Crypto Fear and Greed Index Drops to Extreme Fear at 9

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-09Última atualização em 2026-02-09

Resumo

The Crypto Fear and Greed Index by CoinMarketCap has dropped to 9, indicating a state of "extreme fear" in the market sentiment. This marks a significant decline from 15 a week ago and 41 a month prior. The index hit a yearly low of 5 on February 6. Despite the persistently high market cap, sentiment has shifted aggressively. Bitcoin is trading around $70,505, Ethereum at $2,096, and Solana between $86.2 and $88.6. The overall crypto market cap has rebounded to over $2.4 trillion. The index, which ranges from 0 (extreme fear) to 100 (extreme greed), is a widely referenced tool for quantifying market sentiment.

The sentiment of crypto has changed to panic, and the gauge of CoinMarketCap has turned red now. The CMC Crypto Fear and Greed Index of the platform is at 9, taking it to an extreme fear situation.

One week before, the number was 15 and was neutral with 41 in the last month. On February 8, the score stood at 8, and on February 6, the score hit a yearly low, sitting at 5. It also highlighted how aggressively sentiment has shifted regardless of a persistently high market cap backdrop.

CoinMarketCap has mentioned that the tool is a powerful tool for analysing market sentiment to aid investors in informing crypto investment decisions, referring to it as the most trustworthy measure of total crypto market sentiment and the number 1, most quoted and most trusted index of its kind among mainstream financial outlets.

The Significant Pricing

The index contains a 0-100 scale, and here the lower value shows an extreme fear state and the higher value shows an extreme greed state, successfully quantifying what many traders only feel subjectively in price action.

As the rollout note mentions, this revolutionary index offers a broad-ranging and quantifiable assessment of fear and greed for the overall cryptocurrency industry. The spot markets show that Bitcoin trades around $70,505 with around $42.8 billion in 24-hour volume.

Ethereum is now trading at $2,096 on around $20.9 billion in turnover. The price of Solana sits at $86.2 and $88.6. The pricing situation aligns with a wider rebound in virtual assets, with BTC recently reclaiming the $71,000 area after last week’s failure and overall crypto market capitalisation shifting back over $2.4 trillion. CoinMarketCap makes it clear that the Fear and Greed Index is not a clear indicator in itself but can offer a useful measure of the market sentiment.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Japan Election Result Drive Possible Bull Run for Crypto Prices

TagsCoinMarketCapcrypto fear and greedCryptocurrency

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the current reading of the CoinMarketCap Crypto Fear and Greed Index and what does it signify?

AThe current reading is 9, which signifies an 'Extreme Fear' situation in the market.

QHow does the current Fear and Greed Index reading compare to its value from one week ago and one month ago?

AOne week ago, the index was at 15 (Neutral), and one month ago it was at 41.

QWhat is the purpose of the Crypto Fear and Greed Index according to CoinMarketCap?

AAccording to CoinMarketCap, it is a powerful tool for analyzing market sentiment to aid investors in making crypto investment decisions, and it is considered the most trustworthy and quoted measure of total crypto market sentiment.

QWhat do the values on the 0-100 scale of the index represent?

AOn the 0-100 scale, a lower value indicates an extreme fear state, while a higher value indicates an extreme greed state.

QWhat was the approximate price of Bitcoin and the total crypto market capitalization mentioned in the article?

ABitcoin was trading around $70,505, and the overall crypto market capitalization had shifted back over $2.4 trillion.

Leituras Relacionadas

The Essence of AI Layoffs: Why More AI Adoption Leads to More Corporate Anxiety?

The author, awaiting potential inclusion on an 8000-person layoff list, analyzes the true nature of recent "AI-driven" layoffs. They argue that while AI use, particularly tools like Claude for code generation, has skyrocketed and boosted developer output (e.g., 2-5x more code commits), this has not translated into proportional business growth or revenue. The core issue is a misalignment between increased "Input" (code) and tangible "Outcomes" (user value, revenue). AI acts as a costly B2B SaaS, inflating operational expenses without guaranteed returns. Two key problems emerge: 1) The friction that once filtered out bad ideas is gone, as AI allows cheap pursuit of even weak concepts. 2) Organizational "alignment tax"—the difficulty of coordinating across teams—becomes crippling when development velocity outpaces consensus-building. Thus, layoffs serve two immediate purposes: 1) To offset ballooning AI costs (Token consumption) and maintain cash flow, as rising input costs without outcome growth destroys unit economics. 2) To reduce organizational bloat and alignment friction by simply removing teams, thereby speeding up execution in the short term. Therefore, these layoffs are fundamentally caused by AI, even if AI doesn't directly replace roles. They represent a painful correction until companies learn to convert AI-driven productivity into real business outcomes and streamline organizational coordination to match the new pace of work. The cycle will continue until this learning curve is mastered.

