Podcast Notes|Bitwise Executives: Bad News No Longer Scares Bitcoin, Future Bull Market Institutional Buying Focuses on Major Coins, On-Chain Capital Favors Application Layer

marsbitPublicado em 2026-08-13Última atualização em 2026-08-13

Resumo

Bitwise executives Matt Hougan and Ryan Rasmussen discuss the current crypto market. They note that Bitcoin has become insensitive to negative news, suggesting a possible market bottom. The traditional 4-year cycle is compressing, with shallower drawdowns (55% vs. 70-80%) due to growing institutional participation. A key theme is a "forked" market: institutional money (e.g., from major wealth platforms) will focus on large-cap assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum via ETFs, while on-chain native capital targets high-revenue DeFi applications like Uniswap, Aave, and Hyperliquid. The biggest catalyst is not within crypto but the potential inclusion of crypto (1-2%) in the model portfolios of major wealth managers (managing ~$20 trillion), which could drive sustained, massive inflows. Macro factors like large U.S. government borrowing ($600B+) and capital rotation from crowded AI trades could benefit crypto. They view Bitcoin as digital gold and assets like Ethereum/Solana as tech stocks, with different drivers. In a rapid-fire Q&A, they discuss price targets for 2030, expressing more confidence in mainstream assets (BTC, ETH) over smaller caps. They also highlight Hyperliquid (HYPE) and Robinhood (HOOD) as interesting plays, with differing preferences.

Organized & Compiled: Deep Tide TechFlow

Guests: Matt Hougan (Bitwise Chief Investment Officer), Ryan Rasmussen (Bitwise Research Director)

Host: The Rollup Podcast Host

Podcast Source: The Rollup

Original Title: Bitwise CIO & Research Head: Why Institutions Are Buying Ethereum Now (Majors vs Apps)

Broadcast Date: August 12, 2026

Note: The guests' institution, Bitwise, operates multiple crypto ETF products; their views have a structural long bias. This article retains their original statements and does not constitute investment advice.

Key Takeaways

At the time of recording, Bitcoin was around $65,000, having retreated more than 50% from last October's high. But the two Bitwise executives see the other side: Throughout the summer, Saylor (MicroStrategy founder) was selling, a nine-figure cold wallet was hacked, and the Clarity Bill stalled in the Senate. Bitcoin didn't drop at all. They interpret this as a bottoming characteristic—those who wanted to sell have already sold, leaving behind "ride or die" long-term holders, while the real big buyers, Wall Street wealth management platforms, have just completed a two-year education period and are about to start allocating.

The two guests offered a clear bifurcated judgment: The coming bull market will be split into two markets. Institutional capital will buy major assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum that can accommodate large capital, while on-chain native capital will bet on DeFi applications with real revenue (Hyperliquid, Uniswap, Aave, Morpho, etc.). They particularly emphasized that the biggest catalyst is not in the crypto sphere's view, but within the model portfolios of four wealth platforms—Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, UBS, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch—which manage a combined ~$20 trillion in assets. Allocating just 1% to 2% to crypto would mean hundreds of billions in sustained inflows. At the time of compilation (August 13), ETH is around $1,900, spot ETFs have seen five consecutive weeks of net inflows, with the most recent week seeing ~$245 million, the strongest in nearly four months; the SEC is scheduled to review the Reg Crypto proposal on August 14, the regulatory variable discussed in this episode is landing right now.

Selected Highlights

On Market Bottom

  • "When the market becomes completely numb to bad news, it's often a sign of a real bottom." (Matt)
  • "This pullback from the peak is 55%, not the 70% to 80% of the past. Cycles are compressing, volatility is decreasing." (Ryan)
  • "Bear markets always last longer than you think, but you might wake up one day to a raging bull market." (Matt)

On Institutional Buying

  • "Our typical client path is eight meetings with us before they start allocating. They might see us once a year. That's a two-year education process." (Matt)
  • "The question they're asking is no longer 'Should we invest in crypto?' but 'When do we invest in crypto?'" (Ryan)
  • "They look at 3 to 5 years, 10 years, not 3 to 5 days. The market has a new type of investor, and volatility naturally comes down." (Matt)

On the Bifurcated Bull Market

  • "Bitcoin will look more and more like gold, Ethereum and Solana will look more and more like software company stocks. They were meant to have different drivers." (Ryan)
  • "A $2.5 billion market cap Uniswap can't hold institutional money. The liquidity scale just doesn't match." (Matt)
  • "DeFi will become in the next bull market what we thought it would become in 2021. The regulatory shackles are off." (Ryan)

On Regulation and Macro

  • "The first draft rules for Reg Crypto are coming out soon, allowing new projects to raise capital without triggering SEC registration, then gradually moving toward decentralization. Washington is slower than crypto is used to, but this is the real deal." (Matt)
  • "The U.S. government says it needs to borrow $600 billion in Q4, larger than the GFC bailout package. This long-term trend won't stop." (Ryan)

I. The Market is Numb to Bad News. This Might Be the Bottom.

Host: The market is waiting for a final summer drop, an October bottom. What do you think of this script?

