Crypto Funds Shed $4B as Outflows Hit Five-Week Streak

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-23Última atualização em 2026-02-23

Resumo

Crypto investment funds have extended their net outflows to a five-week streak, totaling nearly $4 billion, with $288 million withdrawn in the latest week alone. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, including major ones like BlackRock’s IBIT and Fidelity’s FBTC, led the outflows, marking their longest withdrawal period since early 2025. Spot Ether ETFs also saw five consecutive weeks of outflows, though Solana and XRP products attracted minor inflows, indicating selective investor interest. Analysts attribute the trend to macroeconomic uncertainty, geopolitical risks, and a broader shift away from volatile assets. Despite the outflows, total net inflows since the launch of U.S. Bitcoin ETFs remain above $50 billion, suggesting long-term allocation hasn't fully reversed.

Crypto investment funds continued to see withdrawals, extending five weeks of net outflows that have reached nearly $4 billion. According to the latest data from CoinShares, funds registered net outflows of $288 million last week alone. Market data indicate that institutional investors withdrew from crypto products, specifically spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs). U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs have registered five consecutive weeks of net outflows, the longest period since early 2025.

Continued Outflows in Bitcoin and Ether Funds

The outflow pattern started in late January and has been ongoing through February, with some weeks seeing withdrawals of over $1.4 billion. In total, spot Bitcoin ETFs have experienced a total outflow of around $3.8 billion in the five weeks. Analysts have noted that the continued outflows are happening in tandem with a slowdown in institutional interest in Bitcoin exposure through listed products. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) and Fidelity’s FBTC have been some of the largest contributors to the net outflows.

The Spot Ether ETFs have also seen five weeks of consecutive outflows. It appears that the rotation of funds is having a certain impact on the overall market for ETFs. It has been noted that Solana and XRP ETFs have seen small inflows of funds over the past period, suggesting a selective interest in other crypto indices. Despite the outflows, the total net inflows since the launch of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have been above $50 billion, indicating that long-term allocation has not fully reversed.

Institutional Sentiment and Market Context

There has been an increase in institutional wariness due to macroeconomic uncertainty, geopolitical events, and the overall risk-off environment in financial markets. These factors have caused some allocators to reduce their exposure to more volatile crypto assets. Market analysts have pointed out that the current five weeks of consecutive outflows are one of the longest periods of negative flows since early 2025, when a similar trend occurred before a market-wide sell-off.

The price of Bitcoin has been ranging around important technical levels during this period, while the overall cryptocurrency market has been under pressure. The lower net inflows into ETFs have been accompanied by a lack of directional activity in some of the prominent digital currencies, thus supporting the conservative approach adopted by institutional participants.

Other factors that have been affecting the flows include the release of macroeconomic data and risk management approaches adopted by institutional desks responsible for managing digital asset allocations. The equity market volatility and the hardening of monetary expectations have also been affecting overall allocation patterns away from the risk assets of the crypto market. Despite the current redemptions, the total assets managed by the crypto ETFs are quite large.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Pi Network Introduces PiRC1 Token Framework for Mainnet Ecosystem

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the total amount of net outflows from crypto investment funds over the five-week period mentioned in the article?

AThe total net outflows from crypto investment funds over the five-week period reached nearly $4 billion, with spot Bitcoin ETFs alone experiencing outflows of around $3.8 billion.

QWhich specific type of investment product has seen five consecutive weeks of net outflows, marking the longest such period since early 2025?

AU.S.-listed spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have registered five consecutive weeks of net outflows, the longest period since early 2025.

QAccording to the article, what are some of the key reasons cited for the increased institutional wariness and subsequent outflows?

AThe increased institutional wariness is due to macroeconomic uncertainty, geopolitical events, and the overall risk-off environment in financial markets, which have caused allocators to reduce exposure to volatile crypto assets.

QDespite the recent outflows, what does the data indicate about the long-term allocation into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs since their launch?

ADespite the recent outflows, the total net inflows since the launch of U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs have been above $50 billion, indicating that long-term allocation has not fully reversed.

QWhich two cryptocurrencies' ETFs were mentioned as seeing small inflows, suggesting a selective interest from investors?

