Custodia Bank Loses Case For Rehearing Over Fed Master Account – Details

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-03-15Última atualização em 2026-03-15

Resumo

Custodia Bank has lost its request for a full court rehearing in its legal battle to obtain a Federal Reserve master account. The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit upheld an earlier ruling, with a 7-3 vote, affirming the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City's (FRBKC) authority to deny such applications. This decision reinforces the Fed's discretion in granting master accounts, which provide direct access to its payment system. Custodia, a crypto bank, had argued the denial was unlawful. The bank's options now include appealing to the US Supreme Court or applying for a special limited master account similar to the one granted to Kraken.

Crypto bank Custodia has lost another legal battle in its campaign to review the Federal Reserve’s position as the final authority over granting master accounts. This development comes after the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rejected the Caitlin Long-led digital bank’s request for rehearing after an initial favorable ruling for the Federal Reserve in October 2025.

Custodia Loses 6-Year Legal Battle With FRBKC

In 2023, the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (FRBKC) rejected Custodia’s application for a master account, a designation that would have granted the crypto bank access to the Fed’s payment rails, thus eliminating the need for intermediary services. Notably, Custodia challenged this decision at a Wyoming district court in 2024, claiming its eligibility for a master account as a nonmember depository institution, while also stating the FRBKC lacked the constitutional authority to deny its application, having satisfied the requirements.

Following an initial defeat at this state court, Custodia moved its case to the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, where a three-man panel also sided with the Federal Reserve, reinforcing the central banks as the final authority to grant a master account regardless of the candidate’s eligibility. In December 2025, the crypto bank filed for a petition for an en banc hearing that would include a full ten-member panel. However, a report by independent editor Eleanor Terrett states the appellate court has chosen to uphold the initial ruling in favor of the FRBKC.

🚨NEW: The 10th Circuit has rejected @custodiabank’s request for a full court rehearing in its master account fight with the @federalreserve, after a panel ruled in October that Reserve Banks have legal discretion to deny master account access.

Active judges voted 7–3 against... https://t.co/SXE4qf5TBH pic.twitter.com/O9pQ9zrH5h

— Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) March 13, 2026

Further details indicate that the judgment was reached by a 7-3 vote, with the majority of the panel agreeing that the Federal Reserve holds final authority over such account-designation matters. Notably, dissenting judges Timothy Tymkovich and Allison Eid warned that granting Federal Reserve banks unchecked authority to accept or deny applications from state-chartered institutions contravened the Monetary Control Act of 1980.

What Next For Custodia?

In terms of its next actions, Custodia is within its rights to take the case to the US Supreme Court. However, the odds of the nation’s apex court granting such reviews are low. Alternatively, the crypto bank can seek to apply for the special limited master account recently granted by the FRBKC to crypto exchange Kraken. Although this differs from standard master accounts, they both have similar features that could ease operations for Custodia.

At the time of writing, Custodia has yet to issue any official reaction to the Appellate Court’s recent ruling.

Total crypto market cap valued at $2.4 trillion on the daily chart | Source: TOTAL chart on Tradingview.com

Criptomoedas em alta

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat was the latest legal development in Custodia Bank's case against the Federal Reserve?

AThe US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit rejected Custodia Bank's request for a full court rehearing, upholding an earlier panel ruling in favor of the Federal Reserve.

QWhy did the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (FRBKC) originally reject Custodia's application?

AThe FRBKC rejected Custodia's application for a master account, a designation that would have granted the crypto bank direct access to the Fed's payment systems without needing an intermediary.

QWhat was the vote count by the appellate court judges on the rehearing request, and who dissented?

AThe judgment was reached by a 7-3 vote. Judges Timothy Tymkovich and Allison Eid were among the dissenting judges.

QWhat are Custodia's potential next steps following this court decision?

ACustodia can either appeal the case to the US Supreme Court or seek to apply for the special limited master account recently granted to crypto exchange Kraken.

