Hester Peirce Urges Early SEC Talks on Tokenized ETFs

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-17Última atualização em 2026-03-17

Resumo

Hester Peirce, a commissioner at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has urged asset managers and crypto companies to engage with regulators early in the development of tokenized ETFs and other blockchain-based products. She emphasized that the SEC is open to discussing product design proactively rather than taking enforcement action after launch. Peirce encouraged direct submissions of proposals and highlighted the agency’s willingness to consider tailored exemptions for crypto firms. She also addressed the growing interest in tokenization and clarified that the SEC’s role is to ensure compliance with disclosure rules and legal limits, not to judge investment quality. The shift reflects changing perspectives on blockchain technology within the financial industry.

Hester Peirce has urged asset managers to engage regulators to clear a path for new exchange-traded structures and tokenized products.

As per the latest remarks to media and industry audiences, Peirce has publicly invited asset managers and crypto companies to come in and talk as they advance tokenized asset products, indicating that the agency is willing to engage early in product design instead of waiting until later to take enforcement action.

This quick move induced various reporters to reach out to the commissioner for further clarification. Replying to the request, Peirce mentioned that the agency wants companies to submit proposals directly as markets evolve.

Adding more to this, she highlighted the intentions of the agency for a more tailored revolution exemption for crypto firms and discussed oversight of leveraged ETFs. This was after Peirce suggested that companies advancing tokenized instruments involve the SEC during early advancement.

To break down her point for clear understanding, the commissioner further mentioned that they really want crypto firms to actively engage in dialogue with the agency regarding their intention.

The Changed Perspectives

Eventually, she made public the commitment of the SEC to collaborate with sponsors to assess market demand for these products. As per Peirce, blockchain-based securities are still under consideration by asset managers for inclusion in ETFs.

Adding more to this, she highlighted that the SEC prefers direct communication over informal compliance assumptions, further mentioning that staff expect more legal and technical questions as tokenisation surges.

Peirce evaluated that various companies showed heightened interest in tokenisation by submitting constant tokenisation proposals to the SEC. In this situation, she mentioned the perspectives of the people on blockchain technology have changed prominently recently, accepting that many individuals have approached them to highlight various advantages of tokenisation.

Regarding the focus of the SEC on highly leveraged exchange-traded funds, Peirce mentioned that the agency does not judge whether products are good investments but must make sure they comply with disclosure regulations and legal limits.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Zcash (ZEC) Jumps 12%: Can the Momentum Fuel a Bigger Weekly Run?

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat has Hester Peirce urged asset managers to do regarding tokenized products?

AHester Peirce has urged asset managers to engage with regulators early to clear a path for new exchange-traded structures and tokenized products, and to submit proposals directly as markets evolve.

QHow does the SEC prefer to engage with companies developing tokenized asset products?

AThe SEC prefers direct communication and early engagement during product design, rather than waiting until later to take enforcement action.

QWhat did Peirce highlight about the SEC's approach to crypto firms and exemptions?

APeirce highlighted the SEC's intention to provide a more tailored revolution exemption for crypto firms and discussed oversight of leveraged ETFs.

QAccording to Peirce, how have perspectives on blockchain technology changed recently?

APerspectives on blockchain technology have changed prominently, with many individuals approaching the SEC to highlight various advantages of tokenization, and companies have shown heightened interest by submitting constant tokenization proposals.

QWhat is the SEC's focus regarding highly leveraged exchange-traded funds?

AThe SEC does not judge whether products are good investments but ensures they comply with disclosure regulations and legal limits.

Leituras Relacionadas

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

The meme coin competition is shifting from community hype to technological and ecosystem advantages. This analysis contrasts Bonk, an established token on the Solana network known for its speed and low costs, with the newer Little Pepe ($LILPEPE), currently in its presale phase. Bonk leverages its mature community and Solana's infrastructure, while Little Pepe differentiates itself with a Layer 2 Ethereum solution promising tax-free trading, staking rewards, and enhanced scalability. To drive engagement, Little Pepe is offering substantial giveaways totaling $777,000. Both coins, despite their different strategies—Bonk as a proven ecosystem and Little Pepe as an early-stage utility project—are capturing significant market attention as demand surges.

