How to View the Divergence Between Gold and Oil Prices?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-03-23Última atualização em 2026-03-23

Resumo

The article analyzes the divergence between gold and oil prices following the outbreak of the U.S.-Iran war. While oil prices surged significantly, gold experienced a decline, contrary to expectations given its traditional role as a safe-haven asset during geopolitical crises. Gold serves three primary hedging functions: against geopolitical risk, inflation risk, and U.S. dollar risk. Since late 2023, gold had been in a strong bull market, rising from $1,800 to over $5,000, driven by simultaneous geopolitical tensions (e.g., Russia-Ukraine war, Middle East conflicts), inflationary pressures, and a weakening dollar due to the Fed's premature rate cuts. However, after the U.S. "decapitation" strike on Iran, gold prices fell sharply. This was attributed to two main factors: a shift of capital from gold to oil, as investors repositioned portfolios to capitalize on rising oil prices, and a liquidity crisis in U.S. financial markets that forced large-scale sell-offs of gold—a highly liquid asset—to meet redemption demands. More critically, growing pessimism about a prolonged U.S.-Iran conflict raised fears of sustained high oil prices, potential global economic disruption, and a possible reversal of Fed monetary policy (delayed cuts or even renewed hikes). This expectation of tighter policy caused gold’s dollar-related hedging function to reverse, overwhelming its geopolitical and inflation hedging roles and leading to a severe correction. Oil prices also experienced volatility...

Since the outbreak of the US-Iran war, as two commodities highly correlated with geopolitics, crude oil and gold have shown completely different trends: the former has risen sharply, while the latter has fallen slightly. Why is this?

As a natural currency, gold has three major hedging functions: hedging against geopolitical risks, inflation risks, and US dollar risks. The price of gold is simultaneously influenced by these three forces, thus playing varying degrees of hedging roles at different stages.

Since the end of 2023, precious metals have experienced a super bull market, with the price of gold soaring from $1,800 to over $5,000. The reason for such strong upward momentum is that gold simultaneously served as a hedge against geopolitical risks, inflation risks, and US dollar risks.

In October 2023, on top of the Russia-Ukraine war, large-scale conflicts broke out between Israel and Palestine, plunging the Middle East into turmoil. In 2024, the Red Sea crisis erupted, and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait was blockaded. In 2025, Trump took office, and the international order became precarious. These are all manifestations of chaotic geopolitical situations, providing strong support for the price of gold.

On the other hand, in 2023, the US economy shifted from overheating to stagflation. By 2024, influenced by political factors, the Federal Reserve boldly initiated an interest rate-cutting cycle before inflation issue was fully resolved, leading to a resurgence of US dollar liquidity. On one hand, there was mid-cycle easing, and on the other, the risk of secondary inflation. Gold simultaneously served as a hedge against US dollar risks and inflation risks, fueling the takeoff of gold prices.

With all three hedging functions in place, how could the price of gold not rise? In addition, benefiting from the Federal Reserve's easing cycle, both emerging and developed markets, whether in A-shares or US stocks, experienced a bull market.

Now, regarding oil prices, last year's average oil price was significantly lower than the previous year. This was because after Trump took office, he persuaded OPEC to significantly increase crude oil production in an attempt to force Russia to make concessions at the negotiating table. This strategy initially worked, with Putin repeatedly softening his stance on peace talks. If not for the US-Iran war, it was expected that Russia and Ukraine would sign a ceasefire agreement in the first half of this year.

Since the outbreak of the Middle East war, the prices of gold and oil have experienced multiple fluctuations, with their trends diverging due to different causes.

For gold, in mid-to-late January (half a month before the war), as the probability of a US-Iran conflict continued to rise, the price of gold increased, reflecting its geopolitical hedging attribute. According to the market's mainstream expectations at the time, this conflict might be similar to last year's "Midnight Hammer" operation, with a short duration, making it more of a temporary trend.

