JPMorgan Closes the 'Financial Backdoor': Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Face Compliance Reshuffle

比推Publicado em 2025-12-29Última atualização em 2025-12-29

Resumo

JPMorgan Chase has recently frozen accounts linked to at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups, Blindpay and Kontigo, highlighting the risks cryptocurrency transactions pose to banks. These startups, backed by Y Combinator, primarily served Latin American markets, including Venezuela—a region under U.S. sanctions. The bank’s a surge in disputed transactions, such as chargebacks and fraud claims, triggered the freezes. Checkbook, a payments partner that provided these firms virtual account access to JPMorgan, noted that the startups failed to adequately verify their end customers' identities or ensure transaction legitimacy. While JPMorgan stated the action wasn’t due to the nature of stablecoin businesses, the incident underscores broader regulatory concerns. U.S. and global authorities have warned that stablecoins are being used for money laundering, terrorism financing, and other illicit activities. Both affected startups abruptly tightened compliance measures or terminated high-risk clients after the account closures.

Written by: Michael Roddan, Yueqi Yang

Compiled by: Block Unicorn

Original Title: Stablecoin Startups Bring Trouble to JPMorgan


JPMorgan has recently frozen accounts used by at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups in recent months, highlighting the risks that cryptocurrency transactions pose to banks, which must understand the customers they do business with and the sources of their funds.

These stablecoin startups operate in Venezuela and other regions where sanctions or other restrictions pose legal risks to banks. One of the stablecoin startups once claimed that customers did not need identity verification before transactions. Another startup, after JPMorgan froze its account, suddenly terminated all customers from high-risk countries, according to the company's communication records with customers.

Stablecoins have surged in popularity overseas, especially in countries with unstable economies and currencies. Last summer, the U.S. passed a stablecoin bill, giving this type of cryptocurrency pegged to the U.S. dollar legal status.

Individuals and businesses use stablecoins to obtain U.S. dollars and make overseas remittances. They need to establish connections with U.S. banks to convert cryptocurrencies into U.S. dollars. However, banks are cautious, fearing penalties from regulators even during the Trump administration, which supported cryptocurrencies. Global and U.S. regulators and law enforcement agencies have stated that stablecoins have been used to fund terrorist organizations, launder money, and engage in other criminal activities.

JPMorgan froze the accounts of two startups invested in by venture capital firm Y Combinator—Blindpay and Kontigo—both primarily focused on the Latin American market. These two companies connected with JPMorgan through the digital payment company Checkbook, which is also supported by JPMorgan and other institutions.

Blindpay has processed over $100 million in transactions. In August of this year, the company began offering an account through JPMorgan aimed at helping customers overcome barriers to entering the U.S. financial system. Blindpay stated in a blog post at the time that obtaining loans from U.S. banks was 'much harder than imagined.'

Later that day, JPMorgan and Checkbook froze Blindpay's account. According to a series of now-deleted blog posts on the company's website, the stablecoin company quickly began strengthening anti-money laundering measures and customer verification. Blindpay did not respond to requests for comment.

Last year, Checkbook joined JPMorgan's payment partner network, enabling Checkbook to process payments for its customers through JPMorgan. For this purpose, Checkbook creates virtual accounts for its customers at JPMorgan.

Virtual accounts allow fintech companies like Checkbook to quickly open U.S. dollar-denominated accounts for overseas customers and business clients, avoiding situations where they cannot access the U.S. banking system for various reasons. Under U.S. law, businesses opening bank accounts in the U.S. must provide proof of their operations in the U.S. and a physical U.S. address.

Virtual accounts have become a popular service offered by stablecoin companies like Blindpay. Checkbook's accounts have opened a backdoor for these small stablecoin companies to enter the U.S. financial system. Soon after, JPMorgan noticed a sharp increase in the number of disputed transactions (i.e., refunds and chargebacks). Chargebacks can arise from fraud, unauthorized use, and billing errors, especially when cardholders report identity theft or dispute purchases. It is unclear why these companies experienced a surge in disputed transactions. JPMorgan has contacted Checkbook for an explanation.

