From "On-Chain Applications" to "Financial Infrastructure": The Generational Evolution and Transformation of Perp DEX

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-15Última atualização em 2026-01-15

Resumo

Title: From "On-Chain Applications" to "Financial Infrastructure": The Generational Evolution of Perp DEX The 2025 period was a "great filtering era" for the derivatives sector. Surviving Perp DEX platforms have moved beyond being mere "low-cost versions" of CEXs by solving the core cost in finance: trust. With the adoption of full-chain abstraction, users in 2026 can perform seamless cross-chain transactions while retaining asset sovereignty, as funds are secured in smart contracts rather than held by intermediaries. On-chain derivatives now consistently account for over 25% of total trading volume, marking a fundamental shift in user behavior. Over 90% of Perp DEXs failed due to product homogeneity, reliance on subsidized "rented liquidity," and soaring customer acquisition costs. Merely forking existing code or offering token incentives proved unsustainable. Four successful models have emerged: 1. **Hyperliquid**: Achieved near-CEX performance by building its own L1 blockchain optimized for low-latency order books, attracting quantitative capital. 2. **Aster**: Leveraged the Binance ecosystem to offer enhanced capital efficiency, allowing users to earn yield on collateral (e.g., staking rewards) while trading. 3. **Lighter**: Built an app-specific ZK-Rollup to provide a verifiable, mathematically-proven trading infrastructure with anti-MEV properties, appealing to institutions. 4. **Decibel**: Unified high performance and full-chain composability on Aptos, achieving...

Author: Max.s

The year 2025 is often regarded as the "Great Filter Era" for the derivatives sector. As we stand before the current power landscape of Perp DEX, it is clear: the vast majority of once-prominent forked projects have faded into obscurity, while the surviving ones are reshaping the financial order with a全新的的姿态.

The survival of Perp DEX does not stem from being faster or cheaper than centralized exchanges (CEX), but from addressing the core cost in the financial system — trust. After several crises involving opaque清算 mechanisms in second-tier exchanges (the Double-Ten crash left all market makers in agony!), the market has reached a consensus: transparency is not an option but the foundational logic of infrastructure.

Early Perp DEXs were often seen as "low-end versions" of CEXs. However, with the普及 of full-chain abstraction (Chain Abstraction) technology, users in 2026 can achieve seamless cross-chain experiences. User assets no longer need to be custodied by intermediaries but are locked in smart contracts. This return of "asset sovereignty" is the底气 for Perp DEX to claim a share of the market from CEXs.

Currently, on-chain derivatives trading volume has stably captured over 25% of the total market share. This is not merely numerical growth but a migration in user behavior patterns. When清算 logic, funding rates, and order matching are recorded on an immutable ledger, Perp DEX has evolved from experimental DApps to essential infrastructure in the crypto market.

The demise of most Perp DEXs: mediocrity is the original sin. Behind the prosperity lies an极其残酷 elimination race. Over the past two years, more than 90% of Perp DEXs have fallen into silence. The "causes of death" for these failures are highly consistent: product homogeneity, reliance on subsidies for liquidity, and lack of technical depth.

During the "Points" frenzy, numerous projects attracted users with inflated liquidity mining rewards. However, once points were redeemed and airdrops distributed, these platforms fell into a death spiral of "liquidity draining to zero." This model reliant on rented liquidity will gradually disappear from professional markets starting in 2026.

Note: Rented liquidity refers to the model where DEXs incentivize users to provide capital to support trading depth by distributing points or token subsidies. Simply put, the protocol does not truly "own" this liquidity but temporarily rents users' funds by paying high "rent" (token or point rewards).

Another reason for the downfall of DEXs is the soaring customer acquisition cost. In the absence of a unique niche, merely tweaking a UI or forking GMX's code is no longer sufficient to survive in this highly competitive market. Projects without core advantages in order matching engines or strong ecosystem backing are essentially expensive liquidity mining pools, not real exchanges.

Four existing DEX models值得后来者们借鉴学习:

Hyperliquid Model: Vertical Integration and Technological Hegemony

On the list of surviving DEXs, Hyperliquid is an unavoidable monument. It proves that if general-purpose公链 cannot support high-frequency trading, the best solution is to build your own chain.