QWhat was the main argument of the dissenting judges in this case?

AThe dissenting judges warned that granting Federal Reserve banks unchecked authority to deny applications from state-chartered institutions contravened the Monetary Control Act of 1980.

Leituras Relacionadas

On L1 Value Capture from Two Solana Proposals

The article, "Discussing L1 Value Capture Through Two Solana Proposals," by Max Resnick, explores how Layer 1 (L1) blockchain tokens derive their fundamental value, drawing parallels to traditional asset pricing theory. Resnick argues that L1 token value, like stock value, stems from claims on future income streams for holders, not merely from network activity or technological promise. This value is captured when fees are either burned (economically akin to a buyback) or distributed to stakers (akin to dividends). Inflationary staking rewards, by contrast, redistribute value among holders rather than creating it. The core challenge is the quality and defensibility of fee-based revenue. High-quality fees come from sustainable, recurring demand for the network's economic utility (e.g., long-term financial activity), not from transient speculation (e.g., meme coins, airdrops). The strength of a blockchain's network effects—liquidity, applications, users—can make its revenue more defensible and grant it greater pricing power than often assumed. The article proposes a foundational valuation framework for L1s, separating revenue (fees captured for token holders), costs, and total token supply. A key accounting principle is that inflationary rewards should not be counted as a cost unless the newly minted tokens are symmetrically counted as a value input; otherwise, it misrepresents profitability. Finally, Resnick discusses the economics of increasing protocol fees to boost revenue. Since revenue equals price times quantity, the net effect depends on demand elasticity. Research on Ethereum suggests transaction demand is somewhat elastic; a fee increase reduces volume. A uniform fee is a blunt instrument, as different transactions (e.g., small transfers vs. large settlements) have vastly different abilities to pay. The article suggests that transaction-value-based fees, potentially implemented via token programs, could be a more efficient way to capture value from high-willingness-to-pay activities. The discussion is framed around ongoing Solana proposals (SIMD-550, SIMD-553) but focuses on the universal principles of L1 value accrual.

marsbitHá 6m

On L1 Value Capture from Two Solana Proposals

marsbitHá 6m

Meme Coin with $60 Million Market Cap Plunges 65% in One Minute, FOMO Faces Renewed Scrutiny

A Solana-based meme token, $CATE, which had surged from a $20M+ to over $80M market cap in about a week, experienced a dramatic 65% crash within one minute. This flash crash has intensified scrutiny on the trading app 'fomo' and highlighted the speculative nature of the current meme coin market. The crash coincided with two events: the token's X account being suspended and the fomo app experiencing downtime, preventing users from trading. While the X suspension was straightforward, the fomo outage raised significant questions. $CATE's primary narrative driver was the open endorsement by Poorgoat, a top-ranked trader on fomo with over 200,000 followers, who had turned a ~$45,000 investment into over $2M at the peak. The token itself had no novel fundamentals, being a "cat sister" to Doge, a concept already existing on Ethereum without success. The crash, triggered by less than $1.5M in selling volume despite over 60,000 holder addresses, exposed a harsh reality: purely "organic" community-driven meme tokens (excluding past successes like $SPX) may now have a market cap ceiling around $17M, as exemplified by the long-term chart of $neet. This incident has fueled existing controversies surrounding fomo. Critics have grown skeptical of the app, alleging that rankings dominated by KOLs who receive lucrative token airdrops could be manipulated to create "pump-and-dump" schemes, luring in retail users before a rug pull. The timing of the crash during fomo's outage—preventing many of its users (who represent over 60% of $CATE holders) from reacting—was viewed as highly suspicious. Further controversy arose when another popular fomo trader publicly sold near the peak, and concerns were raised about the security of accessing private keys during the app's downtime. Fomo's official explanation of server overload due to surging user traffic was met with skepticism, given its substantial funding. The event serves as a stark reminder of the risks in meme coin speculation and the potential vulnerabilities of relying on a single trading platform during market volatility.