Checkbook CEO PJ Gupta stated that companies like Blindpay and Kontigo were among the reasons for the rise in chargeback rates. Gupta pointed out that these companies need to ensure that transactions processed through their systems are legitimate and valid and verify the identities of remitting customers. Gupta also mentioned that while Checkbook conducts customer due diligence on the stablecoin companies themselves, due diligence on the customers is the responsibility of these companies.

Gupta stated that when disputed transactions exceed a certain threshold, Checkbook and JPMorgan freeze customer accounts. 'In such cases, we suspend operations and conduct an analysis until we obtain assurances. We send the assurances to the bank, and if both the bank and we agree that the issue will not recur, we can reopen the account. If we cannot reach an agreement, we will not reopen the account,' Gupta said.

Gupta mentioned that transactions from stablecoin companies account for only a small portion of Checkbook's total transaction volume, which exceeds $1 billion per month. He stated that the disputed transactions that prompted JPMorgan's action were due to a large influx of customers using the services provided by stablecoin companies. 'It was entirely because they opened the floodgates, and a large number of people rushed in through the internet,' Gupta said, referring to the disputed transactions of these startups.

Venezuela Sanctions

JPMorgan stated that freezing the accounts of these stablecoin companies was not due to the nature of their business. 'This has nothing to do with stablecoin companies,' a JPMorgan spokesperson said. 'We provide banking services to stablecoin issuers and related businesses, and we recently facilitated the listing of a stablecoin issuer.' Beyond this, the bank declined to comment further.

Kontigo, which raised $20 million from several venture capital firms including Y Combinator and Founders Inc., is one of two cryptocurrency platforms authorized by Venezuelan regulators to operate in the country. Kontigo focuses on serving Venezuelan customers, and its founders claim the company has processed over $1 billion in transactions. Over the past two decades, the U.S. has imposed sanctions on certain sectors of Venezuela's economy, the government, and individuals, and President Donald Trump has been increasing pressure on Venezuela's ruling authorities.

In a promotional video released by Kontigo this month, the company claimed: 'In just 30 seconds, individuals and businesses worldwide can transact using USDC and USDT stablecoins without KYC (Know Your Customer). Users can link bank accounts and instantly transfer funds globally without limits.' Kontigo co-founder Jesus Castillo stated that customers do not need to submit identity verification for cryptocurrency transactions, but identity verification is required for transactions involving fiat currency.

According to Kontigo's communication records with customers, JPMorgan suddenly froze the company's account in November. Checkbook CEO Gupta stated that the account freeze was due to a significant increase in the number of disputed transactions. Castillo, however, said that his startup and other similar companies are facing issues caused by Checkbook.

The role Kontigo plays in transferring funds out of Venezuela was highlighted in a recent report by Transparencia Venezuela, the Venezuelan chapter of Transparency International. The report stated that users could deposit up to $100,000 into Kontigo's digital wallet through private banks in Venezuela without any identity checks on the depositor. Castillo called these claims false and stated that the company has filed a lawsuit against the nonprofit. Transparencia Venezuela did not comment.

He mentioned that Kontigo also uses Bridge, owned by Stripe, to provide virtual accounts for some of its users in the U.S. and Europe. Castillo did not respond to questions about Kontigo's compliance controls. Bridge declined to comment.

After JPMorgan froze Blindpay's account, the stablecoin company's CEO and co-founder Simon Moura and co-founder João Borges flew to San Francisco to meet with an investor from Y Combinator and search for a new payment processor or bank willing to work with them.

'Unfortunately, we were rejected by this promising payment processor because they are still reluctant to work with stablecoin companies,' Moura wrote in a now-deleted blog post. Moura also visited JPMorgan's office to explain how Blindpay operates.

Due to issues with due diligence, Blindpay's potential customer base appears to have significantly shrunk. First, the company stated in a later-deleted blog post that customers from 'high-risk countries' would need to 'undergo stricter KYC processes,' referring to the 'Know Your Customer' regulatory system applicable to banks. A few days later, Blindpay announced that, after a round of due diligence, all its virtual accounts and related crypto wallets had been closed.


Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598958

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did JPMorgan freeze the accounts of stablecoin startups like Blindpay and Kontigo?

AJPMorgan froze the accounts due to a significant increase in disputed transactions, such as chargebacks and refunds, which raised concerns about compliance and potential risks, including fraud and unauthorized use.

QWhat role did Checkbook play in the relationship between JPMorgan and the stablecoin startups?

ACheckbook, a digital payments company, acted as an intermediary by providing virtual accounts through JPMorgan, allowing stablecoin startups to access the U.S. financial system. However, Checkbook relied on the startups to conduct their own customer due diligence.

QHow did the stablecoin startups like Kontigo and Blindpay initially attract customers, and what compliance issues arose?

AKontigo initially advertised no KYC (Know Your Customer) requirements for cryptocurrency transactions, while Blindpay faced issues with inadequate identity verification. This led to compliance risks, including potential money laundering and violations of sanctions, especially in high-risk regions like Venezuela.

QWhat impact did the U.S. sanctions on Venezuela have on Kontigo's operations?

AKontigo, which focused on serving Venezuelan customers, faced challenges due to U.S. sanctions on Venezuela. Its role in facilitating fund transfers out of Venezuela drew scrutiny, as it was accused of allowing large deposits without proper identity verification, though the company denied these claims.

QWhat broader concerns do regulators and law enforcement agencies have regarding stablecoins?

ARegulators and law enforcement agencies worry that stablecoins are being used for illicit activities, such as funding terrorist organizations, money laundering, and other criminal endeavors, due to potential loopholes in compliance and verification processes.

Leituras Relacionadas

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

"Beyond the Pitch: The Profit Game Around the World Cup" The FIFA World Cup transcends being a sporting spectacle, evolving into a massive global arena for speculation and profit-seeking. The 2026 tournament has amplified this dynamic, creating a multi-layered ecosystem of financial opportunism alongside the football. **Prediction markets** have surged into the mainstream. Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi saw trading volumes for World Cup contracts soar, attracting new users with their financial trading model and high-profile, chain-based wealth stories that overshadow traditional sports betting in terms of growth and narrative. However, **traditional sportsbooks** remain the dominant force, leveraging established user habits, legal markets, and comprehensive product offerings to handle the vast majority of speculative wagers, with projections suggesting record-breaking betting volumes. Capital markets also react. **"Concept stocks"** in countries like South Korea and Japan experience volatile price swings based on team performance and anticipated fan spending on items like chicken, beer, and viewing parties, effectively becoming a stock market reflecting fan sentiment. The **ticket resale market** has become a sophisticated arena for arbitrage. Prices fluctuate wildly based on team draws and star power, with sellers sometimes listing tickets they don't yet own in a practice akin to short-selling, while FIFA's own "Right to Buy" tokens add another layer of speculative trading. **Collectibles and merchandise** offer another avenue. Panini sticker albums, with their inherent scarcity and nostalgic value, can become high-value collectibles. Limited-edition or locally themed jerseys command significant premiums on secondary markets, and even counterfeit vendors profit from fans' desire for affordable match-day identity. The **cryptocurrency** space has seen a frenzy of speculative, unauthorized World Cup-themed meme coins on chains like Solana. These tokens, often exploiting team names and player imagery, experience extreme pump-and-dump cycles, creating stories of massive gains for a few early entrants and steep losses for many others. Finally, an entire industry thrives on **providing information and tools** to other speculators. Developers create platforms like SeatSidekick to track ticket inventory and prices, while paid Telegram groups and subscriptions sell betting tips and predictions, monetizing the widespread desire for an informational edge. In essence, the World Cup has become a compressed, global laboratory for speculation. While the games determine champions on the field, a parallel, complex network of financial transactions—spanning prediction contracts, bets, stocks, tickets, collectibles, crypto, and information services—settles its own scores in the global market.

marsbitHá 32m

Beyond the Stadium: The Profitable Games Surrounding the World Cup

marsbitHá 32m

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHá 2h

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHá 2h

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbitHá 2h

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片