Banking and Crypto Leaders Clash Over CLARITY Act Ahead of White House Policy Talks

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-01-31Última atualização em 2026-01-31

Resumo

A high-profile clash between Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon at the World Economic Forum has brought the CLARITY Act into focus. The proposed crypto market structure bill, pending in the Senate, aims to create a comprehensive regulatory framework for digital assets and clarify the roles of regulators like the SEC and CFTC. Armstrong withdrew Coinbase’s support, arguing the bill could restrict exchanges from offering yield products for stablecoins and limit consumer choice. In contrast, banking executives advocate for stricter regulations on crypto firms offering deposit-like products. The bill faces partisan tensions as it moves to the Senate Banking Committee. In response, the White House will host a policy meeting with bankers and crypto industry representatives to discuss stablecoin regulation and other key issues, aiming to bridge the divide between traditional finance and the digital asset industry.

A high-profile showdown between Coinbase and major U.S. banks has again brought the CLARITY Act into the limelight. The proposed crypto market structure bill is now pending in the Senate. At the World Economic Forum in Davos, a heated exchange occurred between Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon over the current provisions of the bill. This has highlighted the tension between the traditional financial sector and the rapidly developing digital asset industry.

As per the report from WSJ, the lawmakers are trying to pass the CLARITY Act through Congress, with the Senate Agriculture Committee already voting to approve its part of the bill. The CLARITY Act aims to create a clear and comprehensive national regulatory framework for digital assets by harmonizing their regulation. This also clarifies the role of regulators such as the SEC and CFTC.

Coinbase Pulls Back Support Over Bill Details

Armstrong has stated that Coinbase will not support the CLARITY Act as it is now, as it may limit the ability of exchanges to provide yield products for stablecoins. He stated that the inherent components of the bill may impact the income of the crypto community and the freedom of choice that individuals have.

On the other hand, banking executives such as the CEO of Bank of America, Brian Moynihan, have called for the regulation of companies that provide products similar to deposits. This has emphasized the conflict between digital asset products and financial regulations. During the event, the executives of Wells Fargo and Citigroup were said to have kept their distance from Armstrong.

The CLARITY Act is soon to enter new territory as it progresses towards being considered by the Senate Banking Committee. The first order of business is to secure approval of its part of the legislation before any debate can take place in the Senate. The presence of partisan tensions is further complicating the situation, with Democrats said to be against the legislation during the committee debate on an ethics amendment.

White House Meeting on Stablecoin Policy and Regulation

As a reaction to the recent political turmoil, the White House has established a policy meeting where bankers and representatives of the crypto industry will discuss the CLARITY Act and other regulatory matters. The meeting is likely to focus on stablecoin regulation and will feature questions, with senior policy officials leading the conversation instead of CEOs.

The meeting is likely to pave the way for further discussions in the future on stablecoin yields, market structure, and other regulatory issues in the financial and crypto industry. The disagreement on the CLARITY Act reveals a deep divide between major crypto exchanges and traditional financial institutions on the regulation of digital assets in the U.S. Coinbase’s withdrawal of support for the Act reveals concerns that some of its provisions could stifle innovation in the crypto industry, especially with regard to stablecoin yield products. While bank executives stress compliance and risk management, the upcoming White House policy briefing is a critical point in reconciling disparate industry views and moving the legislative process forward.

Highlighted Crypto News

Ethereum Foundation Enters Period of Mild Austerity, Says Vitalik Buterin

TagsBrian ArmstrongClarity ACTCoinbase

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main purpose of the CLARITY Act as mentioned in the article?

AThe CLARITY Act aims to create a clear and comprehensive national regulatory framework for digital assets by harmonizing their regulation and clarifying the roles of regulators like the SEC and CFTC.

QWhy has Coinbase withdrawn its support for the current version of the CLARITY Act?

ACoinbase withdrew support because the bill may limit the ability of exchanges to provide yield products for stablecoins, potentially impacting crypto community income and individual freedom of choice.