marsbitHá 17m

Meme Coin with $60 Million Market Cap Plunges 65% in One Minute, FOMO Faces Renewed Scrutiny

marsbitHá 17m

The Yen Carry Trade Is Back in Focus: Why Crypto Traders Should Watch Japan

The US Treasury has reportedly intervened alongside Japan to support the yen, marking the first coordinated effort since 2011. This move aims to stabilize the yen after its sharp decline, which can have broad implications for global markets. The yen's importance stems from the "yen carry trade," where investors borrow cheap yen to fund investments in higher-yielding assets, including cryptocurrencies. A rapid strengthening of the yen could pressure these leveraged positions, forcing investors to unwind them and potentially triggering volatility across risk assets like Bitcoin, as seen in a sharp crypto sell-off in August 2024. For crypto traders, the key risk is not the intervention itself, but whether it leads to significant yen appreciation and a broader unwind of carry trades, impacting global liquidity and crypto market volatility. Monitoring USD/JPY movements, crypto derivatives data, and broader macro indicators is crucial.

TheNewsCryptoHá 27m

The Yen Carry Trade Is Back in Focus: Why Crypto Traders Should Watch Japan

TheNewsCryptoHá 27m

Arthur Hayes' 10,000-Word New Article: When Will the AI Wave Peak? Will the Bubble Burst? Why Am I Frantically Buying ETH?

Arthur Hayes' latest article explores the intersection of AI investment, credit markets, and cryptocurrency. He argues that the massive capital expenditure (CAPEX) in AI infrastructure resembles a real estate-driven credit bubble, akin to the 2008 financial crisis, rather than a tech growth story. Hayes predicts that the AI bubble's peak will arrive in 2027, triggered not by failing AI profits but by a slowdown in the growth rate of data center construction and capex, revealing systemic over-leverage. He explains that banks, incentivized by government policy and steep yield curves, will continue lending to AI projects despite rising risks, expecting eventual government bailouts. Hayes further speculates that the US government might directly intervene by creating a sovereign wealth fund to buy AI equities, injecting permanent liquidity into the system. For crypto investors, this misallocation of capital is bullish. Hayes believes Bitcoin will bottom as AI capex growth decelerates but credit continues to flow, setting the stage for a major rally fueled by the inevitable large-scale monetary stimulus. He sets a rough year-end 2026 target of $5,000 for Ethereum, citing its potential role as a settlement layer for tokenized real-world assets (RWA) as a key narrative driver. The eventual government response to the AI credit bubble, he concludes, will unleash a cryptocurrency bull market unlike any seen since 2021.

marsbitHá 31m

Arthur Hayes' 10,000-Word New Article: When Will the AI Wave Peak? Will the Bubble Burst? Why Am I Frantically Buying ETH?

marsbitHá 31m

Goldman Sachs Details Korea Memory "8 Key Focus Points": Valuation, Long-Term Agreements, Inventory, CXMT Impact, Buybacks, etc.

Goldman Sachs maintains a "Buy" rating on Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix, stating their recent sharp share price corrections reflect excessive market pessimism unsupported by fundamentals. The report addresses eight key market concerns: 1. **HBM Pricing:** GS forecasts HBM blended average prices for Samsung and SK Hynix to nearly double by 2027 due to persistent tight supply and a need to re-establish price premiums over standard DRAM. 2. **Long-Term Agreements (LTAs):** LTA terms are shifting in favor of suppliers, featuring longer terms, higher coverage targets (60-70% of capacity), "floor-price" protections, and significant upfront customer deposits. 3. **Inventory:** While module maker inventory is elevated, this represents a small portion of the overall market. Supplier and end-customer inventories remain healthy at low levels. 4. **NAND Supply:** Fears of a NAND oversupply are overblown. Strong enterprise SSD demand is expected to offset consumer weakness, with the supply-demand gap widening through 2027. 5. **Shareholder Returns:** GS expects both companies' actual dividends to exceed current market consensus. Share buybacks would be well-received, especially for SK Hynix to counter ADR-related dilution. 6. **SK Hynix ADR Premium:** The ADR's ~30% premium over the local share is likely persistent due to conversion constraints but aids long-term valuation re-rating by improving global investor access. 7. **SK Hynix Q2 '26 Results:** The earnings miss was due to one-time factors like slower HBM4 mix transition. Q3 is expected to see a strong recovery with higher volumes and better pricing/mix. 8. **CXMT Impact:** The competitive threat from China's CXMT is limited to the domestic market due to its technology lag and different product mix, posing minimal risk to the global supply-demand balance. GS concludes the current low valuations (approx. 3.5x 2027 P/E) imply an unrealistic lack of profit sustainability.

