LUNA Countdown to Death: The "Prophetic Trade" Mystery Before the Evaporation of 40 Billion

比推Publicado em 2026-02-25Última atualização em 2026-02-25

Resumo

Summary: In February 2026, Terraform Labs' bankruptcy liquidator filed a lawsuit against quantitative trading giant Jane Street in Manhattan federal court, alleging insider trading related to the May 2022 collapse of Terra (LUNA) and UST, which erased $40 billion in value. The complaint centers on a private chat group called "Bryce's Secret," through which Jane Street allegedly obtained non-public information. Specifically, it is claimed that Jane Street was tipped off about Terraform's plan to withdraw $150 million UST from the Curve liquidity pool. Ten minutes after the withdrawal, a wallet linked to Jane Street removed $85 million UST. Additionally, as UST crashed, Jane Street reportedly offered to buy Luna at a steep discount. This case follows a separate $4 billion lawsuit against Jump Trading, which allegedly profited from earlier UST depegging events and received secret Bitcoin transfers. Jane Street dismissed the suit as a desperate money grab, arguing the collapse was ultimately caused by Terraform's fraud. The cases highlight ongoing concerns about information asymmetry and insider advantages in crypto markets, despite their decentralized ethos.

Written by: Universe Wave Naruto, Deep Tide TechFlow

Original Title: The Truth Behind LUNA's Collapse? Someone Predicted the Evaporation of 40 Billion Dollars 10 Minutes Early


In May 2022, 40 billion dollars evaporated within 72 hours.

It was the most devastating collapse in crypto history. UST, once hailed as the "crown jewel of algorithmic stablecoins," plummeted from 1 dollar to worthless in just a few days; Luna, once with a market cap nearing 40 billion dollars, fell from its high of 116 dollars to nearly zero.

Millions of ordinary investors lost their savings that early summer. They refreshed their screens, watching the continuously plunging K-line, unsure of what had happened or what to do.

The official explanation came quickly: flaws in the algorithmic design, Do Kwon lied, a natural market death. Most people accepted this answer, relegating that catastrophe to "another lesson in the crypto world," and moved on.

This answer held for nearly four years.

Until February 23, 2026, when Todd Snyder, the bankruptcy liquidator for Terraform Labs, filed a lawsuit in the Manhattan Federal Court. Jane Street, the world's most secretive and profitable quantitative trading giant, was thrust into the spotlight.

That question, silent for four years, finally has a new version of the answer.

Jane Street and LUNA's Secret Group Chat

To understand the weight of this accusation, one must first know who the defendant is.

To most crypto users, Jane Street might be an unfamiliar name. But on Wall Street, it is legendary—a firm that deliberately maintains a low profile yet quietly became one of the most important players in the global financial market.

Between 1999 and 2000, Tim Reynolds, Robert Granieri, Michael Jenkins—three former Susquehanna traders—alongside IBM developer Marc Gerstein, founded Jane Street in a windowless small office in New York. Starting out, they did ADR arbitrage, inconspicuous and unnoticed. But they soon set their sights on a then-niche market product: ETFs, and made it their core battleground.

This bet changed everything.

Today's Jane Street is one of the world's largest market makers, operating simultaneously in 45 countries and over 200 trading venues, holding about 24% of the primary market share for US-listed ETFs, with monthly equity trading volume reaching 2 trillion dollars. In 2024, its annual net trading revenue was 20.5 billion dollars, already on par with Bank of America and Goldman Sachs. In Q2 2025, its single-quarter net trading revenue刷新 (refreshed) to 10.1 billion dollars, with a net profit of 6.9 billion dollars, breaking the quarterly records of all major Wall Street investment banks.

3000 employees, no CEO, no traditional hierarchy, all employees compensated based on the company's overall profits. Jane Street describes itself as a "collection of puzzle solvers," while the outside world calls it an "anarchist commune"—flat, mysterious, and almost completely closed off to the media.

Its alumni list includes a familiar name: SBF (Sam Bankman-Fried) joined Jane Street in 2014 after graduating from MIT, honing his trading intuition here for three years before leaving in 2017 to establish Alameda Research and FTX. The people nurtured by this company have profoundly changed the face of the crypto world, in whatever sense.

Now, this company, known for being "low-key, precise, always on the side of information advantage," sits in the defendant's seat.

And the core of the accusation comes from a private group chat called "Bryce's Secret."

It was created by Jane Street employee Bryce Pratt. He was once an intern at Terraform, left and joined Jane Street, but his old network remained intact—both doors were open to him.

In February 2022, Pratt brought his old colleagues into this private channel, establishing an information pipeline connecting Terraform's interior with Jane Street, with the other end linked to Terraform's software engineers and business development heads. The complaint alleges that it was through this pipeline that Jane Street learned in advance about Terraform's plan to quietly withdraw funds from the Curve liquidity pool—a decision not yet announced to the public.

At 5:44 PM on May 7, 10 minutes after Terraform Labs quietly withdrew 150 million dollars in UST from the Curve 3pool, a wallet allegedly associated with Jane Street followed by pulling out 85 million dollars in UST, the largest single transaction in the pool's history.

By May 9, UST had fallen to 0.8 dollars, and signs of collapse were undeniable. At this point, Pratt messaged Do Kwon and the Terraform team via the group chat, suggesting Jane Street could consider "purchasing Luna at a significant discount."

While harvesting retail investors, they were also preparing to pick up bargains from the fire.

The defendants named in this case, besides Pratt, include Jane Street co-founder Robert Granieri—the only one of the four founders still active—and employee Michael Huang. The lawsuit cites the Commodity Exchange Act and the Securities Exchange Act, simultaneously raising charges of fraud and unjust enrichment, demanding a jury trial, and seeking compensation and disgorgement of profits.