Matt said he posted a Buzz Lightyear meme captioned with the collective sentiment of crypto: One more summer washout, one final drop, then bottom in October and a straight run up from there. Everyone is ready to go in at the end of October. But the market he sees looks different.

"My strongest feeling over the past two months is that the market has completely stopped reacting to bad news. Saylor sells Bitcoin, Bitcoin doesn't care. A nine-figure cold wallet hack, Bitcoin doesn't care. The Clarity Bill dies, Bitcoin still doesn't care. When the market becomes completely immune to bad news, that's often when a real bottom forms."

Ryan added: In past cycles, the biggest gains often came in the very first days after emerging from a bear market. Those trying to time the bottom perfectly missed the best days. Rather than waiting for Bitcoin in the $50,000s, accept the possibility: Most of this pullback might already be over.

II. The Four-Year Cycle is Being Compressed into a New Shape

Host: They say the four-year cycle is one year to top, one year to bottom. Is that changing now?

Ryan's observation is that the cycle's "amplitude" is compressing. This pullback from the peak was 55%; historically, 70% to 80% was common. The multiple on the last run to new highs was also far less than before. 2025 was a down year by calendar year. The old rule of "three years up, one year down" no longer fits.

The reason is simple: The buyers have changed. Four years ago, it was retail. Now, Bitwise deals daily with institutions, corporations, sovereign wealth funds, and family offices. Their holding periods are different, their decision rhythms are different, and the market is much larger and more liquid than before. The pattern remains, but its shape will inevitably change.

Matt said bear markets are always a bit longer than imagined, but "it's easy to get back to $100,000 within a few months under the right conditions." He repeatedly used one word to describe the coming bull market: slow bull. Slower, more fundamental, more institutional, grinding its way up bit by bit.

III. Why Institutional Buying is Slow: Eight Meetings, A Two-Year Education Period

Host: Are these investors mainly entering through ETFs? How have inflows been recently?

The two guests confirmed that ETFs are the main channel for institutional entry, just like they buy stocks and bonds. Crypto ETFs saw net outflows until late June, turning to relatively strong net inflows since July 1st, mainly into Bitcoin and Ethereum, with smaller flows to Solana and Hyperliquid.

Why now? Matt gave a cold, hard number: Bitwise's typical client averages eight meetings before making an allocation decision, and they might only meet once a year. That's a two-year education process. Bitcoin ETFs were approved in January 2024. By this summer, that education cycle for this group is just finishing.

"Their investment committees are thinking about how to get their ten thousand advisors below them to start allocating crypto. The answer is start with Bitcoin, then add some Ethereum, weighted by market cap. You always start with Bitcoin."

IV. Bifurcated Bull Market: Institutions Buy Majors, On-Chain Capital Buys Apps

Host: Why the bifurcation between institutional and on-chain native capital?

Two reasons. First, liquidity scale mismatch: Money from institutions like UBS, Morgan Stanley, doesn't fit into a $2.5 billion market cap Uniswap. Only a handful of the largest assets can truly absorb institutional-sized capital. Second, mental gap: Institutions don't have the crypto-native "psychological scars". Those with 0% allocation see a 55% drawdown as a gift, a better entry point, while those holding see pain.

Conversely, on-chain native capital understands things like Hyperliquid's nearly $1 billion annual revenue, Uniswap and Morpho returning revenue to token holders. Ryan said this "cash flow" narrative hasn't fully transmitted to the institutional side yet, but it will. Old crypto hands have a chance to get ahead of institutions.

Host: Is Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative back?

Ryan thinks Bitcoin looks more and more like gold, while Ethereum, Solana, Hyperliquid look more and more like tech and software company stocks. Bitcoin's correlation with gold has noticeably increased over the past year, and institutions are pricing these two asset classes with completely different frameworks. He doesn't think one goes up when the other goes down, they'll just diverge more and more because the drivers were always different.

V. The Biggest Catalyst Isn't in Crypto: $20 Trillion is Knocking

Host: What catalysts are institutions waiting for?

Matt pointed to the place Crypto Twitter least pays attention to: Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, UBS, Bank of America Merrill Lynch—the four largest wealth management platforms, managing a combined ~$20 trillion in assets. Their "model portfolios," the standard allocation templates used by thousands of advisors, are being redesigned. Crypto is already in small pilots, like at Wells Fargo. If the model portfolio gives a 1% to 2% crypto allocation, that's hundreds of billions in inflows, on an annual, sustained basis for years.