Hyperliquid attracts substantial quantitative capital because it addresses order book latency through L1底层 optimization. It no longer寄生 on Arbitrum or other Layer 2 solutions but has built a consensus mechanism specifically designed for derivatives. This "vertical integration" grants it matching performance close to CEXs while maintaining on-chain transparency.

More importantly, Hyperliquid has successfully built a "quant-friendly" ecosystem. When third-party market makers发现这里的 API latency is extremely low and slippage is controllable, endogenous liquidity begins to grow organically. This "performance barrier" constructed through hard technological strength makes it从容 in facing competition from generic DEXs lacking distinctive features.

Aster Model: Ecosystem Premium and Asset Management Layer

If Hyperliquid relies on hardcore technology, then Aster and its backing from the Binance ecosystem represent another survival logic:极致 resource efficiency and asset appreciation — essentially, having a strong "backer."

Aster is not just a trading venue; it更像是一个 "leveraged layer for yield-bearing assets." Through deep integration with the Binance ecosystem, it introduces collateral like asBNB or USDF, allowing users to earn Staking or Re-staking yields while holding positions. This optimization of capital efficiency is难以企及 for standalone DEXs.

For large capital users, funding cost is a core consideration. When users open a position on Aster, their margin continues to generate annualized yields. This logic of "liquidity assetization" turns Aster into a highly sticky financial gateway, not merely a speculative tool.

Lighter Model: ZK-Powered Verifiable Financial Infrastructure

The Lighter model represents the pinnacle of "financial infrastructure-ization." It does not seek to become a traffic入口 but provides institutions with a交易底层 offering mathematical certainty through its self-built application-specific ZK-Rollup (App-specific ZK-rollup).

Lighter's uniqueness lies in solving the "mathematical honesty" problem. It encodes order matching and清算 logic into "ZK circuits." This means that the matching and清算 of every trade no longer rely on the "reputation" of nodes but on verifiable mathematical proofs. This is extremely attractive to institutional investors who despise "black-box清算."

Furthermore, Lighter's ZK-Orderbook design inherently possesses anti-MEV properties, protecting the strategy privacy of high-frequency traders. This combination of "verifiability + privacy protection + extremely low latency" makes it a standard interface linking real-world assets (RWA) with on-chain derivatives, building a high compliance and technological moat.

Decibel Model: Unification of Extreme Performance and Full-Chain Composability

In the 2026 market, Decibel represents the third evolutionary model for the new generation of Perp DEXs: the乐高 combination of a "high-performance engine" and "composability." As a full-chain trading engine rising within the Aptos ecosystem, Decibel彻底终结了 the fate that "speed and decentralization cannot be兼得".

Decibel's core competitiveness lies in its deeply optimized Trading VM. Leveraging Aptos's Block-STM parallel execution architecture, it is advancing towards sub-20 millisecond (sub-20 ms) block times and the ability to process over 1 million orders per second. This makes on-chain order matching no longer an "illusion" but a reality capable of competing with top-tier CEXs.

Unlike traditional isolated DEXs, Decibel provides a highly programmable financial platform. It unifies spot trading (Spot), perpetual contracts (Perps), margin trading (Margin), and vaults (Vaults). This "full-stack" design means users can use a single cross-chain margin account to collateralize various assets like APT, USDC, BTC, ETH simultaneously, greatly释放了 capital efficiency.

Decibel's "X-Chain Accounts" technology further breaks down cross-chain barriers. Users can directly fund their accounts using wallets from Ethereum or Solana (like MetaMask or Phantom) without configuring complex cross-chain bridges. This "seamless access" capability, combined with 100% on-chain matching logic, positions Decibel to potentially become the new favorite for on-chain high-frequency traders and institutions in 2026.

New Directions Post-2026: Intent, AI, and Dynamic Pricing

From an industry practitioner's perspective, the future evolution of Perp DEX will focus on the following three dimensions:

Intent-Centric Trading Experience. Future users will no longer need to manually adjust funding rates or slippage but will express an intent. The system will find the optimal execution path across chains through solvers. This model will significantly lower the barrier for retail users to access complex derivatives.

