JPMorgan Closes the 'Financial Backdoor': Stablecoin Cross-Border Payments Face Compliance Reshuffle

比推Publicado em 2025-12-29Última atualização em 2025-12-29

Resumo

JPMorgan Chase has recently frozen accounts linked to at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups, Blindpay and Kontigo, highlighting the risks cryptocurrency transactions pose to banks. These startups, backed by Y Combinator, primarily served Latin American markets, including Venezuela—a region under U.S. sanctions. The bank’s a surge in disputed transactions, such as chargebacks and fraud claims, triggered the freezes. Checkbook, a payments partner that provided these firms virtual account access to JPMorgan, noted that the startups failed to adequately verify their end customers' identities or ensure transaction legitimacy. While JPMorgan stated the action wasn’t due to the nature of stablecoin businesses, the incident underscores broader regulatory concerns. U.S. and global authorities have warned that stablecoins are being used for money laundering, terrorism financing, and other illicit activities. Both affected startups abruptly tightened compliance measures or terminated high-risk clients after the account closures.

Written by: Michael Roddan, Yueqi Yang

Compiled by: Block Unicorn

Original Title: Stablecoin Startups Bring Trouble to JPMorgan


JPMorgan has recently frozen accounts used by at least two fast-growing stablecoin startups in recent months, highlighting the risks that cryptocurrency transactions pose to banks, which must understand the customers they do business with and the sources of their funds.

These stablecoin startups operate in Venezuela and other regions where sanctions or other restrictions pose legal risks to banks. One of the stablecoin startups once claimed that customers did not need identity verification before transactions. Another startup, after JPMorgan froze its account, suddenly terminated all customers from high-risk countries, according to the company's communication records with customers.

Stablecoins have surged in popularity overseas, especially in countries with unstable economies and currencies. Last summer, the U.S. passed a stablecoin bill, giving this type of cryptocurrency pegged to the U.S. dollar legal status.

Individuals and businesses use stablecoins to obtain U.S. dollars and make overseas remittances. They need to establish connections with U.S. banks to convert cryptocurrencies into U.S. dollars. However, banks are cautious, fearing penalties from regulators even during the Trump administration, which supported cryptocurrencies. Global and U.S. regulators and law enforcement agencies have stated that stablecoins have been used to fund terrorist organizations, launder money, and engage in other criminal activities.

JPMorgan froze the accounts of two startups invested in by venture capital firm Y Combinator—Blindpay and Kontigo—both primarily focused on the Latin American market. These two companies connected with JPMorgan through the digital payment company Checkbook, which is also supported by JPMorgan and other institutions.

Blindpay has processed over $100 million in transactions. In August of this year, the company began offering an account through JPMorgan aimed at helping customers overcome barriers to entering the U.S. financial system. Blindpay stated in a blog post at the time that obtaining loans from U.S. banks was 'much harder than imagined.'

Later that day, JPMorgan and Checkbook froze Blindpay's account. According to a series of now-deleted blog posts on the company's website, the stablecoin company quickly began strengthening anti-money laundering measures and customer verification. Blindpay did not respond to requests for comment.

Last year, Checkbook joined JPMorgan's payment partner network, enabling Checkbook to process payments for its customers through JPMorgan. For this purpose, Checkbook creates virtual accounts for its customers at JPMorgan.

Virtual accounts allow fintech companies like Checkbook to quickly open U.S. dollar-denominated accounts for overseas customers and business clients, avoiding situations where they cannot access the U.S. banking system for various reasons. Under U.S. law, businesses opening bank accounts in the U.S. must provide proof of their operations in the U.S. and a physical U.S. address.

Virtual accounts have become a popular service offered by stablecoin companies like Blindpay. Checkbook's accounts have opened a backdoor for these small stablecoin companies to enter the U.S. financial system. Soon after, JPMorgan noticed a sharp increase in the number of disputed transactions (i.e., refunds and chargebacks). Chargebacks can arise from fraud, unauthorized use, and billing errors, especially when cardholders report identity theft or dispute purchases. It is unclear why these companies experienced a surge in disputed transactions. JPMorgan has contacted Checkbook for an explanation.

