Musk Creates Another Capital Myth? SpaceX IPO Approaches, Stock Volatility May Be More Intense Than Tesla

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-04Última atualização em 2026-03-04

Resumo

SpaceX, the aerospace giant founded by Elon Musk, is reportedly preparing for a potential IPO as early as this month, with a target valuation exceeding $1.75 trillion. Analysts predict the stock could experience even greater volatility than Tesla (TSLA.O) post-listing. Key growth is expected from its Starlink satellite internet business, projected to generate significant future revenue and profits. However, the company faces challenges typical of Musk-led ventures, including ambitious timelines that often face delays, such as the Starship rocket and Mars mission goals. The stock’s performance is likely to be heavily influenced by Musk’s leadership and public persona, with a low public float of around 3.3% potentially amplifying price swings. Negative news affecting Tesla or Musk could also impact SpaceX, highlighting concentrated risk. Despite delays, investor focus remains on long-term vision over short-term setbacks.

Source: Jinshi Data

Over the past few years, as SpaceX has gradually transformed into a giant in the aerospace field, market interest in it has grown exponentially. However, investors should expect that after its public listing, the stock price may experience significant volatility.

According to Bloomberg, SpaceX may file a confidential IPO application as early as this month, seeking a valuation of over $1.75 trillion. The company plans to conduct the IPO in June, potentially coinciding with Musk's birthday or a rare planetary alignment event. Headquartered in Starbase, Texas, USA, SpaceX, after absorbing Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI, is estimated to be valued at approximately $1.25 trillion.

PitchBook analyst Franco Granda wrote in a report on Tuesday that the stock performance of SpaceX after its listing would resemble that of Tesla (TSLA.O) but "with even greater volatility."

Future Growth Expectations: Starlink to Contribute Major Revenue

PitchBook predicts that by 2040, SpaceX's revenue will reach $150 billion, with adjusted profits of $95 billion.

In comparison, the company's revenue last year was approximately $16 billion at most, with profits around $8 billion. About $42 billion in annual revenue in the future may come from the Starlink satellite internet business, which currently contributes the majority of SpaceX's cash flow.

This forecast does not include the xAI business. xAI is currently burning cash rapidly but may secure more projects from the U.S. Department of Defense in the future. The forecast also assumes that Tesla and SpaceX will not merge, although Musk and some analysts have suggested this possibility in the past.

Musk wrote on the X platform in November last year: "My companies, somewhat surprisingly, are moving in the direction of integration."

Musk Effect: Vision-Driven but Timelines Often Delayed

Granda stated that many lessons investors learned from Tesla may also apply to SpaceX. For example, both companies are influenced by Musk's famous public optimism.

Granda cited an example where Tesla promised to produce 5,000 cars per week by the end of 2017 but subsequently fell into "production hell" and failed to meet the target. However, when the company finally achieved this milestone in mid-2018, its stock price surged significantly.

SpaceX has also experienced similar delays. The development of its Starship super rocket has faced multiple setbacks, and other spacecraft projects in the company's history have had similar experiences. Musk once set 2022 as the "ideal target" for sending an unmanned mission to Mars, but by 2026, this mission is still years away from realization.

However, investors have gradually grown accustomed to Musk's timelines having a certain degree of "flexibility."

Therefore, when the December deadline for the autonomous taxi project passed, investors did not panic excessively. Later, when Musk achieved the set goal slightly later, the stock price rose accordingly. Granda refers to this phenomenon as the "credibility ledger," where investors automatically factor in delays but focus more on the overall vision.

This could be advantageous for SpaceX. The company recently delayed its Mars colonization plan while also applying to regulators to launch up to 1 million space data centers into orbit, a plan that relies on the progress of the Starship project. SpaceX has also stated plans to build a city on the moon.

Post-IPO Challenges: Higher Volatility and High Dependence on Musk

However, as a publicly listed company, SpaceX must achieve these goals while facing Wall Street investors and making continuous progress in the xAI and Starlink businesses. Therefore, market reactions could be very intense.

