From Hyperliquid to Solana: How an ICO Promise of 'Chain Switching' Shakes Investor Trust?

比推Publicado em 2026-01-19Última atualização em 2026-01-19

Resumo

In a controversial move, the digital collectibles platform Trove announced its sudden migration from Hyperliquid to Solana on January 19, citing a liquidity partner’s decision to liquidate a significant HYPE position. This shift contradicts earlier ICO promises that emphasized Hyperliquid integration and HYPE token backing, triggering backlash from investors who now demand refunds. The ICO, which initially raised over $11.5 million, faced scrutiny after the team briefly prolonged the fundraising period, causing speculative spikes on prediction market Polymarket. Investigations revealed that Trove had transferred $45,000 from its angel round directly into prediction markets, and allegations emerged that the team offered paid promotions to influencers. Community trust eroded further as Trove proceeded with token generation and distribution plans without addressing refund requests, despite the fundamental change in platform and tokenomics. The incident highlights risks in crypto investing, especially around anonymous teams, opaque fund management, and unilateral post-ICO changes.

Author: Sanqing, Foresight News

Original Title: Trove Raises Tens of Millions Then 'Switcheroo', Suspected of Misusing Funds and Manipulating Prediction Markets

On January 19, unwise, a team member of the digital collectibles contract platform Trove, tweeted that Trove would migrate to Solana. The member stated that this was because the liquidity partner supporting its Hyperliquid path chose to liquidate its 500,000 HYPE position. Subsequently, the HYPE purchase address disclosed on its ICO page began selling.

unwise's tweet (top), Trove-associated address HYPE transaction record (bottom) | Source: X (top, translated), HypurrScan (bottom)

Previously, Trove repeatedly mentioned that it had raised $20 million, would launch a token on Hyperliquid, and would build its digital collectibles contract platform based on HIP-3. Based on this public information, it completed an ICO with a $20 million FDV, selling 12.5% of the total supply.

ICO Flip-Flopping, Transferring Raised Funds to Prediction Markets

The Trove ICO was originally scheduled to start on January 9 at 1:00 and end on January 12 at 1:00.

On January 12, the project team announced it had raised over $11.5 million and extended the ICO by 5 days until January 16 at 1:00. 42 minutes later, they posted again revoking this decision and stated the ICO would end as originally scheduled.

Affected by this, the probabilities on Polymarket for the Trove ICO total raising over 15M, 20M, 25M, and 30M all sharply increased from near zero to 40% – 80% within a short time.

On January 17, on-chain detective ZachXBT tweeted that Trove had directly moved $45,000 from its Trove angel round financing into prediction markets on January 11. Trove team member unwise replied, attributing the operation to TJR (an English crypto KOL).

Source: ZachXBT and uniwise tweets (translated)

Furthermore, according to crypto KOL hrithik, they received multiple messages from the Trove team promising additional compensation for promoting their ICO bids and posts.

Source: hrithik tweet (translated)

Community feedback on the ICO changes and Polymarket activities included criticism that the extension decision increased uncertainty and damaged trust.

Source: xero tweet (translated)

Regarding Polymarket, users accused the team of manipulation and non-disclosure, turning a previously promising ICO into demands for refunds, with some calling it insider trading, leading to a shift in sentiment from excitement to caution.

Source: Maran tweet (translated)

Violating ICO Public Information, Temporarily Migrating to Solana

Previously, Trove repeatedly stated on its official Twitter that it had purchased HYPE tokens, would build its digital collectibles contract platform based on HIP-3, and had launched a test website.

Source: TROVE tweet (translated)

During its ICO, it did not make any changes to this related information.

Trove related information | Source: Trove ICO page (translated)

The community strongly opposed the migration to Solana, viewing the shift as a deviation from the initial Hyperliquid promise. Some participants demanded full refunds, stating it no longer aligned with the investment logic.

Source: unwise (left) and Trove official Twitter reply (right), translated

Source: Wazz tweet (translated)

As of now, Trove has not responded to related refund requests. It stated that TGE will occur on January 20 at 00:00, followed by ICO token distribution and oversubscription refunds.

