heated Debate on Zhihu: Behind Cheap Tokens, What Are Users Really Worried About?

marsbitHá 52m

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

In 2026, the crypto industry is undergoing a profound infrastructure-level transformation—TradFi assets are migrating on-chain at an unprecedented pace. According to CoinGecko's Q1 2026 report, the total value locked (TVL) of tokenized real-world assets (RWA) has surpassed $31 billion, a nearly 4x increase from $7.8 billion at the beginning of 2025, with the sector’s aggregate market capitalization reaching $19.3 billion. Among these, the market cap of tokenized stocks surged from $2 million to $486 million, with Q1 spot trading volume reaching $15.1 billion—a single quarter already surpassing the entire second half of 2025. RWA perpetual contract Q1 trading volume reached a staggering $524.8 billion, far exceeding the $313 billion for all of 2025. Meanwhile, BlackRock's BUIDL fund has reached $2.3 billion in scale and has filed for two new tokenized funds, signaling that the world's largest asset manager's tokenization strategy is evolving from pilot to product suite expansion. HTX, as a core participant in the crypto exchange sector, officially launched TradFi perpetual futures products including NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, META, and SPY in 2026, enabling crypto users to gain 24/7 trading access to core U.S. equities. Boston Consulting Group predicts that global tokenized asset scale could reach $16 trillion by 2030, while McKinsey offers a conservative estimate of approximately $2 trillion. The on-chain migration of TradFi assets is no longer a "future narrative" but a structural transformation unfolding in real time, as crypto exchanges evolve from single crypto asset trading platforms toward "multi-asset-class trading infrastructure."

HTX LearnHá 55m

In-Depth Research Report on TradFi: The Convergence Wave of Crypto and Traditional Finance

HTX LearnHá 55m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片