Bitcoin price prediction: $55.5K or $70K for its next impulse move?

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-07-17Última atualização em 2026-07-17

Resumo

After a brief recovery above $65K, Bitcoin's price retreated slightly, with recent liquidations remaining modest compared to earlier large-scale sell-offs. Analysts note fragile market conditions, citing negative ETF flows and lack of specific Bitcoin demand. However, the Bitcoin Regime Score, which combines several market metrics, indicates a modestly bullish short-term outlook for the second consecutive week. From a technical perspective, Bitcoin's price action is at a critical juncture. The higher timeframe trend remains bearish, with $65,260 acting as a key resistance level. The analysis suggests a potential continuation of the downtrend toward $55,560 or even $51,934 in the coming weeks, unless the price closes above $67,292 on a 4-hour chart. An alternative scenario could see a rally up to $77,489 before the larger bearish trend resumes.

After falling to $62.2K on Monday, 13th July, Bitcoin [BTC] gained by 4.45% a day later as the price poked its head above the $65K-level. In the 48 hours since then, Bitcoin has fallen by 1.37% again. The liquidations caused by the rejection of $65K were not much.

Compared to the liquidation cascade caused by the slide from $74K to $60K, the liquidation figures in recent days were modest. The past 24 hours only saw $52 million in BTC trader liquidations, compared to nearly $980 million in liquidations on 23rd June, when BTC fell from $64.2K to $62K.

AMBCrypto reported that fragile market conditions could stall a recovery. According to a Bitfinex analyst, there was no Bitcoin-specific demand in sight, ETF flows were negative, and so was the Coinbase Premium Index.

Bitcoin bounce is not over yet!

The Bitcoin Regime Score combines taker flow, funding rates, Open Interest, exchange flows, ETF flows, and price trends. Using this metric, crypto analyst Axel Adler Jr. demonstrated that the press time reading of +34.6 put the regime score in modestly bullish territory.

The pullback below zero on 14th July has been reversed since, due to the buying pressure that followed.

Main market components have been pointing in the bullish direction in the short-term, the analyst concluded. In fact, the regime remained bullish for the second consecutive week.

Bitcoin price prediction and the case for an imminent bearish reaction

At the time of writing, the price action was at a precarious location. The higher timeframe price trend was bearish. Using the higher timeframe impulse price move from $82,850 to $51,888, Fibonacci retracement levels (orange) were plotted.

Another set of retracement levels was plotted using the 4-hour timeframe’s swing structure. The $65,260-level was the 78.6% retracement level, a key resistance. In recent hours of trading, a bearish reaction ensued too.

It is expected that Bitcoin will continue its downtrend and fall to $55,560 and $51,934 in the coming weeks. This bearish idea would be invalidated upon an H4 session close above $67,292.

In the second scenario, a rally up to $77,489 might materialize before the higher timeframe downtrend takes control.

Final Summary

The Bitcoin Regime Score metric showed short-term bullish market components for Bitcoin.
Price action showed there was a good chance of rejection from $65.3K and a bearish trend continuation.

Criptomoedas em alta

CitreaCTR

wrapped stUSDTWSTUSDT

Velodrome FinanceVELODROME

BrevisBREV

ZRX（0X）ZRX

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat does the Bitcoin Regime Score metric indicate about the current market conditions?

AThe Bitcoin Regime Score, which combines factors like taker flow, funding rates, and ETF flows, had a reading of +34.6 at press time, putting it in 'modestly bullish' territory. The analyst noted that main market components have been pointing in a bullish direction in the short-term, and the regime remained bullish for the second consecutive week.

QWhat are the two potential price targets mentioned if Bitcoin continues its bearish trend?

AIf Bitcoin continues its downtrend, the article suggests it could fall to $55,560 and $51,934 in the coming weeks.

QAccording to the price action analysis, what level would invalidate the bearish idea of a downtrend continuation?

AThe bearish idea of a downtrend continuation would be invalidated upon a 4-hour (H4) candlestick session closing above the $67,292 level.

QHow did recent liquidations compare to the large liquidation event on June 23rd?