marsbitHá 32m

Goldman Sachs Details Korea Memory "8 Key Focus Points": Valuation, Long-Term Agreements, Inventory, CXMT Impact, Buybacks, etc.

marsbitHá 32m

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

O que é $BANK

Bank AI: Um Passo Revolucionário no Futuro da Banca Introdução Em uma era marcada por avanços rápidos na tecnologia, o Bank AI está na interseção da inteligência artificial (IA) e dos serviços bancários. Este projeto inovador visa redefinir o panorama financeiro, melhorando a eficiência operacional, as medidas de segurança e as experiências dos clientes através do poder da IA. Ao embarcarmos nesta exploração do Bank AI, iremos aprofundar no que o projeto implica, suas dinâmicas operacionais, seu contexto histórico e marcos significativos. O que é o Bank AI? No seu cerne, o Bank AI representa uma iniciativa transformadora com o objetivo de integrar a inteligência artificial em várias operações bancárias. Este projeto aproveita as capacidades da IA para automatizar processos, melhorar os protocolos de gestão de risco e melhorar a interação com os clientes através de serviços personalizados. Os principais objetivos do Bank AI incluem: Automatização das Funções Bancárias: Ao aproveitar as tecnologias de IA, o Bank AI visa automatizar tarefas rotineiras, reduzindo o peso sobre os recursos humanos e aumentando a eficiência. Gestão de Risco Melhorada: O projeto utiliza algoritmos de IA para prever e identificar riscos, fortalecendo assim as medidas de segurança contra fraudes e outras ameaças. Personalização dos Serviços Bancários: O Bank AI foca em oferecer produtos e serviços financeiros ajustados, analisando dados e comportamentos dos clientes. Melhoria da Experiência do Cliente: A implementação de soluções impulsionadas por IA, como chatbots e assistentes virtuais, visa proporcionar aos usuários interações mais humanizadas, revolucionando a forma como os clientes se envolvem com os bancos. Com esses objetivos, o Bank AI posiciona-se como um ator crucial para tornar a banca mais eficiente, segura e centrada no usuário. Quem é o Criador do Bank AI? Os detalhes sobre o criador do Bank AI permanecem desconhecidos. Assim, nenhuma pessoa ou organização específica foi identificada nas informações disponíveis. O anonimato que cerca a origem do projeto levanta questões, mas não diminui a sua ambiciosa visão e objetivos. Quem são os Investidores do Bank AI? Semelhante ao criador do projeto, informações específicas sobre os investidores ou organizações que apoiam o Bank AI não foram divulgadas. Sem essas informações, é difícil delinear o apoio financeiro e institucional que pode estar impulsionando o projeto para frente. No entanto, a importância de ter uma sólida base de investimento é fundamental para sustentar o desenvolvimento em um campo tão inovador. Como Funciona o Bank AI? O Bank AI opera em várias frentes inovadoras, focando em fatores únicos que o diferenciam das estruturas bancárias tradicionais. Abaixo estão as principais características operacionais: Automatização: Ao aplicar algoritmos de aprendizado de máquina, o Bank AI automatiza vários processos manuais dentro dos bancos. Isso resulta na redução dos custos operacionais e permite que os trabalhadores humanos redirecionem os seus esforços para atividades mais estratégicas. Gestão de Risco Avançada: A integração da IA nas práticas de gestão de risco equipa os bancos com ferramentas para prever com precisão potenciais ameaças, como fraudes, garantindo que as informações e ativos dos clientes permaneçam seguros. Recomendações Financeiras Personalizadas: Através do aprendizado contínuo a partir das interações com os clientes, os sistemas de IA desenvolvem uma