Coinbase’s USDC Revenue Jumps as Stablecoin Debate Heats Up

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-24Última atualização em 2026-02-24

Resumo

Coinbase's stablecoin revenue, primarily from its USDC share with Circle, surged to $1.35 billion in 2025, accounting for 19% of its total revenue. This growth occurred despite a net loss of $667 million in Q4 2025. USDC transaction volume reached $18.3 trillion last year, though Tether leads in market cap. The stablecoin sector's expansion has intensified regulatory debates, particularly around yield payments. The GENIUS Act prohibits issuers from paying interest, and proposed legislation may further restrict platforms like Coinbase from offering rewards on stablecoin balances, amid concerns over competition with traditional banks.

Bloomberg Intelligence reported that the stablecoin revenue of Coinbase associated with its USDC revenue share with Circle was 19% of overall revenue in 2025 and may surge two to sevenfold if USDC adoption in payments intensifies.

This comes regardless of witnessing a net loss of about $667 million in Q4 of 2025. As per the Q4 2025 shareholder letter of Coinbase, the firm earned about $1.35 billion in stablecoin revenue in 2025.

The figure was up from $911 million in its previous year, with $364 million in stablecoin revenue in just Q4 2025 solely, as interest income on USDC balances became a high-margin line for the exchange, contrasted with volatile trading fees.

The Significant Surge

Talking about stablecoins, they have also gone mainstream in usage terms. Overall stablecoin transaction volume hit a record $33 trillion in the last year, with USDC accounting for around $18.3 trillion of that, ahead of Tether’s USDT by transaction. However, Tether leads in market capitalisation.

The growth is the reason why the politics revolving around stablecoin yield have become so upset. The Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins, commonly known as the GENIUS Act, signed by President Trump last year, made a federal regime for payment stablecoins and specifically restricts issuers from paying interest or yield to holders.

That provision is supported by the banking lobby, as yield-bearing stablecoins could drain deposits from the traditional system. Banks and their associates now want to go further in the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 of the Senate negotiations by shutting what they witness as a loophole that still permits non-issuer affiliates, like exchanges like Coinbase, to pass some of the interest on reserves back to customers as “rewards”.

Draft Senate language of the market structure bill could go beyond the yield restriction and stop Coinbase from offering any rewards associated with the stablecoin balances.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Step Finance and SolanaFloor Shut Down After Treasury Hack Drains Millions in SOL

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat percentage of Coinbase's overall revenue in 2025 came from its USDC revenue share with Circle?

A19% of Coinbase's overall revenue in 2025 came from its USDC revenue share with Circle.

QWhat was the total stablecoin revenue Coinbase reported for the year 2025?

ACoinbase reported earning about $1.35 billion in stablecoin revenue in 2025.

QWhich stablecoin had a higher transaction volume in the last year, USDC or USDT?

AUSDC had a higher transaction volume, accounting for around $18.3 trillion of the total $33 trillion, ahead of Tether's USDT.

QWhat is the name of the US law that restricts stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield to holders?

AThe law is called the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins, commonly known as the GENIUS Act.

QWhat potential new legislation could stop Coinbase from offering rewards on stablecoin balances?

AThe draft Senate language of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 could stop Coinbase from offering any rewards associated with stablecoin balances.

Leituras Relacionadas

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

This article explains the three primary methods for Codex to interact with a computer, each with distinct use cases, permission boundaries, and trust levels. **1. Computer Use:** This offers the broadest access, allowing Codex to visually control and interact with the graphical user interface of authorized macOS/Windows apps, system settings, and even iOS simulators. It's ideal for tasks lacking APIs or structured tools, such as operating legacy software or multi-app workflows. However, it's the slowest method and has the widest permission scope, requiring careful supervision for sensitive actions. **2. Chrome Extension:** This grants Codex access to the user's logged-in Chrome browser state, including cookies, profiles, and open tabs. It's best for tasks requiring user identity across websites like Gmail, LinkedIn, Salesforce, or internal dashboards. Its key advantage is multi-tab control for complex workflows. While more powerful for browser-based tasks than Computer Use, it carries higher sensitivity as actions are performed under the user's identity. **3. In-App Browser:** This is a browser isolated within the Codex thread, separate from the user's personal browsing data. It excels in web development and debugging scenarios—previewing local servers, testing responsive layouts, or annotating designs directly on the page. Its isolation is a strength for development but a limitation for tasks requiring login sessions. The core principle is to choose the narrowest, safest, and most structured interface for the task. Use plugins or MCPs first, resort to visual control (Computer Use) only for GUI-dependent tasks, employ the Chrome extension for identity-reliant browser work, and prefer the In-App Browser for isolated development. **Appshots** are clarified as a fourth, complementary tool for *inputting* context—capturing a screenshot of a window to point Codex to something—rather than a method for Codex to *act*. Together, this layered approach highlights a key to AI agent productization: not granting unlimited permissions, but constraining them within clear boundaries for specific tasks while preserving user oversight.

