Crypto Exchange Bithumb Pushes IPO Past 2028 As Cleanup Effort Continues

bitcoinistPublicado em 2026-04-02Última atualização em 2026-04-02

Resumo

Bithumb, a major South Korean cryptocurrency exchange, has delayed its initial public offering (IPO) plans to after 2028, a significant postponement from its original 2025 target. The decision follows a year of challenges, including compliance issues, board changes, and a major internal error in February that temporarily displayed over $40 billion in fake user balances. The exchange mistakenly credited users with 2,000 Bitcoin instead of 2,000 won, raising serious concerns about its internal controls. Additionally, Bithumb faced regulatory pressure, including a six-month suspension and a $24 million fine for alleged anti-money laundering breaches. Under renewed CEO Lee Jae-won, the company is now prioritizing the strengthening of its accounting systems and internal governance with advisory firm Samjong KPMG before proceeding with an IPO. This slower timeline contrasts with competitor Upbit, which is reportedly preparing for its own public listing.

Bithumb is now looking at an initial public offering sometime after 2028, a further slip from its earlier 2025 target, after a year of compliance trouble, board changes, and a costly internal blunder that briefly showed more than $40 billion in fake balances on its books.

According to reports tied to the company’s shareholder meeting, the South Korea-based exchange says it wants to spend the next stretch fixing its accounting and control systems before it tries to list.

Internal Error Raised Fresh Questions

The exchange’s most damaging recent episode came in February, when it mistakenly credited users with about 2,000 Bitcoin instead of 2,000 won. The mix-up was quickly reversed, and most of the money never left Bithumb’s internal ledger, but the scale of the error was hard to ignore.

It turned a routine systems failure into a public test of trust, and it arrived at a bad time for a company trying to convince regulators and investors that it is ready for the scrutiny that comes with a stock listing.

BTCUSD trading at $66,362 on the 24-hour chart: TradingView

That mistake followed earlier pressure from South Korean authorities. Under CEO Lee Jae-won, Bithumb faced a six-month suspension and a $24 million fine tied to alleged anti-money-laundering breaches.

Shareholders have now backed Lee for another two-year term, even as the company keeps moving the IPO goal farther down the road. The exchange had once expected to list in 2025, but the new plan is to focus on preparation through 2027 before any filing process advances.

Image: AP

A Slower Road To The Market

Bithumb’s latest timeline fits a broader pattern of delay. CFO Jeong Sang-gyun told shareholders that the company is strengthening its accounting policies and internal controls after bringing in Samjong KPMG as an IPO adviser.

That language points to work that usually happens before a listing window opens, not after a target year has already passed. The change in pace also shows how much the exchange’s public debut now depends on proving basic governance, not just market demand.

The exchange is not the only one moving through the South Korean market with listing plans in view. Dunamu, the operator of Upbit, is also said to be preparing for an IPO after a share swap with Naver Financial, with September mentioned as a possible timing point.

Featured image from Moneyseth, chart from TradingView

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the new target year for Bithumb's IPO, and why was it delayed from the original 2025 target?

ABithumb is now targeting an IPO sometime after 2028, a delay from its original 2025 goal. The postponement is due to a year of compliance issues, board changes, and a major internal error that falsely displayed over $40 billion in balances. The company now plans to focus on fixing its accounting and control systems before attempting to list.

QWhat was the significant internal error that occurred at Bithumb in February, and what was its impact?

AIn February, Bithumb mistakenly credited users with approximately 2,000 Bitcoin instead of 2,000 won due to a systems failure. Although the error was quickly reversed and most funds never left the exchange's internal ledger, the massive scale of the mistake severely damaged trust and raised questions about the company's readiness for the scrutiny of a public listing.

QWhat regulatory action did South Korean authorities take against Bithumb under CEO Lee Jae-won?

AUnder CEO Lee Jae-won, Bithumb faced regulatory pressure from South Korean authorities, resulting in a six-month suspension and a $24 million fine for alleged anti-money laundering breaches.

QWho did Bithumb bring on as an IPO adviser, and what is the company's current focus according to its CFO?

ABithumb brought in Samjong KPMG as an IPO adviser. According to CFO Jeong Sang-gyun, the company is now focusing on strengthening its accounting policies and internal controls as part of its preparation for a future listing.

QWhich other major South Korean crypto exchange is also preparing for an IPO, and what was a key step in its preparation?

ADunamu, the operator of the Upbit exchange, is also preparing for an IPO. A key step in its preparation was a share swap with Naver Financial, with September mentioned as a potential timing for its public debut.

