CertiK Tightens KYC and Strengthens Oversight After Huione Backlash, CEO Denies IPO Plans

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-02-12Última atualização em 2026-02-12

Resumo

CertiK has enhanced its KYC procedures and oversight after facing criticism for auditing a stablecoin project linked to the illicit Huione marketplace last year. CEO Ronghui Gu acknowledged the incident as a turning point, leading to stricter client checks, collaboration with external risk experts, and ongoing monitoring of audit report usage. The firm now prioritizes institution-level standards to meet demands from large financial entities for rigorous code safety proofs and regulator-friendly reports. Gu denied current IPO plans despite investor interest, citing market challenges in valuing Web3 companies. He also highlighted evolving risks, including private key mismanagement, deepfakes, and price manipulation, emphasizing trust-building as critical for institutional partnerships.

Blockchain security firm CertiK says that it has improved its procedures and tightened its checks after facing criticism last year for auditing a project linked to the illicit Huione marketplace. Ronghui Gu, CEO of CertiK, said that this episode became a turning point for the firm.

What really happened

CertiK audited a stablecoin project last year. However, the project has links to Huione, which is a marketplace for illegal activities. Online critics questioned whether the audit happened and whether CertiK should have done more background checks. Ronghui Gu replied to all the critics that the company has audited the software, which was given by a U.S.-registered client, and later audited fee has been donated to the charity, and treated this backlash as a lesson.

After this incident, Gu said that CertiK strengthened its KYC and screening process by checking clients more carefully, working with outside risk experts, and increasing monitoring of how its audit reports are used. He said that the firm now keeps a “very close eye” even after the auditing is done.

While auditing the crypto projects was the core for CertiK to earn, Gu says that these services must now meet the institution-level standards. Large financial firms want deeper testing and stronger proof that code is safe, and a clear report they can show regulators. So meeting those needs is now the top priority for the firm, he said.

Gu’s reply on public listing

In January, Gu spoke at the World Economic Forum, which has increased speculation about the possible public listing. He says that media reports went too far, and right now there is no plan, but yes, the investors are really interested. Adding on, he said the market still doesn’t know how to value Web3 companies properly.

Gu also warned that risks are changing. Previously Hackers attacked the smart contracts, but right now, many problem arises from private key handling, deepfakes, and price feed manipulation. He says the firm is still researching the solution for the Deepfakes, which is especially very hard.

For CertiK, building trust is more important because large institutions will only work with companies that they believe in. Gu believes that the Huione moment makes the company stronger for the future and forced to upgrade, improve, and prepare for the stricter expectations from global finance.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Human API Launches Platform Enabling Direct AI-to-Human Task Coordination

TagsCertiKIPO

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat changes did CertiK implement after the Huione-related backlash?

ACertiK strengthened its KYC and screening processes by conducting more thorough client checks, collaborating with external risk experts, and enhancing monitoring of how its audit reports are used. The company now maintains ongoing vigilance even after audits are completed.

QHow did CertiK's CEO characterize the Huione incident?

ARonghui Gu described the Huione incident as a turning point for the company that forced them to upgrade and improve their procedures to meet stricter expectations from global financial institutions.

QWhat did Ronghui Gu say about CertiK's potential IPO?

AGu denied current IPO plans, stating that media reports had gone too far with speculation. He acknowledged investor interest but noted that the market still doesn't know how to properly value Web3 companies.

QWhat new types of security risks did Gu highlight as emerging threats?

AGu warned that risks are evolving from smart contract attacks to problems involving private key handling, deepfakes, and price feed manipulation, with deepfakes being particularly challenging to address.

QHow did CertiK handle the audit fee from the controversial Huione-linked project?

ACertiK donated the audit fee from the Huione-linked project to charity after the software audit was completed for their U.S.-registered client.

