Grayscale files for NEAR ETF as major altcoins bleed – What’s next?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-01-21Última atualização em 2026-01-21

Resumo

Grayscale Investments has filed with the SEC to convert its Grayscale Near Trust (GSNR) into a spot ETF, the Grayscale Near Trust ETF, aiming to list it on NYSE Arca. This move provides traditional investors direct exposure to NEAR, the native asset of NEAR Protocol, through standard brokerage accounts, bypassing complexities of private trusts. The proposed ETF will feature staking, potentially allowing investors to earn rewards. It has institutional backing, with Coinbase serving as custodian and BNY Mellon handling administration. This filing occurs amid a broader trend of institutional crypto adoption, despite recent market weakness affecting NEAR's price. The altcoin ETF landscape is becoming more competitive, with capital shifting between various assets rather than exiting the market entirely.

The push to give Wall Street direct access to Layer-1 blockchains is growing.

After a year of major ETF filings tied to Solana [SOL] and Ripple [XRP], Grayscale Investments has now turned its attention to NEAR Protocol [NEAR].

In a Form S-1 filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on the 20th of January, Grayscale announced plans to convert its existing Near Trust into a spot ETF.

The proposed product will be renamed the Grayscale Near Trust ETF, signaling that NEAR is moving beyond a developer-focused project and into the institutional spotlight.

Details of Grayscale Near Trust ETF

As per the filing, Grayscale plans to upgrade the Grayscale Near Trust (GSNR) from the OTCQB over-the-counter market to the NYSE Arca exchange.

The firm is following its standard strategy, beginning with private placements for accredited investors, moving into public trading, and ultimately seeking full spot ETF approval.

After the conversion, the ETF will give investors direct exposure to NEAR, the native token of the Near Protocol, through regular brokerage accounts.

This structure removes many of the problems linked to private trusts, including low liquidity and tracking errors. That said, Grayscale has built the proposed ETF with support from major institutional partners.

Coinbase Custody Trust Company will safeguard the NEAR tokens, while BNY Mellon will manage administration and transfer services.

Additional features

The filing also highlights staking as a key feature of the proposed ETF. Unlike Bitcoin [BTC] ETFs, this fund plans to stake NEAR tokens on the network.

This approach could allow the fund to earn staking rewards that may be shared with investors, subject to regulatory approval.

This development comes as NEAR’s price faces short-term pressure. At press time, the token was trading around $1.53, down 1.84% over the past 24 hours as per CoinMarketCap.

However, the drop appears tied to broader market weakness, driven by President Trump’s tariff actions involving Greenland and several European countries.

At the same time, the altcoin ETF market is becoming increasingly divided.

Altcoin ETFs analysis

Data from SoSoValue shows mixed institutional flows. Solana and Chainlink [LINK] saw small inflows of $3.08 million and $4.05 million.

Meanwhile, Ethereum [ETH] experienced heavy outflows of nearly $230 million, followed by XRP at $53.32 million and smaller exits from Dogecoin [DOGE].

This suggests investors are actively shifting capital rather than exiting crypto altogether.

Needless to say, NEAR is not alone in this race. Recently, the Bitwise Chainlink ETF also got launched on NYSE Arca on the 14th of January.

Overall, the fast-growing ETF space suggests that 2026 will not have a single dominant winner. Instead, it may be shaped by a wider group of institutional-grade altcoins.


Final Thoughts

  • Grayscale’s move makes it easier for traditional investors to access NEAR without dealing with wallets or private trusts.
  • For NEAR, this filing is a starting point, not the finish line, with execution now becoming the key focus.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of Grayscale's recent filing with the SEC regarding NEAR Protocol?

AGrayscale Investments filed a Form S-1 to convert its existing Grayscale Near Trust (GSNR) into a spot ETF, called the Grayscale Near Trust ETF, to provide investors with direct exposure to NEAR through regular brokerage accounts.

QWhich two major institutional partners are supporting Grayscale's proposed NEAR ETF, and what are their roles?

ACoinbase Custody Trust Company will safeguard the NEAR tokens, and BNY Mellon will manage administration and transfer services for the proposed ETF.

QHow does the proposed Grayscale Near Trust ETF plan to generate additional returns, unlike Bitcoin ETFs?

AThe proposed ETF plans to stake NEAR tokens on the network, which could allow the fund to earn staking rewards that may be shared with investors, subject to regulatory approval.

QAccording to the article, what was cited as a reason for the short-term price pressure on NEAR and other altcoins?

AThe price drop was tied to broader market weakness, driven by President Trump’s tariff actions involving Greenland and several European countries.

QWhat does the mixed institutional flow data from SoSoValue suggest about investor behavior in the altcoin market?

AThe data shows inflows into Solana and Chainlink alongside heavy outflows from Ethereum and XRP, suggesting investors are actively shifting capital between different cryptocurrencies rather than exiting the crypto market altogether.

Leituras Relacionadas

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHá 37m

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHá 37m

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Há 40m

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Há 40m

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbitHá 1h

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbitHá 1h

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbitHá 1h

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar PUSH

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Push Protocol (PUSH) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Push Protocol (PUSH) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Push Protocol (PUSH)Depois de comprar o teu Push Protocol (PUSH), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Push Protocol (PUSH)Transaciona facilmente Push Protocol (PUSH) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

503 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Como comprar PUSH

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de PUSH (PUSH) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片