ARecent liquidations were modest compared to the event on June 23rd. The past 24 hours saw only $52 million in BTC trader liquidations, whereas the June 23rd event involved nearly $980 million in liquidations when BTC fell from $64.2K to $62K.

QWhat was the reason given for the fragile market conditions potentially stalling a Bitcoin recovery?

AAccording to a Bitfinex analyst cited in the article, the fragile conditions were due to a lack of Bitcoin-specific demand, negative ETF flows, and a negative Coinbase Premium Index.

Leituras Relacionadas

Prices From the Future Fool the Oracle, Ostium Drained of $24 Million in Five Minutes

Ostium, a perpetual trading platform, suffered a security incident on July 15, resulting in significant losses from its public liquidity vault. Initial analyses from Blockaid, Cyvers, and PeckShield estimate losses of up to $24 million. The exploit occurred over a five-minute window. According to security firms, the core issue was not a missing signature, but a data integrity failure: a registered price oracle (PriceUpKeep) submitted authorized price reports with manipulated future timestamps, creating false trading profits. The protocol’s verification process confirmed the signatures as authorized but did not enforce price sanity checks or timestamp boundaries, allowing the manipulated data to be accepted for settlement. This caused the liquidity vault to pay out on these fraudulent profits. Ostium’s co-founder confirmed the team paused trading within an hour and is collaborating with law enforcement and security experts. The extracted funds were reportedly swapped for ETH, with a portion moved to Tornado Cash. The incident highlights risks in DeFi oracle designs where cryptographic signature verification is insufficient without additional safeguards for data validity, timestamp freshness, and price reasonableness. Ostium's response and planned fixes—including stricter timestamp validation, independent price checks, and circuit breakers—will be critical to preventing similar exploits.

marsbitHá 4m

Prices From the Future Fool the Oracle, Ostium Drained of $24 Million in Five Minutes

marsbitHá 4m

‘Overly bearish and simplistic’ – Ark Invest fires back after a16z says TradFi wants blockchain, not DeFi

In a debate over the convergence of decentralized finance (DeFi) and traditional finance (TradFi), Ark Invest has criticized venture firm Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) for being "overly bearish and simplistic." a16z argued that TradFi institutions are selectively adopting blockchain technology for cost efficiency and improved operations—like Circle's Arc Chain, Canton Network, and SWIFT's initiatives—rather than embracing DeFi's decentralized ethos. It contends TradFi will integrate viable innovations into its controlled environments. Ark Invest's Lorenzo Valente countered that public, permissionless chains remain crucial, citing the success of BlackRock's BUIDL fund and dominant stablecoins (USDT, USDC) on public networks like Ethereum and Tron. He and Securitize CEO Carlos Domingo view private chains as transitional, akin to "intranet," and believe open access will ultimately prevail. Data shows public chains dominate stablecoin settlements (~75% share), while corporate chains like Canton lead the tokenized assets segment (~85% share). The article concludes both perspectives hold merit: TradFi is selectively adopting DeFi components, but public chains retain significant, validated roles in the evolving financial landscape.

ambcryptoHá 5m

‘Overly bearish and simplistic’ – Ark Invest fires back after a16z says TradFi wants blockchain, not DeFi

ambcryptoHá 5m

Ansem: Why I Believe Token Buybacks Don't Solve Anything?

Crypto trader Ansem argues that token buybacks alone do not create value. Instead, a project's valuation multiple is driven by "trust premium" built between the team and its community. He compares two high-revenue Solana protocols: Hyperliquid (estimated $800M annualized revenue, ~$650B FDV) and pump.fun (estimated $440M annualized revenue, ~$14B FDV). Both aggressively use most protocol revenue for buybacks, yet their valuation multiples differ by nearly 50x. Ansem attributes Hyperliquid's high valuation to the trust earned by its founder Jeff and team through consistent execution, transparent community rewards, and a dedicated user base. In contrast, he criticizes pump.fun for failing to fulfill a promised airdrop of 24% of its token supply for over a year since its July 2025 ICO, despite generating over $1B in revenue and raising $1B in the ICO. He suggests that honoring its commitments could significantly boost its token price and platform metrics. The core thesis is that trust, not just financial mechanics, is the key driver of crypto asset valuations.

