Extended crypto ETF outflows shows institutions disengaging: Glassnode

cointelegraphPublicado em 2025-12-24Última atualização em 2025-12-24

Resumo

Cryptocurrency ETFs, particularly for Bitcoin and Ether, are experiencing a prolonged period of outflows, signaling a significant pullback by institutional investors, according to analytics firm Glassnode. The 30-day simple moving average for net flows into US spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs turned negative in early November, indicating muted institutional participation and a broader liquidity contraction in the crypto market. While aggregate Bitcoin ETF flows have been negative for four consecutive days, BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) saw minor recent inflows. Despite the current trend, IBIT has attracted $62.5 billion since its launch, surpassing all competitors. Notably, it ranked sixth on Bloomberg’s 2025 Flow Leaderboard despite a negative return, even outperforming the SPDR Gold Shares fund in inflows, which analysts see as a positive long-term indicator.

Bitcoin and Ether exchange-traded funds have seen a prolonged streak of outflows, indicating that institutional investors have disengaged with crypto, says the analytics platform Glassnode.

Since early November, the 30-day simple moving average of net flows into US spot Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) ETFs has turned negative, Glassnode said on Tuesday.

“This persistence suggests a phase of muted participation and partial disengagement from institutional allocators, reinforcing the broader liquidity contraction across the crypto market,” it added.

Flows into crypto ETFs usually lag the spot markets for the tokens, which have been trending down since mid-October.

The ETFs are also considered a bellwether for institutional sentiment, which has been a market driver for most of this year but seemingly turned bearish as the wider market has contracted.

Source: Glassnode

Crypto ETF selling pressure is back

Coinglass said aggregate Bitcoin ETF flows have been in the red for the past four consecutive trading days. However, BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) has seen minor inflows over the past week.

“Crypto ETF selling pressure is back,” the Kobeissi Letter said on Tuesday. It reported that crypto funds recorded $952 million in outflows last week, and investors have now withdrawn capital in six out of the last ten weeks.

Related: BlackRock pins Bitcoin ETF as major theme alongside T-bills, tech stocks

Despite the recent outflows, the industry-dominant BlackRock fund has seen $62.5 billion in inflows since inception, eclipsing all rival spot Bitcoin ETFs.

IBIT beat gold for flows

Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas said on Saturday that IBIT is the only ETF on Bloomberg’s “2025 Flow Leaderboard” with a negative return for the year.

“The real takeaway is that it was sixth place despite the negative return,” he added.

Balchunas said that BlackRock’s flagship Bitcoin fund even took in more than the SPDR Gold Shares fund (GLD), which was up 64%.

“That’s a really good sign long term IMO. If you can do $25 billion in a bad year, imagine the flow potential in a good year.”

Magazine: Bitcoin may dip to $65K in 2026, Clarity Act speculation grows: Hodler’s Digest

Criptomoedas em alta

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat does the prolonged streak of outflows from Bitcoin and Ether ETFs indicate according to Glassnode?

AIt indicates that institutional investors have disengaged with crypto, suggesting a phase of muted participation and a broader liquidity contraction across the crypto market.

QSince when has the 30-day simple moving average of net flows into US spot Bitcoin and Ether ETFs turned negative?

ASince early November.

QWhich Bitcoin ETF has seen minor inflows over the past week despite overall outflows?

ABlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT).

QHow much in outflows did crypto funds record last week as reported by the Kobeissi Letter?

A$952 million.

QWhat significant achievement did Bloomberg ETF analyst Eric Balchunas highlight about the iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) on the 2025 Flow Leaderboard?

AIBIT was the only ETF on the leaderboard with a negative return for the year but still ranked sixth in flows, even taking in more than the SPDR Gold Shares fund (GLD) which was up 64%.

Leituras Relacionadas

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

China's A-share market recently faced selling pressure, especially in tech sectors, initially triggered by a global tech sell-off that began in South Korea. However, the article argues this is a case of "mistaken injury" and highlights the market's underlying resilience. This resilience stems from three main pillars: **1) Tech Sector Fundamentals:** Unlike Korea's market dominated by a few memory chip stocks, China's tech sector is diversified across computing, communications, electronics, and semiconductors, supported by dual narratives of global AI supply chains and domestic substitution. Core areas like optical modules and fiber optics continue to show strong earnings growth. **2) "National Team" Support:** State-backed institutions and large corporations have made significant market purchases and announced buybacks, providing liquidity and signaling confidence. This is seen as a stabilizing policy signal, often associated with market bottoms. **3) Broader Market Pillars:** Other major sectors are showing endogenous recovery momentum. Consumer stocks benefit from stabilizing CPI and signs of sector recovery (e.g., liquor price hikes). Cyclical sectors like aluminum have high earnings, potential price increases due to tight supply, and low valuations. The financial sector offers stable dividends and low valuations. The conclusion is that the sell-off was driven by external contagion, not a collapse in fundamentals. With strong policy support and recovering momentum across key sectors, the A-share market possesses the toughness to regain stability.