Bloomberg, citing the core statement in the complaint, reported: Jane Street's operations allowed it to "close billions of dollars in potential risk exposure at the right moment, just hours before the collapse of the Terraform ecosystem."

Jump Trading and Deeper Darkness

The Jane Street lawsuit is not an isolated incident. Two months prior, the same liquidator, Todd Snyder, had already sued Jump Trading and its co-founder William DiSomma, along with former Jump Crypto president Kanav Kariya, in an Illinois federal court, seeking 4 billion dollars in damages.

Jump's story is, in a sense, even more shocking than Jane Street's.

The complaint reveals a picture never fully pieced together before: as early as May 2021, during UST's first de-pegging crisis, Jump secretly intervened, buying approximately 20 million dollars worth of UST to stabilize the price back to 1 dollar.

Later, the public believed the packaged algorithmic stablecoin story—the algorithm worked, the system was self-healing. Terraform借此 (took advantage of this) evade regulatory scrutiny, and Jump, in exchange, received over 61 million Luna tokens at a price of 0.40 dollars per token, when the market price was around 90 dollars—a discount of over 99%. Jump later sold these tokens, with the complaint estimating profits of around 1.28 billion dollars.

During the final collapse in May 2022, Luna Foundation Guard transferred nearly 50,000 bitcoins (approx. 1.5 billion dollars) to Jump without a written agreement, nominally for market support. The final whereabouts of these bitcoins remain unconfirmed to this day. The complaint states: "It is unclear whether Jump further enriched itself through this."

Notably: DiSomma and Kariya, during previous SEC investigative inquiries, invoked the Fifth Amendment hundreds of times to refuse to answer. Jump's subsidiary Tai Mo Shan settled with the SEC in 2024 for 123 million dollars, admitting it "misled investors." Kariya himself resigned as president of Jump Crypto the same year, citing the CFTC investigation.

More crucially, according to the Jane Street complaint, it was through Jump's information channels that Jane Street obtained some "non-public key information." The two cases are connected by an invisible thread.

But there's another half to this story.

Jane Street's response was direct: this is a "desperate lawsuit," a "transparent attempt to extract money from the company." They added that the losses of Terra and Luna investors stem from the "multi-billion dollar fraud" created by Do Kwon and Terraform management themselves, and they will vigorously fight back.

This statement is not wrong. Do Kwon pleaded guilty to fraud and was sentenced to 15 years in prison; Terraform also paid a 4.47 billion dollar fine. Luna's death spiral was destined from the mechanism's design: algorithmic stablecoins are, in essence, a system that requires continuous buy-side support and confidence maintenance. Once panic triggers, the arbitrage mechanism operates in reverse, destroying itself at an exponential rate.

But "Do Kwon is guilty" and "others are innocent" are not mutually exclusive propositions.

A building has a fatal structural flaw—that is a fact. During its collapse, whether someone took the opportunity to empty it of its most valuable items before the firefighters arrived is a separate legal and ethical question.

Another detail is worth noting. On the same day the Jane Street lawsuit was exposed, on-chain tracking researcher ZachXBT announced he would release "a major investigation into one of the crypto industry's most profitable institutions on February 26, 2026, regarding multiple employees long using internal data for insider trading." He did not name names. But the微妙 (subtle) timing made the entire crypto Twitter hold its breath in anticipation.

This story isn't over yet. But one thing is already certain: in this market that touts "decentralization," true asymmetry never disappeared; it just moved from bank trading desks to behind on-chain smart contracts, continuing to exist in a more隐蔽 (hidden) form.

The Luna incident might just be the most violent tear in that crack, and those standing on the other side of the crack had already evacuated safely long before the wall collapsed.

"The gentry's money is returned intact, the common people's money is split thirty-seventy," as in the movie, so it is in the crypto world.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7614333

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core allegation against Jane Street in the Terra (LUNA) collapse lawsuit?

AThe lawsuit alleges that Jane Street used non-public information obtained through a private chat called 'Bryce's Secret' to learn about Terraform Labs' plan to secretly withdraw $150 million UST from the Curve liquidity pool. This allowed a Jane Street-associated wallet to withdraw $85 million UST just 10 minutes later, enabling them to avoid massive losses before the ecosystem's collapse.

QWho is Bryce Pratt and what role did he allegedly play in the events?

ABryce Pratt was a former Terraform Labs intern who later worked at Jane Street. He allegedly created the 'Bryce's Secret' private chat, which served as an information pipeline between Terraform insiders and Jane Street, facilitating the transfer of material non-public information.

QWhat connection does the lawsuit draw between Jane Street case and the earlier case against Jump Trading?

AThe lawsuit suggests a connection, stating that Jane Street obtained some of its 'non-public key information' through Jump Trading's information channels. This links the two cases, with Jump Trading also facing a separate $4 billion lawsuit for its alleged role in the collapse.

QHow did Jane Street respond to the allegations in the lawsuit?

AJane Street dismissed the lawsuit as a 'desperate litigation' and a 'transparent attempt to extract money from the company.' They argued that the losses were fundamentally caused by the '$10 billion fraud' manufactured by Do Kwon and Terraform Labs' management themselves.

QWhat was the alleged role of Jump Trading during UST's first depegging crisis in May 2021?

AThe lawsuit against Jump Trading alleges that during UST's first depeg in May 2021, Jump secretly intervened by buying approximately $20 million worth of UST to stabilize its price back to $1 dollar. In return, they reportedly received over 61 million Luna tokens at a massive 99%+ discount, later selling them for an estimated profit of $1.28 billion.

Leituras Relacionadas

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHá 9m

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHá 9m

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Há 13m

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Há 13m

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbitHá 1h

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbitHá 1h

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbitHá 1h

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片