Kraken, Coinbase expand into stock trading as equities outperform crypto

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-25Última atualização em 2026-02-25

Resumo

Kraken and Coinbase are expanding into stock trading to attract traditional finance investors as equities significantly outperform the crypto market. This move represents a strategic shift towards hybrid financial products. Kraken launched 24/7 perpetual futures contracts for tokenized equities like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, offering up to 20x leverage and availability in over 110 countries. Conversely, Coinbase is focusing on spot equity trading through a partnership with Yahoo Finance, with plans to introduce tokenized U.S. equities later this spring. This expansion occurs amid a major crypto market contraction, with total capitalization falling to $2.24 trillion, down 47.5% since October 2025. In contrast, the S&P 500 has gained 17% over the same period. By integrating equities, both exchanges aim to capture capital rotation, diversify revenue, and boost user engagement.

Crypto platforms are sharpening their focus on traditional finance investors as a new wave of hybrid financial products reshapes market structure.

The first meaningful bridge between digital assets and traditional markets emerged through crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs).

These vehicles gave institutional and retail TradFi investors regulated exposure to digital assets such as Bitcoin, drawing approximately $54.4 billion in Asset Under Management (AUM).

That success demonstrated sustained demand for structured crypto-linked products.

Now, exchanges are taking the next step by introducing stock-based trading features and positioning themselves as comprehensive financial platforms capable of capturing a broader share of global capital flows.

Kraken, Coinbase target traditional finance investors

On the 24th of February, Kraken announced the launch of xStock perpetual Futures contracts, enabling 24/7 trading of tokenized equities backed 1:1 by their underlying shares.

The exchange confirmed that the product will be accessible to users in more than 110 countries.

Through instruments such as SPYx Perps, QQQx Perps, and GLDx Perps, investors can gain exposure to major benchmarks and commodities while tracking their respective underlying assets—the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, and gold.

Kraken’s perpetual stock contracts will support leverage of up to 20x, offering significantly greater exposure than traditional spot equity trading.

Coinbase, in contrast, has opted to focus on spot equity trading. Its recent partnership with Yahoo Finance allows users to trade selected stocks directly within the Coinbase One app.

While Kraken offers continuous 24/7 trading, Coinbase’s stock trading will operate around the clock but remain limited to five days per week, aligning more closely with traditional equity market structure.

The company also disclosed plans to roll out tokenized U.S. equities and tokenized perpetual stock products later this spring.

Mark Greenberg, Kraken’s Global Head of Consumer, described the initiative as “a new chapter for global capital markets,” stating:

“[Regulated tokenized equities] trade with the same speed, accessibility, and flexibility as crypto via tokenization, delivering a more efficient risk management experience.”

Expansion comes amid crypto market contraction

The expansion into equities comes at a time when liquidity has tightened significantly across the cryptocurrency market, prompting investors to reassess asset allocation.

At the time of writing, approximately $2.03 trillion has exited the crypto market, leaving total capitalization near $2.24 trillion.

A further 2.5% decline would effectively bring cumulative capital outflows in line with current market value.

Technical data show the crypto market has fallen 47.5% since the October 6, 2025 crash. On a year-to-date basis, it has declined 30.8%.

By comparison, the S&P 500 (blue line)—widely used as a benchmark for U.S. publicly traded equities—has gained 17% over the same post-crash period and recorded only a 2.74% drawdown since the start of the year.

With equities outperforming digital assets, Kraken and Coinbase appear to be positioning themselves to capture capital rotation rather than compete against it.

The strategy could expand user engagement and diversify revenue streams, particularly as Coinbase reports a 22% decline in fourth-quarter revenue.

In the near term, investors continue to accumulate crypto-related equities. Over the past 24 hours, these stocks have risen approximately 3.4%, while market capitalization reached $1.8 billion, according to SosoValue.


Final Summary

  • Kraken and Coinbase are moving to attract institutional capital by integrating stock trading into their platforms.
  • Equities have outperformed the broader crypto market since the crash on the 6th of October.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat new type of product did Kraken launch to enable 24/7 trading of tokenized equities?

AKraken launched xStock perpetual Futures contracts, which are backed 1:1 by their underlying shares.

QHow does Coinbase's approach to stock trading differ from Kraken's in terms of trading hours?

ACoinbase's stock trading operates around the clock but is limited to five days per week, while Kraken offers continuous 24/7 trading.

QWhat was the main driver for crypto platforms like Kraken and Coinbase to expand into stock trading?

AEquities have significantly outperformed the crypto market since the October 6, 2025 crash, with the S&P 500 gaining 17% while crypto declined 30.8% year-to-date.

QWhat advantage do Kraken's perpetual stock contracts offer over traditional spot equity trading?

AKraken's perpetual stock contracts support leverage of up to 20x, offering significantly greater exposure than traditional spot equity trading.

QHow much capital has exited the crypto market according to the article, and what is the current total market capitalization?

AApproximately $2.03 trillion has exited the crypto market, leaving total capitalization near $2.24 trillion.

Leituras Relacionadas

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHá 2h

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHá 2h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHá 3h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

marsbitHá 3h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片