TheNewsCryptoHá 37m

Little Pepe (LILPEPE) vs Bonk—Cross-Chain Meme Coin Battle Heats up as Demand Surges

TheNewsCryptoHá 37m

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

A US law enforcement task force has frozen over $700 million in cryptocurrency linked to investment scams targeting Americans. The operation, which involved cooperation from crypto exchanges and legal processes, also took down more than 500 fraudulent websites and a Telegram channel used to recruit victims. Two Chinese nationals were named in arrest warrants for operating a scam compound in Burma. In a related move, the US State Department announced a $10 million reward for information disrupting scam centers in Burma. Singaporean authorities, alongside major crypto exchanges and analytics firms, also prevented nearly $3 million in losses through a parallel operation. The scale of cybercrime remains vast, with the FBI reporting over $20 billion in losses in 2025.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Crypto Crime Hit Hard: $700 Million Frozen By DOJ Strike Force

bitcoinistHá 1h

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

Telegram founder Pavel Durov announced that the Toncoin (TON) network will reduce transaction fees by six times in one week, lowering the cost to just 0.00039 TON (approximately $0.0005). This fee reduction is part of the "Make TON Great Again" (MTONGA) roadmap and will remain fixed regardless of network congestion. The update follows a recent upgrade that made the network 10 times faster and transactions nearly instant. Durov also hinted that future steps aim to make most transactions fully feeless. Although Telegram discontinued formal involvement with TON due to regulatory issues, Durov remains a strong supporter. Currently, Toncoin is trading around $1.30, down over 8% in the past week.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Toncoin Fees To Drop 6x As Network Moves Toward Feeless Transactions

bitcoinistHá 2h

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

The article "a16z: AI's 'Amnesia' – Can Continual Learning Cure It?" explores the limitations of current large language models (LLMs), which, like the protagonist in the film *Memento*, are trapped in a perpetual present—unable to form new memories after training. While methods like in-context learning (ICL), retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and external scaffolding (e.g., chat history, prompts) provide temporary solutions, they fail to enable true internalization of new knowledge. The authors argue that compression—the core of learning during training—is halted at deployment, preventing models from generalizing, discovering novel solutions (e.g., mathematical proofs), or handling adversarial scenarios. The piece introduces *continual learning* as a critical research direction to address this, categorizing approaches into three paths: 1. **Context**: Scaling external memory via longer context windows, multi-agent systems, and smarter retrieval. 2. **Modules**: Using pluggable adapters or external memory layers for specialization without full retraining. 3. **Weights**: Enabling parameter updates through sparse training, test-time training, meta-learning, distillation, and reinforcement learning from feedback. Challenges include catastrophic forgetting, safety risks, and auditability, but overcoming these could unlock models that learn iteratively from experience. The conclusion emphasizes that while context-based methods are effective, true breakthroughs require models to compress new information into weights post-deployment, moving from mere retrieval to genuine learning.

marsbitHá 2h

a16z: AI's 'Amnesia', Can Continuous Learning Cure It?

marsbitHá 2h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets

An individual manipulated a weather sensor at Paris Charles de Gaulle Airport with a portable heat source, causing a Polymarket weather market to settle at 22°C and earning $34,000. This incident highlights a fundamental issue in prediction markets: when a market aims to reflect reality, it also incentivizes participants to influence that reality. Prediction markets operate on two layers: platform rules (what outcome counts as a win) and data sources (what actually happened). While most focus on rules, the real vulnerability lies in the data source. If reality is recorded through a specific source, influencing that source directly affects market settlement. The article categorizes markets by their vulnerability: 1. **Single-point physical data sources** (e.g., weather stations): Easily manipulated through physical interference. 2. **Insider information markets** (e.g., MrBeast video details): Insiders like team members use non-public information to trade. Kalshi fined a剪辑师 $20,000 for insider trading. 3. **Actor-manipulated markets** (e.g., Andrew Tate’s tweet counts): The subject of the market can control the outcome. Evidence suggests Tate’sociated accounts coordinated to profit. 4. **Individual-action markets** (e.g., WNBA disruptions): A single person can execute an event to profit from their pre-placed bets. Kalshi and Polymarket handle these issues differently. Kalshi enforces strict KYC, publicly penalizes insider trading, and reports to regulators. Polymarket, with its anonymous wallet-based system, has historically been more permissive, arguing that insider information improves market accuracy. However, it cooperated with authorities in the "Van Dyke case," where a user traded on classified government information. The core paradox is reflexivity: prediction markets are designed to discover truth, but their financial incentives can distort reality. The more valuable a prediction becomes, the more likely participants are to influence the event itself. The market ceases to be a mirror of reality and instead shapes it.

marsbitHá 3h

Can a Hair Dryer Earn $34,000? Deciphering the Reflexivity Paradox in Prediction Markets