After the US carried out a "decapitation" strike on Iran, the price of gold rebounded briefly but soon plummeted. This was because the main force shifted from gold to crude oil. Due to the excessive concentration of gold holdings earlier, the main funds chose to sell gold to obtain liquidity for going long on crude oil. In other words, the "position switching" from gold to crude oil led to a fall in gold and a rise in oil.

On the other hand, as overseas markets began to price in a prolonged US-Iran war, risk assets such as US stocks came under pressure, triggering a wave of redemptions. The US financial market faced a liquidity crisis, and as an asset with liquidity second only to cash, gold was heavily sold. In other words, the selling pressure on gold in early March was not because international investors were bearish on gold but rather a self-preservation strategy amid the liquidity crisis.

If it were just a liquidity crisis, the price of gold would often form a "deep V" trend, providing buying opportunities. However, the more troublesome part came later. Since mid-March, overseas expectations for the US-Iran conflict have become more pessimistic, with concerns not only about the potential long-term blockade of the strait but also about the possibility of warring parties launching large-scale attacks on each other's energy facilities. This would keep oil prices at relatively high levels for an extended period, dealing a devastating blow to the global economy and even causing the collapse of the international order. In such a scenario, the Federal Reserve might delay its interest rate-cutting pace or even restart a rate-hiking cycle as it did in 2022. Based on this expectation, the price of gold plummeted, with the extent of the correction breaking the highest record in recent years.

In other words, gold's geopolitical hedging function is still at play, but the current sharp decline in gold prices is driven by expectations of a reversal in the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. The US dollar anti-hedging attribute of gold has overshadowed its geopolitical and inflation hedging attributes, becoming its main driver. Compared to previous declines, the fundamentals of gold have changed. It is no longer a liquidity crisis or profit-taking but rather overseas concerns about the tightening of the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. These concerns are also reflected in risk assets such as A-shares and US stocks, as no one is spared when disaster strikes.

Since the outbreak of the US-Iran war, oil prices have also experienced twists and turns. The reason for this volatility is that overseas investors' perception of geopolitics has deviated. After the "decapitation" strike, oil prices continued to rise, reaching nearly $120 per barrel. However, in early March, as Trump hinted that "the war will end soon," the market began executing "TACO" trades, believing that the Iran situation might ease, and oil prices once plummeted by 30%. However, unlike tariff issues, the initiative in a geopolitical crisis does not lie with Trump. He cannot extricate himself easily while the strait is blockaded. Eventually, the market corrected its expectations for oil, and prices returned to an upward trend.

On geopolitical issues, the market sometimes makes misjudgments, but such pricing deviations are not necessarily bad. A drop in oil prices can反而 provide opportunities to add positions, making it easier for latecomers to enter the market.

Looking ahead, the trends of gold and oil prices will depend on the pace of the US-Iran conflict. If it evolves into a prolonged war like the Russia-Ukraine conflict, gold may lack配置 value in the first half of the year, and in the short term, one might focus on the energy chain. However, the situation could still reverse. The US-Iran war may reach a critical turning point, which will determine whether the Strait of Hormuz can be unblocked in the short term. It all depends on Trump's choice.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what are the three main safe-haven functions of gold?

AThe three main safe-haven functions of gold are: hedging against geopolitical risks, hedging against inflation risks, and hedging against U.S. dollar risks.

QWhat event in 2025 is mentioned as a factor contributing to the chaotic geopolitical situation that supported gold prices?

ADonald Trump taking office in 2025 is mentioned as a factor that made the international order precarious, contributing to the chaotic geopolitical situation.

QWhy did the price of gold fall sharply after the U.S. 'decapitation' strike on Iran, as explained in the article?

AThe price fell because major funds switched from gold to crude oil, selling gold to obtain liquidity for oil positions. Additionally, a liquidity crisis in U.S. financial markets led to large-scale selling as gold is a highly liquid asset.

QWhat was the main reason for the significant drop in gold prices from mid-March onwards, according to the analysis?

