Hyperliquid’s market share surges to 33% – Can HYPE target $36 next?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-01-31Última atualização em 2026-01-31

Resumo

Hyperliquid's market share surged from 18% in December to 33% by the end of January, driven by the introduction and success of its equity and commodity perpetuals (perps). Non-crypto assets, such as silver and gold, now account for 30% of the platform's trading volume, positioning it as a key cross-asset trading platform. This growth has positively impacted the native token HYPE, with increased trading volume generating higher fees, which fuel token buybacks and burns. Weekly revenue rose from $11 million to $15.5 million, and HYPE's price increased by 70%. Maintaining support above $28 could lead to a breakout toward $36, while a drop below may push it back to the $20-$28 range.

Hyperliquid [HYPE] has regained a portion of the market share it lost in 2025 following heated competition from Aster [ASTER], Lighter [LIT], and other rivals.

According to Dune data, the platform’s market dominance rose from a recent low of 18% seen in December to over 33% at the end of January.

That’s a 15% jump in market share, thanks to booming equity perpetuals (perps) that have positioned it as a key cross-asset platform.

How equity perps fueled Hyperliquid’s growth

Hyperliquid was initially focused on crypto perps or derivatives that allow traders to speculate on prices with leverage.

They are called perpetuals because they don’t expire with strict deadlines like Options, so one can hold them indefinitely, provided they pay fees to keep the positions open.

The platform unveiled a similar offering for equity and commodities via an upgrade, HIP-3, enabled by third-party integrations.

Interestingly, the recently volatile precious metals market has cemented Hyperliquid as a crucial cross-asset trading platform.

On Friday, silver and gold ranked among the top five assets by trading volume on Hyperliquid. Silver traded $3 billion in volume, while gold closed at nearly $700 million. The other top assets were Bitcoin, Ethereum, and HYPE, while Solana [SOL] ranked sixth.

According to crypto VC partner and trader McKenna, 30% of Hyperliquid’s overall trading volume is driven by non-crypto assets. He added,

“Let me repeat, Hyperliquid will bring in more daily volume from TradFi perpetuals than digital asset perpetuals.”

Impact of the equity perps boom on HYPE

The equity perps boom was expected to be net positive for the native token, HYPE.

It is a bullish catalyst because the higher the equity perps’ trading volume climbs, the more fees are generated, which drives HYPE buybacks and burns.

In fact, DeFiLlama data showed the positive correlation between the recent rebound in generated revenue, perps volume, and HYPE price.

The average weekly revenue has increased from $11 million to $15.5 million, and the HYPE price has mooned by 70% over the same period.

On the price charts, the altcoin had given back some of the gains amid bearish pressure on Bitcoin. But defending $28 zone as support could reinforce a potential breakout above $36 if the equity perps’ traction extends.

However, breaking below $28 support would invalidate the bullish outlook and trap HYPE back in the December price range of $20-$28.

Final Thoughts

Hyperliquid’s market share has increased from 18% to 33% amid equity and commodity perps trading surge
Non-crypto assets now account for 32% of Hyperliquid’s overall trading volumes

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was Hyperliquid's market share at the end of January, and what was this a significant increase from?

AHyperliquid's market share rose to over 33% at the end of January, which was a significant increase from a recent low of 18% seen in December.

QWhat new type of perpetuals, introduced via HIP-3, was a key driver behind Hyperliquid's recent growth?

AThe introduction of equity and commodities perpetuals (perps) via the HIP-3 upgrade was a key driver behind Hyperliquid's recent growth.

QAccording to the data, what percentage of Hyperliquid's overall trading volume is now driven by non-crypto assets?

AAccording to the data, 30% of Hyperliquid's overall trading volume is now driven by non-crypto assets.

QHow does the increase in trading volume from equity perps directly benefit the native token, HYPE?

AThe increase in trading volume generates more fees, which are used to drive HYPE token buybacks and burns, making it a bullish catalyst for the token's price.

QWhat is the critical price level for HYPE that, if broken, would invalidate the bullish outlook and trap it in its December price range?

AThe critical price level is $28. Breaking below this support would invalidate the bullish outlook and could trap HYPE back in the December price range of $20-$28.

Leituras Relacionadas

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

The meme coin competition is shifting from community hype to technological and ecosystem advantages. This analysis contrasts Bonk, an established token on the Solana network known for its speed and low costs, with the newer Little Pepe ($LILPEPE), currently in its presale phase. Bonk leverages its mature community and Solana's infrastructure, while Little Pepe differentiates itself with a Layer 2 Ethereum solution promising tax-free trading, staking rewards, and enhanced scalability. To drive engagement, Little Pepe is offering substantial giveaways totaling $777,000. Both coins, despite their different strategies—Bonk as a proven ecosystem and Little Pepe as an early-stage utility project—are capturing significant market attention as demand surges.

TheNewsCryptoHá 37m

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

TheNewsCryptoHá 37m

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

A US law enforcement task force has frozen over $700 million in cryptocurrency linked to investment scams targeting Americans. The operation, which involved cooperation from crypto exchanges and legal processes, also took down more than 500 fraudulent websites and a Telegram channel used to recruit victims. Two Chinese nationals were named in arrest warrants for operating a scam compound in Burma. In a related move, the US State Department announced a $10 million reward for information disrupting scam centers in Burma. Singaporean authorities, alongside major crypto exchanges and analytics firms, also prevented nearly $3 million in losses through a parallel operation. The scale of cybercrime remains vast, with the FBI reporting over $20 billion in losses in 2025.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

bitcoinistHá 1h

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that the Toncoin (TON) network will reduce transaction fees by six times in one week, lowering the cost to just 0.00039 TON (approximately $0.0005). This fee reduction is part of the "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA) roadmap and will remain fixed regardless of network congestion. The update follows a recent upgrade that made the network 10 times faster and transactions nearly instant. Durov also hinted that future steps aim to make most transactions fully feeless. Although Telegram discontinued formal involvement with TON due to regulatory issues, Durov remains a strong supporter. Currently, Toncoin is trading around $1.30, down over 8% in the past week.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

bitcoinistHá 2h

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHá 2h

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHá 2h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHá 3h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets