Claude's New Policy Abandons Its Most Loyal Agent Users

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-15Última atualização em 2026-05-15

Resumo

Anthropic, in a move signaling the end of the "all-you-can-eat" era for AI subscriptions, has separated programmatic usage from its Claude subscription plans. Starting June 15, 2024, usage of the Claude Agent SDK, `claude -p` command, and third-party tools like OpenClaw will no longer draw from subscription limits. Instead, users receive a fixed monthly credit based on retail API prices: $20 for Pro, $100 for Max 5x, and $200 for Max 20x. This change drastically reduces usable capacity for heavy users—previously, their shared subscription limit was worth an estimated $2,000-$5,000 in API value. While Anthropic simultaneously increased Claude Code interactive limits to appease users, the new policy primarily impacts developers running automated, high-frequency agents, pushing their effective costs nearly ten times higher. Seizing the opportunity, OpenAI promptly announced a free two-month migration plan for its Codex enterprise service, which does not differentiate between interactive and automated usage, directly targeting discontented Claude users. This marks an opening salvo in the broader ASI (Artificial Superintelligence) competition, where the final battle is shifting from pure model capability to ecosystem strength, developer loyalty, and infrastructure. The article frames this as a necessary correction of a pricing "loophole" by Anthropic ahead of its IPO, as programmatic calls lack training data value and can incur massive costs. The move underscores a wider indust...

Anthropic has separated Agent SDK usage from subscriptions, offering a fixed credit based on API retail prices instead. Heavy users have seen their usable volume shrink by nearly tenfold. In the same week, OpenAI offered enterprise users two months of free migration to Codex. The first pricing battle in the final round of the ASI race has begun.

Anthropic has changed programmatic calls from an "all-you-can-eat buffet" to "rationed portions."

Effective June 15, calls from claude -p, Agent SDK, GitHub Actions, and third-party tools like OpenClaw and Hermes are all being separated from subscription quotas.

https://x.com/ClaudeDevs/status/2054610152817619388

This is being replaced by a monthly Credit calculated based on API retail prices: $20 for Pro, $100 for Max 5x, and $200 for Max 20x.

The original subscription quota remains unchanged, dedicated exclusively to Claude Code interactive use and claude.ai chat. The two pools do not interfere with each other.

Credits must be manually claimed. Notification emails were sent on June 8, effective from June 15, resetting monthly without rollover.

Anticipating user frustration, Claude Code quotas were raised twice in a row to appease users.

Last week, the 5-hour rolling window doubled, and this week the weekly total increased by another 50%. These are cumulative and effective until July 14.

https://x.com/ClaudeDevs/status/2054639777685934564

All paying users are automatically adjusted; no action is required.

Anthropic's biggest competitor, OpenAI, quickly seized this opportunity, immediately launching a free Codex migration for enterprises.

https://x.com/OpenAIDevs/status/2054586214112780518

Apply within 30 days for 2 months free, with a built-in one-click migration tool that can directly transfer Claude Code's system prompts, Skills, and MCP configurations.

Codex does not differentiate between interactive and programmatic calls; subscription users can use it however they want.

These three events happening simultaneously are not a coincidence.

Why Split?

There is a structural flaw in Anthropic's subscription model. On the eve of its impending IPO and the ASI sprint, Anthropic can no longer tolerate this flaw.

The economic model of subscriptions is based on the premise that human typing speed is limited.

The Token volume a $200/month Max 20x user can consume through manual interaction translates to an API retail price between $2000 and $5000.

Anthropic was willing to subsidize this difference because interactive data is valuable for model training.

Agent SDK and claude -p broke this premise.

Machines calling 24/7, a for loop could consume a month's quota in just a few hours. Moreover, programmatic calls have almost no training value from user behavior data.

It was tolerable when the user base was small.

But SpaceX just leased 220,000 GPUs to Anthropic, Google added up to $40 billion in investment, and Amazon signed a $25 billion capacity agreement.

For further reading: Breaking News, Musk's xAI Disbands! 220,000 GPUs Reluctantly Given Entirely to Claude

With compute power secured and user numbers poised to explode, the subsidy bleeding would amplify exponentially.

Anthropic's help documentation also explicitly states its position: teams running production-grade automation should switch to the developer platform and use API keys for pay-as-you-go billing.

This is a pricing flaw patch, timed by the rhythm of the ASI competition.

How Big is the Cost?

Same face value, but actual shrinkage is nearly tenfold.

A Max 20x user pays $200 monthly and receives a Credit of $200.

But before, they shared the subscription quota, which, converted to API retail price, was worth approximately $2000-$5000.

