Global debt markets show dollar dominance moves in cycles, US Fed says

cointelegraphPublicado em 2025-12-18Última atualização em 2025-12-18

Resumo

A new Federal Reserve discussion paper reveals that the U.S. dollar’s dominance in global debt markets has moved in cycles over the past 60 years, with no clear long-term trend toward either dollarization or de-dollarization. The study identifies three distinct "dollarization waves" since the 1960s, showing currency usage shifts are cyclical rather than structural. As of 2024, emerging markets still rely heavily on dollar-denominated debt, which makes up about 80% of their international bonds. Meanwhile, the rise of dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDT and USDC—which together represent 85% of the $309.6 billion stablecoin market—has reinforced dollar dominance. These stablecoins are backed significantly by U.S. Treasury holdings, making their issuers major holders of U.S. government debt. The report concludes that despite vulnerabilities, the dollar’s global role remains unchallenged due to a lack of alternatives. Efforts to internationalize other currencies, including the Chinese renminbi, have seen limited success. European policymakers have expressed concern over the growing influence of dollar-backed stablecoins.

A new Federal Reserve discussion paper finds that the US dollar’s role in global bond markets has risen and fallen in cycles over the past six decades, with no clear long-term trend toward either greater dollar dominance or de-dollarization.

Using the Bank for International Settlements’ (BIS) international debt securities database, the authors identify three distinct “dollarization waves” since the 1960s, showing that shifts in currency use have followed cyclical patterns rather than a steady structural change in global financing.

“We find no monotonic dollarization or de-dollarization trend; instead, the dollar’s share exhibits a wavelike pattern,” the paper says.

The most recent wave emerged after the 2008 global financial crisis, when the dollar regained market share in international bond issuance, climbing back toward levels seen before the surge in euro-denominated bond issuance in the early 2000s, according to the report.

Share of international debt issued by currency, 2000–2024. Source: Federalreserve.gov

The study also found that, as of 2024, emerging market issuers still rely predominantly on dollar-denominated debt, which accounts for about 80% of their outstanding international bonds, while efforts by China begun in 2010 to internationalize its currency, the renminbi, have produced only modest gains.

“While the dollar’s eminence rests on vulnerable foundations, the absence of viable alternatives has left the dollar’s primacy unchallenged,” the report said.

Related: Intuit to use Circle’s stablecoin for financial platforms

Stablecoins back US Treasurys

The global stablecoin market has expanded sharply over the past year, growing to roughly $309.6 billion from $205.5 billion in December 2024, according to DefiLlama data.

Most of that growth has been concentrated in US dollar-pegged tokens, with Tether’s USDt (USDT) and Circle’s USDC (USDC) together accounting for about 85% of total stablecoin supply, or roughly $264 billion of the market at the time of writing.

Stablecoin market cap. Source: DefiLlama

As dollar-pegged stablecoins have expanded, issuers have become significant holders of short-term US government debt.

In its second-quarter 2025 reserve report, Tether said its exposure to US Treasurys exceeded $127 billion, including $105.5 billion held directly and $21.3 billion held indirectly. According to the company, that level of Treasury holdings places Tether among the largest holders of US government debt.

Circle’s latest transparency report, dated Dec. 15, shows USDC is also backed largely by US government debt instruments, including $49.7 billion in overnight reverse Treasury repos and $18.5 billion in short-term Treasurys.

Circle’s reserves composition. Dec. 15, 2025. Source: Circle

A July report from digital asset bank Sygnum said the US government sees dollar-pegged stablecoins as a means to reinforce the dollar’s role as a global reserve currency and is backing their growth through legislation.

Other countries have taken notice. In April, Italy’s Economy and Finance Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti warned that US policies supporting dollar-backed stablecoins pose a greater long-term risk to Europe’s financial system than trade tariffs, citing their potential to erode the euro’s role in cross-border payments.

In December, a group of 10 European banks said they plan to launch a euro-pegged stablecoin in the second half of 2026.

Magazine: Meet the onchain crypto detectives fighting crime better than the cops

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main finding of the Federal Reserve discussion paper regarding the US dollar's role in global debt markets?