Checkbook CEO PJ Gupta stated that companies like Blindpay and Kontigo were among the reasons for the rise in chargeback rates. Gupta pointed out that these companies need to ensure that transactions processed through their systems are legitimate and valid and verify the identities of remitting customers. Gupta also mentioned that while Checkbook conducts customer due diligence on the stablecoin companies themselves, due diligence on the customers is the responsibility of these companies.

Gupta stated that when disputed transactions exceed a certain threshold, Checkbook and JPMorgan freeze customer accounts. 'In such cases, we suspend operations and conduct an analysis until we obtain assurances. We send the assurances to the bank, and if both the bank and we agree that the issue will not recur, we can reopen the account. If we cannot reach an agreement, we will not reopen the account,' Gupta said.

Gupta mentioned that transactions from stablecoin companies account for only a small portion of Checkbook's total transaction volume, which exceeds $1 billion per month. He stated that the disputed transactions that prompted JPMorgan's action were due to a large influx of customers using the services provided by stablecoin companies. 'It was entirely because they opened the floodgates, and a large number of people rushed in through the internet,' Gupta said, referring to the disputed transactions of these startups.

Venezuela Sanctions

JPMorgan stated that freezing the accounts of these stablecoin companies was not due to the nature of their business. 'This has nothing to do with stablecoin companies,' a JPMorgan spokesperson said. 'We provide banking services to stablecoin issuers and related businesses, and we recently facilitated the listing of a stablecoin issuer.' Beyond this, the bank declined to comment further.

Kontigo, which raised $20 million from several venture capital firms including Y Combinator and Founders Inc., is one of two cryptocurrency platforms authorized by Venezuelan regulators to operate in the country. Kontigo focuses on serving Venezuelan customers, and its founders claim the company has processed over $1 billion in transactions. Over the past two decades, the U.S. has imposed sanctions on certain sectors of Venezuela's economy, the government, and individuals, and President Donald Trump has been increasing pressure on Venezuela's ruling authorities.

In a promotional video released by Kontigo this month, the company claimed: 'In just 30 seconds, individuals and businesses worldwide can transact using USDC and USDT stablecoins without KYC (Know Your Customer). Users can link bank accounts and instantly transfer funds globally without limits.' Kontigo co-founder Jesus Castillo stated that customers do not need to submit identity verification for cryptocurrency transactions, but identity verification is required for transactions involving fiat currency.

According to Kontigo's communication records with customers, JPMorgan suddenly froze the company's account in November. Checkbook CEO Gupta stated that the account freeze was due to a significant increase in the number of disputed transactions. Castillo, however, said that his startup and other similar companies are facing issues caused by Checkbook.

The role Kontigo plays in transferring funds out of Venezuela was highlighted in a recent report by Transparencia Venezuela, the Venezuelan chapter of Transparency International. The report stated that users could deposit up to $100,000 into Kontigo's digital wallet through private banks in Venezuela without any identity checks on the depositor. Castillo called these claims false and stated that the company has filed a lawsuit against the nonprofit. Transparencia Venezuela did not comment.

He mentioned that Kontigo also uses Bridge, owned by Stripe, to provide virtual accounts for some of its users in the U.S. and Europe. Castillo did not respond to questions about Kontigo's compliance controls. Bridge declined to comment.

After JPMorgan froze Blindpay's account, the stablecoin company's CEO and co-founder Simon Moura and co-founder João Borges flew to San Francisco to meet with an investor from Y Combinator and search for a new payment processor or bank willing to work with them.

'Unfortunately, we were rejected by this promising payment processor because they are still reluctant to work with stablecoin companies,' Moura wrote in a now-deleted blog post. Moura also visited JPMorgan's office to explain how Blindpay operates.