Leituras Relacionadas

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

In recent months, the rapid growth of the AI industry has attracted significant talent from the crypto sector. A persistent question among researchers intersecting both fields is whether blockchain can become a foundational part of AI infrastructure. While many previous AI and Crypto projects focused on application layers (like AI Agents, on-chain reasoning, data markets, and compute rentals), few achieved viable commercial models. Gensyn differentiates itself by targeting the most critical and expensive layer of AI: model training. Gensyn aims to organize globally distributed GPU resources into an open AI training network. Developers can submit training tasks, nodes provide computational power, and the network verifies results while distributing incentives. The core issue addressed is not decentralization for its own sake, but the increasing centralization of compute power among tech giants. In the era of large models, access to GPUs (like the H100) has become a decisive bottleneck, dictating the pace of AI development. Major AI companies are heavily dependent on large cloud providers for compute resources. Gensyn's approach is significant for several reasons: 1) It operates at the core infrastructure layer (model training), the most resource-intensive and technically demanding part of the AI value chain. 2) It proposes a more open, collaborative model for compute, potentially increasing resource utilization by dynamically pooling idle GPUs, similar to early cloud computing logic. 3) Its technical moat lies in solving complex challenges like verifying training results, ensuring node honesty, and maintaining reliability in a distributed environment—making it more of a deep-tech infrastructure company. 4) It targets a validated, high-growth market with genuine demand, rather than pursuing blockchain integration without purpose. Ultimately, the boundaries between Crypto and AI are blurring. AI requires global resource coordination, incentive mechanisms, and collaborative systems—areas where crypto-native solutions excel. Gensyn represents a step toward making advanced training capabilities more accessible and collaborative, moving beyond a niche controlled by a few giants. If successful, it could evolve into a fundamental piece of AI infrastructure, where the most enduring value in the AI era is often created.

marsbitHá 12h

Gensyn AI: Don't Let AI Repeat the Mistakes of the Internet

marsbitHá 12h

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

A US researcher's visit to China's top AI labs reveals distinct cultural and organizational factors driving China's rapid AI development. While talent, data, and compute are similar to the West, Chinese labs excel through a pragmatic, execution-focused culture: less emphasis on individual stardom and conceptual debate, and more on teamwork, engineering optimization, and mastering the full tech stack. A key advantage is the integration of young students and researchers who approach model-building with fresh perspectives and low ego, prioritizing collective progress over personal credit. This contrasts with the US culture of self-promotion and "star scientist" narratives. Chinese labs also exhibit a strong "build, don't buy" mentality, preferring to develop core capabilities—like data pipelines and environments—in-house rather than relying on external services. The ecosystem feels more collaborative than tribal, with mutual respect among labs. While government support exists, its scale is unclear, and technical decisions appear driven by labs, not state mandates. Chinese companies across sectors, from platforms to consumer tech, are building their own foundational models to control their tech destiny, reflecting a broader cultural drive for technological sovereignty. Demand for AI is emerging, with spending patterns potentially mirroring cloud infrastructure more than traditional SaaS. Despite challenges like a less mature data industry and GPU shortages, Chinese labs are propelled by vast talent, rapid iteration, and deep integration with the open-source community. The competition is evolving beyond a pure model race into a contest of organizational execution, developer ecosystems, and industrial pragmatism.

marsbitHá 14h

Why is China's AI Developing So Fast? The Answer Lies Inside the Labs

marsbitHá 14h

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

Corning, a 175-year-old glass company, is experiencing a dramatic revival as a key player in AI infrastructure, driven by surging demand for high-performance optical fiber in data centers. AI data centers require vastly more fiber than traditional ones—5 to 10 times as much per rack—to handle high-speed data transmission between GPUs. This structural demand shift, coupled with supply constraints from the lengthy expansion cycle for fiber preforms, has created a significant supply-demand gap. Nvidia has invested in Corning, along with Lumentum and Coherent, in a $4.5 billion total commitment to secure the optical supply chain for AI. Corning's competitive edge lies in its expertise in producing ultra-low-loss, high-density, and bend-resistant specialty fiber, which is critical for 800G+ and future 1.6T data rates. Its deep involvement in co-packaged optics (CPO) with partners like Nvidia further solidifies its position. While not the largest fiber manufacturer globally, Corning's revenue from enterprise/data center clients now exceeds 40% of its optical communications sales, and it has secured multi-year supply agreements with major hyperscalers including Meta and Nvidia. Financially, Corning's optical communications revenue has surged, doubling from $1.3 billion in 2023 to over $3 billion in 2025. Its stock price has risen nearly 6-fold since late 2023. Key future catalysts include the rollout of Nvidia's CPO products and the scale of undisclosed customer agreements. However, risks include high current valuations and potential disruption from next-generation technologies like hollow-core fiber. The company's long-term bet on light over electricity, maintained even through the telecom bubble crash, is now being validated by the AI boom.

marsbitHá 15h

3 Years, 5 Times: The Rebirth of a Century-Old Glass Factory

marsbitHá 15h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片