AThe paper finds that the US dollar's role in global bond markets has risen and fallen in cyclical waves over the past six decades, with no clear long-term trend toward either greater dollar dominance or de-dollarization.

QAccording to the report, what percentage of emerging market issuers' outstanding international bonds are denominated in US dollars as of 2024?

AAs of 2024, dollar-denominated debt accounts for about 80% of emerging market issuers' outstanding international bonds.

QWhich two stablecoins dominate the stablecoin market, and what is their combined market share?

ATether's USDt (USDT) and Circle's USDC (USDC) together account for about 85% of the total stablecoin supply.

QHow significant is Tether's holding of US Treasurys, according to its Q2 2025 reserve report?

ATether's exposure to US Treasurys exceeded $127 billion, a level that places it among the largest holders of US government debt.

QWhat concern did Italy's Economy and Finance Minister raise regarding US policies on dollar-backed stablecoins?

AHe warned that US policies supporting dollar-backed stablecoins pose a greater long-term risk to Europe's financial system than trade tariffs, citing their potential to erode the euro's role in cross-border payments.

Leituras Relacionadas

Understanding CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) in One Article: Why Nvidia Is Willing to Spend $3.2 Billion on a Fiber?

NVIDIA and Corning announced a multi-year strategic partnership on May 6, 2026, with NVIDIA committing up to $3.2 billion to support Corning's U.S. expansion. This investment will triple Corning's manufacturing plants and significantly boost its optical fiber and communications production capacity. The core driver behind this massive investment is the fundamental shift from copper to optical interconnect technology within AI data centers. As GPU clusters scale, copper wires face critical limitations: severe signal attenuation over distance, high energy consumption for signal integrity, and excessive heat generation. Optical fiber, transmitting light instead of electrical signals, solves these issues with minimal loss, near-light speed, and lower power needs. The article outlines a three-stage evolution of data center interconnect: 1. **Traditional Copper Interconnects:** The mainstream solution of the 2010s, now being phased out due to scaling bottlenecks. 2. **Pluggable Optical Modules:** The current mainstream, where modules convert electrical signals to light externally. This process still introduces energy loss and latency. 3. **CPO (Co-Packaged Optics):** The next-generation technology where the optical engine is integrated directly with the GPU chip package. This drastically reduces the electrical signal travel distance to mere millimeters, slashing power consumption and latency while boosting data density. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang has identified CPO as an essential core technology for AI infrastructure. NVIDIA's investment signifies a strategic shift from being a buyer to actively controlling its supply chain for critical components. With demand for specialized optical fiber far outstripping supply—evidenced by soaring prices—securing long-term manufacturing capacity has become a competitive necessity. While Corning's expansion may pressure some suppliers, a projected global fiber supply gap of 5-15% over the next few years creates a significant opportunity window, particularly for Chinese manufacturers competitive in optical preforms, chips, and modules. Ultimately, NVIDIA's move is not about chasing a trend but an engineering imperative. The transition to light-based interconnects like CPO is driven by the physical limits of copper, marking a definitive step in the ongoing AI computing revolution.

marsbitHá 4m

Understanding CPO (Co-Packaged Optics) in One Article: Why Nvidia Is Willing to Spend $3.2 Billion on a Fiber?

marsbitHá 4m

KOL's Perspective: Why Is SOL Set to Rise from This Point?

**Summary: Why SOL is Positioned for Growth at This Level** The article argues that SOL is poised for an upward move from its current price point, citing several key factors. Primarily, SOL has just broken out of a 4-month consolidation phase. This breakout signals a return of risk appetite to the broader crypto market, as SOL is seen as a key indicator of overall crypto health. The token's ownership has reportedly shifted from short-term traders and tourists to long-term accumulators, leading to low volume. Any meaningful increase in trading activity could thus trigger significant upward momentum. Fundamental strengths include strong institutional adoption, integration with DeFi and RWAs (Real-World Assets), and the potential benefits from the Clarity Act. Despite its high volatility—having dropped 70% from its all-time high but still up 12x from its bear market low—SOL is highlighted as one of the few tokens from the last cycle to reach new highs. It boasts a robust ecosystem of applications, users, and protocols. Future catalysts include the expected influx of AI developers following the Miami Accelerate conference, which focused on AI on Solana. Furthermore, Solana is positioned as the premier chain for memecoin activity, a trend expected to continue and drive network usage and fees. The article concludes that recent price action reflects a healthy transfer to long-term holders, setting the stage for growth.

