Ethena struggles as revenue falls 32% – Can demand save ENA at $0.089?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-28Última atualização em 2026-03-28

Resumo

Ethena's (ENA) financial performance weakened significantly in Q1 2026, with its price dropping to $0.089. Key metrics show a 32% decline in Gross Protocol Revenue to $65.06 million, attributed to reduced minting activity and staking rewards. Total Value Locked (TVL) also fell by approximately $130 million since March, indicating sustained capital outflows and declining user activity, which hit a low of around 1,200 daily active users. Despite a slight improvement in gross profit, it remains substantially lower than previous quarters. However, spot market data shows consistent accumulation, with $3.41 million in net inflows over three days, suggesting investor demand may provide some price support. Without a recovery in core fundamentals, significant upside potential remains limited.

Ethena’s [ENA] price now appears to be aligning with its weakening financial performance. Over the past 24 hours, the asset has recorded a double-digit decline, dropping to $0.089 at press time.

While the numbers reflect mounting pressure, a broader evaluation of market conditions is necessary to determine whether this decline marks the start of a deeper correction or a temporary adjustment.

Ethena’s momentum weakens across key metrics

On-chain data shows that ENA has underperformed across multiple fronts since the start of Q1 2026, particularly when compared to its performance in the previous two quarters.

A key area of concern is revenue efficiency. Gross Protocol Revenue fell to $65.06 million, down from $96.15 million in Q4 2025, representing a 32% decline. The drop becomes even more pronounced when compared to Q3 2025.

This contraction points to weaker minting activity and reduced staking rewards, both of which suggest declining on-chain participation.

Source: DeFiLlama

In a market that has remained relatively stable compared to the October–December 2025 cycle, this underperformance raises concerns about weakening user demand rather than external pressure.

Liquidity conditions reinforce this trend. Total Value Locked (TVL), a core indicator of protocol health and user commitment, has continued to decline steadily.

Since the start of March 2026, TVL has fallen by approximately $130 million, bringing it to around $6.66 billion at the time of writing. Within the last 24 hours alone, roughly $16 million has been unstaked, signaling sustained capital exit from the protocol.

Can profit alone sustain user interest?

Despite the broader slowdown, Ethena has recorded a slight improvement in gross profitability.

In Q1 2026, the protocol has generated $614,190 in gross profit, compared to $463,200 in Q4 2025. While this reflects a marginal increase, it does little to offset the sharp decline from earlier performance levels.

For context, Q3 2025 saw $10.18 million in gross profit, roughly 16.5 times higher than current figures. This gap highlights a structural decline in earning potential, even as short-term profitability shows minor improvement.

The implication is clear, as modest profit growth alone may not be sufficient to retain users, especially in a competitive DeFi environment where capital quickly rotates toward higher-yield opportunities.

User activity data supports this view. According to Artemis, Daily Active Users have dropped to around 1,200, the lowest level recorded since December.

Spot demand offers a counter-signal

Despite weakening fundamentals and declining liquidity, spot market activity presents a more resilient picture. Exchange netflow data indicates that buying pressure has increased recently. Over the past 24 hours, net inflows into spot positions reached approximately $303,000.

More notably, this is not an isolated event. Over the past three days, cumulative purchases have climbed to around $3.41 million, suggesting consistent accumulation.

Source: CoinGlass

Such a sustained demand indicates that investors continue to absorb sell-side pressure, even as capital exits the protocol layer.

If this accumulation trend holds, it could limit further downside and support price stabilization. However, without a recovery in core fundamentals, particularly user activity and revenue generation, any upside may remain constrained within a narrow range.


Final Summary

  • Ethena’s protocol performance deteriorated in Q1 2026, even as broader market conditions remained relatively stable.
  • Spot investors continue to accumulate, despite rising liquidity outflows and declining TVL.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current price of ENA and how much has it declined in the last 24 hours?

AThe current price of ENA is $0.089, and it has recorded a double-digit decline over the past 24 hours.

QBy what percentage did Ethena's Gross Protocol Revenue fall in Q1 2026 compared to Q4 2025?

AEthena's Gross Protocol Revenue fell by 32%, dropping from $96.15 million in Q4 2025 to $65.06 million in Q1 2026.

QWhat does the decline in Total Value Locked (TVL) and the unstaking of funds indicate about the Ethena protocol?