The Explosion of AI Agents. With the maturation of on-chain automation tools, DEXs will built-in AI strategy engines. A significant portion of future open interest will be driven by AI. This means DEXs need to provide more powerful computing capabilities and lower data latency to accommodate the high-frequency博弈 of robots.

Evolution of Pricing Models. Current AMMs or simple order books remain fragile during extreme market conditions. We are seeing more projects introduce complex dynamic risk engines that automatically adjust system parameters in real-time through more scientific formulas:

实时调节系统参数。This automated adjustment based on real-time volatility and position deviation will make the system robustness of Perp DEX truly surpass that of traditional centralized institutions.

The second half for Perp DEX is a survival race about "efficiency." Projects that attempted to sustain themselves through mediocre subsidies have long turned to dust. The future winners will either possess impeccable technological foundations like Hyperliquid, have irreplicable ecosystem resources like Aster, or have found the perfect balance between performance limits and full-chain composability like Decibel.

In this field, there is only one reason to survive: Do you provide an execution efficiency that capital and strategies cannot refuse?

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the core value proposition of Perp DEXs that allows them to compete with CEXs, according to the article?

AThe core value proposition is not being faster or cheaper than CEXs, but rather solving the most fundamental cost in the financial system: trust. Perp DEXs provide transparency, with清算 logic, funding rates, and order matching recorded on an immutable ledger, which has become a consensus requirement after crises involving opaque清算 on second-tier exchanges.

QWhat is 'Liquidity Renting' and why did it lead to the failure of many Perp DEX projects?

ALiquidity Renting refers to a model where a DEX induces users to provide capital to support trading depth by distributing points or token subsidies. The protocol doesn't truly 'own' this liquidity but temporarily rents users' funds by paying a high 'rent' (token or point rewards). This model failed because once the points were redeemed and airdrops distributed, these platforms fell into a 'liquidity to zero' death spiral, as the liquidity was not sustainable without continuous subsidies.

QHow does the Hyperliquid model achieve its competitive advantage in the Perp DEX space?

AHyperliquid achieves its advantage through vertical integration and technical hegemony. It built its own L1 blockchain specifically optimized for derivatives trading, solving the order book latency issues of general-purpose blockchains. This gives it CEX-like matching performance while maintaining on-chain transparency. It also created a 'quant-friendly' ecosystem with low API latency and controllable slippage, fostering endogenous liquidity growth and building a strong performance barrier.

QWhat unique problem does the Lighter model solve with its ZK technology, and for which user base is it particularly attractive?

AThe Lighter model solves the problem of 'mathematical-level honesty' by building an application-specific ZK-Rollup. It encodes order matching and清算 logic into ZK circuits, meaning every trade's execution and清算 relies on verifiable mathematical proofs rather than the 'reputation' of nodes. This is extremely attractive to institutional investors who are averse to 'black box清算'. Additionally, its ZK-Orderbook design is naturally resistant to MEV, protecting the strategy privacy of high-frequency traders.

QWhat are the three key future evolution directions for Perp DEXs mentioned in the article's conclusion?

AThe three key future evolution directions are: 1) Intent-centric trading体验, where users express an intent and the system finds the optimal execution path across chains. 2) The爆发 of AI Agents, where a significant portion of open interest will be driven by AI, requiring DEXs to provide greater computational power and lower data latency. 3) The evolution of pricing models, moving beyond simple AMM or order books to incorporate complex dynamic risk engines that automatically adjust system parameters based on real-time volatility and position deviation for superior robustness.