marsbitHá 54m

KOL's Perspective: Why Is SOL Set to Rise from This Point?

marsbitHá 54m

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

This article details a recent surge in replicating pre-Bitcoin Proof-of-Work (PoW) protocols, specifically focusing on Hal Finney's 2004 RPOW (Reusable Proofs of Work). Within five days in May 2026, multiple independent builders in the Bitcoin/cypherpunk community launched projects inspired by this early electronic cash proposal. The initiative began with Fred Krueger's `rpow2.com`, a centralized but auditable system that replaced RPOW's original IBM 4758 hardware with Ed25519 signatures. Initially a faithful replica, it later adopted Bitcoin-like features (21M supply cap, difficulty adjustment) and a controversial 5.24% founder allocation. This sparked rapid forks, including `rpow4.com` which incorporated full Bitcoin parameters, a prediction market (`rpowmarket.com`), and a DEX (`rpow2swap.com`). Concurrently, Mike In Space created a prototype of Wei Dai's 1998 b-money proposal (`b-money.replit.app`), pushing the historical exploration even further back. The article contrasts these centralized, server-dependent experiments with Bitcoin's core innovation of decentralized, trustless consensus. It also highlights a parallel development: the `HASH` project on Ethereum, which uses smart contract hooks to enable a purely fair-launch, browser-mineable PoW token with 0% allocations to team or VCs. The collective activity is framed as a meme-driven, educational exploration of cypherpunk history rather than a serious financial movement, with all projects heavily disclaiming any investment value.

marsbitHá 59m

Those Pre-Bitcoin PoW Protocols Have Recently Been Reimplemented

marsbitHá 59m

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

South Korea's cryptocurrency industry is engaged in a rare, direct confrontation with regulators. The Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), the primary anti-money laundering (AML) watchdog, has recently imposed heavy penalties on major exchanges like Upbit and Bithumb for alleged violations involving unregistered overseas VASPs and AML procedures. However, exchanges are now actively challenging these actions in court and through industry associations. In a significant shift, the Seoul Administrative Court ruled in favor of Upbit's operator, Dunamu, overturning part of an FIU-ordered business suspension. The court found the FIU's penalty criteria and justification insufficiently clear. Similarly, the court suspended the enforcement of a six-month business suspension against Bithumb pending a final ruling, citing potential irreversible harm to the exchange. Beyond legal battles, the industry is contesting proposed legislative amendments. The Digital Asset eXchange Alliance (DAXA) strongly opposes a draft rule that would mandate Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) for all crypto transfers over 10 million KRW (~$6,800). DAXA argues this "poison pill" clause violates legal principles and would overwhelm the STR system, increasing reports from 63,000 to an estimated 5.45 million annually for major exchanges, thereby crippling effective AML monitoring. This conflict highlights a structural tension in South Korea's crypto governance: comprehensive digital asset laws are still developing, while regulators rely heavily on AML enforcement. The industry's move from passive compliance to active legal and legislative challenges signifies a new phase, pressing for clearer rules and more proportionate enforcement. While short-term disputes may intensify, this clash could ultimately lead to a more mature and sustainable regulatory framework for South Korea's vibrant crypto market.

marsbitHá 1h

South Korean Exchanges 'Battle' Regulators, Challenging the Boundaries of Enforcement and Legislation

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar US

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Talus Network (US) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Talus Network (US) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Talus Network (US)Depois de comprar o teu Talus Network (US), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Talus Network (US)Transaciona facilmente Talus Network (US) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

377 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.12.11

Como comprar US

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de US (US) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片