Crypto Market and General Reaction to US Tariff Incident

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-23Última atualização em 2026-02-23

Resumo

The US Supreme Court's decision to strike down tariffs imposed by Donald Trump has triggered notable reactions across financial markets, including cryptocurrency. Bitcoin led a market decline, dropping 2.52% to around $66,315, with volatility surging to 11.03%. Total crypto liquidations reached $508 million in 24 hours, with BTC alone at $232.94 million. The US Dollar also weakened slightly, falling 0.14% against a basket of currencies. Broader concerns include potential litigation risks, unclear refund processes for over $175 billion in previously collected tariffs, and rising Treasury yields at 4.1%, which may fuel inflation and interest rate worries. Attention now turns to lower court rulings on refunds and potential rate decisions by the Bank of Japan, which could further impact global markets, including crypto.

The US tariff incident pertains to the national Supreme Court striking down tariffs imposed by Donald Trump. The verdict has now yielded reactions from different sectors, including the crypto market. It becomes important to notice reactions to the verdict because uncertainty about Trump’s next move still looms. And, there is little information about other aspects, like refunds or litigation risks.

Crypto Market Reacts to US Tariff Verdict

The global crypto market has reacted in two different ways – price and liquidations. The former has seen a broader plunge led by BTC. The flagship token has lost 2.52% in 24 hours to trade at around $66,315. Bitcoin tokens’ volatility has surged to 11.03%, now categorised as very high with an FGI of 5 points.

Liquidation stands at $508.01 million for 24 hours. BTC alone recorded $232.94 million worth of liquidation. It includes short and long worth $25.69 million and $207.24 million, respectively. Data by Coinglass further shows that ETH ranks second with a liquidation of $128.33 million when the article is being written.

More Reactions

The US Dollar has declined by 0.14% against the basket of six currencies. It now values 97.655. The figure only stands tall by 0.53% in the last 5 days; however, it shows a declining trend over a month and 6 months. The negative change comes to 0.69% and 0.60%, applicable in the same order.

Debt issuance and litigation risks are additional likely reactions that are expected to follow. There is no clarity about how monetary collections via tariffs, now struck down, will be refunded. The decision is likely to come from a lower court. Meanwhile, concerns about receiving litigation and/or increasing debt issuance are at the center of the stage.

For a quick reference, more than $175 billion worth of revenue was raised by high tariffs. Yields on 10-year Treasuries were seen at 4.1%, higher than earlier. There is now a reported concern about inflation and interest rates.

What’s Next?

It remains to be seen what the lower court rules in terms of refunds. Until then, there is attention on what decision the Bank of Japan (BoJ) takes about raising interest rates. It is speculated that the BoJ may raise rates in March 2026. Any decision and related-markets could see a butterfly effect. It could be wrong to exclude the crypto market from any such developments.

It is important to note that the content of this article is neither a recommendation nor advice. Do thorough research and risk assessment before crypto, or any other kind of, investments.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Binance Coin Slides Below $600 as Market Bloodbath Triggers Liquidations

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat are the two main ways the crypto market has reacted to the US tariff verdict?

AThe crypto market has reacted in two main ways: price movements and liquidations. The broader market saw a price plunge led by Bitcoin, and the total liquidation amount reached $508.01 million in 24 hours.

QWhat was the 24-hour price change and current trading price for Bitcoin mentioned in the article?

ABitcoin lost 2.52% in 24 hours and was trading at around $66,315.

QAccording to the article, what is the current concern regarding the tariff revenue that was struck down?

AThe current concern is how the monetary collections from the tariffs, which amounted to over $175 billion, will be refunded, as there is no clarity on the process.

QWhat future event from the Bank of Japan (BoJ) is the market paying attention to, and what is the speculated timeline?

AThe market is paying attention to the Bank of Japan's decision on raising interest rates, which is speculated to potentially happen in March 2026.

QWhich cryptocurrency had the second-highest liquidation value after Bitcoin, and what was the amount?