Granda predicts that if certain major events typically cause only a 10% to 15% fluctuation in Tesla's stock price, they could trigger a 20% to 30% fluctuation in SpaceX's stock. This is partly because SpaceX's publicly traded shares are expected to account for only about 3.3%.

SpaceX stock may also benefit from the so-called "Musk premium." Even as Tesla's core electric vehicle business declines, this premium has helped keep its stock price at a high level. However, this光环 also means that Musk's companies are highly dependent on him.

Cantor Fitzgerald analyst Andres Sheppard previously stated:

"Today, over 50% of shareholders would say that Tesla is Elon, and Elon is Tesla. Many people, perhaps even the majority, directly link Tesla's success to Elon's tenure."

Tesla also mentioned the company's dependence on Musk in its annual report, warning that if Musk is forced to sell some of his shares, the stock price could fall. SpaceX was founded by Musk over twenty years ago, and he currently holds about 44% of the company's shares. Its dependence on the CEO is likely similarly high.

Granda stated that negative news from Tesla would likely put pressure on SpaceX's stock price, and vice versa. At the same time, Musk's political stance has also sparked controversy and affected Tesla's sales. Granda concluded:

"The combination of lower float, earlier-stage technology, and highly concentrated Musk exposure means its volatility could exceed the already significant volatility pattern seen in Tesla's history."

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the expected valuation of SpaceX for its upcoming listing, and how does it compare to its previous valuation after absorbing xAI?

ASpaceX is seeking a valuation of over $1.75 trillion for its IPO, which is significantly higher than its previous valuation of approximately $1.25 trillion after absorbing Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company, xAI.

QAccording to PitchBook analyst Franco Granda, how will SpaceX's stock performance compare to Tesla's after it goes public?

APitchBook analyst Franco Granda stated that SpaceX's stock performance after its public listing is expected to be similar to Tesla's stock but with even stronger volatility.

QWhat is the primary source of cash flow for SpaceX currently, and what is its projected contribution to future revenue by 2040?

AThe Starlink satellite internet business is currently the primary source of cash flow for SpaceX. It is projected to contribute approximately $42 billion in annual revenue by 2040.

QWhat phenomenon does the analyst refer to as the 'credibility ledger' in the context of Elon Musk's companies?

AThe 'credibility ledger' refers to the phenomenon where investors automatically factor in delays to Elon Musk's ambitious timelines but remain focused on the overall vision, leading to stock price increases when the goals are eventually met, even if later than initially promised.

QWhat are the key factors cited by the analyst that could lead to SpaceX's stock having higher volatility than Tesla's?

AThe key factors leading to potentially higher volatility for SpaceX's stock are: a lower public float of only about 3.3%, the earlier stage of its core technology, and a highly concentrated exposure to 'Key Man Risk' associated with Elon Musk himself.

Leituras Relacionadas

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

The AI Agent era is accelerating, with the CB Insights AI 100 list highlighting global investment confidence. The focus has shifted from whether AI works to its speed of deployment and ability to manage complex workflows, with autonomous AI Agents driving this transformation. At the forefront is Questflow, a Singapore-based startup redefining financial intelligence through its on-chain AI brokerage. Unlike tools that merely provide data dashboards, Questflow deploys AI Agents that proactively scan markets, form judgments, and execute trades via a conversational interface—operating 24/7 without requiring manual confirmation for each decision. This embodies the new AI paradigm of agents capable of executing multi-step workflows autonomously. Questflow's mission is to democratize institutional-grade trading intelligence. Historically reserved for the ultra-wealthy, this capability is now accessible starting from just $1 through Questflow's "AI Clone + Copy Trade" model. The platform charges only a 1% execution fee, aligning its incentives directly with users and eliminating traditional management or performance fees. The timing is opportune, aligning with key trends identified by CB Insights: the scalable deployment of AI Agents, accelerated AI adoption in financial services, and the maturation of on-chain infrastructure. With robust liquidity on platforms like Hyperliquid and Polymarket, alongside advancements in AI reasoning and non-custodial wallet security, Questflow is positioned to merge the roles of broker, fund, and exchange into a single, accessible platform for millions.