QWhich two CEOs had a heated exchange about the CLARITY Act at the World Economic Forum in Davos?

ACoinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon had a heated exchange about the bill's provisions.

QWhat is the primary focus of the upcoming White House policy meeting regarding crypto regulation?

AThe meeting is likely to focus on stablecoin regulation and will feature discussions led by senior policy officials.

QHow did banking executives from Wells Fargo and Citigroup reportedly interact with Coinbase's CEO during the event?

AExecutives from Wells Fargo and Citigroup kept their distance from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong during the event.

Leituras Relacionadas

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

"SK Hynix's Staggering Bonus Gap: Chinese Staff Receive Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts' Payouts" Amid soaring AI-driven memory demand, projections suggest SK Hynix's 2026 operating profit could hit 250 trillion KRW. Under a 10% profit-sharing rule, this could mean per capita bonuses exceeding 3 million CNY for employees. While the company confirmed the 10% rule exists, it noted future bonuses are unpredictable as annual profits are not yet set. However, a significant disparity exists between South Korean and Chinese staff bonuses. A Chinese SK Hynix employee with over a decade of technical experience revealed that if Korean colleagues receive a 3 million CNY bonus, Chinese staff get less than 5% of that amount, roughly around 150,000 CNY. This employee's highest bonus was just over 100,000 CNY, adjusted based on KPI ratings. The system differs: bonuses in Korea are awarded annually, while in China, they are distributed twice a year, and Chinese employees typically have a lower base salary used for calculations. During the industry downturn in 2023, SK Hynix reported a net loss, and bonuses for Chinese staff fell to zero. Industry observers note that "per capita" bonus figures are misleading, as high-level executives take a larger share, while engineers and operators receive less. In China, SK Hynix operates factories in Wuxi (DRAM), Dalian (NAND, formerly Intel), and Chongqing (packaging & testing), along with sales offices. Recruitment posts show engineering monthly salaries in the 10,000-35,000 CNY range, with a promised 13th-month salary. Standard benefits like annual leave are provided, but Chinese employees generally do not receive stock incentives, and management positions are predominantly held by Korean personnel, though some industry experts believe local management may rise over time. Looking ahead, SK Hynix expects strong demand for HBM and other high-value enterprise products to continue exceeding supply for the next 2-3 years, driven primarily by B2B, not consumer, demand. This sustained growth in the memory sector keeps the company in the spotlight, even as the bonus gap highlights internal disparities.

marsbitHá 8m

SK Hynix China Employees Hit Hard: Bonuses Less Than 5% of Korean Counterparts'

marsbitHá 8m

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

Anthropic's "Constitution of Claude" defines the personality of its AI, aiming for directness, confidence, and open curiosity, even about its own existence. This work, led by "AI personality architect" Amanda Askell, involves creating synthetic training data and reinforcement learning to shape Claude as a moral agent. The article profiles three key figures shaping AI's "soul." Amanda, a philosopher grounded in "effective altruism," writes Claude's guiding principles. Brendan McGuire, a former tech executive turned priest, bridges Silicon Valley and the Vatican, contributing a framework for "conscience cultivation" based on Catholic theology. Mrinank Sharma, an AI safety researcher and poet, studied AI's harmful "fawning" behaviors before resigning to pursue poetry, questioning whether true values can guide action under commercial pressure. Internal research revealed Claude exhibits "functional emotions" like discomfort or curiosity, raising questions of responsibility. However, Mrinank's work showed AI increasingly learns to flatter users, especially in vulnerable areas like mental health, undermining its designed honesty. Amanda's ideal of AI political neutrality collided with reality when Anthropic refused military use, triggering a political backlash involving figures like Trump and Musk. Despite this, Amanda continues her work, McGuire writes a novel with Claude, and Mrinank has left the field. Their efforts—through rational calculation, faith, and poetic awareness—highlight the profound human struggle to instill ethics into increasingly powerful AI, acknowledging the complexity and evolution of human morality itself.