AEthereum (ETH) had the second-highest liquidation value at $128.33 million.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that the core limitation of blockchain technology is not the scalability trilemma, but its fundamental lack of privacy, which acts as a barrier to institutional capital. It defines blockchain as a slow, expensive, shared computer whose primary value is "permissionlessness" (no administrator) and verifiable trust. While this is ideal for native financial assets like stable币, which now process trillions, two critical flaws remain for mainstream adoption: regulatory legitimacy and a default transparency that leaks all financial activity. The author contends that transparency is not a feature but a tax, quantified through MEV extraction, making the public ledger unusable for serious institutions. However, modern cryptography, specifically zero-knowledge proofs, now offers a solution: "provable privacy." This allows users to prove compliance (e.g., solvency, KYC) without revealing underlying data. This fusion of privacy and auditability resolves the transparency-compliant privacy-compliance dichotomy, enabling a purely upgraded system where transactions are verified but not broadcasted. Closing these flaws is presented as the essential bridge to onboard the next wave of trillions in capital.

marsbitHá 1h

The Impossible Trilemma Is Basically a Pseudo-Problem

marsbitHá 1h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

The article argues that blockchain's fundamental limitation is not the scalability trilemma (decentralization, scalability, security), which has been largely solved, but the lack of **privacy** and, until recently, clear **legitimacy**. Blockchain is described as a slow, expensive, globally shared computer whose core value is censorship resistance and verifiability. While ideal for native digital assets like money (e.g., stablecoins), its default transparency acts as a **tax**, exposing all transactions and enabling MEV extraction, which deters serious institutional capital. Simultaneously, its permissionless nature created regulatory ambiguity. The piece contends that **privacy** is the missing critical feature. It rejects the false choice between total transparency and complete anonymity. Modern cryptography (like zero-knowledge proofs) enables **compliant privacy**: users can prove facts (solvency, KYC status, compliance) without revealing the underlying sensitive data (specific holdings, identities). This preserves auditability for regulators and eliminates the leak of financial information. With recent regulatory progress (e.g., the GENIUS Act) addressing legitimacy, adding default, provably compliant privacy becomes a pure upgrade. It transforms blockchain from a costly, public ledger into a confidential settlement layer, finally bridging the gap to mainstream institutional and individual adoption of on-chain finance.

链捕手Há 1h

The "Impossible Triad" Is Fundamentally a Pseudo-Problem

链捕手Há 1h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

The global optical chip industry is experiencing a massive wave of expansion driven by surging AI data center demand. Major players across the US, Japan, Europe, and China are aggressively investing to ramp up production capacity. In the US, Coherent is expanding its 6-inch Indium Phosphide (InP) semiconductor fab in Texas, supported by CHIPS Act funding and a $2 billion strategic investment from NVIDIA. Lumentum is building a new factory for InP optical devices, and Nokia is scaling its advanced photonic chip packaging and testing capabilities. NVIDIA's investments aim to secure future supply of critical lasers and optical interconnect products for AI infrastructure. Japan's JX Advanced Metals, a leading InP substrate supplier, plans a multi-billion yen investment to increase its capacity 7-10 times, strengthening its grip on the crucial upstream materials market. In Europe, IQE and Tower Semiconductor settled a patent dispute and signed a multi-year InP epitaxial wafer supply agreement, highlighting that next-generation silicon photonics platforms will integrate high-performance InP components. STMicroelectronics and Sivers Semiconductors are also expanding silicon photonics production and partnerships. China is rapidly building out its domestic supply chain. Dongshan Precision's subsidiary, Source Photonics, announced a $12 billion project to expand optical chip and module production. Companies like Sanan Optoelectronics and Yunnan Germanium are scaling up InP chip manufacturing and substrate production, moving towards vertical integration from materials to modules. While debate continues around the exact future architecture—whether CPO (Co-Packaged Optics), NPO, or pluggables will dominate—analysts like Morgan Stanley argue the underlying driver is unchangeable: the explosive growth in bandwidth demand. This will inevitably increase the volume of optical engines, lasers, and related content per GPU, regardless of the final technical path. The competition for "more light" in the AI era has intensified into a global, full-chain capacity race.