AThe decline in TVL, including $16 million unstaked in 24 hours, signals sustained capital exit from the protocol, indicating weakening user commitment and health.

QDespite the broader slowdown, which financial metric showed a marginal improvement for Ethena in Q1 2026?

AGross profitability showed a marginal improvement, increasing to $614,190 in Q1 2026 from $463,200 in Q4 2025.

QWhat counter-signal does spot market activity provide against the weakening fundamentals?

ASpot market activity shows increased buying pressure, with net inflows of $303,000 in 24 hours and cumulative purchases of $3.41 million over three days, suggesting consistent accumulation by investors.

Leituras Relacionadas

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

OpenAI engineer Weng Jiayi's "Heuristic Learning" experiments propose a new paradigm for Agentic AI, suggesting that intelligent agents can improve not just by training neural networks, but also by autonomously writing and refining code based on environmental feedback. In the experiment, a coding agent (powered by Codex) was tasked with developing and maintaining a programmatic strategy for the Atari game Breakout. Starting from a basic prompt, the agent iteratively wrote code, ran the game, analyzed logs and video replays to identify failures, and then modified the code. Through this engineering loop of "code-run-debug-update," it evolved a pure Python heuristic strategy that achieved a perfect score of 864 in Breakout and performed competitively with deep reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms in MuJoCo control tasks like Ant and HalfCheetah. This approach, termed Heuristic Learning (HL), contrasts with Deep RL. In HL, experience is captured in readable, modifiable code, tests, logs, and configurations—a software system—rather than being encoded solely into opaque neural network weights. This offers potential advantages in explainability, auditability for safety-critical applications, easier integration of regression tests to combat catastrophic forgetting, and more efficient sample use in early learning stages, as demonstrated in broader tests on 57 Atari games. However, the blog acknowledges clear limitations. Programmatic strategies struggle with tasks requiring long-horizon planning or complex perception (e.g., Montezuma's Revenge), areas where neural networks excel. The future vision is a hybrid architecture: specialized neural networks for fast perception (System 1), HL systems for rules, safety, and local recovery (also System 1), and LLM agents providing high-level feedback and learning from the HL system's data (System 2). The core proposition is that in the era of capable coding agents, a significant portion of an AI's learned experience could be maintained as an auditable, evolving software system.

marsbitHá 40m

OpenAI Post-Training Engineer Weng Jiayi Proposes a New Paradigm Hypothesis for Agentic AI

marsbitHá 40m

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

This article explores the recent phenomenon of AI companies increasingly using anthropomorphic language—like "thinking," "memory," "hallucination," and now "dreaming"—to describe machine learning processes. Focusing on Anthropic's newly announced "Dreaming" feature for its Claude Agent platform, the piece explains that this function is essentially an automated, offline batch processing of an agent's operational logs. It analyzes past task sessions to identify patterns, optimize future actions, and consolidate learnings into a persistent memory system, akin to a form of reinforcement learning and self-correction. The article draws parallels to similar features in other AI agent systems like Hermes Agent and OpenClaw, which also implement mechanisms for reviewing historical data, extracting reusable "skills," and strengthening long-term memory. It notes a key difference from human dreaming: these AI "dreams" still consume computational resources and user tokens. Further context is provided by discussing the technical challenges of managing AI "memory" or context, highlighting the computational expense of large context windows and innovations like Subquadratic's new model claiming drastically longer contexts. The core critique argues that this strategic use of human-centric vocabulary does more than market products; it subtly reshapes user perception. By framing algorithms with terms associated with consciousness, companies blur the line between tool and autonomous entity. This linguistic shift can influence user expectations, tolerance for errors, and even perceptions of responsibility when systems fail, potentially diverting scrutiny from the companies and engineers behind the technology. The article concludes by speculating that terms like "daydreaming" for predictive task simulation might be next, continuing this trend of embedding the idea of an "inner life" into computational processes.

marsbitHá 42m

Your Claude Will Dream Tonight, Don't Disturb It

marsbitHá 42m

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ENA

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Ethena (ENA) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Ethena (ENA) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Ethena (ENA)Depois de comprar o teu Ethena (ENA), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Ethena (ENA)Transaciona facilmente Ethena (ENA) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

216 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Como comprar ENA

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ENA (ENA) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片