Leituras Relacionadas

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

The pre-IPO stock token market is experiencing significant turmoil following strong statements from AI giants Anthropic and OpenAI. Both companies have updated their official policies, declaring that any transfer of their company shares—including sales, transfers, or assignments of share interests—without prior board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized in their corporate records. This means buyers in such unauthorized transactions would not be recognized as shareholders and would have no shareholder rights. A major point of contention is the use of Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), which are legal entities commonly used by pre-IPO token platforms to pool investor funds and indirectly acquire shares from employees or early investors. The companies explicitly state they do not permit SPVs to acquire their shares, and any such transfer violates their restrictions. They warn that third parties selling shares through SPVs, direct sales, forward contracts, or stock tokens are likely engaged in fraud or are offering worthless investments due to these transfer limits. This stance directly threatens the core model of many pre-IPO token platforms, which rely on SPV structures. The announcement revealed additional risks within this model, such as complex "SPV-within-SPV" layering that obscures legal transparency, increases management fees, and creates a chain reaction risk of invalidation. Following the news, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). The market reaction highlights a divergence: while asset-backed pre-IPO tokens plummeted, purely speculative pre-IPO futures contracts, which are bilateral bets on future IPO prices with no claim to actual shares, remained relatively stable as they are unaffected by the transfer restrictions. The industry is split on the implications. Some believe the fundamental logic of pre-IPO token trading is broken if leading companies reject SPV-held shares, potentially causing a domino effect. Others, like Rivet founder Nick Abouzeid, argue that buyers of such unofficial tokens always knowingly accepted the risk of non-recognition by the company. The statements serve as a stark risk warning and a corrective measure for a market where valuations for some AI-related pre-IPO tokens had soared to irrational levels, far exceeding recent funding round valuations.

marsbitHá 39m

Anthropic and OpenAI Have Single-Handedly Severed the Logic of Pre-IPO Stock Tokenization

marsbitHá 39m

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

The pre-IPO token market has been rocked by strong statements from Anthropic and OpenAI. Both AI giants have updated official warnings, declaring that any sale or transfer of their company shares without explicit board approval is "invalid" and will not be recognized on their corporate records. This directly targets Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs), the common legal structure used by pre-IPO token platforms. These platforms typically use an SPV to acquire shares from employees or early investors, then issue blockchain-based tokens representing a claim on the SPV's economic benefits. Anthropic and OpenAI's position means that if an SPV's share purchase lacked authorization, the underlying asset could be deemed worthless, nullifying the token's value. Anthropic explicitly warned that any third party selling its shares—via direct sales, forwards, or tokens—is likely fraudulent or offering a valueless investment. The crackdown highlights risks in the popular SPV model, including complex multi-layered "Russian doll" SPV structures that obscure legal ownership, add fees, and concentrate risk. If one layer is invalidated, the entire chain could collapse. Following the announcements, tokens like ANTHROPIC and OPENAI on platforms like PreStocks fell sharply (over 20%). In contrast, purely speculative pre-IPO prediction contracts remained stable, as they involve no actual share ownership. The move is seen as a corrective measure amid a market frenzy where some pre-IPO token valuations (e.g., Anthropic's token hitting a $1.4 trillion implied valuation) far exceeded recent official funding rounds. Opinions are split: some believe this undermines the core logic of pre-IPO token trading if top companies reject SPVs, while others argue buyers always assumed this legal risk when accessing unofficial channels. The statements serve as a stark warning and a potential catalyst for market de-leveraging and clearer boundaries.