Now it's replaced by a fixed $200 credit calculated at API retail price.

https://x.com/anakin/status/2054643675590807884

Pro users are in an even more awkward position. $20 for Sonnet only allows about six to seven million input Tokens or a little over a million output Tokens. A few rounds of intensive Agent loops will deplete it.

https://x.com/alexgreensh/status/2054619241811169402

Third-party tool users are hit the hardest.

Previously, using Agent tools like OpenClaw and Hermes was equivalent to running high-frequency automation at subscription prices.

Under the new policy, this path is left with only that small amount of credit. Once burned, users either enable Extra Usage to continue at API prices or stop until next month.

The only good news is that third-party tools finally received their "official ID."

Two months ago, Anthropic still viewed OpenClaw as a means of exploiting loopholes. Now, the announcement directly names and acknowledges their legitimacy.

Mismatch Between Compute Power and Developers

At the moment of greatest compute power, Anthropic uses pricing policy to push heavy developers toward competitors.

SpaceX's 220,000 GPUs are currently the only compute power cooperation that can be immediately deployed; other partners' capacity all needs to wait until late 2026 or even 2027.

With this batch of spot compute power backing it up, Claude Code quotas can be successively raised.

But the Claude Code quota increase and the SDK Credit cap target two different groups.

The overlap between interactive users and programmatic call users is limited. The improved experience for the former does not offset the losses for the latter.

OpenAI precisely stepped into this crack.

Codex does not separate usage by method, does not differentiate between call types, has zero seat fee, charges by Token, and includes a tool for one-click migration from Claude Code.

The pain point just created by Anthropic is immediately used as a selling point by OpenAI.

https://x.com/brodieferguson/status/2054653995864707344

The two-month free period is just enough for enterprises to get their automated pipelines running and form muscle memory.

After the free period ends, the migration cost is already too high to move back.

Why This Matters to Everyone

The era of "unlimited all-you-can-eat buffets" for AI subscriptions is ending.

Anthropic's patching of this loophole is just the beginning.

As Agent capabilities grow stronger and automated calls become more frequent, all AI companies will face similar economic pressure.

AI payment models will gradually shift from monthly flat rates to pay-as-you-go based on actual consumption, much like the path cloud computing took.

The ownership of the developer ecosystem determines what AI ordinary users will use in the future.

Whoever wins over developers will have a richer tool ecosystem.

Today's battle between Claude Code and Codex will directly reflect the quality of AI applications available on everyone's phones in three to five years.

The endgame of the ASI competition is not just about model capabilities, but also about ecosystems.

The final round of the ASI competition, the contenders are basically locked in: on one side, OpenAI + Microsoft + Stargate (Oracle + SoftBank); on the other, Anthropic + Google + Amazon + SpaceX.

Model capabilities are converging. The real moat lies in who has the strongest infrastructure, the most developers, and the most entrenched enterprise customers.

This week's covert pricing war is the first shot in the final round.

Three things to watch next: the verdict in the Musk vs. Altman case in mid-May, Anthropic's IPO pricing in June, and whether the temporary Claude Code quota increase becomes permanent after its expiration on July 14.

The direction of these three events will directly determine which side the developer ecosystem scale tips towards in the ASI race.

Remember to claim your Credit on June 8. If you don't claim, it's $0; claiming gives you at least $200.

Appendix: Full Announcement

Using Claude Agent SDK in Your Claude Plan

Updated today

Claude subscription plans are now eligible for monthly Agent SDK credits. These credits cover Claude Agent SDK usage, the claude -p command, and third-party applications built on the Agent SDK. This article explains what is covered by the credit, how it works, and how to claim it.

Available in Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans from June 15, 2026. Claude developer platform accounts using API keys will not receive credits. Pay-as-you-go billing remains unchanged.

What's Changing

From June 15, 2026, Claude Agent SDK and claude -p usage will no longer count against your Claude plan's usage limits. Your subscription usage limits remain unchanged and are reserved for interactive use of Claude Code, Claude Cowork, and Claude.

To support Agent SDK usage, eligible Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plan users can claim a separate monthly credit. This credit applies only to Agent SDK usage and refreshes with your billing cycle.

Monthly Credit by Plan

*Members using standard seats in seat-based Enterprise plans are not eligible to claim the Agent SDK monthly credit.

What the Credit Covers

The Agent SDK monthly credit applies to:

Claude Agent SDK usage (Python or TypeScript) in your own projects

The claude -p command (non-interactive mode) in Claude Code

Claude Code GitHub Actions integration

Third-party applications using your Claude subscription for authentication via Agent SDK

The Credit Does Not Apply to:

Interactive Claude Code in terminals or IDEs

Claude conversations on web, desktop, or mobile apps

Claude Cowork

Other features deducted from extra usage

How the Credit Works

Per user, not shared. Credits belong to individual accounts. They cannot be shared or pooled among team members.

