Argentina Bans Polymarket Over Illegal Gambling Concerns Following Colombia

TheNewsCryptoPublicado em 2026-03-17Última atualização em 2026-03-17

Resumo

Argentina has blocked the prediction market platform Polymarket following a court ruling in Buenos Aires that declared its operations illegal under the country's gambling regulations. Authorities have directed internet service providers and app stores to restrict access to the platform. Officials raised concerns over the use of cryptocurrencies for betting and the lack of user identity checks, which could allow minors to participate. The decision follows similar action taken by Colombia, where Polymarket was also classified as an illegal gambling operation for failing to meet licensing requirements. The case reflects growing global regulatory scrutiny of crypto-based prediction markets, which are increasingly being treated as gambling platforms due to their structure and potential risks to market integrity.

Argentina’s authorities have blocked Polymarket across the country after a ruling by a Buenos Aires court. It declared that it operated illegally and outside the country’s legal framework and regulations regarding gambling. The country’s authorities have asked ENACOM to impose a blockade against Polymarket by internet service providers. The limited access to mobile applications across the country. They have also asked app stores to remove Polymarket applications to prevent users from accessing them.

It was also determined that the platform enabled users to place bets using cryptocurrencies. And the traditional forms of payment in an easy manner. There were also concerns raised by officials regarding the lack of verification measures for the identity of users. This may lead minors to indulge in illegal betting activities. Complaints from local gambling organizations prompted legal action against the platform’s operations.

Regulatory Concerns and Regional Crackdown Expand

Investigations were conducted regarding suspicious trading activities related to inflation prediction markets. This have recently received significant regulatory interest from financial oversight organizations. Reports have been received about unusual betting patterns that have sparked concerns about a potential case. The officials have studied the trading and have observed that some behaviors may have suggested a potential information advantage for some groups in the entire system. This may have compromised the overall integrity and transparency in the current decentralized prediction markets operating globally.

It is worth noting that the authorities concluded that the platform operated like an online betting system. The authorities noted that prediction markets generally take a similar form to gambling structures, in which users of the platforms make predictions about real-world events in order to obtain financial rewards. The classification of prediction markets as gambling structures increases the need for stricter regulation and enforcement of the existing gambling laws.

Argentina’s decision comes in the wake of a similar decision made by the Colombian authorities, banning Polymarket from operating within their jurisdiction since it did not comply with the licensing requirements. The Colombian authorities classified the prediction platform as an illegal gambling platform and asked all the internet service providers within the country to block the platform immediately. The case is a testament to the increasing global scrutiny of crypto-based platforms that take a similar form to gambling and trading mechanisms.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Polymarket Users Threaten Journalist Over Iran Missile Report Dispute

TagsArgentinaBlockchainCRYPTO GAMBLINGCryptocurrencyexchangegamblingPolymarket

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhy did Argentina block Polymarket?

AArgentina blocked Polymarket because a Buenos Aires court ruled that it operated illegally outside the country's legal gambling framework and regulations.

QWhat actions did Argentine authorities take against Polymarket?

AAuthorities asked ENACOM to impose an ISP blockade, restricted access to its applications, and requested app stores to remove Polymarket's apps.

QWhat were the specific concerns officials had about Polymarket platform?

AOfficials raised concerns about the use of cryptocurrencies for betting, lack of user identity verification, and the risk of minors engaging in illegal betting activities.

QHow did Argentina classify Polymarket's operations?

AArgentina classified Polymarket as an online betting system, noting that prediction markets function similarly to gambling structures where users predict real-world events for financial rewards.

QWhich other country recently took similar action against Polymarket?

AColombia recently banned Polymarket for operating without complying with licensing requirements, classifying it as an illegal gambling platform.

Leituras Relacionadas

9.42 Million Retail Investors Compete for Changxin Technology, Who Got Allotted?

Evergreen Technology's IPO subscription results are now available. On July 20, the domestic memory chip giant announced the offline preliminary allotment results and online lottery results for its IPO. A total of approximately 9.43 million retail investors participated in the online subscription, generating 770,000 winning lots with a final winning rate of about 0.4714%, setting a record for new shares on the STAR Market. After triggering a clawback mechanism from institutional to retail investors, the online retail allocation was significantly increased to 3.851 billion shares. Simultaneously, 285 institutional investors participated in the offline subscription, ultimately receiving 2.173 billion shares at an allotment rate of approximately 0.1756%. Leading insurers and public funds were among the major recipients. Notably, Liang Wenfeng, founder of the major AI model company DeepSeek, through his quantitative investment firms Ningbo Huanfang Quantitative and Zhejiang Jiuzhang Asset, secured the largest share among private funds, with a total allotment worth approximately 175 million yuan. Estimates suggest potential profits could reach 730 million yuan if Evergreen Technology's market capitalization reaches 3 trillion yuan post-listing. The company is expected to list on July 27 and could become the highest-valued tech stock on the A-share market, with various brokerages providing valuations ranging from 1 trillion to over 4 trillion yuan. However, recent significant corrections in global tech stocks may impact its post-listing performance. (Character count: 1,196)

marsbitHá 45m

9.42 Million Retail Investors Compete for Changxin Technology, Who Got Allotted?

marsbitHá 45m

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

The article discusses the evolving relationship between Ethereum's Layer 1 (L1) and Layer 2 (L2) solutions, moving beyond the initial "L2 for scaling" model. As Ethereum L1 itself scales (increasing Gas Limit, statelessness, zkEVM), the unique value proposition of L2s shifts from merely providing cheap execution to offering differentiated features like application-specific optimization, privacy, and flexible governance. The piece explores three key themes: 1. **L2's New Role:** L2s are transitioning from a pure scaling technology to a spectrum of execution environments with varying degrees of security inheritance from Ethereum L1. 2. **Interoperability as State Trust:** Solving L2 fragmentation is less about cross-chain bridges and more about enabling faster, trust-minimized state verification between environments. This involves initiatives like faster L1 finality, intent-based architectures (Open Intents Framework), and native account abstraction. 3. **Blurring Layers:** With the potential integration of zk-proofs into L1 validation (making L1 akin to its own "Rollup") and the concept of "Native Rollups," the rigid boundary between L1 and L2 may fade. The future could be a unified system with multiple execution domains (for DeFi, gaming, privacy, etc.) sharing a common security, settlement, and state framework. In conclusion, Ethereum's goal is not to abandon L2s or re-centralize everything on L1, but to re-integrate the fragmented user experience—liquidity, accounts, applications—while preserving the scaling benefits of a multi-environment ecosystem. The endgame is a cohesive "one chain" feeling for users, powered by diverse but securely interconnected execution layers.

marsbitHá 1h

L2 'Recalibration': When L1 Becomes Its Own Rollup, What Is Ethereum's Endgame?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片