链捕手Há 5m

The AI Agent Era Accelerates Its Arrival: Questflow Defines a New Paradigm of Financial Intelligence with On-Chain AI Brokerage

链捕手Há 5m

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

Titled "Why Putting a Price on Social Interaction Is Doomed to Fail," this article critiques attempts to monetize social networks directly through SocialFi models, arguing their inevitable failure stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of media dynamics. Using Marshall McLuhan's theory of "hot" and "cold" media, the author posits that social networks are inherently "cold" media. Their value isn't contained in individual posts but is co-created through user participation, interpretation, and fragmented, ongoing interaction (e.g., replies, shares). This ambiguity and need for user involvement are core to their function. The article asserts that SocialFi projects like Friend.tech failed because introducing real-time, tradable financial pricing (a definitive "hot" signal) into this "cold" environment doesn't add a layer—it replaces the medium's essence. The unambiguous price signal overshadows and nullifies the nuanced, participatory social signal. Users become traders, not participants, and when speculative profits vanish, the underlying social ecosystem—never genuinely cultivated—collapses entirely. This principle extends beyond crypto. The author argues platforms like Twitter have gradually "heated up" through metrics (likes, retweets counts, algorithmically defined value), shifting users from participants to performers and eroding organic engagement. The solution isn't to abandon capital but to manage its entry point. Successful models like Substack, Patreon, or Bandcamp allow capital to "condense" at specific, isolated nodes (e.g., subscriptions, one-time payments) without permeating and "heating" every social interaction. They preserve the core "cold," participatory medium while enabling monetization at designated boundaries. The NFT boom and bust serves as a stark parallel: the ancient "cold" medium of collecting (valued for story, community, gradual accumulation) was rapidly destroyed by platforms that introduced real-time floor prices, rarity scores, and trading dashboards, transforming collectors into speculators and vaporizing cultural value when prices fell. The core lesson: "Liquidity equals heat." Injecting high liquidity and definitive pricing into a "cold" participatory medium doesn't optimize it; it fundamentally alters and destroys its value-creating mechanism. The future lies not in pricing every social gesture but in finding precise, non-invasive points for capital to condense without overheating the entire ecosystem.

marsbitHá 13m

Why Pricing Social Interactions is Doomed to Fail?

marsbitHá 13m

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA and a first-generation immigrant, delivered the commencement address to Carnegie Mellon University's class of 2026. He shared his personal journey from a humble background to founding NVIDIA, emphasizing resilience, learning from failure, and the responsibility that comes with leadership. Huang framed the present moment as the dawn of the AI revolution, a shift he believes is more profound than previous computing waves. He described AI as fundamentally resetting computing—moving from human-written software to machines that understand, reason, and use tools. This will create a new industry for generating intelligence and transform every sector. While acknowledging AI's potential to automate tasks and displace some jobs, Huang distinguished between the *tasks* of a job and its core *purpose*. He argued AI will augment human capability, not replace humans. The real risk, he stated, is not AI itself, but people being left behind by those who effectively use AI. He presented AI as a generational opportunity for massive infrastructure investment—in chip factories, data centers, energy grids, and advanced manufacturing—that could re-industrialize nations like the U.S. and bridge the digital divide by making computing and intelligent tools accessible to all. Huang called for a balanced approach: advancing AI safely and responsibly, establishing prudent policies, ensuring broad access, and encouraging universal participation. He urged the graduates not to fear the future but to engage with optimism and ambition, reminding them of CMU's motto, "My heart is in the work." His core message was clear: this is their moment to actively build and shape the AI-powered future, not merely observe it.

marsbitHá 1h

Jensen Huang's CMU Speech: In the AI Era, Don't Just Watch, Build

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片