Ryan added the bigger context: Ray Dalio recommends 15% allocation to Bitcoin or gold. One of America's most successful financial advisors, Ric Edelman, recommends clients allocate 20% to 40% to crypto. Even Charles Schwab is saying portfolios can have 6% crypto. Five years ago, this was unimaginable.

Matt's conclusion: Don't just watch the Fed, the Clarity Bill—variables the crypto sphere is used to watching. The most marginal buyers in the coming years are in the model portfolios of wealth platforms. Those seemingly insignificant small news items will trigger sustained, hundreds of billions in inflows over years.

VI. Macro: $600 Billion Borrowing and a Hawkish Fed

Host: Will money from AI rotate back into crypto?

Ryan said money flowed out of crypto, gold, and into AI-driven U.S. stocks over the last couple of years. Now capital is starting to come out of that crowded trade to look for new places. From his conversations with institutional clients, no one is asking "Should we invest in crypto?" anymore; they're all asking "When?"

The long-term logic hasn't changed: U.S. fiscal deficits continue to widen. The government announced it needs to borrow $600 billion in Q4, larger than the Global Financial Crisis bank bailout package, and the trend is accelerating. On the Fed side, market expectations for rate hikes have receded. The Jackson Hole speech at the end of the month will give some direction, but the market is adapting to the hawkish Fed tone, and oil price pressure is also blunting. As macro uncertainty declines, institutions gain confidence for cross-asset allocation. Crypto will be one beneficiary of capital rotation in Q4 and 2027.

VII. Lightning Round: $8,000 Ethereum, $500 HYPE

Host: Are your clients buying more Bitcoin or Ethereum now?

Matt: Still Bitcoin dominant, interest in Ethereum is rising. People are excited about stablecoins and tokenization, but the starting point is always Bitcoin.

Host: $180,000 Bitcoin by 2030?

Both call over. $8,000 Ethereum? Both also over, but Matt says "There are details worth unpacking here." $25,000-$30,000 Zcash? Both call under. Ryan's explanation: Not about being bearish on privacy coins, but the idea that all assets should go up itself isn't valid. Bitcoin is only $65,000 today. Reaching the million-dollar level by 2030 will take longer than people think.

$500 HYPE, about a 10x, corresponding to ~$600 billion valuation? Both somewhat uncomfortably called under. Ryan cautions that because of the buyback mechanism, the total market cap at that price might be much lower than imagined. Also, historically there's rotation between platform tokens; that's the biggest risk for a long-term 2030 call.

When asked who they were more bullish on, Robinhood (HOOD) or Hyperliquid (HYPE), they disagreed. Ryan is more bullish on HYPE: Smaller market cap, earlier in the cycle, will benefit from the next bull run. Matt wants both but sees HOOD as a "generational asset you can buy and hold for ten years, an amazingly well-executed company."

Host: Lighter $30 or $50?

Ryan said many internally at Bitwise are bullish on Lighter. The perpetual futures space will grow significantly in the next few years. $30 is more like a ceiling than a floor. Matt thinks predicting for such new platforms is too hard and deferred to Ryan.

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to Matt and Ryan from Bitwise, what is a key indicator that the crypto market may have bottomed?

AAccording to Matt and Ryan from Bitwise, a key indicator that the crypto market may have bottomed is when the market becomes completely numb to bad news, such as major sell-offs, hacks, or regulatory setbacks, and fails to react negatively to them.

QWhat two distinct buyer groups do the Bitwise executives predict will drive the next bull market, and what will each group primarily invest in?

AThe Bitwise executives predict two distinct buyer groups will drive the next bull market: 1) Institutional investors (like wealth management platforms) who will primarily invest in large-cap 'mainstream' assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum due to their liquidity and size. 2) On-chain native capital who will primarily invest in DeFi applications with real revenue streams, such as Hyperliquid, Uniswap, Aave, and Morpho.

QWhat is the 'education cycle' for institutional investors to start allocating to crypto, as described by Matt Hougan?

AAs described by Matt Hougan, the typical institutional investor client of Bitwise requires an average of eight meetings to make a decision to allocate to crypto. Since they might only meet once a year, this translates to an approximately two-year 'education cycle' or process before they begin investing.

QWhat major catalyst for crypto adoption lies outside the traditional crypto community's focus, according to the podcast discussion?

AAccording to the discussion, the major catalyst lies in the 'model portfolios' of the four largest wealth management platforms (Morgan Stanley, Wells Fargo, UBS, and Bank of America Merrill Lynch). If these platforms, which manage a combined ~$20 trillion in assets, allocate just 1-2% to crypto in their standard advisor portfolios, it would trigger hundreds of billions of dollars in sustained, multi-year inflows.

QWhat was the general price prediction stance ('over' or 'under') for Bitcoin at $180,000 and Ethereum at $8,000 by 2030?

ABoth Matt and Ryan called 'over' for Bitcoin reaching $180,000 by 2030. For Ethereum reaching $8,000 by 2030, both also called 'over', though Matt noted there were details worth unpacking in that assessment.

Leituras Relacionadas

A 22-Year-Old Mathematical Puzzle, Solved by a Union Hospital Intern?

In an astonishing development, a longstanding mathematical problem known as the Crouzeix conjecture, which had challenged experts in numerical linear algebra for 22 years, appears to have been solved by Shanmu Jin, a neurosurgery resident and postdoctoral researcher at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. With no formal advanced mathematical training—his background is in geology and medicine—Jin relied on self-study and, crucially, the AI model GPT-5.6. The conjecture, proposed by mathematician Michel Crouzeix in 2004, concerns a fundamental constant (speculated to be 2) bounding the relationship between matrix norms and polynomial values over numerical ranges. It is critical for applications in matrix function analysis and numerical methods. Despite dedicated efforts by leading mathematicians, the best proven constant had only been reduced to 2.414. Jin approached the problem using sophisticated prompt engineering with GPT-5.6. He adapted a known prompting strategy, isolating the AI from external resources to force original reasoning, employing multiple divergent "sub-agents" to explore different paths, and enforcing rigorous adversarial review of proposed proof steps. After about 16 hours of autonomous, unsupervised operation, the AI produced a novel and elegant proof. The key insight involved a clever "sampling strategy" that reduced the problem to a simple positivity condition—a solution described as elegant and unexpected by experts. The proof was verified by the conjecture's originator, Michel Crouzeix, and other specialists like Alex Townsend and Anne Greenbaum, who expressed astonishment at its validity. Jin has made the entire process open-source, including the prompt, drafts, and formal verification code. Remarkably, just eight days after Jin's preprint appeared, mathematicians Emiel Lorist and Felix Schwenninger published an independent, concise 5-page proof using a different approach, also developed with the aid of ChatGPT 5.6. Jin welcomed this complementary work. This event marks a potential turning point, demonstrating how AI can enable experts from non-traditional backgrounds to solve deep theoretical problems and dramatically accelerate scientific discovery, heralding what some are calling a new "golden age" for interdisciplinary research.

marsbitHá 11m

A 22-Year-Old Mathematical Puzzle, Solved by a Union Hospital Intern?

marsbitHá 11m

Embodied AI Companies Have Yet to Learn How to Spend Money | TMTpost In-depth

Embodied AI companies in China are facing unprecedented challenges in capital management after a wave of massive funding. The industry, seen as the ultimate carrier for AI, attracted approximately 43.8 billion RMB in the first half of 2026 alone, creating a landscape where even small startups hold billions in cash. However, this influx has exposed a critical gap: many founders—often scientists and engineers—lack experience in deploying such large sums effectively. The article highlights contrasting and often problematic approaches to spending. Some companies practice extreme frugality, drastically limiting R&D, marketing, and even basic operational costs to extend their financial runway, sometimes resorting to living off investment income. This "wait-it-out" strategy, while conserving cash, risks stifling innovation, causing talent drain, and missing crucial product development windows. In one case, excessive cost-cutting led to catastrophic data loss. Conversely, other firms spend recklessly. Examples include a company secretly paying 100 million RMB for ineffective TV exposure, jeopardizing its IPO plans, and others funding multiple unproven product lines simultaneously or creating deceptive demos to attract further investment. The cautionary tale of Vicarious Surgical, which burned through over $100 million on an overly complex proprietary arm before failing, is cited. A core issue is the immense and often opaque cost structure. High salaries for scarce AI talent, exorbitant compute costs for training models (especially "embodied brains" or world models), and the colossal expense of acquiring high-quality robotic training data create financial black holes. Estimates suggest collecting 1 million hours of usable data could cost over 1.6 billion RMB, with most collected data being unusable. This lack of transparency extends to investors, who struggle to verify how funds are actually spent. There are reports of companies maintaining separate internal accounts, engaging in circular "data trading" to artificially boost revenue, and general obfuscation around R&D burn rates. In response, some investors are taking unprecedented control, embedding their own financial personnel to approve even minor expenses. The sector is at a crossroads. While capital continues to flow due to China's strategic advantage in supply chains and engineering, the fundamental question has shifted from securing funding to learning how to spend it wisely. The industry must now master the difficult discipline of allocating vast resources to drive genuine technological progress and sustainable business models, or risk a significant reckoning when the investment tide eventually recedes.

marsbitHá 27m

Embodied AI Companies Have Yet to Learn How to Spend Money | TMTpost In-depth

marsbitHá 27m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar LAYER

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Solayer (LAYER) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Solayer (LAYER) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Solayer (LAYER)Depois de comprar o teu Solayer (LAYER), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Solayer (LAYER)Transaciona facilmente Solayer (LAYER) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

448 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Como comprar LAYER

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de LAYER (LAYER) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片