Peace Talks Hit an Impasse Again, U.S. Stocks Retreat from Highs, Can Bitcoin Hold the $80,000 Level?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-09Última atualização em 2026-05-09

Resumo

Peace Talks Stalemate Sinks Stocks, Tests Bitcoin's $80K Support Optimism over a potential U.S.-Iran peace deal, which briefly propelled the S&P 500 and Nasdaq to record highs, evaporated within 24 hours. Iran dismissed key U.S. proposals regarding uranium enrichment and Strait of Hormuz access, reversing market sentiment. U.S. stocks fell, led by semiconductors and small caps, while oil prices whipsawed violently. The core narrative is a binary market bet on war or peace, creating extreme volatility. The probability of a deal by mid-May dropped to 20%. Oil (Brent) briefly crashed 12% before recovering to around $100, but a shift in its market structure hinted at ample physical supply despite geopolitical risk. Bitcoin fell roughly 1.56%, finding support near $80,000. The pullback was considered structurally healthy, backed by strong institutional inflows into U.S. ETFs and rising long-term holder conviction. Ethereum gained on positive U.S. crypto regulation hopes. In equities, major indices declined with the Russell 2000 hit hardest. The "Magnificent Seven" tech stocks were a rare bright spot, but the semiconductor sector sold off sharply. Notably, high-beta momentum stocks suffered dramatically worse losses than the broader market. Upcoming U.S. non-farm payrolls data is the next key catalyst. Treasury yields rose with oil, the dollar was steady, and gold/silver gained on a mix of inflation and safe-haven demand. European markets also fell. The situation in the Strait...

The prospects for U.S.-Iran peace talks have once again fallen into uncertainty.

Following an exclusive report by Axios the previous day suggesting "both sides were close to reaching an agreement," the market was briefly immersed in optimism, with the S&P 500 hitting a record high and the Nasdaq setting a new record in sync. On Wednesday, the S&P 500 surged 1.46% to 7,365.12, and the Nasdaq skyrocketed 2.02% to 25,838.94, both touching all-time closing highs.

This positive sentiment failed to last 24 hours.

An Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson stated on Wednesday that Washington's proposed peace plan "is still under review," with two core demands—suspending uranium enrichment and reopening the Strait of Hormuz—remaining unresolved. Iran's red line on uranium reserves remained firm. The bullish confidence accumulated the previous day was rapidly drained by this news. Risk sentiment subsequently reversed. All three major U.S. stock indices closed lower, with the semiconductor sector leading the decline and small-cap stocks under particular pressure.

Core Narrative: Peace Agreement Still a Long Way Off

The market's interpretation of this war has become highly binary: either a deal is reached, or the fighting continues.

This week's diplomatic rhythm created significant volatility beats. On Monday, Trump announced a pause to the "Project Freedom" maritime escort mission, and Pakistani intermediaries released positive signals. On Tuesday, Saudi media even predicted a breakthrough on passage rights through the Strait of Hormuz "within hours," sending oil prices plummeting, with WTI crude briefly falling over 5% intraday and Brent dipping below $97.

However, Iran quickly tempered expectations. The Iranian Foreign Ministry explicitly stated that uranium enrichment is a red line, not a bargaining chip. Concurrently, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps announced it would establish a new "control system" for the Strait of Hormuz, hinting that even if passage is opened in the future, it would be a selective opening under Iran's leadership, not an unconditional restoration.

Simultaneously, the U.S. Treasury Department announced additional sanctions on Iranian-related oil networks that same day, and U.S. forces reportedly used force against an Iranian oil tanker violating the blockade within the strait. This parallel pursuit of economic pressure and military deterrence shows the U.S. government has not loosened its grip.

Polymarket data shows the probability of a peace deal being reached before May 15 has fallen to 15%, and was around 20% at the time of writing.

Consequently, oil prices traced a dramatic V-shape.

