NYSE Moves Toward 24/7 Markets With Blockchain Trading Venue for Tokenized Equities

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-20Última atualização em 2026-01-20

Resumo

The New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), under its parent company Intercontinental Exchange, is developing a blockchain-based trading platform to enable 24/7 trading of tokenized stocks and ETFs. This initiative aims to meet investor demand for continuous trading and instant settlements, similar to cryptocurrency markets. The platform will combine the NYSE’s existing order-matching technology with blockchain for record-keeping, settlements, and funding—using stablecoins and tokenized bank deposits. However, the project is still pending approval from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which will review investor protections and regulatory compliance. If approved, the system could significantly reduce settlement times and costs, marking a major step toward integrating blockchain technology into traditional finance. The move also reflects competitive pressure, as other exchanges like Nasdaq are exploring tokenized equity offerings.

The New York Stock Exchange is developing a blockchain-based platform that allows tokenized stocks and ETFs to trade 24/7. This initiative is being led by the NYSE’s Parenting company, Intercontinental Exchange. The project needs to get approval from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

NYSE executives stated that the project is primarily designed to address the major issue affecting investors. Investors are expecting 24/7 trading and instant settlements similar to cryptocurrency trading. So, NYSE believes that blockchain infrastructure could support faster settlements and 24/7 trading. Other exchanges, like Nasdaq, have already approached regulators to allow the tokenized stocks on the exchanges. So NYSE doesn’t want to fall behind.

SEC Approval Still Pending

The NYSE projects work by using its existing order matching technology with the help of blockchain that handles record, settlements, and funding, and the money would move using stablecoins and tokenized bank deposits. The NYSE is currently in discussion with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to approve its trading structure. Regulators are expected to examine how the investor protections, disclosures, and tokenized securities are defined under U.S. Law in 24/7 trading.

Tokenised Stocks are a form of digital version of a real share, which is stored in the blockchain. Instead of the paper records and settling through brokers, the ownership is tracked on-chain. Under the proposed model, the trades can settle and be funded in real time using the tokenized deposits or stablecoin-based payments. These transactions can occur outside the standard banking hours.

If Approved then the initiative would enable round-the-clock trading with the potential to reduce the settlement time and cost. The development would signal a deeper integration of blockchain technology into traditional finance.

Highlighted Crypto News:

‌Immutable (IMX) Price Prediction 2026, 2027-2030

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) developing to enable 24/7 trading?

AThe NYSE is developing a blockchain-based platform that allows tokenized stocks and ETFs to trade 24/7.

QWhich company is leading the NYSE's initiative to create a blockchain trading venue?

AThe initiative is being led by the NYSE's parent company, Intercontinental Exchange (ICE).

QWhat is the primary reason the NYSE is pursuing this blockchain project for investors?

AThe project is primarily designed to address investor demand for 24/7 trading and instant settlements, similar to cryptocurrency trading.

QWhat technology does the NYSE plan to use for handling records, settlements, and funding in its new system?

AThe NYSE plans to use blockchain technology to handle records, settlements, and funding, with money moving through stablecoins and tokenized bank deposits.

QWhat is the current status of the NYSE's project regarding regulatory approval?

AThe NYSE is currently in discussions with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to get approval for its trading structure, and the project is still pending SEC approval.

Leituras Relacionadas

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手Há 2h

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

链捕手Há 2h

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbitHá 3h

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbitHá 3h

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手Há 3h

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手Há 3h

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

Bitcoin's recent recovery from February lows is approaching a critical supply cluster between $84,000 and $88,000, which holds the largest concentration of Bitcoin supply on the current chart. This zone represents the cost basis for short-term holders (investors who bought within the last 155 days) and is stacked with "trapped" sellers who bought near those levels and are now at breakeven. Technical analysis suggests the rally faces significant resistance in this area. Two primary scenarios are outlined: a direct push into the $84k-$86k zone followed by a rejection and pullback to $70,000 support, or a more volatile path involving a dip before testing the supply cluster. A weekly close above $84,000 would weaken the bearish rejection case, but a decisive break above $86,900-$88,000 is needed for a stronger bullish confirmation. Bitcoin is currently trading around $80,430.

bitcoinistHá 3h

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

bitcoinistHá 3h

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbitHá 5h

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape