Mapping the New Finance Ecosystem: Nine Major Sectors in a 'Hundred Regiments Battle', with Tokenization, Stablecoins, and Neo-Banks as the Main Battlefields

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-19Última atualização em 2026-01-19

Resumo

Andy, founder of The Rollup, outlines the landscape of Neo Finance in 2026, identifying it as the fastest-growing sector in the global financial system. The ecosystem comprises nine major segments, including over 100 projects, with tokenization, stablecoins, and neobanking highlighted as the primary growth areas. Tokenization of real-world assets like bonds and commodities is gaining significant traction. Stablecoins remain the top entry point for new users, with yield-bearing variants growing exponentially. Neobanks are leveraging DeFi infrastructure to offer consumer-friendly banking experiences with superior yields. The article emphasizes that outdated crypto practices are fading, and a new financial era driven by utility and adoption is emerging.

Author: Andy, Founder of The Rollup

Compiled by: Felix, PANews

Andy, the founder of The Rollup, recently published an article discussing the market landscape of Neo Finance in 2026, pointing out that Neo Finance will become the fastest-growing sector in the global financial system. Below are the details.

The Neo Finance sector will give birth to more true 'billion-dollar unicorn' companies than ever before. It is poised to become the fastest-growing sector in the global financial system for years, and even decades, to come.

Below is the market landscape for Neo Finance in 2026, covering nine major segments and over 100 ecosystem projects:

The combination of front-end consumer-grade user experience and back-end efficient DeFi infrastructure will provide users with a 'bank-like experience' that is both familiar and far superior to traditional banking.

Users' savings can be traded and transferred globally and are available 24/7. A simple example: a user's 'checking account' could earn a 5% annual interest rate, compared to 0.25% from a traditional bank.

Driven by teams focusing on different parts of the technology stack, the Neo Finance market has the potential to fundamentally change how the world interacts with money.

Let's take a look at some key areas in the market map.

Tokenization

Tokenization is the process of bringing real-world assets (such as treasury bonds, stocks, commodities, credit, money markets, etc.) on-chain.

The infrastructure and tokenization agent layer includes: Figure, Ondo Finance, Paxos, Centrifuge, Superstate Inc, Midas, Grove Finance, Nest, Dinari, Securitize, and other companies.

Tokenization has been discussed for years, but 2025 is the year it truly begins to scale.

Stablecoins

Stablecoins are by far the most successful crypto product, with 90% of new finance customers preferring stablecoins as their first point of contact with cryptocurrency.

The stablecoin issuer sector is booming, with numerous companies emerging, such as: Circle, Paxos, Tether, and Sky.

Meanwhile, yield-bearing stablecoins (or 'yield coins') like $sUSDS, $sUSDe, $BUIDL, $USYC, and $syrupUSDC have seen exponential growth over the past 18 months, with a supply exceeding $13 billion.

Users no longer have to choose between stability and yield as they did in the CeDeFi space during 2020-2022; now they can have both.

Neo-Banks

In the neo-bank sector, many teams are emerging, such as ether.fi, KAST, Tuyo, Galaxy, and others. These teams are leveraging DeFi backends to build consumer-facing 'bank-like' experiences from the ground up.

Remember the 'DeFi Mullet'? (PANews Note: Refers to a front-end with a TradFi user-friendly interface and a back-end powered by DeFi underlying technology) It's still here, and the data proves it.

Tokenization, stablecoins, and neo-banks are the three key areas of focus currently, expected to see the most significant growth in 2026 and beyond.

Beyond this, the crypto market is facing a harsh reality: old strategies are failing.

High FDV, low circulating supply launches aimed at dumping on retail; protocols lacking value accrual pathways; alt DEXs on 'ghost' chains; VC-backed projects where founders cash out hundreds of millions before achieving any PMF (Product-Market Fit).

All these plays are outdated, and this trend will continue.

In fact, I got into crypto after reading 'The Truth Machine' in 2017. Back then, I was almost certain this technology would reshape finance. Somehow, it feels like we veered off the original mission. Nine years later, we are closer than ever to that dream becoming a reality.

Everything is in place, the opportunity is here. Welcome to the era of Neo Finance.

Related reading: Nihilism and Vicious Cycles: Why Should We Oppose Over-Financialization?

