DoubleZero gains 11% – Analyzing if 2Z can hold above $0.08

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-02-26Última atualização em 2026-02-26

Resumo

DoubleZero (2Z) surged 11% in 24 hours, with trading volume up 78% to $12 million, driven by institutional inflows and a technical breakout. The altcoin saw $37.79 million in USD inflows after recent outflows, with Solana leading token inflows. The price broke above a key descending trendline at $0.06647 and is now testing resistance at $0.07560. To sustain bullish momentum, it must hold above $0.08. The MACD indicates growing bullish strength, with net buy volume positive. However, TVL has declined from its yearly high of $1.9 billion to $1.083 billion, and fees have dropped to around $316K, showing mixed on-chain activity.

DoubleZero [2Z] surged by 11% following a broader market resurgence in the past 24 hours, at press time. During this spike, the volume spiked by more than 78%, reaching $12 million at press time.

Analytically, the rally was driven by institutions, USD inflows, and a technical breakout on the charts.

Daily USD inflows turn positive

As per data from DefiLlama, the altcoin saw positive inflows after two consecutive days of outflows. About $37.79 million had entered the 2Z market, though it was still small compared to the $90 million that left.

Since the start of February, the platform has seen more outflows than inflows. Over the past two weeks, its highest inflow has been $78 million, while its biggest outflow was $55 million the day before.

For these inflows by token, Solana [SOL] topped in the past 24 hours. This is probably because the token was deployed on the Solana blockchain. This increase took the total of Solana mainnet staking on DoubleZero to 168 million SOL.

Additionally, institutions were still convinced and were pouring in capital. For instance, crypto investment firm DBA maintained a stake in DoubleZero as its strategy to back Bitcoin [BTC] with its $68 million Fund II. This reinforced institutional backing.

2Z invalidates the descending trendline

The charts showed that 2Z broke above a descending trendline at $0.06647 that had held the price since the 24th of January. DoubleZero’s price continued to rise but now battles the mini resistance at $0.07560.

For the altcoin to sustain the shift in direction bias and momentum, the price has to stay above $0.08, which was the last lower low of the structure.

At press time, the MACD showed that bullish strength was increasing, as confirmed by the net buy volume. The Net Volume showed that buyers had outdone sellers, as they scooped 2.32 million 2Z tokens more than their counterparts sold.

The invalidation of the existing price structure hinted at a potential bottom. This takes into account that $0.06913 was around the launch price of 2Z on Binance’s Spot market. Still, there was potential for a pullback for a retest of this breakout.

TVL declines from yearly highs

The Total Value Locked (TVL) and fees showed DoubleZero’s influence in the crypto industry, especially staking.

The altcoin had $1.083 billion in TVL, almost 7x more than that of Cardano [ADA], which was at $161 million as per DefiLlama data.

DoubleZero’s TVL experienced a decline from its ATH high of $1.9 billion achieved this year. Its fees also dropped to around $316K at press time.

These metric readings showed that activity was mixed in sentiment, as USD inflows were positive while TVL was declining. On the other hand, price action was breaking out, but sustaining the rally depended on staying above $0.080.


Final Summary

  • DoubleZero rallied about 11% in the past 24 hours amid positive inflows.
  • For 2Z to remain bullish on the 4-hour chart, the price needs to break and stay above $0.080.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the percentage increase in DoubleZero's price in the past 24 hours and what was the accompanying volume spike?

ADoubleZero's price surged by 11% and its trading volume spiked by more than 78%, reaching $12 million.

QAccording to the article, what were the three main drivers behind the DoubleZero rally?

AThe rally was driven by institutions, USD inflows, and a technical breakout on the charts.

QWhat key price level must DoubleZero's price stay above to sustain its bullish momentum and shift in direction bias?

AThe price must stay above $0.08, which was the last lower low of the structure.

QWhich blockchain's token topped the inflows in the past 24 hours and what was the result for its mainnet staking on DoubleZero?

ASolana [SOL] topped the inflows, and this increase took the total of Solana mainnet staking on DoubleZero to 168 million SOL.

QHow does DoubleZero's current Total Value Locked (TVL) compare to that of Cardano [ADA], and what was the trend for its TVL?

ADoubleZero's TVL was $1.083 billion, almost 7x more than Cardano's $161 million. However, it had declined from its all-time high of $1.9 billion achieved earlier in the year.

