Dragonfly Survey on Current State of Crypto Recruitment: Compliance Roles +340%, Data Science +74%, Crypto Enters the Era of On-Demand Hiring

marsbitPublicado em 2026-04-16Última atualização em 2026-04-16

Resumo

Dragonfly's 2026 crypto talent report reveals a fundamental shift in hiring: companies now recruit based on actual need rather than market hype. In 2025, the industry saw a net reduction of 472 roles, but compliance positions surged by 340% and data science roles grew by 74%. The second half of 2025 brought discipline and recovery, with hiring stabilizing. Candidates are now more cautious, prioritizing company durability, clear role definition, and tangible impact over broad narratives. Engineering, AI/ML, and security roles remain highly competitive. Founders are advised to hire based on milestones—not cycles—and provide clear value propositions to attract talent. Remote work remains common, but key hubs like New York and the Bay Area dominate. AI's influence is significant, but its unclear impact in crypto may slow hiring. The outlook for 2026 is flat to moderate growth, driven by execution-focused teams with credible stories.

Author: Zackary Skelly (Head of Talent at Dragonfly)

Compiled by: Deep Tide TechFlow

Deep Tide Introduction: Dragonfly releases the 2026 crypto industry insights report, revealing a fundamental shift in hiring logic. In 2025, the industry saw a net reduction of 472 people, but compliance roles surged by 340%, and data science roles grew by 74%. The most critical change: candidates are no longer impulsive about the bull market; they want clear value explanations and certainty. If you can't explain "why this role is important," the conversion rate will plummet.

1/

We are now in the first quarter of 2026, and the hiring situation in the cryptocurrency space is completely different from any previous cycle.

We have just released the latest "Talent Insights Report," detailing how we got here and what it means for founders and talent teams.

2/

TL;DR

2025 did not kill crypto hiring; it matured it.

Companies are no longer hiring based on price but on actual needs.

This shift has become the new benchmark heading into 2026.

3/

The year was clearly divided into two halves.

The first half of 2025 (25H1) was turbulent, with pro-crypto optimism quickly reversing amid macro shocks.

Job removals surged in March (750), with most losses concentrated in the first half.

Approximately 3,700 new jobs were added for the year, while about 4,100 were removed, resulting in a net reduction of -472.

4/

The second half (H2) brought discipline and recovery.

The overall job trend in H2 was largely consistent with 2024, just at a lower overall level.

July reset, August bottomed out, September reopened, and Q4 stabilized.

The more severe reset in spring was the main reason 2025 overall was lower than 2024.

5/

In our 25H1 report, we made some predictions. Let's score them now:

✓ Late Q3 rebound (September job openings +26%), Q4 slowdown, compliance hiring started early

✗ Underestimated the degree of divergence in traffic and applications; overestimated the resilience of legal roles relative to compliance roles

6/

The real shift from 25H1 to H2 was not how many people companies hired, but what roles they hired for. Core first, earn the right to scale.

→ Engineering: -12%, still the anchor → Marketing: -27% → Design: -33% → Customer Service: -35% → Sales & BD: -16% → Legal: -41% → Compliance: +340%

7/

Data science was the clearest winner of the year, up +74% year-over-year. (Thanks to AI?)

8/

Interesting changes also happened on the candidate side.

Traffic remained stable in the second half, while applications dropped by about 26%.

People are still browsing, just not submitting applications as easily.

9/

In early cycles, market excitement did most of the hiring work: rising salaries, influx of applications.

This mechanism is failing.

Stronger months still drive page views, but attention conversion rates are not what they used to be.

10/

Why? Partly because candidates have become more cautious.

They are more rigorously screening companies for durability, ownership clarity, team quality, and technical credibility: open-source proof, product depth, hardcore problems, GTM roadmap.

Generic category narratives no longer work.

11/

Areas of concentrated belief: Infrastructure, DeFi, L1, and L2 remain core, but DeFi interest has narrowed to stablecoins, payments, and RWA.

Fintech-related and institutional use cases have gained significant attention. AI remains a key interest point.

12/

Stage preferences also tell an interesting story.

Seed and Series A stages are still the most attractive to candidates, with high demand for founder roles and first-employee roles. However, larger, more mature companies can still attract interest.

13/

The most common factor causing candidates to drop out is not compensation, stage, or size, but ambiguity.

If you cannot clearly explain why the company is important, what specific scope they will own, and why the opportunity has lasting power, the conversion rate will drop significantly.

14/

Geographically, remote work is still the norm, but the most active hiring teams are more concentrated in New York and lean towards in-person work.

Talent remains global, but New York + the Bay Area still dominate. Europe is the largest non-US hub.

(Note: Specific geographic hiring = smaller TAM, longer hiring cycles.)

15/

Another factor shaping the current landscape: Hiring is concentrating towards later-stage teams and significantly in the verticals candidates are most interested in.

We expect hiring for the remainder of 2026 to be driven more by acquisitions, pivots, and consolidation, rather than pure new growth.

16/

So what should founders do?

Hire based on milestones—product launches, revenue, partnerships, regulatory progress—not market cycles or calendar plans.

Companies that did well with hiring in H2 2025 could clearly articulate and stick to the reason for each role's existence.

17/

Know that teams are different, so sequence hires thoughtfully:

→ Core builders first (engineering, security, data/protocol) → BD explores fit → Product is flexible based on type (consumer earlier, infrastructure leaner) → Compliance, finance, risk → Marketing/support scales after leverage appears

18/

Keep pipelines always open for scarce talent.

Engineering, AI/ML, and security roles are severely supply-constrained and cannot be restarted from zero every cycle. Even if specific needs are closed, relationships should be kept warm.

19/

Recognize that the way roles are sold has changed.

Candidates want runway clarity, clear ownership for the first 30–60 days, and transparent upside mechanisms.

You must sell differentiation. You are not selling your category; you are selling why you will win and what specific role they can play.

20/

You also need a real AI story. Not "we are an AI company."

Candidates want to know:

→ How AI is used internally → How it changes the product → Whether it creates a real advantage

Vague answers lose talent.

21/

Specific advice for talent teams:

Put your strongest people at the front of the process (first impressions matter), keep interview loops tight, and provide clear feedback.

22/

An open question: AI makes 2026 harder to predict.

People can do more with fewer people. Better tools enable some to start their own. Some might go work directly on AI.

Meanwhile, higher output per employee means faster scaling, and crypto is positioned more broadly than ever.

23/

Our current view on AI's impact: Before clear AI × Crypto use cases solidify, deceleration signals are stronger than acceleration signals.

📎 Further reading: The Agentic Economy Will Be Massive, Agentic Commerce Won't

24/

Our baseline expectation for 2026: Flat to moderate growth, led by engineering, AI/data, and security. Consolidation will continue.

Whether bull, baseline, or bear market, this is a year focused on quality building.

25/

The teams that will win talent will be those with the most credible stories, not the loudest ones.

Execution discipline, durable business models, and good explanations of both are essential.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat were the key changes in the crypto hiring landscape in 2025 according to Dragonfly's report?

AThe key changes were a shift from hiring based on market hype to hiring based on actual need, with a net reduction of 472 jobs. Compliance roles surged by 340% and data science roles grew by 74%, while roles in marketing, design, customer service, sales, BD, and legal declined significantly.

QWhich job function saw the highest percentage increase in hiring in 2025, and what was the speculated reason?

AData science saw the highest percentage increase at 74%, with the report speculating that this growth might be due to the influence of AI.

QHow did candidate behavior change in the second half of 2025 (H2)?

ACandidate traffic remained stable, but the number of applications submitted dropped by approximately 26%. Candidates became more cautious, browsing jobs but not applying as readily, and demanded greater clarity on a company's importance, role specifics, and long-term viability.

QWhat are the new priorities for founders when hiring in the current crypto environment?

AFounders should hire based on specific milestones (like launches, revenue, partnerships, regulatory progress) rather than market cycles. They must clearly articulate why each role is important, provide clear runways, define ownership for the first 30-60 days, and offer transparent upside mechanisms.

QWhat is the geographic concentration of the most active crypto hiring teams and the talent pool?

AThe most active hiring teams are concentrated in New York and favor in-person work. The talent pool remains global, but New York and the Bay Area dominate, with Europe being the largest non-US hub.

Leituras Relacionadas

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbitHá 10h

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbitHá 10h

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbitHá 11h

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbitHá 11h

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbitHá 12h

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbitHá 12h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar ERA

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Caldera (ERA) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Caldera (ERA) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Caldera (ERA)Depois de comprar o teu Caldera (ERA), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Caldera (ERA)Transaciona facilmente Caldera (ERA) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

452 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.07.17

Como comprar ERA

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de ERA (ERA) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片