ASolana and XRP ETFs have seen small inflows of funds, suggesting a selective interest in other crypto indices.

Leituras Relacionadas

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

Intel CEO Chen Liwu outlines a bold vision for the company's transformation in a podcast interview, targeting a "10x return in 5-10 years." He emphasizes a strategic shift beyond traditional process node scaling, focusing on advanced packaging (like EMIB), new materials (glass substrates, GaN, SiC, InP, synthetic diamond), and system-level integration. Key to this is Intel's foundry business, where he prioritizes building trust through superior yield, defect density, and cycle times. Chen sees strong CPU demand resurgence driven by agent AI and inference workloads. He details the Terafab collaboration with Elon Musk to address semiconductor infrastructure gaps and stresses the strategic importance of U.S.-based advanced manufacturing. Acknowledging Intel is still in the "crawl" phase of his crawl-walk-run framework, Chen believes the company's full potential—extending from its PC base into edge computing and physical AI—will become apparent by 2030-2032.

marsbitHá 8m

Intel CEO Liwu Chen's First Podcast Interview: Our Goal is '10x in 5-10 Years', Betting on Advanced Packaging, Glass Substrate, and Synthetic Diamond

marsbitHá 8m

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

Pete Florence, a former senior research scientist at Google DeepMind and a key contributor to the Vision-Language-Action (VLA) model architecture, is deliberately distancing his startup, Generalist AI, from the trendy "world model" label. He argues that the industry should prioritize concrete goals over buzzwords. His goal is to create robots that can perform a vast range of unseen tasks with high speed and success rates, without needing task-specific training data. Recently, his company raised $400 million (¥2.7 billion) at a $2 billion valuation. Notable investors include NVIDIA's NVentures, Bezos Expeditions, NFDG, as well as Xiaomi co-founder Lin Bin, Zoom founder Eric Yuan, and renowned AI scientist Fei-Fei Li. Florence's approach stems from his academic background at MIT under Professor Russ Tedrake, focusing on understanding the physical world. After joining DeepMind, he developed models like Transporter Network and co-created the VLA framework. He left in 2025 to found Generalist AI. The company has launched two models: GEN-0, which demonstrated that scaling laws apply to physical motion, and GEN-1. GEN-1 was trained on over 500,000 hours of physical interaction data collected via a specialized wearable device. It achieves a 99% success rate on precise mechanical tasks like folding boxes and maintains performance three times faster than its predecessor. Florence believes GEN-1 is reaching a commercial utility threshold similar to the GPT-3 inflection point. The substantial funding round, following GEN-1's release, signifies strong investor confidence in Generalist AI's practical, goal-driven path to creating versatile, useful robots, regardless of the "world model" terminology.

marsbitHá 9m

He Just Raised 2.7 Billion, and Li Fei-Fei Also Invested

marsbitHá 9m

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

In three days, Google lost two AI legends. On June 18, Noam Shazeer, co-author of the seminal "Attention is All You Need" paper and Gemini co-lead, left for OpenAI. Just 48 hours later, John Jumper, 2024 Nobel laureate and AlphaFold lead, departed DeepMind for Anthropic. This follows Andrej Karpathy joining Anthropic in May. These moves highlight a structural trend: top AI talent is concentrating at mission-driven, pre-IPO firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, while Google becomes a primary source. The exodus stems from a core mission mismatch. Google's ad-centric model often subordinates AI research to product and revenue goals, creating friction for pioneers like Shazeer, who returned in 2024 only to leave again. In contrast, OpenAI and Anthropic offer singular focus on pushing AI boundaries, whether towards AGI or safety-aligned models, which deeply appeals to top researchers like Jumper. Financial incentives amplify the pull. With both OpenAI and Anthropic nearing IPO, employees stand to gain immensely from equity, an upside Google's mature stock cannot match. Furthermore, the 2023 merger of Google Brain and DeepMind, intended to consolidate strength, has instead created cultural tension and slowed the path from research to product, as evidenced by Gemini's pace. This talent redistribution is reshaping the AI landscape. While Google retains vast data and compute resources, its true crisis is the quiet, continuous loss of the people who define the field's future. The real moat in AI is not infrastructure, but the concentration of brilliant minds—a battle Google is currently losing.