compreensão sutil das necessidades dos usuários, permitindo oferecer conselhos adaptados sobre decisões financeiras. Interações Melhoradas com os Clientes: Utilizando chatbots e assistentes virtuais alimentados por IA, o Bank AI permite uma experiência de cliente mais envolvente, permitindo que os usuários tenham suas dúvidas resolvidas rapidamente, reduzindo assim os tempos de espera e melhorando os níveis de satisfação. Juntas, estas características operacionais posicionam o Bank AI como um pioneiro no setor bancário, estabelecendo novos padrões para a prestação de serviços e a excelência operacional. Cronologia do Bank AI Compreender a trajetória do Bank AI requer uma análise do seu contexto histórico. Abaixo está uma cronologia que destaca marcos e desenvolvimentos importantes: Início de 2010: A conceituação da integração da IA nos serviços bancários começou a ganhar atenção à medida que instituições bancárias reconheciam os potenciais benefícios. 2018: Ocorreu um aumento significativo na implementação de tecnologias de IA, quando os bancos começaram a usar ferramentas de IA como chatbots para atendimento ao cliente básico e sistemas de gestão de risco para melhorar o tratamento de segurança. 2023: A sofisticação da IA continuou a avançar, com a introdução de IA generativa para tarefas mais complexas, como processamento de documentos e análise de investimentos em tempo real. Este ano marcou um salto significativo nas capacidades proporcionadas aos bancos pela tecnologia de IA. 2024-Estado Atual: Neste ano, o Bank AI está em uma trajetória ascendente, com pesquisas e desenvolvimentos em andamento prontos para aprimorar ainda mais as capacidades nas operações bancárias. A exploração contínua das aplicações de IA sugere desenvolvimentos emocionantes por vir. Pontos Chave Sobre o Bank AI Integração da IA na Banca: O Bank AI foca na adoção da inteligência artificial para simplificar os processos bancários e melhorar as experiências dos usuários. Automatização e Foco em Gestão de Risco: O projeto enfatiza fortemente essas áreas, visando transferir o peso das tarefas rotineiras enquanto melhora as estruturas de segurança através de análises preditivas. Soluções Bancárias Personalizadas: Ao aproveitar os dados dos clientes, o Bank AI possibilita serviços bancários ajustados que atendem às necessidades individuais dos usuários. Compromisso com o Desenvolvimento: O Bank AI permanece comprometido com contínuas pesquisas e esforços de desenvolvimento, garantindo a sua adaptabilidade e relevância contínua à medida que a tecnologia continua a evoluir. Conclusão Em resumo, o Bank AI exemplifica um passo crucial em frente na indústria bancária, aproveitando a inteligência artificial para remodelar paradigmas operacionais, melhorar a segurança e promover a satisfação do cliente. Apesar das lacunas de informação em torno do criador e dos investidores, os objetivos claros e os mecanismos funcionais do Bank AI fornecem uma base sólida para sua evolução contínua. À medida que a tecnologia de IA continua a avançar e se fundir com o setor bancário, o Bank AI está bem posicionado para impactar significativamente o futuro dos serviços financeiros, aprimorando a maneira como entendemos e interagimos com a banca.

122 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2024.12.03

Como comprar BANK

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Depois de comprar o teu Lorenzo Protocol (BANK), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Lorenzo Protocol (BANK)Transaciona facilmente Lorenzo Protocol (BANK) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

480 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de BANK (BANK) são apresentadas abaixo.