Intraday, Brent futures once fell to $96.73, a drop of over 12%. As the peace talk news gradually soured, bulls re-entered the market. Brent closed near $100, and WTI closed around $90.5, both barely holding key round-number levels.

Notably, Dated Brent (spot) has fallen below the Brent front-month futures contract, a reversal signal of the backwardation structure, hinting that physical crude oil supply is relatively ample at present, forming a structural divergence from the geopolitical risk priced into the futures market.

Outside the Strait, U.S. crude oil exports hit a record high last week, with global buyers accelerating their shift to U.S. supply sources to avoid Middle East transportation risks.

BNP Paribas' head of energy strategy, Aldo Spanjer, has simply abandoned trading the energy market: "The outcome is too binary, headlines are enough to trigger stop-losses, this has happened five times this week already, it's almost untradeable." TP ICAP energy analyst Scott Shelton called the current situation a "risk desert," with only hedging positions left in the market.

Can Bitcoin Hold the $80,000 Level?

Now, turning to the asset of most interest to crypto enthusiasts: Bitcoin.

Bitcoin continued to face pressure in this context, with spot Bitcoin falling about 1.56% on the day, finding support near the $80,000 level.

Unlike previous rounds of panic selling, this pullback structure is relatively healthy. On-chain data shows the proportion of long-term holder supply has risen to 78.3% of the circulating supply, exchange balances have fallen consecutively to a 7-year low, and whale addresses have net purchased about 270,000 BTC over the past 30 days. BlackRock's Bitcoin ETF holdings have grown to about $62 billion, indicating a stabilizing institutional holding structure.

Regarding Ethereum, sentiment this week overall benefited from rising expectations for U.S. crypto regulatory legislation to be enacted. ETH rose approximately 5.6% over five days, oscillating in the $2,360–$2,412 range, with its market cap maintaining around $2.33 trillion.

It's worth noting that April of this year was the strongest month for net inflows into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs since October 2025, with net inflows reaching $2.44 billion. The institutional pipeline continues to open, forming an internal echo with Bitcoin's relatively resilient performance amidst current macro turbulence.

From a narrative logic perspective, the impact of the Middle East situation on the crypto market is showing structural differentiation. Surging oil prices and rising inflation expectations lead to increased probability of Fed rate hikes, thus pressuring Bitcoin; but simultaneously, capital from some Middle Eastern regions is accelerating the transfer of assets into decentralized channels to evade potential sanction risks and liquidity constraints within the banking system. On the same day the U.S. Treasury added sanctions on Iranian-related oil networks, on-chain data showed slight abnormal movements in anonymous mixing transaction volumes. This is not a conclusion, but a signal worth continuous observation.

On the crypto legislation front, market expectations for the enactment of a U.S. regulatory framework are also supporting sentiment. Stablecoin and digital asset market structure bills are advancing in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives. If passed within the year, they would provide compliance support for institutions to further expand allocations.

U.S. Stocks Fluctuate Near Highs, Semiconductors Catch Down

Thursday was the second directionless trading session of the week.

The S&P 500 closed down 0.38% at 7,337.11 points; the Dow fell 313.62 points (-0.63%) to 49,596.97 points; the Nasdaq's decline was relatively restrained, closing down just 0.13% at 25,806.20 points. The Russell 2000 small-cap index fell 1.63%, the largest decline among major indices for the day.

All sectors closed lower, with the energy sector suffering the heaviest losses and consumer staples showing relative resilience.

Divergence was evident within the tech sector. Tesla rose 3.28%, Nvidia rose 1.76%, Microsoft rose 1.68%, Meta rose 0.64%; Apple fell 0.03%, Alphabet fell 0.01%, Amazon fell 1.39%. The "Magnificent Seven" combined index rose a slight 0.69% overall, one of the few bright spots of the day.

Semiconductors were the hardest hit. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (SOX) closed down 2.72%, with AMD down 3.07% and TSMC's ADR down 1.28%. Stronger-than-expected earnings from Qualcomm and Fortinet, and Datadog's analyst day providing some support to the software sector—potentially marking a fourth consecutive weekly gain for the software index—could not conceal the systemic selling pressure in the chip sector.