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the three main areas of focus in the Neo Finance ecosystem according to the article, and why are they significant?

AThe three main areas are tokenization, stablecoins, and neobanks. They are significant because they are expected to drive the most substantial growth in 2026 and beyond, combining consumer-friendly front-end experiences with efficient DeFi back-end infrastructure to revolutionize how the world interacts with money.

QHow does the article describe the current state and growth of 'yield stablecoins'?

AThe article states that yield stablecoins (or 'yield coins') like $sUSDS, $sUSDe, $BUIDL, $USYC, and $syrupUSDC have experienced exponential growth over the past 18 months, with their supply exceeding $13 billion.

QWhat is the 'DeFi Mullet' concept mentioned in the article, and what does it refer to?

AThe 'DeFi Mullet' refers to a business model where the front-end offers a user-friendly interface familiar to traditional finance (TradFi) users, while the back-end is powered by decentralized finance (DeFi) infrastructure.

QWhat outdated practices in the crypto market does the article claim are no longer effective?

AThe article claims that outdated practices include high Fully Diluted Valuation (FDV) with low circulating supply to sell to retail investors, protocols with no path to value accrual, alt-DEXs on 'ghost' chains, and venture-backed projects where founders cash out millions before achieving any Product-Market Fit (PMF).

QWhat major shift does the article suggest happened in 2025 regarding tokenization?

AThe article suggests that 2025 was the year when tokenization, the process of putting real-world assets like treasuries and stocks on-chain, truly began to scale and see mass adoption after being discussed for many years.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Exquisite Self-Interest of Former OpenAI CTO Murati: Personally Handing Over the Knife and Then Being the First to Seek Reconciliation

Court documents from Elon Musk's lawsuit reveal OpenAI's former CTO, Mira Murati, played a central and seemingly self-interested role in Sam Altman's November 2023 ouster and reinstatement. As early as 2022, she complained to Altman about his shifting priorities and pressure to prioritize revenue. By 2023, she privately supplied co-founder Ilya Sutskever with extensive internal evidence against Altman, which became a key 52-page memo for the board. She was appointed interim CEO after Altman's firing and informed Microsoft. However, text messages show Murati simultaneously relayed the board's stance to Altman while secretly urging Microsoft's CEO to help reverse the decision. Once employee backlash mounted, she refused to publicly defend the board's move she helped engineer. She then became the first signatory on the employee petition demanding the board resign and reinstate Altman. A former board member testified Murati was "waiting to see which way the wind blew," not realizing "she herself was the wind." The evidence depicts her actions as consistently aligning with her own interests throughout the crisis.

marsbitHá 6m

The Exquisite Self-Interest of Former OpenAI CTO Murati: Personally Handing Over the Knife and Then Being the First to Seek Reconciliation

marsbitHá 6m

AI Inference Bills Soar, Shopify and Roblox Warn: Savings from Layoffs Not Enough to Cover Chip Costs

The 2026 Q1 earnings season reveals a paradox: while AI helps companies freeze hiring and boost productivity, the soaring costs of AI inference—token consumption and GPU depreciation—are eroding savings from workforce reductions. Shopify reported that AI now writes over 50% of its code, enabling significant output with stable headcount. However, LLM costs, driven by heavy usage of its AI assistant Sidekick, are pressuring its subscription毛利率. Similarly, Roblox attributed a quarter of its full-year利润率下调 to increased AI investment. The article highlights a broader industry imbalance: combined AI capital expenditure for Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and Google is projected to reach $725 billion in 2026, vastly outpacing potential savings from layoffs. For instance, Meta's planned裁员 would save about $2.4 billion annually, offsetting only ~12% of its incremental AI depreciation. While底层 model and chip suppliers like NVIDIA maintain high profitability, application-layer companies face a pricing squeeze. Their strategies now involve要么 tightly linking AI costs to user engagement (like Shopify) or introducing fees for advanced AI features (like Roblox), as covering AI bills with裁员 savings alone is financially unsustainable.

marsbitHá 16m

AI Inference Bills Soar, Shopify and Roblox Warn: Savings from Layoffs Not Enough to Cover Chip Costs

marsbitHá 16m

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbitHá 26m

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitHá 26m

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报Há 38m

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报Há 38m

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手Há 42m

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale