Qubic Unveils 3-Phase Rollout For Dogecoin Mining Attack

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-03-25Última atualização em 2026-03-25

Resumo

Qubic has announced a three-phase plan to transition its mining operations from Monero (XMR) to Dogecoin (DOGE), starting on April 1. The shift is designed to be deliberate and methodical rather than instantaneous. Phase 1 (beginning April 1) serves as a testing period where Monero mining remains active 50% of the time, while Dogecoin runs at 100% in "test mode." Computor revenue during this phase remains in XMR only. Phase 2 allows computors to choose between XMR and DOGE revenue, with XMR gradually phased out. Those opting for DOGE will no longer receive XMR. Phase 3 completes the transition, with revenue switching entirely to DOGE, XMR mining disabled, and both DOGE mining and AI training running at full capacity. Qubic claims its network is now three times faster after recent optimizations, which it says will help handle the increased load. The team cited Dogecoin’s significantly larger daily emission value—approximately $1.44 million compared to Monero’s—as the key economic incentive for the switch.

Qubic will begin its staged transition from Monero to Dogecoin mining on April 1. Via X, the Qubic team layed out a three-phase rollout that it says is designed to move deliberately rather than flip the network over in a single step.

In a post published Tuesday, the project said “the transition from Monero to Dogecoin doesn’t happen overnight” and that its core team had designed a three-phase process in which “each phase is evaluated before moving forward.” The framing is notable given Qubic’s increasingly explicit language around its mining strategy. The headline objective, as the team describes it, is to reach a final state where “DOGE + AI” run “simultaneously, full time.”

3-Phase Rollout For Dogecoin Mining Shift

The first phase begins April 1 and is positioned as a testing period lasting one to two epochs. During that stage, computor revenue remains denominated in XMR only, Monero mining remains active 50% of the time, and Dogecoin enters what Qubic calls “test mode” while running on mainnet at 100%. AI training continues alongside it. In other words, Qubic is not immediately removing the existing Monero-based incentive structure, but introducing DOGE at full operational intensity before revenue is switched over.

The second phase is the actual migration. For one to two epochs, computors will be able to choose between XMR and DOGE revenue, with XMR beginning to phase out and DOGE phasing in with a top-up applied. Qubic also said that computors who opt to bring DOGE “are no longer eligible for XMR.”

By the third and final phase, Qubic says computor revenue will be DOGE only. The XMR dispatcher will be turned off completely, DOGE will remain active 100% of the time, and AI training will also run at 100%. “No rushing. No shortcuts. Just disciplined execution,” the team wrote.

Source: X @_Qubic_

Qubic paired that roadmap with a performance claim aimed directly at the April 1 launch window. On March 23, the project said its network had become “3x faster” on live mainnet, with tick times reduced from 2 seconds a year ago to 1 second and now 0.6 seconds after the latest core optimization.

“Every share a miner submits gets validated through Oracle Machines in a single tick,” Qubic wrote. “Faster ticks mean faster confirmations, a more efficient pipeline, and a network that can handle the load when April 1st hits. The network got faster right before it needed to be.”

The economic case for targeting Dogecoin is straightforward in Qubic’s telling. In a March 20 post, the team pointed to its earlier Monero campaign, saying it went from less than 2% of Monero’s hashrate to “51%+ dominance in a live takeover event,” while generating more than $3.5 million in mining revenue and finding over 26,000 XMR blocks.

Dogecoin, it argued, is a much larger prize. “DOGE produces roughly 14.4 million coins per day. At current prices, that’s approximately $1.44M in daily emission, roughly 10x what Monero was producing,” the team wrote. “The same playbook. A much bigger target.”

At press time, DOGE traded at $0.09752.

DOGE holds above key support, 1-week chart | Source: DOGEUSDT on TradingView.com

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the start date for Qubic's transition from Monero to Dogecoin mining?

AApril 1.

QHow many phases are in Qubic's rollout plan for the Dogecoin mining shift?

AThree phases.

QIn the final phase, what will be the only form of computor revenue?

ADOGE only.

QWhat performance improvement did Qubic claim its network achieved on March 23?

AIt became 3x faster on live mainnet, with tick times reduced to 0.6 seconds.

QWhat economic reason did Qubic give for targeting Dogecoin instead of Monero?

ADogecoin produces approximately $1.44M in daily emission, which is roughly 10x what Monero was producing.

Leituras Relacionadas

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHá 1h

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHá 1h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHá 2h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片