BVNK 创始人:稳定币发展的三个阶段

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-03Última atualização em 2026-05-03

作者:Jesse Hemson Struthers,BVNK 首席执行官兼创始人

编译:佳欢,ChainCatcher

关于稳定币,目前有一个相当普遍的说法:它是新兴市场个人对冲货币波动的工具。这确实是事实,也很重要,但这并不是全貌。

今天在 BVNK,我们处理着 360亿美元 的年化稳定币交易量。我们只是这个庞大生态系统中的一员,但我们从交易量数据中发现了一些有意思的规律,它们指向一个三阶段的演变过程。

这一切始于2022年,当时券商平台及其散户用户开始用稳定币给账户充值。一路发展到今天,企业级平台正在把稳定币钱包嵌入自己的产品中。

360 亿数据里的三阶演进

第一阶段(2022-2024年):券商破局与模式验证

BVNK 最早的交易量来自券商平台,核心用例是账户充值。散户用户存入稳定币为账户充值,随时随地进行股票、加密货币和其他资产的交易,我们自动兑换为法币,与平台完成结算。

这种用例有时会被轻视,觉得不算"真实世界"的应用。但想想它意味着什么:跨境、全天候、即时结算。一个巴西用户可以在周日凌晨2点给券商账户充值。这就是资金流转的未来,只是发生在一个没有因此得到足够认可的行业里。

2023-2024年,这一用例大约占我们总交易量的50%。业内已有公开信息显示,Bridge 和 Zerohash 等公司在 Bitso、tastytrade 等客户身上看到了同样的趋势。

第二阶段(2024-2025年):机构接力与生态扩容

这是真正有意思的阶段。大型支付服务商开始为客户接入稳定币支付通道:dLocal、Worldpay、Thunes、Visa 以及其他公司。应用场景不断拓展:商户结算、B2B 应付账款、资金库运营。

BVNK 按用例划分的年化交易量

2025年,B2B支付占我们总交易量的44%,成为最大类别,超过了账户充值。

值得注意的是,很多在交易平台上找到 PMF(产品市场契合)的稳定币支付服务商,并没有成功跨越到 B2B 支付这个赛道。

在此期间,我们还看到了几个高增长用例的起飞。

第一个是 B2C 薪资和零工支出。像 Deel 和 Ontop 这样的公司正在用 BVNK 的基础设施,实时向全球各地的员工、卖家和创作者发放薪酬。

第二个是嵌入式稳定币钱包的需求激增。我们的交易量在一年内从接近于零增长到34亿美元,增幅达263倍。

金融科技公司和全球性平台意识到,稳定币不只是用来收付款的,它可以作为钱包层直接嵌入产品中。我们已经从简单的"发送/接收",进入了把稳定币当作基础设施来用的阶段。

对这些企业来说,拥有钱包就意味着拥有客户关系和价值流动的控制权。

按稳定币用例划分的增长率

第三阶段(2026年及以后):企业押注与基建重构

去年,我们接入的企业客户比过去所有年份加起来还多,而2026年的客户储备显示出用例正在发生明显转变。

几乎每4个新客户中就有1个(23%)要求嵌入数字美元钱包,几乎追上了 B2B 支付(占新客户的32%)。这些钱包就是嵌在平台里的全球支付基础设施,背后是数百万终端用户。

2025年与2026年按用例划分的 BVNK 客户数量对比

平台嵌入稳定币钱包,不只是多了一种支付方式,而是在搭建基础设施。当一个市场平台嵌入钱包,或者一家科技巨头把稳定币支出能力内置到平台中,你看到的是:企业正在押注稳定币,把它作为未来资金流转和价值存储的基石。

2026年,我们还看到另外两个新兴用例的需求在增长:

B2C 稳定币结账已经成为一个独立的应用场景(占新客户的7%),主要是奢侈品、旅游和大型科技公司在传统支付方式之外增加稳定币结账选项。

B2C 薪资和市场平台支出继续增长(占新客户的8%)。

演进背后的必然性

券商平台最先证明了稳定币支付的价值:用户往往是加密原住民(不需要市场教育),从第一天起就需要全球覆盖,而且和国际电汇相比,稳定币的优势立竿见影。

但同样的优势(速度快、全球可达、全天候可用)同样适用于 B2B 支付、B2C 支出,以及如今企业平台内部的嵌入式钱包体验。

另外一点,像 BVNK 这样早在2022年就大规模跑通了早期用例的稳定币支付基础设施提供商,已经积累了过硬的运营能力和合规框架,而这正是今天的支付公司和企业所需要的。这份实战记录,成了后续一切发展的基础。