Leituras Relacionadas

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbitHá 47m

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbitHá 47m

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbitHá 59m

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbitHá 59m

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbitHá 1h

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

marsbitHá 1h

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619)

Weekly Editor's Picks (0613-0619): Market Insights & Analysis This weekly digest curates in-depth analysis often lost in the information flow, focusing on key insights across macro trends, investment, and technology. **Macro & Geopolitics:** With the Strait of Hormuz reopening and military conflict shifting to negotiation, markets are pivoting from "war shock" to "supply restoration." Trades include shorting crude risk premiums, longing airlines/tourism, Asian energy importers, and bond duration, while shorting inflation expectations. LNG, fertilizer, and chemical chains are also being repriced. **Investment & VC:** Ray Dalio advises against betting on concentrated AI giants dominating indices, advocating for diversified portfolios of high-quality, low-correlation assets instead. Analysis covers the 4-year crypto cycle, predicting the core surviving product by 2029 will be asset trading markets. Current BTC metrics suggest a potential bottoming zone, presenting a patient accumulation window. SpaceX's high-profile IPO at a $2.1T valuation faces scrutiny over fundamentals, with key watchpoints being its likely inclusion in the Nasdaq index and Q2 earnings. Concerns are raised about potential "gamma squeeze" and systemic risks if its narrative-driven valuation gets amplified by passive index funds. Robinhood (HOOD) is noted for breaking its high correlation with crypto, bolstered by its stock trading and new underwriting business. **Web3 & AI:** A warning highlights ~$1.8T in off-balance-sheet AI infrastructure commitments (purchase commitments, leases) as a potential systemic risk if AI monetization lags. AI models are being used for World Cup predictions, adding a new layer for betting markets. A cost breakdown of a $20 AI subscription reveals the supply chain from model companies to cloud, GPUs, and power. **Prediction Markets:** The emergence of prediction market "concept stocks" is noted, with Robinhood developing its own platform, Rothera, signaling a shift from market competition to a "channel war" for user access. **CeFi & DeFi:** The SpaceX IPO tested perpetual contract mechanisms for pre-IPO assets, highlighting challenges in handling corporate actions like stock splits on-chain. The de-pegging of STRC (Strategy's preferred share) to ~$89 reflects market concerns over MicroStrategy's capital structure and BTC-backed leverage model. BlackRock's covered-call Bitcoin ETF (BITA) offers yield but caps upside, appealing to yield-seeking institutions. **Ethereum:** An opinion piece argues Ethereum's core strength is its vast developer community and composability, solidifying its role as the default operating system for the financial internet. **Weekly Hot Topics:** Include the US-Iran deal reopening the Strait of Hormuz, Fed's hawkish hold, Anthropic restricting model access, SpaceX acquiring Cursor, and a humorous stock surge for "Liuliumei" due to its "LLM" ticker.

marsbitHá 1h

Alliance's Co-Founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written on the Occasion of Cursor's $60 Billion Sale

In this letter to entrepreneurs, Alliance reflects on the success of Cursor's $60 billion sale to Elon Musk, using it as a case study to counter the misconception that opportunities in crowded fields like AI or crypto are exhausted. The piece argues that great companies like Cursor, Stripe, Figma, and Shopify are not built by geniuses with perfect ideas, but by founders who start with a non-consensus belief about the future and build for years before that future becomes obvious to everyone. They identify long-term shifts, find overlooked entry points, and execute relentlessly. The framework for success involves: 1. **Identifying your place in the technology cycle**: Early-stage opportunities focus on making new tech usable for power users (e.g., Coinbase, Cursor). Later-stage opportunities involve finding the "yin" to an existing "yang"—the blind spots of first-generation players (e.g., Stripe vs. PayPal, Figma vs. Adobe). 2. **Cultivating unique insights**: Immerse yourself deeply in the market. Use every product, talk to users, and build an audience. Insights will emerge naturally from deep engagement. 3. **Finding a "hair-on-fire" problem**: Look for a 10x improvement or a severe, urgent pain point. The strongest signal is people already building clumsy workarounds. 4. **Building a focused MVP**: Don't just add features because you can. Ask why users would abandon their current tool for yours. The best startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction. 5. **Winning a distribution channel**: Distribution is often the moat. Before product-market fit, achieve channel-market fit. Find where your customers are and build an engine to reach them, even through unscalable, manual efforts initially. 6. **Persistence**: The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Success stories like Cursor, Airbnb, and Nvidia involved years of grinding, rejection, and perseverance when the path forward seemed unclear. The conclusion is that there is no secret. Most people fail to consistently execute these steps over the long term. The few who do build the companies that define the next era. The world is yours to create.

链捕手Há 1h