Odaily星球日报Há 42m

Anthropic and OpenAI Personally Sever the Logic of Pre-IPO Crypto-Stocks

Odaily星球日报Há 42m

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

"AI Membership: The Hidden Cost Pushing Workers Toward 'Poverty'" The widespread corporate push for AI adoption is creating a hidden financial burden for employees. Companies, from giants like Alibaba to small firms, are mandating AI use, often tying token consumption to KPIs, but frequently refuse to cover the costs. Workers are forced to pay for subscriptions out of pocket to stay competitive and avoid being replaced. Front-end developer Long Shen spends up to 2000 RMB monthly on tools like Cursor and ChatGPT Plus, seeing it as a necessary 3% salary investment to handle 90% of his coding tasks. While it boosted his performance and led to promotions, he now faces idle time at work, pretending to be busy. Designer Peng Peng navigates strict company firewalls by using personal devices and accounts for AI image generation tools like Midjourney, spending hundreds monthly without reimbursement, while her boss demands faster, more numerous revisions. The pressure creates workplace anxiety and suspicion. Programmer Li Huahua, after a friend's experience of raised KPIs following AI success, fears being branded a "traitor" for using it yet worries about falling behind if she doesn't. The dynamic allows management to demand results without understanding the tools or covering expenses, treating employees like AI "agents." While some, like entrepreneur Jin Tu, find high value in paid AI, building entire systems and winning competitions, for most, it's a trap. Free tools like Kimi and Doubao are introducing fees, closing off alternatives. The initial efficiency gains individual advantage, but as AI becomes ubiquitous, the personal edge disappears, workloads increase, and a cycle of dependency begins. Workers like Long Shen realize they cannot maintain AI-generated code without AI, making stopping harder than continuing to pay. The tool promising liberation is instead becoming a compulsory, costly chain in the modern workplace.

marsbitHá 1h

The Waged Worker Driven to Poverty by AI Subscriptions

marsbitHá 1h

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

Strategy CEO Phong Le emphasizes that the company's legacy software business is integral to its Bitcoin Treasury Company model, creating unique operational, financial, and cultural synergies. He argues that the software division, which recently reported its strongest quarter in a decade with 12% revenue growth and 27% margin expansion, funds Bitcoin-related expenses and provides a critical institutional foundation. This includes a 35-year operating history, public company infrastructure, and extensive compliance standards that most digital asset firms lack. Conversely, Le states the Bitcoin strategy has energized employees and engaged customers. Looking ahead, Strategy is leveraging its "Mosaic" AI data platform to automate internal systems and drive its software evolution, aiming for more autonomous and adaptive operations.

bitcoinistHá 1h

Strategy Says Its Software Business Is Quietly Powering Its Bitcoin Machine

bitcoinistHá 1h

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

"SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire and Its Heirs" explores the unconventional succession narrative within SK Group, South Korea's second-largest conglomerate, following SK Hynix's dramatic market rise. Unlike traditional chaebol scripts prioritizing the eldest son, ownership, and political marriages, Chairman Choi Tae-won's three children from his first marriage are charting distinct paths. The eldest daughter, Choi Yun-jeong, is considered the most visible candidate. With a background in biology, consulting, and a PhD, she holds executive roles at SK Bioscience and SK Inc.'s growth strategy unit, focusing on biopharma and new businesses. Her marriage is to an AI infrastructure entrepreneur, not a traditional chaebol heir. The second daughter, Choi Min-jeong, took a unique route by voluntarily serving as a South Korean naval officer, including a tour in the Gulf of Aden. She later worked on policy and strategy for SK Hynix in Washington D.C. before co-founding an AI-driven healthcare startup in San Francisco. She married a former U.S. Marine Corps officer, connecting the family to U.S. defense and policy networks. The son, Choi In-geun, who has Type 1 diabetes, followed a more classic preparatory path with a physics degree and a stint at SK E&S but left to join McKinsey's Seoul office. He remains publicly silent and holds no SK shares, defying the traditional "crown prince" archetype. Their paths unfold against the backdrop of their parents' high-profile, contentious divorce and a record-setting asset division lawsuit. The article argues that as SK Hynix becomes a geopolitical asset in the AI era, the conventional rules of chaebol inheritance are changing. The heirs are being groomed not simply to take over, but to navigate a complex global landscape defined by AI, biotech, geopolitics, and policy, forging legitimacy through their own expertise and networks rather than birth order alone.

marsbitHá 1h

SK Hynix's Trillion-Won Empire: The Successors

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow