Hyperliquid: Should HYPE investors wait as price nears $32 zone?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-04-02Última atualização em 2026-04-02

Resumo

Hyperliquid (HYPE) has continued its short-term downtrend, falling below the key $37 support level on April 2nd. Despite previous bounces, none of the recent rebounds were strong enough to push the price toward the local high of $43.7. The broader market sentiment remains pessimistic, with Bitcoin and other altcoins also facing selling pressure. The long-term structure, however, remains bullish. HYPE experienced a significant rally in 2025, nearly reaching $60, before pulling back to $20 by year-end. The recent rise to $43.7 is considered part of a new bullish wave, with the current retracement viewed as a temporary setback. Key Fibonacci retracement levels suggest further potential declines toward the $29.5–$32.44 zone, which long-term buyers are eyeing as a demand area. Technical indicators, including the RSI below 50 and a negative CMF reading of -0.15, reflect bearish momentum and capital outflows. Traders are advised to wait rather than rush into buying. A move above $41.59 would invalidate the current bearish retracement outlook and signal potential new highs. Until then, investors should monitor the $29–$32 range for a buying opportunity.

Hyperliquid [HYPE] continued its short-term downtrend to fall below the $37 level on the 2nd of April. Since the 15th of March, $37 has acted as a reliable short-term support.

Each retest has seen a price bounce, but none of the bounces of the past two weeks were enough to drive prices to the local highs at $43.7. The final week of March saw a move above the psychological $40 mark, but the bears were quick to seize control of the trends thereafter.

At the same time, Bitcoin [BTC] and many prominent crypto altcoins were posting losses and reeling under selling pressure. The market sentiment remained extremely pessimistic.

Does this mean HYPE investors should sell and wait for the downtrend to continue?

HYPE investors should not miss THIS chance

While the recent Hyperliquid token price losses seem grievous, they might just be part of a retracement. The long-term structure showed that HYPE saw a rally in 2025 that nearly reached $60, then pulled back to $20 by year-end.

The push higher to $43.7 since then has been part of the next bullish wave higher. The rally in March saw a pullback over the past two weeks, and this retracement could continue for a bit longer.

The Fibonacci retracement levels plotted for the most recent swing move higher from $25.6 showed that there was more space for HYPE to fall. The $32.44 and $29.5 were the levels in the golden pocket that long-term buyers will want to keep an eye on.

Yet, they shouldn’t rush to buy, either. At press time, the RSI showed that the momentum had turned bearish, with the RSI sliding below neutral 50. The CMF also reflected hefty capital outflows from the market, with a reading of -0.15.

Traders’ call to action: Wait

The 4-hour chart showed a bearish structure in place for HYPE. The lower high it set below $42 on the 25th of March was the swing high on this timeframe. Meanwhile, the $29.55-$32.5 zone remained the demand zone for buyers to defend.

A move back above $41.59 is needed to prove this retracement idea wrong and show that the token has what it takes to make new highs past $43.7. Until this happens, long-term investors can wait for the retracement to end before buying.

Final Summary

The long-term Hyperliquid token price trend was bullish, but the current short-term trend was bearish.
The current sell-off comes with the longer-term structure’s pullback. Therefore, investors with a time horizon will be watching the $29-$32 demand zone.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat key support level did Hyperliquid (HYPE) fall below on April 2nd, which had been reliable since mid-March?

AHyperliquid fell below the $37 support level on April 2nd, which had acted as a reliable short-term support since March 15th.

QAccording to the Fibonacci retracement levels, which two price zones are identified as the 'golden pocket' for potential long-term buying opportunities?

AThe Fibonacci retracement levels identified the $32.44 and $29.5 price zones as the 'golden pocket' for potential long-term buying opportunities.

QWhat two indicators are mentioned as showing bearish momentum and capital outflows for HYPE at press time?

AAt press time, the RSI had slid below the neutral 50 level, indicating bearish momentum, and the CMF had a reading of -0.15, reflecting hefty capital outflows.

QWhat price does HYPE need to move back above to prove the current retracement idea wrong and signal potential for new highs?

AHYPE needs to move back above $41.59 to prove the current retracement idea wrong and show potential to make new highs above $43.7.

QWhat is the overall recommendation for long-term HYPE investors based on the article's final summary?

AThe overall recommendation for long-term investors is to wait for the current retracement to end and to watch the $29-$32 demand zone as a potential buying opportunity, as the long-term trend remains bullish despite the short-term bearish trend.

Leituras Relacionadas

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHá 4m

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHá 4m

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbitHá 4m

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbitHá 4m

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

Coldcard hardware wallet users are facing a new wave of coordinated attacks targeting a firmware flaw, with researcher Alex Thorn flagging 218 recent transactions moving approximately 389 Bitcoin from potentially impacted addresses. The attack pattern shows a high rate of transactions targeting unique victim addresses, differing from previous waves. The vulnerability, which causes affected devices to generate weaker wallet seeds, is estimated to have impacted over 1,100 wallets, leading to around $90 million in Bitcoin stolen. Thorn advises affected users who control their keys may attempt to move funds with a higher-fee transaction before the attacker's transactions are confirmed.

cointelegraphHá 12m

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

cointelegraphHá 12m

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

Bitcoin miners are capitulating as evidenced by a sustained drop in network hash rate and a record-steep 19.9% decline in mining difficulty, signaling the shuttering of unprofitable machines. However, in a significant divergence from historical patterns, the stocks of publicly traded mining companies have soared, with one major player gaining over 430% in the past year, even as BTC's price fell roughly 46%. This surge is largely attributed to these companies pivoting toward the more lucrative AI narrative. Simultaneously, miners face a structural squeeze. Daily block reward revenue in BTC terms has hit a new all-time low following the latest halving, with current dollar-denominated daily revenue around $30 million compared to a longer-term average of ~$40 million. Fee revenue remains negligible, covering less than one block's subsidy over a 28-day average and accounting for only about ten minutes of the network's daily security budget. This capitulation cycle is unique: miner stress and crypto price weakness have decoupled due to alternative revenue streams (AI), while the long-term reliance on increasing bitcoin prices to offset shrinking subsidies continues, with fee income still far from filling the impending gap.

marsbitHá 15m

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

marsbitHá 15m

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHá 15m