Refreshes monthly. Your credit resets at the start of each billing cycle. Unused credits do not carry over to the next cycle.

One-time opt-in. You claim the credit once through your Claude account. Afterwards, it refreshes automatically each cycle.

Priority deduction. Agent SDK usage is deducted first from your monthly credit, then from other sources.

Usage transfers to extra usage after credit is exhausted. When your monthly credit is used up, additional Agent SDK usage flows to extra usage at standard API rates—but only if you have extra usage enabled. If extra usage is not enabled, Agent SDK requests will stop until your credit refreshes.

What Remains Unchanged

This change does not affect:

Subscription usage limits. Your plan's usage limits have not changed as part of this update.

Interactive Claude Code. Using Claude Code in terminals or IDEs continues to use your subscription usage limits exactly as before.

Claude conversations. Web, desktop, and mobile chat continue to use subscription usage limits.

API key users. If you use Agent SDK with an API key from the Claude developer platform, nothing changes. Pay-as-you-go billing continues, and you will not receive an Agent SDK monthly credit.

For Team and Enterprise Administrators

If you manage a Team or Enterprise account, here's what you need to know:

Credit is per user. Each eligible user in your team claims their own credit. Credits cannot be pooled, transferred, or shared across the organization.

Large-scale production automation. The Agent SDK monthly credit is sized for personal experimentation and automation. Teams running shared production automation should use the Claude developer platform and API keys for predictable pay-as-you-go billing.

What you need to do. No action is required now. Eligible users in your team will receive an email with details and instructions for claiming the credit before June 15, 2026.

References:

https://support.claude.com/zh-CN/articles/15036540-%E5%9C%A8%E6%82%A8%E7%9A%84-claude-%E8%AE%A1%E5%88%92%E4%B8%AD%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8-claude-agent-sdk

https://x.com/ClaudeDevs/status/2054610152817619388

https://x.com/ClaudeDevs/status/2054639777685934564

This article is from the WeChat public account "Xinzhiyuan," author: Xinzhiyuan, editor: Ellen

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main change Anthropic made to its pricing structure regarding Claude Agent SDK and related tools?

AAnthropic separated programmatic calls (via Claude Agent SDK, claude -p, GitHub Actions, and third-party tools like OpenClaw and Hermes) from the standard subscription limits. Instead, it now provides a separate monthly credit based on API retail prices ($20 for Pro, $100 for Max 5x, $200 for Max 20x) for such usage.

QWhy did Anthropic implement this pricing change, according to the article?

AAnthropic implemented this change to fix a structural flaw in its subscription model. The model was based on limited human typing speed, but programmatic/Agent usage allows for unlimited automated calls, creating unsustainable cost subsidies for Anthropic, especially as user numbers are expected to grow.

QWhat was OpenAI's response to Anthropic's pricing policy change?

AOpenAI seized the opportunity by offering a free migration to Codex for enterprise users. It provides two months of free service, an integrated migration tool to move from Claude Code, and a usage model that does not differentiate between interactive and programmatic calls.

QHow does the article describe the impact of the change on heavy Agent SDK or third-party tool users?

AThe impact is severe, described as a nearly tenfold reduction in effective usage for heavy users. Previously, subscription limits (valued at $2000-$5000 in API retail terms for a Max 20x user) covered this usage. Now, they receive a fixed credit worth only its face value ($200 for Max 20x).

QWhat broader trend in AI service pricing does the article suggest this change represents?

AThe article suggests this marks the beginning of the end for the 'all-you-can-eat' subscription model in AI. It predicts a shift towards usage-based billing, similar to the evolution of cloud computing, as Agent capabilities and automated usage increase the cost pressure on AI companies.

Leituras Relacionadas

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手Há 37m

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

链捕手Há 37m

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbitHá 52m

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbitHá 52m

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手Há 52m

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手Há 52m

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

Bitcoin's recent recovery from February lows is approaching a critical supply cluster between $84,000 and $88,000, which holds the largest concentration of Bitcoin supply on the current chart. This zone represents the cost basis for short-term holders (investors who bought within the last 155 days) and is stacked with "trapped" sellers who bought near those levels and are now at breakeven. Technical analysis suggests the rally faces significant resistance in this area. Two primary scenarios are outlined: a direct push into the $84k-$86k zone followed by a rejection and pullback to $70,000 support, or a more volatile path involving a dip before testing the supply cluster. A weekly close above $84,000 would weaken the bearish rejection case, but a decisive break above $86,900-$88,000 is needed for a stronger bullish confirmation. Bitcoin is currently trading around $80,430.

bitcoinistHá 59m

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

bitcoinistHá 59m

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbitHá 2h

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow