Former White House Crypto Adviser Confident CLARITY Act Will Pass As Deadline Nears

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-02-17Última atualização em 2026-02-17

Resumo

Former White House crypto adviser Bo Hines expressed confidence that the CLARITY Act, a stalled crypto market structure bill, will pass despite delays. The legislation faces a deadline as the White House pressures the crypto and banking industries to resolve disputes over stablecoin yield restrictions, which raised concerns about deposit flight risks. Hines noted both industries are negotiating under pressure and have proposed compromises, such as giving community banks a larger role. He emphasized the current administration's pro-digital asset stance and urged leveraging this legislative window, which is "rapidly closing" due to the approaching midterm elections. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent also stressed the urgency, warning that Democratic control in November could hinder the bill's passage.

A former White House crypto adviser has shared his thoughts on the delay of the long-awaited market structure bill and whether the banking and digital assets industry will resolve their differences soon.

Bo Hines Optimistic About Crypto Legislation

On Monday, Bo Hines, CEO of Tether US and former executive director of the US President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, expressed optimism about the passage of the crypto market structure bill, known as the CLARITY Act.

In a recent interview with journalist Eleanor Terret at the Digital Assets at Duke Conference, Hines affirmed that he’s “actually confident that CALRITY will get passed” despite the delay.

It’s worth noting that the highly anticipated legislation has been stalled after hitting a roadblock a month ago due to restrictions on the payment of stablecoin yield, meant to address the banking industry’s concerns of deposit flight risk.

The crypto industry heavily criticized the Senate Banking Committee’s policy, leading to the delay of the mid-January markup session and an extended negotiation process between lawmakers and leaders from both industries.

Now, time seems to be running out, Terret noted, as we approach the alleged White House’s end-of-month deadline for the crypto and banking industries to solve the stablecoin yield dispute.

Due to this, Hines affirmed that both sides “are in the pressure cooker right now,” arguing that the two industries understand they must make concessions to reach an agreement and advance the bill.

As reported by Bitcoinist, the digital assets industry has already proposed some compromises to salvage the crypto legislation, such as giving community banks a larger role in the stablecoin system.

The former White House adviser highlighted the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s (OCC) recent moves. Notably, the OCC has started to issue conditional licenses to more digital assets native companies, which he considers will provide a pathway to “find a resolution that (...) protects banks from deposit flight, but also allows these crypto companies to be innovative and offer different solutions to their customers.”

CLARITY Act’s Window ‘Rapidly Closing’

Hines also noted that the crypto industry is aware that they must take advantage of the legislative momentum, “especially under this administration that’s been extremely pro- digital assets.”

As he explained, “this is where you’re going to get the best return on investment in a sense of like what you’ve been doing over the course of (...) the last few years in terms of political activity and engagement.”

Similarly, Patrick Witt, the current executive director of the US President’s Crypto Council, shared a similar perspective on Friday. The advisor affirmed that they are “working hard to address the issues that were raised that led to the postponement of that markup and hopefully get that back on the books soon.”

Nonetheless, he urged lawmakers to keep the momentum going, emphasizing that the window to pass the legislation is still open, but it is “rapidly closing” as the midterm election campaign season approaches, which “takes all the oxygen out of the room.”

The US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent also pressed lawmakers to advance the bill soon, highlighting the importance of getting the legislation on President Donald Trump’s desk before the end of the spring legislative window.

Bessent stressed that the chances of getting a deal done could collapse if Democrats take control in November, recalling the crackdown on the industry during the Biden administration.

“There’s a lot of innovation that goes on adjacent to crypto, the blockchain, and DeFi. So, I think it’s important to get this clarity bill done as soon as possible and on the president’s desk this spring,” he declared on Friday.

Bitcoin (BTC) trades at $68,049 in the one-week chart. Source: BTCUSDT on TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QWho is Bo Hines and what is his role in the crypto industry?

ABo Hines is the CEO of Tether US and the former executive director of the US President’s Council of Advisors for Digital Assets.

QWhat is the name of the crypto market structure bill discussed in the article?

AThe crypto market structure bill is called the CLARITY Act.

QWhat was the main reason for the delay of the CLARITY Act's markup session?

AThe delay was caused by restrictions on the payment of stablecoin yield, which were meant to address the banking industry's concerns about deposit flight risk.

QAccording to the article, what is the alleged deadline given to the crypto and banking industries?

AThe alleged White House deadline is the end of the month for the industries to solve the stablecoin yield dispute.

QWhy does the article suggest the window to pass the legislation is 'rapidly closing'?

AThe window is rapidly closing because the midterm election campaign season is approaching, which consumes all the political focus and oxygen in the room.

Leituras Relacionadas

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbitHá 11h

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbitHá 11h

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbitHá 13h

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbitHá 13h

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbitHá 13h

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbitHá 13h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar HOUSE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Housecoin (HOUSE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Housecoin (HOUSE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Housecoin (HOUSE)Depois de comprar o teu Housecoin (HOUSE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Housecoin (HOUSE)Transaciona facilmente Housecoin (HOUSE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

271 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.04.27

Como comprar HOUSE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de HOUSE (HOUSE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片