Hong Kong Aims to Act as Global Connector Between Crypto and Traditional Finance

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-02Última atualização em 2026-02-02

Resumo

Hong Kong lawmaker Johnny Ng emphasizes that the city is positioning itself as a global connector between cryptocurrency and traditional finance, rather than competing directly with other nations. He argues that crypto is not a zero-sum game and should function as an interconnected global system. Hong Kong’s advantages include its common law system, English-language courts, and free capital flow, which help build a regulated and trusted crypto environment. The city also leverages the Greater Bay Area, collaborating with hubs like Shenzhen and Macau to combine fundraising and regulatory expertise with technological innovation. Recent efforts include inviting global crypto firms, such as Coinbase, to establish operations in Hong Kong and introducing clearer custody and OTC trading rules to better integrate crypto with institutional and corporate finance.

Johnny Ng, a Hong Kong lawmaker and a strong supporter of Web3 and digital assets, says that Hong Kong is not trying to “Beat” other countries in crypto; instead, it can act as a global connector between crypto markets and traditional finance across the U.S., Europe, and China.

Ng says that crypto should not be treated as the Zero sum game, meaning Crypto doesn’t belong to one country and is global, which works best when it is connected. He also stated that Hong Kong’s goal is to link East and West, Crypto startups and traditional banks, and innovation and regulations.

Why Hong Kong has a strong advantage

According to him, Hong Kong already has the strong advantages of a common law system that the global investors could understand and the English language court, trusted by the international businesses, with a free movement of money in and out of the city. This helps Hong Kong to build a crypto market that is regulated, safer, and accepted by the global financial institutions.

A key part of Hong Kong’s strategy involves the Greater Bay Area, which connects cities and Chinese hubs such as Shenzhen and Macau. Ng explained that Hong Kong helps to raise money and handle rules, whereas these main cities turn ideas into real products, which makes the region powerful.

Inviting the global crypto firms

Ng pointed out that Vitalik Buterin spent a lot of time in Hong Kong during Ethereum’s early stages, which shows that the region has long supported blockchain innovations. In 2023, during the period of strict enforcement by the U.S. regulations, he invited the major crypto companies like Coinbase to operate in Hong Kong.

In 2026, Hong Kong plans to introduce clearer custody rules and regulate OTC crypto trading with larger trading limits for professional investors. Ng says that the next phase is about the infrastructure, and these steps aim to make crypto work smoothly with real businesses and large investors.

Highlighted Crypto News:

XRP Slides Below $1.60 Amid Broader Crypto Market Pullback

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat role does Hong Kong aim to play in the global crypto market according to Johnny Ng?

AHong Kong aims to act as a global connector between crypto markets and traditional finance, linking East and West, crypto startups and traditional banks, and innovation and regulations.

QWhat advantages does Hong Kong have in building a regulated crypto market?

AHong Kong has a common law system, English language courts trusted by international businesses, and free movement of money, which help build a regulated, safer crypto market accepted by global financial institutions.

QHow does the Greater Bay Area contribute to Hong Kong's crypto strategy?

AThe Greater Bay Area connects cities like Shenzhen and Macau, where Hong Kong handles fundraising and regulations while these cities turn ideas into real products, making the region powerful.

QWhat did Johnny Ng do in 2023 regarding global crypto companies?

AIn 2023, during strict U.S. regulations, Johnny Ng invited major crypto companies like Coinbase to operate in Hong Kong.

QWhat regulatory steps is Hong Kong planning for 2026 to support crypto integration?

AIn 2026, Hong Kong plans to introduce clearer custody rules and regulate OTC crypto trading with larger limits for professional investors to make crypto work smoothly with real businesses and large investors.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHá 1h

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHá 1h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Há 1h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Há 1h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHá 3h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHá 3h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Há 5h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Há 5h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHá 6h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'