Due to issues with due diligence, Blindpay's potential customer base appears to have significantly shrunk. First, the company stated in a later-deleted blog post that customers from 'high-risk countries' would need to 'undergo stricter KYC processes,' referring to the 'Know Your Customer' regulatory system applicable to banks. A few days later, Blindpay announced that, after a round of due diligence, all its virtual accounts and related crypto wallets had been closed.


Twitter: https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

BitPush TG Discussion Group: https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

BitPush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link: https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7598958

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did JPMorgan freeze the accounts of stablecoin startups like Blindpay and Kontigo?

AJPMorgan froze the accounts due to a significant increase in disputed transactions, such as chargebacks and refunds, which raised concerns about compliance and potential risks, including fraud and unauthorized use.

QWhat role did Checkbook play in the relationship between JPMorgan and the stablecoin startups?

ACheckbook, a digital payments company, acted as an intermediary by providing virtual accounts through JPMorgan, allowing stablecoin startups to access the U.S. financial system. However, Checkbook relied on the startups to conduct their own customer due diligence.

QHow did the stablecoin startups like Kontigo and Blindpay initially attract customers, and what compliance issues arose?

AKontigo initially advertised no KYC (Know Your Customer) requirements for cryptocurrency transactions, while Blindpay faced issues with inadequate identity verification. This led to compliance risks, including potential money laundering and violations of sanctions, especially in high-risk regions like Venezuela.

QWhat impact did the U.S. sanctions on Venezuela have on Kontigo's operations?

AKontigo, which focused on serving Venezuelan customers, faced challenges due to U.S. sanctions on Venezuela. Its role in facilitating fund transfers out of Venezuela drew scrutiny, as it was accused of allowing large deposits without proper identity verification, though the company denied these claims.

QWhat broader concerns do regulators and law enforcement agencies have regarding stablecoins?

ARegulators and law enforcement agencies worry that stablecoins are being used for illicit activities, such as funding terrorist organizations, money laundering, and other criminal endeavors, due to potential loopholes in compliance and verification processes.

Leituras Relacionadas

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

"Hook Summer" Arrives? Sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite Uniswap v4 Narrative Amidst a slight market recovery, attention within the Ethereum ecosystem has shifted to Meme coins built on Uniswap v4's Hook protocol. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD have become market focal points, with market caps ranging from millions to tens of millions, bringing concentrated liquidity to a narrative-dry market. Uniswap v4 Hooks are "plugin smart contracts" that allow developers to inject custom logic at key points in a liquidity pool's lifecycle (initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps, etc.), making the AMM programmable. Recent representative projects include: * **sato**: Market cap peaked over $38M; uses a v4 curve mechanism for minting/burning, locking ETH as reserve. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, positioning as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Market cap neared $6.6M; a "lending AMM protocol" allowing users to borrow ETH against deposited LO0P tokens without immediate selling pressure. * **FLOOD**: Market cap approached $6M; channels trading reserves into Aave v3 to generate yield, which is retained in the pool. The emergence of these Hook-based tokens could drive long-term growth for the Uniswap ecosystem by attracting users and liquidity to v4 pools. Combined with Uniswap's activated fee switch (partially used to burn UNI), the long-term outlook for UNI appears positive. However, short-term UNI price appreciation is not directly guaranteed. Factors include the sustainability and lifecycle of these new tokens, their price volatility, overall market conditions, and regulatory pressures. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) lags behind v3 and v2, indicating Hook adoption still requires time to mature. In summary, the Hook ecosystem serves as "long-term nourishment" for UNI, but acts more as a "catalyst" than a direct "booster" in the short term. Note: These are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

marsbitHá 23m

Has Hook Summer Really Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Narrative of Uniswap v4