AThe main reason was the market's expectation that the Federal Reserve might delay interest rate cuts or even restart a rate hike cycle due to concerns that the U.S.-Iran conflict could keep oil prices high and severely impact the global economy.

QWhat does the article suggest is the key factor that will determine the future trends of gold and oil prices?

AThe future trends of gold and oil prices will depend on the pace and development of the U.S.-Iran conflict, specifically whether it becomes a protracted war like in Ukraine and the critical issue of whether the Strait of Hormuz can be unblocked in the short term.

Leituras Relacionadas

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

South Korea's cryptocurrency industry is engaged in a rare, direct confrontation with regulators. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the primary anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog, has recently imposed heavy penalties on major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb for alleged violations involving unregistered overseas VASPs and AML procedures. However, exchanges are now actively challenging these actions in court and through industry associations. In a significant shift, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of Upbit's operator, Dunamu, overturning part of an FIU-ordered business suspension. The court found the FIU's penalty criteria and justification insufficiently clear. Similarly, the court suspended the enforcement of a six-month business suspension against Bithumb pending a final ruling, citing potential irreversible harm to the exchange. Beyond legal battles, the industry is contesting proposed legislative amendments. The Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) strongly opposes a draft rule that would mandate Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) for all crypto transfers over 10 million KRW (~$6,800). DAXA argues this "poison pill" clause violates legal principles and would overwhelm the STR system, increasing reports from 63,000 to an estimated 5.45 million annually for major exchanges, thereby crippling effective AML monitoring. This conflict highlights a structural tension in South Korea's crypto governance: comprehensive digital asset laws are still developing, while regulators rely heavily on AML enforcement. The industry's move from passive compliance to active legal and legislative challenges signifies a new phase, pressing for clearer rules and more proportionate enforcement. While short-term disputes may intensify, this clash could ultimately lead to a more mature and sustainable regulatory framework for South Korea's vibrant crypto market.

marsbitHá 48m

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

marsbitHá 48m

After 50x Storage Surge, Justin Sun Always Looks to the Next Decade

Sun Yuchen, known for his controversial stunts like a $30 million lunch with Warren Buffett (canceled due to a kidney stone) and eating a $6.2 million duct-taped banana, is often overshadowed by a significant fact: his decade-long track record of spotting major investment trends. In 2016, he famously advised young people to invest in Bitcoin, Nvidia, Tesla, and Tencent instead of buying property. A hypothetical $20,000 investment in Nvidia and Tesla from that list would now be worth over 50 million RMB. His latest major call was on November 6, 2025, predicting a "50x storage opportunity" tied to the AI boom, which materialized with Sandisk's stock surging nearly 50-fold by 2026. Looking ahead, Sun now focuses on the next frontier: Physical AI. He identifies four key areas: 1. **Embodied AI/Robotics**: He sees this reaching its "iPhone moment," with companies like UBTech and Galaxy General leading in commercialization. 2. **Drones**: Viewed as the first commercially viable form of Physical AI, revolutionizing sectors from warfare (e.g., AeroVironment's Switchblade) to logistics. 3. **Spatial Computing**: Beyond VR, it's about AI understanding physical space, a foundational technology for robotics and autonomous systems, exemplified by Apple's Vision Pro. 4. **Space Exploration**: After a 2025 suborbital flight with Blue Origin, Sun advocates for space as the ultimate frontier, discussing blockchain's potential role in space asset management and data transactions. His investment philosophy involves betting on entire, inevitable trends rather than single companies. For robotics, he sees Tesla (the body/manufacturer) and Nvidia (the brain/AI platform) as complementary plays. In defense drones, he highlights companies making tanks obsolete (AeroVironment) and those augmenting fighter jets (Kratos). For space, he participated in Blue Origin's flight and anticipates SpaceX's potential IPO to redefine the sector's valuation. Sun Yuchen's vision frames the next two decades not as a revolution in information flow (like the internet), but in the fundamental operation of the physical world through AI-powered robots, autonomous systems, and spatial intelligence, ultimately extending human and AI activity into space. While many still focus on conventional assets, he continues to look toward the next technological horizon.