飞轮才刚刚转动

整个市场的增长势头很明显,但要记住,我们仍处于早期。

通过让支付变得更快、更便宜、全球互通,稳定币打开了新市场的大门,而这个市场有多大,今天很难估算。

Uber 的类比很有参考意义:它的市场不只是出租车,而是在出行变得便捷、随叫随到之后才涌现出的大量出行需求。

稳定币也是一样,它的独特优势在优化现有用例的同时,也会创造出全新的应用场景。

Leituras Relacionadas

QCP Capital Analysts Explained Why Bitcoin Stalled at $63,000

QCP Capital's latest report explains that Bitcoin has stalled around $63,000, testing the lower boundary of its recent trading range ($62,500–$64,000). The retreat wasn't due to a single catalyst but stems from several cross-market pressures: heightened geopolitical risks, rising oil prices, uncertainty around global liquidity, and a muted reaction to positive U.S. macroeconomic data. While U.S. inflation and jobs data softened, reducing expectations of imminent Fed tightening, Bitcoin's price response has been subdued. This highlights the importance of other factors like trader positioning, liquidity conditions, and overall risk appetite. The regulatory landscape is progressing on two tracks: congressional legislation (like the CLARITY Act) is delayed, but SEC rulemaking continues. Corporate treasury activity, exemplified by Strategy's new Bitcoin monetization program, now creates a potential two-way flow, adding complexity to supply dynamics. Geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz keep oil prices elevated, impacting crypto indirectly through inflation expectations and financial conditions. Historical seasonality shows August and September are typically weak for Bitcoin, but this is descriptive, not predictive, in today's ETF-driven market. In conclusion, Bitcoin has shown resilience by absorbing multiple negative forces without a decisive breakdown. However, it has failed to convert improving macro fundamentals into sustained upward momentum. The market awaits key events like the U.S. PCE data, the Jackson Hole symposium, and the September FOMC meeting for a potential catalyst to break the current range.

cryptonews.ruHá 3m

QCP Capital Analysts Explained Why Bitcoin Stalled at $63,000

cryptonews.ruHá 3m

Did DeepSeek Intentionally Make an Unfriendly Agent?

DeepSeek is shifting its strategy from being a low-cost model provider to building a foundational ecosystem for AI agents. This pivot is marked by two recent moves: increasing the price of its flagship V4 Pro model and launching the DeepSeek Harness agent framework. Previously, DeepSeek's success was built on creating powerful, affordable models and open-sourcing them to drive adoption. Now, the focus is moving "beyond the model" to the runtime environment where agents operate. Harness is key to this new approach. Unlike integrated agent products from competitors, Harness deconstructs the agent stack—separating the model, tools, skills, workflows, and UI into modular, replaceable components. Its core innovation is the Cordis kernel, which enables dynamic loading, unloading, and management of plugins, allowing agents to modify their own capabilities during execution. Significantly, Harness does not lock users into DeepSeek's models; it allows integration with third-party models. This suggests DeepSeek's ambition is not to control the model layer but to establish the standard runtime environment for future agents—akin to an operating system for the agent era. The V4 Pro price increase aligns with this shift: the model transitions from a loss-leading acquisition tool to a core revenue engine within a broader ecosystem. Harness is currently complex and developer-focused, prioritizing ecosystem builders over end-users. Its success will be measured not by immediate user numbers, but by the plugins, agents, and platforms built upon it. DeepSeek's long-term bet is that controlling the agent runtime will be more valuable than merely providing the underlying models, potentially redefining how AI agents are created and evolved.

marsbitHá 38m

Did DeepSeek Intentionally Make an Unfriendly Agent?

marsbitHá 38m

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: Talk is Cheap

This monthly market analysis extends its timeline to incorporate critical July comments from the Fed Chair, noting that bond markets have already priced in perceived policy shortcomings. The report observes a growing divergence: equity markets, after some deleveraging, continue a "trust-based" rally, while bond and currency markets signal persistent distrust. Precious metals bottoming suggests a central bank consensus that the era of "competitive currency devaluation" is ending, with verbal interventions losing power. Looking forward to Q3-Q4, the analysis remains bullish on supply-constrained global resources like copper and power, as well as gold, which prices ongoing monetary失信. It argues that digital assets are unlikely to see major outperformance until excess liquidity is released and AI growth rates are fully priced. Key market views include: 1. Commodities like gold remain primary liquidity absorbers over Bitcoin, with recent consolidation seen as healthy. 2. The bull trend for RMB-denominated assets (e.g., STAR 50 Index) is firmly established. 3. Key resource country indices and currencies are near inflection points, with spot copper already at new highs. The report suggests resource equities, particularly in China's market, are at the end of their consolidation phase, offering attractive valuations with embedded optionality on rising metal prices. It highlights the predictive significance of recent US-Japan FX interventions and Treasury-Fed dynamics, suggesting a shift towards less communication and data management to maintain stability. A long position in resource assets is presented as a positive expected-value strategy over a multi-year horizon.

marsbitHá 2h

Metrics Ventures Market Observation: Talk is Cheap

marsbitHá 2h

The Value, Growth, and Risks of Prediction Markets

The article discusses the explosive growth and complex nature of prediction markets in the United States, focusing on their value, risks, and regulatory challenges. Key drivers include sports betting, which fueled a 1795% year-over-year trading volume increase in Q2 2026, with platforms like Kalshi and Polymarket dominating. These markets offer significant potential as superior hedging tools for businesses and more efficient price discovery mechanisms than traditional polls or derivatives for events like Fed rate decisions, elections, or GPU prices. They also serve as customer acquisition channels for platforms like Robinhood. However, major challenges persist. A central conflict exists between federal regulators (CFTC), which classify event contracts as derivatives under its jurisdiction, and state authorities, which view sports-related contracts as illegal gambling, leading to numerous lawsuits. There is significant consumer protection risk: data shows most retail users lose money to professional traders, platforms market high-risk products like parlays, and protections (e.g., age limits, addiction help) are weaker than in state-regulated sports betting. The "self-certification" process allows rapid contract launches but creates regulatory uncertainty. The author argues prediction markets are fundamentally "better markets" but currently fail to provide adequate consumer safeguards. Proposals include integrating protection mechanisms (cooling-off periods, position limits), aligning risk warnings with product risks, creating paths from speculation to long-term investing, and applying specific consumer protections and taxes to sports contracts. The piece concludes by urging stakeholders to address these issues before a potential regulatory backlash undermines the markets' legitimate utility.

marsbitHá 2h

The Value, Growth, and Risks of Prediction Markets

marsbitHá 2h

Trading

Spot
活动图片