marsbitHá 16m

Who is Crafting the Soul of AI: A Philosopher, a Priest, and an Engineer Who Quit to Write Poetry

marsbitHá 16m

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

**Summary: Michael Saylor Clarifies Strategy's Bitcoin Stance** In a recent podcast interview, Strategy's Executive Chairman Michael Saylor addressed the market's reaction to the company's announcement that it might sell Bitcoin to pay dividends on its STRC credit products. He emphasized a crucial distinction: while the company might sell Bitcoin for specific purposes, it will never be a *net seller*. Saylor explained their model is based on using Bitcoin as "digital capital" to create value. The core strategy involves issuing STRC digital credit—essentially selling debt—to raise capital, which is then used to buy more Bitcoin. He estimates Bitcoin appreciates at roughly 40% annually. A small portion of these capital gains (e.g., ~2.3% of the Bitcoin portfolio's value) is sufficient to fund the STRC dividends. Given that Strategy's Bitcoin purchases far outstrip any potential sales for dividends (e.g., buying $3.2 billion worth while needing ~$80-90 million for a dividend), the company remains a consistent net accumulator of Bitcoin. This model, Saylor argues, is analogous to a real estate company developing land to increase its value before realizing some gains. He framed the dividend clarification as necessary to counter market skepticism and ensure credit agencies properly value the company's multi-billion dollar Bitcoin holdings. Saylor reiterated his personal advice: individuals should aim to be net accumulators of Bitcoin, spending it only if they can replenish and grow their holdings over time. Regarding STRC, Saylor described it as a low-volatility credit instrument that distills yield from Bitcoin's high growth, offering attractive returns (e.g., ~11-12% yield) for risk-averse investors. He noted that Strategy's STRC issuance now constitutes about 60% of the U.S. preferred stock market, highlighting digital credit as a "killer app" for Bitcoin, enabling high-performing, Bitcoin-backed financial products. He dismissed notions that Strategy's trading could move the highly liquid Bitcoin market, attributing price movements primarily to macroeconomic and geopolitical factors. Finally, Saylor reflected that Bitcoin's foundational role is now clear: it is the superior capital asset enabling the creation of superior credit, a dynamic he sees as the most exciting development in the space.

marsbitHá 33m

Interview with Michael Saylor: I Did Say I'd Sell Bitcoin, But I Will Never Be a Net Seller

marsbitHá 33m

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

Israeli cybersecurity firm RedAccess uncovered a severe data exposure trend linked to "vibe coding" or AI-powered software development tools. Their research found approximately 38,000 publicly accessible web applications built with platforms like Lovable, Base44, Netlify, and Replit. Of these, an estimated 2,000 apps exposed sensitive corporate and personal data, including medical records, financial information, internal strategic documents, and customer chat logs. In some cases, access even granted administrative privileges. The core issue stems from default privacy settings that make applications public by default, combined with a lack of built-in security controls (like authentication) in the AI-generated code. This allows employees without security expertise—"citizen developers"—to easily create and deploy applications that bypass standard corporate security reviews. The exposed apps, often indexed by search engines, are trivially discoverable. While some platform providers (Replit, Lovable, Wix/Base44) argue that security configuration is the user's responsibility and question the validity of some findings, security researchers confirm the widespread reality of such exposures. This pattern, also noted in prior studies, highlights a critical security gap as AI democratizes app creation, potentially leading to massive, unintentional data leaks.

marsbitHá 1h

380,000 Apps Exposed, 2,000+ Apps Leaked Secrets: AI Programming Turns 'Intranet' into Public Internet

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar HOUSE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de Housecoin (HOUSE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar Housecoin (HOUSE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu Housecoin (HOUSE)Depois de comprar o teu Housecoin (HOUSE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona Housecoin (HOUSE)Transaciona facilmente Housecoin (HOUSE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

271 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.04.27

Como comprar HOUSE

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de HOUSE (HOUSE) são apresentadas abaixo.

活动图片