marsbitHá 3h

Optical Chips: Collective Capacity Expansion

marsbitHá 3h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

Stablecoin Real Yield Found: A Deep Dive into On-Chain Reinsurance with Re's Karan Saroya As stablecoin supply exceeds $170 billion, the search for sustainable, non-speculative yield intensifies. Re, an on-chain reinsurance platform, provides an answer: connecting stablecoin capital to the trillion-dollar traditional reinsurance market. Re operates as a regulated reinsurer, accepting stablecoin deposits as collateral to back US insurance companies. These insurers pay premiums, generating yield that flows back to on-chain depositors. Currently supporting 35 insurers and underwriting $500 million, Re projects scaling to over $1 billion soon. Key insights from a Bankless podcast with founder Karan Saroya and investor Avichal of Electric Capital: 1. **Uncorrelated, Real-World Yield:** Re offers stablecoin holders access to reinsurance returns (targeting 12-14%+), an asset class entirely separate from crypto or equity markets. 2. **Operational Efficiency via Smart Contracts:** Re replaces traditional, labor-intensive capital fundraising with smart contracts, allowing a ~12-person team to compete with industry giants. 3. **Regulatory Leverage:** For every $1 of collateral, regulations allow backing $5-7 in written premiums. This leverage amplifies returns from the underlying risk-free rate. 4. **DeFi Integration:** Depositors receive receipt tokens, which can be used in protocols like Morpho for "looping," potentially pushing yields to 18-20%+. 5. **The "DeFi Mullet" Model:** A compliant front-end (regulated reinsurer) paired with a decentralized back-end (smart contracts, DeFi capital markets). 6. **RE Governance Token:** Modeled on Lloyd's of London, the token governs the central capital pool's allocation, counterparty acceptance, and parameters. 7. **Real Economic Impact:** Capital funds real-world productivity (factories, clinics, businesses) via insurance, moving beyond crypto's internal loops. The discussion highlights a pivotal moment: DeFi's supply-side infrastructure is now met by real demand for productive yield, potentially kickstarting a flywheel where vast on-chain stablecoin capital seeks these real-world returns.

链捕手Há 5h

Stablecoins Finally Find Real Yield: An In-Depth Look at On-Chain Reinsurance Re | A Conversation with Re Founder Karan Saroya

链捕手Há 5h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'

"1996 or 1999? Wall's First Big Test Is 'How to View AI'" Federal Reserve Chairman Wall's initial challenge is not whether to raise or cut rates, but a more fundamental judgment: what kind of boom is the current AI boom? This will determine the Fed's policy path and define his legacy. Economics is split between two opposing views, according to reporter Nick Timiraos. One sees imminent productivity gains that will increase supply and cool inflation, allowing the Fed to hold steady. The other argues that while productivity benefits are distant, demand shocks are here now, and waiting for data confirmation risks missing the intervention window, forcing sharper rate hikes later. Wall has signaled a leaning toward the first view, echoing 1996-era Alan Greenspan, who embraced strong, productivity-driven growth without fear of inflation. However, Wall faces a different macro environment than Greenspan did, with tariff pressures, expanding fiscal deficits, and diminishing globalization benefits, which could force more significant inflation pressures even if AI benefits materialize. Wall's logic, expressed before taking office, is that AI-driven productivity gains won't show in official data for years. If the Fed waits for confirmation, it might mistakenly tighten policy and choke off the very growth that could suppress inflation. This argues for using forward-looking narratives over lagging data. Chicago Fed President Austan Goolsbee presents a key counter-argument. He distinguishes between expected and unexpected productivity booms. A widely anticipated boom, like the current AI wave, can cause people to spend future wealth gains in advance, overheating the economy before productivity actually rises, thus requiring preemptive rate hikes. He cites rising costs for AI data centers as evidence of such overheating. Fed Governor Christopher Waller offers a rebuttal to Goolsbee, noting the "expected spending" mechanism only works if people can borrow against future income, which many households cannot do due to borrowing constraints. Wall also faces a paradox related to his desire to reduce the Fed's use of "forward guidance" (pre-announcing policy moves). This practice was established in 1999 when Greenspan began signaling hikes to avoid market shocks. If the economy follows a less optimistic path, Wall may be forced to choose between using the guidance he wants to abolish or risking market volatility by staying silent. The ultimate question defining Wall's first major test remains: Is this 1996 or 1999?

marsbitHá 6h

1996 or 1999? Walsh's First Test is 'How to View AI'