Ethena jumps 11.35% – As THIS turns positive, will ENA see a stronger breakout?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-04-10Última atualização em 2026-04-10

Resumo

ENA surged 11.35% to $0.09702, rebounding from below $0.09 and signaling early recovery strength, though it remains within a broader weak structure. The price faces key resistance at $0.10, a historical supply zone where upward momentum has slowed. Technical indicators like the MACD turning positive and Parabolic SAR flipping bullish suggest improving short-term sentiment. Persistent outflows reduced sell-side pressure, but limited inflows indicate weak demand. The funding rate turned slightly positive, reflecting growing long positioning without overcrowding. Overall, ENA shows signs of recovery but lacks strong confirmation for a sustained breakout above $0.10.

ENA surged 11.35% in 24 hours to $0.09702, rebounding sharply from recent lows and signaling early recovery strength. Price pushed higher after holding sub-$0.09 demand, which had previously acted as a consistent reaction zone.

This rebound reflected renewed buyer interest following a prolonged decline phase. However, the move has developed within a broader weak structure, which still lacks strong continuation signals.

The ENA rally has started to rebuild short-term strength, yet it has not fully shifted the larger trend.

Can ENA clear the $0.10 barrier?

ENA rebounded cleanly from below $0.09 and moved toward the $0.10 psychological resistance. This level has historically acted as a supply zone, where sellers have consistently stepped in.

As price approached this region, upward progress began to slow, which indicated hesitation among buyers. The structure showed a developing recovery leg, yet it lacked strong breakout confirmation above resistance.

Buyers managed to stabilize the price above recent lows, which supported the short-term trend. However, failure to decisively break above $0.10 kept the structure in a recovery phase rather than a confirmed reversal.

The current positioning suggested that further upside depended on sustained demand strength at these levels.

The MACD line had crossed above the signal line, while the histogram turned positive, signaling improving directional strength. This crossover emerged after an extended bearish phase, which reinforced the idea of a developing reversal.

In addition, the Parabolic SAR flipped below price, confirming a transition toward short-term bullish control. This shift suggested that downward pressure had weakened as buyers regained influence.

Source: TradingView

Outflows dominate as sell pressure eases

Spot flow data continued to reflect persistent outflows, with netflows recorded at -$384.87K. This consistent negative trend indicated that tokens had been leaving exchanges over time.

Such behavior reduced the available supply for immediate selling, which helped ease sell-side pressure.

As a result, the recent price rebound aligned with this reduction in exchange-held liquidity.

However, inflow activity remained limited, which suggested that strong demand had not yet fully returned. The structure pointed toward a supply-driven move, where reduced selling supported price rather than aggressive accumulation.

Source: CoinGlass

Are longs stepping in as funding flips positive?

Ethena’s OI-Weighted Funding Rate shifted into positive territory, reaching approximately 0.0095%. This change indicated that long traders had started paying to maintain positions, reflecting a growing bullish bias in derivatives markets.

The shift aligned with the recent price increase, which suggested that leverage had begun to support the upward move. However, the Funding Rate remained moderate, which showed that positioning had not yet become overcrowded.

This balance reduced the risk of sharp liquidation-driven reversals in the short term.

The gradual increase in long positioning suggested improving sentiment, although it still lacked the intensity typically seen during strong trend expansions.

Source: CoinGlass

Final Summary

  • ENA has rebounded strongly, but the price still struggled below the key $0.10 resistance level.
  • Outflows reduced selling pressure, while funding turns positive, showing an early bullish positioning shift.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the 24-hour price increase for ENA and what price level did it reach?

AENA surged 11.35% in 24 hours to reach a price of $0.09702.

QWhat key psychological resistance level is ENA currently struggling to break above?

AENA is struggling to break above the key psychological resistance level of $0.10.

QWhat two technical indicators signaled a shift towards a bullish trend for ENA?

AThe MACD line crossed above the signal line with a positive histogram, and the Parabolic SAR flipped below the price, both signaling a shift towards a bullish trend.

QAccording to the spot flow data, what was the trend and how did it affect selling pressure?

ASpot flow data showed persistent outflows of -$384.87K, meaning tokens were leaving exchanges. This reduced the available supply for selling, which helped ease sell-side pressure.

QWhat does a positive OI-Weighted Funding Rate of 0.0095% indicate for the Ethena market?

AA positive OI-Weighted Funding Rate indicates that long traders are paying to maintain their positions, reflecting a growing bullish bias and leverage starting to support the upward price move in the derivatives market.

Leituras Relacionadas

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbitHá 6h

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbitHá 6h

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbitHá 8h

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbitHá 8h

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbitHá 8h

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbitHá 8h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片