marsbitHá 23m

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

With the broader market showing signs of recovery, a new wave of interest has emerged around Ethereum-based meme coins. Following ASTEROID, tokens like sato, sat1, Lo0p, and FLOOD, built upon the Uniswap v4 Hook protocol, are capturing market attention. Their market capitalizations range from millions to tens of millions of dollars, injecting much-needed focused liquidity into a market lacking narratives. This article explores whether this trend signifies an incoming "Hook Summer" and its potential impact on UNI's price. Hooks are essentially plug-in smart contracts for Uniswap v4 liquidity pools, allowing developers to inject custom logic at key points in a pool's lifecycle (like initialization, adding/removing liquidity, swaps). This transforms the AMM into programmable building blocks. Key highlighted projects include: * **sato**: Peaked over $38M market cap. It utilizes a v4 curve for minting/burning; buying locks ETH as reserve to mint new tokens, while selling redeems ETH from the reserve and burns tokens. * **sat1**: Market cap briefly exceeded $10M, promoted as an "optimized sato," but later declined significantly. * **Lo0p**: Reached nearly $6.6M. It's a lending AMM protocol where buying LO0P tokens locks them as collateral, allowing users to borrow ETH from the pool reserve at 40% LTV, aiming to improve capital efficiency for idle ETH in LPs. * **FLOOD**: Peaked near $6M. Its mechanism directs asset reserves from buys into Aave v3 to generate yield, with fees and interest retained in the pool to potentially influence the token's price long-term. In the long term, the development of the Hook ecosystem can attract users and liquidity to Uniswap v4, benefiting UNI's fundamentals—especially combined with the recent activation of the protocol fee switch, where a portion of fees is used to burn UNI. However, in the short term, these Hook-based tokens are unlikely to directly drive significant UNI price appreciation. Their impact is moderated by factors like token sustainability, price volatility, and broader market and regulatory conditions. Currently, Uniswap v4's TVL ($595M) still trails behind v2 and v3, indicating adoption and growth will take time. The article concludes that while the Hook ecosystem provides long-term "nourishment" for UNI, its short-term role is more of a "catalyst" than a "booster." Readers are cautioned that these are early-stage experimental tokens and may carry unknown risks.

Odaily星球日报Há 35m

Has Hook Summer Truly Arrived? sato, Lo0p, FLOOD Ignite the New Uniswap v4 Narrative

Odaily星球日报Há 35m

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Said We'd Sell Bitcoin, But Never Be a Net Seller In a recent podcast, MicroStrategy Executive Chairman Michael Saylor clarified the company's stance on potentially selling Bitcoin. Following MicroStrategy's earnings call statement about being prepared to sell BTC to fund dividends for its STRC (Strategic) credit product, Saylor emphasized the distinction between selling and being a "net seller." Saylor explained the core business model: MicroStrategy sells credit instruments like STRC and uses the proceeds to buy Bitcoin, which is viewed as "digital capital" expected to appreciate around 30-40% annually. A portion of these capital gains can then be used to pay the dividends on the credit products. He stressed that even if the company sells some Bitcoin for dividends, it simultaneously buys much more with new credit issuance. For example, after raising $3.2 billion from STRC sales in April, the dividend obligation was only $80-90 million, making the company a net buyer. The clarification aims to counter market narratives questioning the value of Bitcoin on MicroStrategy's balance sheet if it were never sold, and to dismiss claims of a "Ponzi scheme." Saylor reiterated his personal philosophy for investors: "Don't be a net seller of bitcoin" and ensure your Bitcoin holdings increase each year. Saylor also discussed Bitcoin's role as the foundation for "digital credit," noting that STRC has become the largest and most liquid preferred stock issue in the U.S., offering high risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio). He highlighted Bitcoin's deep liquidity, stating that even large purchases by MicroStrategy do not move the market significantly, which is driven by macro factors, geopolitical tensions, and capital flows from ETFs and credit products. Finally, Saylor reflected on his early inspiration from sci-fi books, which motivated his path to MIT, and maintained his fundamental thesis on Bitcoin remains unchanged: it is superior digital capital enabling superior digital credit.

链捕手Há 39m

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I Would Sell Bitcoin, But Never a Net Sale

链捕手Há 39m

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片