Data from Goldman Sachs' trading desk provides a more telling dimension: their high-beta momentum basket fell a sharp 8% on the day, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100 fell less than 0.5%. This spread is among the top ten extreme single-day values of the past five years, and this marks the fifth such occurrence so far in 2026.

Furthermore, the VIX fell 1.78% to 17.08, showing a rare divergence from the stock market decline. Typically, when stocks fall, the fear index rises; their concurrent downward movement suggests the market may already be waiting for tomorrow's (Friday) Non-Farm Payrolls data, unwilling to place directional bets in the short term.

Recent U.S. stock earnings reports are also highly representative. Arm Holdings reported its FY2026 Q4 earnings after the close on May 6th, with adjusted EPS of 60 cents and revenue of $1.49 billion, both slightly surpassing analyst expectations. Licensing revenue grew 29% year-over-year, royalty revenue grew 11%.

The report itself wasn't bad. But on the earnings call, management mentioned that the company's latest AGI CPU data center chips face supply bottlenecks, with an additional $1 billion in demand temporarily unable to convert into revenue. Raymond James analyst Simon Leopold wrote directly: "Supply constraints led management to temper revenue guidance increases."

The stock surged as much as 13% after hours, only to give back all gains and then some, falling over 10% after Thursday's open, becoming one of the heaviest decliners among tech giants for the day. This is the third time in the past year Arm has seen "better-than-expected earnings" followed by a "next-day plunge."

After Arm's performance, CoreWeave took the stage after hours. Its Q1 actual revenue beat expectations, its revenue backlog has ballooned to $99 billion, and Nvidia injected another $2 billion during the quarter. However, its Q2 revenue guidance fell short of market expectations, while its full-year 2026 capital expenditure guidance was raised to $31-35 billion, more than doubling the $14.9 billion in 2025. Its stock fell over 10% after hours.

CoreWeave's losses are real, its debt is real, but its orders are also real: a $99 billion revenue backlog, and Nvidia's continuous backing. But clearly, everyone is doubting whether this future money can outrun today's capital expenditures.

Fed Leans Hawkish, Friday's Non-Farm Payrolls Data

Finally, on the Federal Reserve front, slight hawkish shifts appeared in the short-term interest rate market that day, with the probability of an unexpected rate hike before year-end rising to about 20%. But the market largely viewed this as noise, as labor data remains strong. Weekly initial jobless claims only edged up to 200,000, showing no substantial cracks yet in the job market.

The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose about 4.8 basis points to 4.393%, moving higher in sync with the rebound in oil prices.

Offshore Chinese yuan briefly broke through 6.80 per dollar, hitting a four-year high, before retreating slightly, closing the New York session at 6.8078. The U.S. Dollar Index rose 0.08% to 98.10.

Regarding gold, spot gold touched above $4,700 per ounce intraday, a two-week high, closing up 0.22% at $4,701.61. The tug-of-war between inflation worries fueled by oil prices and safe-haven demand amid peace talk expectations found gold its place. Silver saw larger gains, with COMEX silver futures closing up 3.02% at $79.64 per ounce, and spot silver briefly breaking above $82 intraday.

In European markets, the pan-European STOXX 600 fell 1.02%, the UK's FTSE 100 fell 1.55%, France's CAC 40 fell 1.17%, and Germany's DAX fell 0.99%.

The variable of the Strait of Hormuz is not yet cleared. And the next market trigger is Friday's Non-Farm Payrolls data. This week's initial jobless claims slightly rose to 200,000 but remained below the market expectation of 206,000, indicating continued mild layoff pressure in the labor market. With the probability of a Fed rate hike this year rising to about 20%, this also means the jobs data will become the next coordinate for repricing.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the primary reason for the sudden reversal in market sentiment regarding the US-Iran peace talks?

