Crypto Investors Cheer As South Korea Scraps Punishing Tax Plan

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-03-20Última atualização em 2026-03-20

Resumo

South Korea's main opposition party, the People Power Party, has proposed a bill to abolish the planned 20% tax on cryptocurrency gains, which was scheduled to take effect in 2027. The tax had been repeatedly delayed due to political debates and concerns over fairness, as it imposed a lower threshold compared to stock gains. The proposal aims to integrate crypto income into a unified financial investment tax framework instead of maintaining a separate regime. While this offers short-term relief for investors, the country continues to advance broader crypto regulations, including user protection laws and AI-powered tracking systems, indicating that a more comprehensive and integrated tax environment may still emerge in the future.

South Korean right-wing lawmakers have proposed a bill to abolish the taxation of crypto assets scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027.

A Long Chain Of Regulation Delays

According to Korean outlet Digital Asset, Korea’s main opposition party the People Power Party is advancing a plan that would effectively abolish the dedicated 20% “crypto tax” by merging virtual‐asset income into a unified financial investment tax framework, instead of enforcing a separate regime just for digital assets.

The proposal comes after multiple postponements. Ruling and opposition parties alternated between promising delays and demanding quick implementation, repeatedly using crypto tax timelines as an election wedge with youth voters. The original 20% tax on gains over roughly ₩2.5 million was pushed from 2022 to 2023, then to 2025, and then again toward 2027 amid political infighting and concerns over investor protection.

The core issue has lays in parity. Crypto gains were set to be taxed at 20% above a very low threshold, while stock gains only paid similar rates above ₩50 million, fueling claims that young, retail‐heavy crypto traders were being unfairly targeted. Song Eon-seok, floor leader of the party and the responsible for introducing the bill, explained:

Given that the financial investment income tax has been abolished for the development of the capital market and the protection of investors, imposing a separate income tax on digital assets raises issues regarding equity and consistency in the tax system.

Kim Han-gyu, senior deputy floor leader for policy of the Democratic Party, responded to the proposal saying that they ruling party will discuss the bill now that it’s been introduced, although “there is no serious discussion or consensus within the party”, local media reported.

South Korea In The Forefront Of Crypto Regulation

South Korea has already rolled out the Virtual Asset User Protection Act and is still fighting over a second‐phase “Virtual Asset Law” covering stablecoins and more comprehensive oversight, underscoring that taxation is only one piece of a much tougher framework.

While many jurisdictions are tightening tax enforcement on digital assets, South Korea is prioritizing regulatory safeguards and market structure first. It’s worth noting, however, that South Korea’s National Tax Service is also moving ahead with a strong AI Crypto Tracking System, as reported by Bitcoinist on March 12.

A more balanced tax design could reduce incentives for Korean traders to move volume offshore or into grey‐area platforms, potentially supporting onshore liquidity and institutional participation. The apparent end of a standalone crypto tax is a short‐term relief, but once the unified financial investment tax kicks in, sophisticated reporting and on‐chain tracing tools mean evasion risks will climb. Active traders should prepare for stricter KYC, better record‐keeping, and the possibility that today’s relief turns into tomorrow’s more robust, integrated tax regime.

At the moment of writing, BTC’s trades for $70k on the daily chart. Source: BTCUSD on Tradingview

Cover image from Perplexity, BTCUSD chart from Tradingview

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main reason South Korean lawmakers are proposing to abolish the dedicated crypto tax?

AThey aim to address issues of equity and consistency in the tax system by merging virtual-asset income into a unified financial investment tax framework, rather than having a separate regime just for digital assets.

QHow many times has the implementation of South Korea's 20% crypto tax been postponed?

AThe tax has been postponed multiple times, originally from 2022 to 2023, then to 2025, and again to 2027.

QWhat was the key disparity between crypto and stock taxation that fueled claims of unfair targeting?

ACrypto gains were set to be taxed at 20% above a very low threshold (around ₩2.5 million), while stock gains only paid similar rates above a much higher threshold of ₩50 million.

QWhat broader regulatory framework is South Korea implementing alongside the tax discussion?

ASouth Korea has rolled out the Virtual Asset User Protection Act and is developing a second-phase 'Virtual Asset Law' covering stablecoins and more comprehensive oversight.

QWhat potential market impact could a more balanced tax design have according to the article?

AIt could reduce incentives for Korean traders to move volume offshore or into grey-area platforms, potentially supporting onshore liquidity and institutional participation.

Leituras Relacionadas

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

Intel CEO Chen Liwu outlines a bold vision for the company's transformation in a podcast interview, targeting a "10x return in 5-10 years." He emphasizes a strategic shift beyond traditional process node scaling, focusing on advanced packaging (like EMIB), new materials (glass substrates, GaN, SiC, InP, synthetic diamond), and system-level integration. Key to this is Intel's foundry business, where he prioritizes building trust through superior yield, defect density, and cycle times. Chen sees strong CPU demand resurgence driven by agent AI and inference workloads. He details the Terafab collaboration with Elon Musk to address semiconductor infrastructure gaps and stresses the strategic importance of U.S.-based advanced manufacturing. Acknowledging Intel is still in the "crawl" phase of his crawl-walk-run framework, Chen believes the company's full potential—extending from its PC base into edge computing and physical AI—will become apparent by 2030-2032.

marsbitHá 5m

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

marsbitHá 5m

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbitHá 6m

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbitHá 6m

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbitHá 2h

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbitHá 2h

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbitHá 2h

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbitHá 2h

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbitHá 2h