marsbitHá 1h

After 50x Storage Surge, Justin Sun Always Looks to the Next Decade

marsbitHá 1h

The Billionaires Behind the Most Expensive Midterm Election in History

"The Most Expensive Midterm Elections and Their Billionaire Backers" This analysis details the unprecedented scale of spending in the 2026 midterm elections, highlighting the key billionaire donors shaping the political landscape. Jeff Yass, founder of Susquehanna International Group, has contributed over $81 million, ranking third among individual donors behind George Soros ($102.6M) and Elon Musk ($84.8M). Yass is a major donor to Trump's MAGA Inc. and supports school choice and various candidates. Overall, federal committees have raised over $4.7 billion this cycle, with political ad spending projected to reach $10.8 billion. Republican-aligned groups are significantly out-raising their Democratic counterparts. "Dark money" from undisclosed sources continues to grow. The core stakes involve control of Congress and policy direction for Trump's final term. Donors are also motivated by specific issues: Sergey Brin and Chris Larsen are funding opposition to a proposed California wealth tax and supporting crypto-friendly policies. Other top donors include OpenAI's Greg Brockman and his wife Anna ($50M total to MAGA Inc. and an AI-focused PAC), Richard Uihlein ($45.3M to conservative causes), venture capitalists Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz (each over $44M to crypto/AI PACs and MAGA Inc.), Miriam Adelson ($42.6M to GOP leadership PACs), Paul Singer ($33.9M), and Diane Hendricks ($25.8M to MAGA Inc.). The article notes that the peak fundraising period is still ahead, with major primaries approaching.

marsbitHá 1h

The Billionaires Behind the Most Expensive Midterm Election in History

marsbitHá 1h

The Largest IPO in History Is Approaching, Surpassing SpaceX, 28 Years of AI Self-Iteration, Countdown to Intelligence Explosion

"Anthropic Nears Trillion-Dollar IPO, Fueled by Explosive Growth and 2028 'Intelligence Explosion' Warning Anthropic is considering a deal valuing the AI company near $1 trillion, potentially leading to one of the largest IPOs ever and surpassing SpaceX. Its revenue has skyrocketed, with Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR) reaching $45 billion in May 2026—a 500% increase in just five months. This vertical growth curve is attributed to its key products, Claude Code and Cowork, dominating AI coding and enterprise collaboration. Beyond commercial success, co-founder Jack Clark issued a pivotal warning in an interview: there is a greater than 50% chance that by the end of 2028, AI systems will achieve recursive self-improvement—the ability to autonomously build a 'better version' of themselves, initiating an 'intelligence explosion.' This prophecy underpins the company's astronomical valuation, as the market prices in the potential for transformative and disruptive AI. Further signaling its ambition, Anthropic formed a $1.5 billion joint venture with Goldman Sachs and Blackstone, aiming to disrupt traditional consulting firms like McKinsey by deploying Claude AI for complex strategic work. This move tests AI's capacity to replace high-level cognitive labor, a precursor to its predicted autonomous evolution. The narrative presents a dual future: unprecedented economic opportunity alongside significant risks like economic restructuring and security threats. Anthropic's meteoric rise and Clark's 2028 prediction frame the coming years as a countdown to a potential technological singularity."

marsbitHá 2h

The Largest IPO in History Is Approaching, Surpassing SpaceX, 28 Years of AI Self-Iteration, Countdown to Intelligence Explosion

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar WAR

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de WAR (WAR) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar WAR (WAR) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu WAR (WAR)Depois de comprar o teu WAR (WAR), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona WAR (WAR)Transaciona facilmente WAR (WAR) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

123 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.04.28

Como comprar WAR

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de WAR (WAR) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片