AThe reversal was primarily triggered by statements from an Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson on Wednesday. The spokesperson indicated that the US-proposed peace plan was still 'under review' and that key demands—pausing uranium enrichment and reopening the Strait of Hormuz—remained unresolved. Crucially, Iran emphasized that its uranium enrichment was a 'red line' and not a negotiation chip.

QAccording to the article, what are two key factors that provide underlying support for Bitcoin's price near the $80,000 level?

ATwo key factors providing support are strong institutional demand and positive on-chain fundamentals. 1) Institutional demand: April saw the strongest net inflows ($24.4 billion) into US spot Bitcoin ETFs since October 2025, with BlackRock's ETF holdings reaching ~$62 billion. 2) On-chain fundamentals: The proportion of BTC held by long-term holders rose to 78.3% of the circulating supply, exchange balances hit a 7-year low, and whale addresses were net buyers of ~270,000 BTC over the past 30 days.

QDescribe the unusual divergence observed in the VIX (Volatility Index) on the day of the market decline.

AOn the day of the market decline, the VIX (often called the 'fear gauge') fell 1.78% to 17.08, moving in the same downward direction as the falling stock indices (S&P 500, Nasdaq). This is considered unusual because typically, when stocks fall, the VIX rises as market fear and expected volatility increase. The article suggests this divergence might indicate the market is in a holding pattern, waiting for the upcoming non-farm payrolls data before making a directional bet.

QWhy did Arm Holdings' stock price fall significantly despite reporting quarterly earnings that beat analyst expectations?

AArm Holdings' stock fell because, during its earnings call, management disclosed that its latest AGI CPU data center chip was facing supply constraints. This bottleneck meant that an additional $10 billion in demand could not be converted into immediate revenue. Analysts noted that these supply constraints caused management to refrain from raising revenue guidance, which outweighed the positive impact of the earnings beat.

QWhat contradictory signals does the article highlight in the crude oil market regarding the current physical supply versus futures market pricing?

AThe article highlights a structural divergence: the spot price of Brent crude oil has fallen below its front-month futures price. This reversal from the typical 'backwardation' structure (where spot prices are higher than futures) suggests that physical oil supply in the market is currently relatively abundant. This stands in contrast to the elevated prices seen in the futures market, which are still pricing in significant geopolitical risk premiums related to the Middle East tensions.

Leituras Relacionadas

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbitHá 4m

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbitHá 4m

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbitHá 1h

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbitHá 1h

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

The article describes an era where AI-generated content is flooding the market, forcing human authors to prove they are not machines. It begins with the example of dozens of AI-written, error-ridden biographies of Henry Kissinger appearing on Amazon within hours of his death, a pattern repeated for other deceased celebrities and even living experts who find fraudulent books under their names. This spam content has exploded, with monthly new book releases on platforms like Amazon reaching 300,000 by late 2025. The issue spans genres, from suspiciously high proportions of AI-written teen romance and self-help books to dangerous, AI-generated foraging guides containing lethal advice. The platforms' automated review systems, designed to catch plagiarism and banned words, are ill-equipped to detect AI-generated text that avoids these pitfalls while being nonsensical or fraudulent. The problem has infiltrated traditional publishing. A major publisher, Hachette, had to recall a bestselling horror novel after AI detection tools suggested 78% of its content was machine-generated. An acclaimed European philosophy book was later revealed to be entirely written by AI under a fake author persona. In response, authors are fighting back. At the 2026 London Book Fair, 10,000 writers published a blank book titled "Don't Steal This Book" containing only their signatures—using emptiness as a protest weapon in an age of AI overproduction. Initiatives like the "Human Author Certification" program have emerged, ironically placing the burden on humans to prove their work is not machine-made. The article warns of a vicious cycle: AI-generated low-quality books pollute the data used to train future AI models, leading to "model collapse" and an ever-worsening flood of digital waste, eroding trust in publishing and devaluing human creativity.

marsbitHá 1h

The Era Has Arrived Where Human Writers Must Prove They Are Not Machines

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片