marsbitHá 2h

Two Legends Lost in Three Days: Is Google's AI Talent Dam Cracking?

marsbitHá 2h

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

Beyond the familiar performance charts like MMLU-Pro and MMMU, which major AI models strive to ace, stands a key "examiner": Chinese-Canadian researcher Wenhu Chen. An assistant professor at the University of Waterloo and founder of TIGERLab, Chen addresses the crucial need for more rigorous AI evaluation. As models like GPT-4 began scoring near-perfect results on older benchmarks like MMLU, it became difficult to distinguish their true capabilities. In response, Chen introduced MMLU-Pro in 2024, featuring harder, more reasoning-focused questions with more answer choices, successfully reintroducing meaningful performance gaps. His work extends to multi-modal evaluation with MMMU and its enhanced version, MMMU-Pro. These benchmarks test a model's ability to understand and reason with complex information from images, charts, and text across diverse academic subjects, exposing the significant challenges even top models face in genuine comprehension. Chen's background in complex QA, table reasoning, and his experience at Google DeepMind on projects like Gemini inform his approach. He understands that effective benchmarks must anticipate how models might "cheat" by memorizing data or avoiding visual analysis. His lab also actively researches video understanding and generation models (e.g., UniVideo, Vamba), ensuring his evaluation work is grounded in practical model-building challenges. Now at Meta's Super Intelligence Lab, Chen continues his focus on multi-modal data and evaluation, representing the deep yet often unseen contributions of Chinese talent in shaping the fundamental tools of the AI industry.

marsbitHá 2h

Behind the AI Report Card, Lies a Chinese 'Exam Setter'

marsbitHá 2h

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: Written at the Moment Cursor Sold for $600 Billion

Alliance Co-founder's Letter to Entrepreneurs: On Cursor's $60 Billion Sale Many aspiring founders see massive exits like Cursor's $60B sale and wonder why they can't achieve the same, often concluding opportunities are exhausted. But great companies aren't built in obvious, crowded spaces. Cursor, like Stripe, Figma, and Shopify before it, started with a non-consensus belief about the future. Before ChatGPT, they believed AI would transform knowledge work. They focused on a genuinely exciting domain, became their own customer, and obsessed over power users. Their journey involved years of "glass-chewing" effort before the market was ready. The pattern is consistent: identify a long-term technological shift, find a missed entry point, and execute for years before the trend becomes obvious. First-generation products (PayPal, Adobe, Amazon) prove a market exists. Second-generation winners (Stripe, Figma, Shopify) rebuild that market around new insights, technology, or changing customer behaviors. Founders must identify their phase in the cycle. Early entrants like Coinbase or Cursor focus on making new technology usable for power users. Later entrants find the "yin" to the established "yang"—the blind spots incumbents miss as they grow distant from individual users. The key is deep market immersion. Use every product in your space. Talk to users. Build an audience. Stop looking for ideas and start *seeing* them everywhere. Then, choose one. The idea must offer a 10x improvement or solve a "hair-on-fire" pain point—something severe enough that users are already crafting workarounds. When building, avoid feature bloat. Ask: why would someone switch? Great startups rarely force new behaviors; they improve familiar workflows with drastically lower friction (e.g., Cursor forked VS Code instead of creating a new editor). Distribution is the underestimated moat. Before product-market fit, achieve distribution-market fit. How do customers discover new tools? Founders like those at Airbnb, Stripe, and Cursor did unscalable, manual work to recruit early users. The final, unteachable ingredient is resilience. Cursor built for years pre-market, faced rejection, and persisted. So did Airbnb, Nvidia, and Rain (which launched post-FTX collapse). The lesson isn't that these founders were smarter, but that they stayed in the game long enough for their insights to compound. Framework: Spot technological cycles. Cultivate unique insight. Obsess over your market. Talk to customers. Find a hair-on-fire problem. Build the simplest wedge. Win your distribution channel. Above all, don't quit when it gets hard. Most people won't do these things consistently. The few who do build the next generation of great companies. Go build.

marsbitHá 2h