marsbitHá 12m

How Does Codex Use a Computer? Three Entry Points and Permission Boundaries

marsbitHá 12m

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

For years, the semiconductor equipment industry followed an unwritten "iron rule": suppliers offered steep discounts for new tool introductions (Design-in) and faced consistent price pressure during repeat orders, especially during market downturns. This long-standing buyer's market dynamic is now being upended. Recently, SK Hynix's primary equipment suppliers have reportedly requested a 3-4% price *increase*, a nearly unprecedented move. This shift is driven by a severe supply-demand imbalance fueled by the AI compute boom. Securing equipment has become an urgent arms race as chipmakers' expansion speed dictates their ability to fulfill massive AI chip orders. Key areas feeling the strain include: **TCB (Thermal Compression Bonding) Equipment:** Demand is exploding, driven by the simultaneous needs of HBM4 memory stacking, AI chip Chip-on-Substrate (C2S), and logic Chiplet Chip-on-Wafer (C2W) packaging. Players like Hanmi Semiconductor, Hanwha Semitech, and ASMPT are receiving major orders. While hybrid bonding is seen as the future, TCB remains the pragmatic choice for HBM4 mass production, with its lifecycle extended by relaxed specifications and ongoing technological upgrades. **Test Equipment Bottlenecks:** Ironically, AI-driven shortages are now crippling test equipment manufacturing. Critical components like FPGAs, Driver ICs, and CPUs face severe shortages and extended lead times (up to 52 weeks for FPGAs), as AI data center and server vendors prioritize supply. This creates a paradoxical cycle: AI chip shortages drive fab expansion, which requires more test equipment, whose production is delayed because its key parts are diverted to make AI chips. The industry is entering a broad, AI-powered upcycle. SEMI forecasts global semiconductor equipment sales to hit a record $156 billion by 2027, fueled by investment in advanced logic/foundry, HBM-driven DRAM, and advanced packaging (like CoWoS). Major players like TSMC, SK Hynix, and Micron are aggressively ramping capital expenditure. In conclusion, leading equipment vendors are no longer just selling tools; they are selling the critical capability to deliver AI-era capacity. Pricing power is shifting decisively to those with indispensable technology in key process nodes like advanced logic, HBM, and advanced packaging, rewriting the industry's traditional power structure.

marsbitHá 25m

The "Iron Rule" of Chip Equipment Is Being Broken

marsbitHá 25m

Weekly Token Unlock: XPL to Release Millions in Token Value

Weekly Token Unlocks: XPL and SoSoValue Tokens Worth Over $10 Million Set for Release This week sees significant token unlocks for two projects. SoSoValue, an AI-powered crypto investment research platform, will unlock 13.03 million tokens, valued at approximately $3.87 million. The project aims to merge CeFi efficiency with DeFi transparency. Separately, Plasma, a Layer 1 blockchain designed for global stablecoin payments, will unlock 110 million tokens worth about $10.42 million. The network focuses on high throughput, stablecoin-native features, and full EVM compatibility. Both projects have provided their detailed token release schedules.

marsbitHá 1h

Weekly Token Unlock: XPL to Release Millions in Token Value

marsbitHá 1h

Bitcoin Must Hold $60K Or Risk Major Breakdown, TradingView Analyst Warns

Bitcoin has reached a critical juncture around the $60,000 level, which analysts view as a major technical and psychological support zone. According to a TradingView analysis, a successful hold above this demand area could pave the way for a recovery toward $81,000. However, the warning is clear: a decisive and sustained break below $60,000 would invalidate the bullish outlook, likely triggering stop losses and a deeper market correction. The current setup is described as a binary test—maintaining support keeps the recovery narrative alive, while losing it would signal a shift toward a more significant downturn.

bitcoinistHá 2h

Bitcoin Must Hold $60K Or Risk Major Breakdown, TradingView Analyst Warns

bitcoinistHá 2h

Venus Protocol Integrates Tokenized Stocks As Lending Collateral On BNB Chain

Venus Protocol now allows tokenized stocks from companies like Apple, Tesla, and Microsoft to be used as borrowing collateral on BNB Chain. This integration brings a key real-world asset (RWA) use case into DeFi lending. Users can deposit these tokenized equities, which are described as 1:1 backed by real shares held by regulated custodians, into isolated pools to borrow stablecoins or BNB without selling their underlying positions. This move expands DeFi lending beyond crypto-native assets, resembling traditional margin finance. It highlights BNB Chain's competition for RWA activity and aims to attract more stable liquidity. However, tokenized stocks introduce different risks, including dependency on off-chain custodians and challenges with collateral valuation due to differing market hours between traditional and on-chain trading. While not an immediate price catalyst, this development is significant within broader crypto trends like compliance pressure and RWA tokenization. Success will depend on growing liquidity, reliable custody, robust price oracles, and clear rules for redemptions and liquidations.

bitcoinistHá 3h