Source: Trove official Twitter (translated)

The Boundary Between ICO Promises and Investor Protection

The changes in Trove's actual execution have deviated from the core path, technical dependencies, and liquidity promises publicly during the ICO. These are major substantive changes, not mere technical optimizations or iterations.

Source: Trove ICO page (translated)

This behavior of诱导 (inducing) first and switching later changes the essence of the investment target; the initial investment logic should be invalidated. Investors'诉求 (demands) for refunds to protect their rights should receive broad support.

The crypto investment environment is highly speculative and uncertain. Participants must carefully review project whitepapers, on-chain fund flows, team track records, etc., before deciding, and specifically evaluate the project team's communication transparency, timeliness, and compensation mechanisms for any major changes.

Investors need to be especially vigilant towards project parties with non-public team information, high anonymity, or those with delayed communication after changes.

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7604143

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the main reason given by the Trove team for migrating from Hyperliquid to Solana?

AThe Trove team member unwise stated that the migration was due to their liquidity partner liquidating its 500,000 HYPE position, which was a key support for their Hyperliquid path.

QHow much funding did Trove claim to have raised during its ICO, and what percentage of the total token supply was sold?

ATrove claimed to have raised $20 million at a $200 million fully diluted valuation (FDV) and sold 12.5% of the total token supply in its ICO.

QWhat controversial action did Trove take regarding the ICO timeline, and how did it affect the Polymarket prediction market?

ATrove initially extended the ICO by 5 days on January 12 but reversed the decision 42 minutes later. This caused short-term spikes in probabilities on Polymarket for various fundraising milestones (15M, 20M, 25M, 30M) from near zero to 40-80%.

QWhat allegation did ZachXBT make about Trove's use of funds, and how did the team respond?

AZachXBT alleged that Trove transferred $45,000 from its angel funding round directly into a prediction market on January 11. The Trove team member unwise responded by attributing the action to TJR, an English crypto KOL.

QHow did the community react to Trove's decision to migrate to Solana, and what did many investors demand?

AThe community strongly opposed the migration, viewing it as a deviation from the initial Hyperliquid promise. Many investors demanded full refunds, arguing that the investment logic was no longer valid.

Leituras Relacionadas

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHá 6m

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHá 6m

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbitHá 6m

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbitHá 6m

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

Coldcard hardware wallet users are facing a new wave of coordinated attacks targeting a firmware flaw, with researcher Alex Thorn flagging 218 recent transactions moving approximately 389 Bitcoin from potentially impacted addresses. The attack pattern shows a high rate of transactions targeting unique victim addresses, differing from previous waves. The vulnerability, which causes affected devices to generate weaker wallet seeds, is estimated to have impacted over 1,100 wallets, leading to around $90 million in Bitcoin stolen. Thorn advises affected users who control their keys may attempt to move funds with a higher-fee transaction before the attacker's transactions are confirmed.

cointelegraphHá 13m

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

cointelegraphHá 13m

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

Bitcoin miners are capitulating as evidenced by a sustained drop in network hash rate and a record-steep 19.9% decline in mining difficulty, signaling the shuttering of unprofitable machines. However, in a significant divergence from historical patterns, the stocks of publicly traded mining companies have soared, with one major player gaining over 430% in the past year, even as BTC's price fell roughly 46%. This surge is largely attributed to these companies pivoting toward the more lucrative AI narrative. Simultaneously, miners face a structural squeeze. Daily block reward revenue in BTC terms has hit a new all-time low following the latest halving, with current dollar-denominated daily revenue around $30 million compared to a longer-term average of ~$40 million. Fee revenue remains negligible, covering less than one block's subsidy over a 28-day average and accounting for only about ten minutes of the network's daily security budget. This capitulation cycle is unique: miner stress and crypto price weakness have decoupled due to alternative revenue streams (AI), while the long-term reliance on increasing bitcoin prices to offset shrinking subsidies continues, with fee income still far from filling the impending gap.

marsbitHá 16m

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

marsbitHá 16m

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHá 16m