marsbitHá 1h

The Essence of AI Layoffs: Why More AI Adoption Leads to More Corporate Anxiety?

marsbitHá 1h

Can the Solana Foundation and Google's Collaboration on Pay.sh Bridge the Payment Link Between Web2 and Web3 in the Agent Economy?

Solana Foundation, in collaboration with Google Cloud, has launched Pay.sh, a payment gateway designed to bridge the gap between AI agents and enterprise-grade service infrastructure. The initiative aims to solve a key bottleneck in the "agent economy": existing payment systems are ill-suited for autonomous AI agents. Traditional methods like credit cards require human verification, while newer on-chain protocols like x402 and MPP create a separate, Web3-native system that raises barriers for service providers. Pay.sh functions as a universal payment layer. It allows users to fund a Solana wallet via credit card or stablecoin, which then acts as an identity and payment proxy for AI agents. When an agent needs to access a paid API service (e.g., Google Cloud, Alibaba Cloud), Pay.sh handles the transaction seamlessly. It leverages the HTTP 402 status code ("Payment Required") to initiate payments, intelligently choosing between one-time transfers (x402-style) or session-based authorizations (MPC-style) based on the service's billing model. This spares agents from manual account registration and API key management. A key feature for service providers is low integration effort. They can adopt Pay.sh by providing a declarative configuration file, enabling features like tiered pricing, free tiers, and automatic revenue splitting to multiple addresses (e.g., for royalties, cloud costs). Providers can also list their APIs in a central Pay Skill Registry for agent discovery. The collaboration with Google Cloud provides crucial infrastructure for API proxying, traffic routing, and compliance logging, aiming to keep agent activities within regulated boundaries. By connecting Web2 services with Web3 payment rails, Pay.sh positions the Solana wallet as a foundational identity and payment tool for AI agents, potentially driving more transaction volume to the Solana ecosystem. However, the report notes challenges. The service registry currently lacks robust vetting, risking exposure to unauthorized or malicious third-party APIs. Pay.sh also inherits security and compatibility risks from its underlying payment protocols (x402, MPC). Furthermore, adoption may be hindered by varying regional data privacy and payment compliance regulations among API providers. Despite these hurdles, Pay.sh represents a significant step towards integrating Web2 and Web3 for autonomous agent commerce.

marsbitHá 1h

Can the Solana Foundation and Google's Collaboration on Pay.sh Bridge the Payment Link Between Web2 and Web3 in the Agent Economy?

marsbitHá 1h

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Cycle Indicator Turns Positive for the First Time in 7 Months: End of Bear Market or False Breakout?

Bitcoin's "Bull-Bear Market Cycle Indicator" from CryptoQuant has turned positive for the first time since October 2025. This gauge, based on the P&L Index relative to its 365-day moving average, suggests a potential shift from a bear market phase. Concurrently, the Bull Score Index rose to a neutral reading of 50 in late April. The indicator's move into positive territory follows a roughly 35% price rebound from a low near $60,000 in February to above $81,000. The recovery over approximately three months was faster than the 12-month period observed during the 2022 bear market. However, analysts caution against premature optimism, citing a historical precedent from March 2022. Back then, the Bull Score Index briefly hit 50, but it proved to be a false signal as Bitcoin's price subsequently plunged further. Structural differences exist in the current cycle, including consistent inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs and an increase in large holder addresses. Yet, some models, referencing the four-year halving cycle, suggest a potential deeper bottom near $50,000 might still be possible around late 2026. In summary, while on-chain data shows marked improvement and the worst panic may be over, market participants remain cautious. A convincing trend reversal confirmation likely requires Bitcoin to sustainably break above key resistance, such as the 200-day moving average near $82,000.

marsbitHá 1h

Bitcoin's Bull-Bear Cycle Indicator Turns Positive for the First Time in 7 Months: End of Bear Market or False Breakout?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片