marsbitHá 5m

Misjudged A-Shares: Resilience, Expectations, and Confidence

marsbitHá 5m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

The U.S. Congress is struggling to advance the crypto market structure bill known as the Clarity Act, with bipartisan compromise proving difficult. Key hurdles include unresolved disputes over "yield" products and, more critically, the inclusion of strong ethics provisions for elected officials—a non-negotiable demand for many Democrats. While a compromise on yield was reached in May, securing only limited Democratic support in committee, the separate Senate Agriculture Committee version later passed with no Democratic votes due to the ethics impasse. As Republicans push for a full Senate vote in July, demands for ethics rules have expanded, and other contentious issues like developer protections and concerns from law enforcement and large banks further complicate negotiations. Despite consensus on the need for legislation, the path forward is unclear. Recent discussions between senators and White House officials aim to find acceptable ethics language. Some lawmakers question whether a compromise text can garner enough bipartisan support, with one Democrat stating the current proposal lacks the strong ethics provisions required for their vote. Potential short-term goals for the crypto community include symbolic Senate action before the August recess, a longer-term aim for passage by 2026, or establishing a detailed framework that addresses ethics and other compromises. The process remains arduous, relying on the traditional, vote-by-vote effort to build bipartisan support.

marsbitHá 24m

The Clarity Act's Journey Through Congress: The Thorny Path of Bipartisan Compromise in the U.S.

marsbitHá 24m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

"The Rivalry Between Kalshi and Polymarket Founders Turns Bitter and Litigious" The intense feud between Tarek Mansour, CEO of Kalshi, and Shayne Coplan, founder of Polymarket, has escalated far beyond typical business competition into personal animosity and regulatory battles. Both lead billion-dollar prediction market platforms, but their approaches differ sharply. Kalshi positions itself as the compliant operator, securing U.S. regulatory approval before launching. In contrast, Polymarket initially operated offshore, allowing U.S. users to access its platform via VPN, which drew regulatory scrutiny. The conflict reached a peak in November 2024 when FBI agents raided Coplan's New York apartment. While Coplan publicly blamed political motives, his team privately suspected Kalshi was involved. According to sources, Kalshi's lawyers had previously reported Polymarket's operations to federal prosecutors, highlighting its accessibility to U.S. users despite a ban. This incident fueled mutual accusations and underhanded tactics, including social media smear campaigns and attempts to sabotage each other's major business deals. Their rivalry also played out in Washington, influencing regulatory debates. Kalshi actively lobbied against Polymarket's practices, framing them as illegal and unethical. Polymarket, after facing a CFTC fine and investigation, later acquired a licensed U.S. firm to launch a domestic app, regaining a foothold. Despite the hostility, both companies have seen massive growth, with combined trading volumes soaring. However, increased regulatory scrutiny, particularly around insider trading on Polymarket's platform, continues to pose challenges. The founders' deep-seated mutual disdain ensures their battle for market dominance remains as much a personal vendetta as a commercial one.

marsbitHá 33m

Are Kalshi and Polymarket Founders at Odds? This Business Rivalry Is More Brutal Than You Think

marsbitHá 33m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar O

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de O1 exchange (O) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar O1 exchange (O) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu O1 exchange (O)Depois de comprar o teu O1 exchange (O), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona O1 exchange (O)Transaciona facilmente O1 exchange (O) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

167 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.29

Como comprar O

Como comprar PROS

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Pharos (PROS) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Pharos (PROS) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Pharos (PROS)Depois de comprar o teu Pharos (PROS), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Pharos (PROS)Transaciona facilmente Pharos (PROS) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

160 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.29

Como comprar PROS

O que é VERONA

I. Introdução ao Projeto VERONA é uma blockchain construída para todos, em todo o lado, através da abstração da cadeia. Utilizando a sua camada de Abstração Generalizada, a VERONA distingue-se por integrar funcionalidades complexas de blockchain, como contas, assinaturas e interoperabilidade, diretamente ao nível do protocolo. Esta abordagem permite a interação com aplicações de blockchain sem a necessidade de compreender as tecnologias subjacentes.1) Informação Básica Nome: VERONA (VERONA)III. Links Relacionados Link do site oficial: https://xion.burnt.com/ Whitepaper: https://xion.burnt.com/whitepaper.pdf Exploradores: https://explorer.burnt.com/ Mídias Sociais: https://x.com/burnt_xion Nota: A introdução ao projeto provém dos materiais publicados ou fornecidos pela equipa oficial do projeto, que é apenas para referência e não constitui aconselhamento de investimento. A HTX não se responsabiliza por quaisquer perdas diretas ou indiretas resultantes.

778 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.22

O que é VERONA

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de A (A) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片