marsbitHá 58m

Ansem: Why I Believe Token Buybacks Don't Solve Anything?

marsbitHá 58m

Li Shanyou: The World Is Getting More Competitive, But We Can Choose to Be Slower, Go Deeper, and Turn Inward

**Title:** Li Shanyou: The World Is Moving Faster and More Chaotically; We Can Choose to Be Slower, Deeper, and More Inward **Summary:** In an era where AI evolves weekly and past experiences often fail, the article argues for returning to First Principles. It shifts focus from "cognition" (knowledge/content), which AI has disrupted, to "consciousness" or "the capacity to know"—the foundational ability that enables cognition and determines its scope and depth. The piece uses Zhang Yiming (founder of ByteDance) as a case study for the "second-order consciousness" of the mobile internet era: success through rational logic, modeling, and deduction, which allowed him to surpass earlier "first-order" entrepreneurs reliant on copying experiences. However, the author suggests that the AI era demands a further leap to "third-order consciousness"—operating from a place of inner inspiration, vision, or "ideas," beyond pure rationality. Figures like Elon Musk and Steve Jobs are cited as examples, with DeepSeek's Liang Wenfeng presented as a potential representative of this new, AI-native wave of entrepreneurs driven by curiosity and innovation rather than just commercial logic. For the majority who may not become such visionary leaders, the author proposes an alternative path: the "Path of Quality" or "Work as Art." This involves turning inward, focusing on the immediate task at hand, and imbuing one's work with care and dedication—creating a "quality" product not as a means to an end, but as an end in itself. This process refines both the work and the individual's own consciousness. In a hyper-competitive, fast-paced world, this path offers a counterpoint: to be slower, go deeper, and focus inward, finding meaning by creating quality in everyday endeavors, regardless of scale.

marsbitHá 1h

Li Shanyou: The World Is Getting More Competitive, But We Can Choose to Be Slower, Go Deeper, and Turn Inward

marsbitHá 1h

1inch Co-founder Anton Bukov Leaves, Launches New Project Second Tier

Anton Bukov, co-founder of the decentralized exchange aggregator protocol 1inch, has announced his departure from the company's daily operations. Bukov, who was instrumental in designing core 1inch architectures like the Router, Fusion, and cross-chain Swap, ceased involvement in November 2025 due to strategic and leadership disagreements, though he retains his co-founder title and 50% equity stake. Concurrently, Bukov unveiled his new venture, Second Tier (tier.xyz), describing it as infrastructure to "shorten the distance between economic intent and on-chain execution." He explicitly stated it is not a DEX or aggregator. The project's public-facing material is currently a manifesto criticizing systemic financial friction and advocating for building new architectural categories rather than competing within existing ones. No product details, team, or funding have been disclosed. The split highlights a strategic divergence within 1inch. While CEO Sergej Kunz has steered the company toward traditional finance integration—evidenced by a 2025 brand refresh and a major Coinbase partnership—Bukov emphasized a commitment to decentralized, permissionless DeFi principles. Bukov's exit coincides with a challenging period for 1inch. Q1 2026 data shows a 60.3% quarterly drop in its daily average trading volume to $97.1 million, underperforming the broader DEX aggregator market decline. Its market share fell from 25.2% to 17.0%, dropping it to fourth place among competitors. Key questions remain regarding Bukov's future role as a major 1inch shareholder, the timeline for Second Tier's product development, and whether 1inch's institutional-focused strategy can reverse its declining trading metrics.

Foresight NewsHá 1h

1inch Co-founder Anton Bukov Leaves, Launches New Project Second Tier

Foresight NewsHá 1h

Trading

Spot

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar MOVE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Movement (MOVE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Movement (MOVE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Movement (MOVE)Depois de comprar o teu Movement (MOVE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Movement (MOVE)Transaciona facilmente Movement (MOVE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

333 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2026.06.02

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de MOVE (MOVE) são apresentadas abaixo.