Leituras Relacionadas

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

On April 24, 2026, DeepSeek released V4, a Chinese large language model offering a free "million-token context window," enabling it to process vast amounts of data like entire books or years of corporate documents in one go. In contrast, OpenAI’s GPT-5.5, released around the same time, is more powerful but significantly more expensive, charging up to $180 per million output tokens. DeepSeek’s strategy represents a shift from a pure AI research firm to a heavy-infrastructure player, building data centers in Inner Mongolia’s Ulanqab to bypass U.S. chip export restrictions. This move, supported by Huawei’s Ascend chips and China’s cheap green electricity, highlights a fundamental divergence in AI development models: U.S. firms focus on high-cost, high-margin services, while Chinese players like DeepSeek prioritize accessibility and affordability. Facing intense talent poaching from tech giants, DeepSeek is seeking a $44 billion valuation funding round to retain researchers and scale infrastructure. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers are compressing AI models to run on smartphones, making AI accessible offline and across the Global South. Through open-source models and localized solutions, Chinese AI is empowering non-English speakers and low-income users, driving a form of "digital equality." While Silicon Valley builds walled gardens, DeepSeek and others are turning AI into a public utility—like tap water—flowing freely to those previously left behind.

marsbitHá 6m

OpenAI Goes Left, DeepSeek Goes Right

marsbitHá 6m

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

On April 18, 2026, an attacker stole 116,500 rsETH (worth ~$292M) from KelpDAO’s cross-chain bridge in 46 minutes—the largest DeFi exploit of 2026. The stolen assets were deposited into Aave V3 as collateral, causing $177–200M in bad debt and triggering a cascade of losses across nine DeFi protocols. Aave’s TVL dropped by ~$6B overnight. This legal analysis argues that KelpDAO and LayerZero Labs share concurrent liability, with fault apportioned 60%/40%. KelpDAO negligently configured its bridge with a 1-of-1 decentralized verifier network (DVN)—a single point of failure—despite LayerZero’s explicit recommendation of a 2-of-3 setup. LayerZero, which operated the compromised DVN, failed to secure its RPC infrastructure against a known poisoning attack vector. Both protocols’ terms of service cap liability at $200 (KelpDAO) or $50 (LayerZero), but these limits are likely unenforceable due to unconscionability, gross negligence exceptions, and potential securities law invalidation (if rsETH is deemed a security under the Howey test). Aave’s governance also faces fiduciary duty claims for raising rsETH’s loan-to-value ratio to 93%—far above competitors’ 72–75%—without adequately assessing bridge risks, amplifying the systemic fallout. Practical recovery targets include LayerZero Labs (a registered Canadian entity), KelpDAO’s founders, auditors, and identifiable Aave governance delegates. The incident underscores escalating legal risks for DeFi protocols, infrastructure providers, and governance participants.

marsbitHá 1h

$292 Million KelpDAO Cross-Chain Bridge Hack: Who Should Foot the Bill?

marsbitHá 1h

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

On April 24, the U.S. Department of Justice arrested U.S. Army Special Forces Staff Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke for insider trading related to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro on January 3. Van Dyke allegedly profited over $400,000 by placing bets on a prediction market, Polymarket, using insider knowledge of the covert operation. According to the indictment, Van Dyke registered an account (0x31a5) on December 26 and made a series of bets predicting Maduro’s capture and U.S. military involvement in Venezuela. He withdrew most of his funds on the day of the operation and attempted to obscure his tracks by transferring assets through crypto and brokerage accounts. This case marks the first time the DOJ has prosecuted insider trading on Polymarket. PolyBeats had previously identified five suspicious accounts, including Van Dyke’s—the highest earner—in January. The other accounts, with profits ranging from $34,000 to $145,000, remain under unofficial scrutiny but have not been charged. Their lower profits, indirect access to information, and unclear legal boundaries may complicate prosecution. Polymarket has since strengthened its market integrity rules, explicitly prohibiting trading based on confidential or insider information. Van Dyke’s arrest, nearly four months after his trades, signals increased regulatory attention and the persistent traceability of blockchain-based transactions.

marsbitHá 1h

Insider Trading in War: 5 People Involved, the Highest Earner Was Arrested

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片