Alibaba Invested in a Latin American Stablecoin Company, Why VelaFi?

marsbitPublicado em 2026-01-14Última atualização em 2026-01-14

Resumo

VelaFi, a financial infrastructure platform focused on Latin America and bridging fiat and crypto, has raised $20 million in a Series B round, bringing its total funding to over $40 million. Notably, the investment round included participation from Alibaba Investment, a subsidiary of Alibaba Group. Alibaba's investment is strategic, as VelaFi's stablecoin-based infrastructure enables instant, low-cost cross-border settlements. This addresses key pain points of high fees and slow processing times, aligning with Alibaba's goals for its AliExpress and B2B platforms in emerging markets. The funding was co-led by XVC and Ikuyo, with participation from other firms. VelaFi, part of Galactic Holdings and led by CEO Maggie Wu, was formerly known as TruBit Business. It has expanded from Latin America into the U.S. and Asia, serving hundreds of enterprise clients and processing billions in transaction volume. VelaFi's core B2B model focuses on two main services: providing regulated on/off ramps for converting between local fiat and stablecoins, and facilitating cross-border payments by converting one local currency directly into another (e.g., Mexican Pesos to Brazilian Reals). It achieves this by integrating with local instant payment systems like Mexico's SPEI and Brazil's PIX, using stablecoins as a settlement layer to create a faster, more efficient alternative to traditional banking channels.

A financial infrastructure platform deeply rooted in Latin America, dedicated to connecting the fiat and crypto worlds, is emerging.

On January 12, VelaFi officially announced the completion of a $20 million Series B funding round. With this round, VelaFi's total funding has exceeded $40 million. This amount not only confirms the market's confidence in the stablecoin payment sector.

It is worth noting that Alibaba Investment, an investment institution under Alibaba Group, appeared among VelaFi's investors.

Why Alibaba?

Alibaba Investment is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Alibaba Group, established in the British Virgin Islands in 2000.

As one of the world's largest B2B and B2C trade platforms, Alibaba is well aware of the pain points in cross-border payments—high fees, lengthy settlement cycles, and exchange rate volatility risks.

The stablecoin infrastructure provided by VelaFi enables instant, low-cost cross-border settlements. VelaFi's deep presence in emerging markets like Latin America overlaps with the key growth regions of AliExpress and Alibaba.com.

Through this investment, Alibaba is likely exploring the use of stablecoin technology to optimize its local payment and merchant settlement experience in emerging markets.

Who Else is Betting on VelaFi?

VelaFi's current funding round was led by XVC and Ikuyo, with participation from Alibaba Investment, Planetree, and existing investor BAI Capital, among others. To date, VelaFi's total funding has surpassed $40 million.

One of the lead investors, XVC, is a dual-currency (RMB and USD) fund management institution headquartered in Beijing. Its partner, Boyu Hu, has invested in star companies like Kuaishou, Weee!, Walnut Programming, and霸王茶姬 (a popular tea chain).

The other lead investor, Ikuyo, is a Tokyo-listed company. This investment is not their first interaction; as early as November 2025, when VelaFi entered the Japanese market, the two parties had already reached a strategic cooperation agreement, jointly becoming co-organizers of the Stablecoin Settlement Association to provide more transparent and economical settlement services for exporters and global enterprises.

Who is VelaFi?

VelaFi is part of Galactic Holdings. Galactic Holdings was founded by a Chinese founding team. Its co-founder and CEO, Maggie Wu, is also the CEO of VelaFi and the founder of the well-known venture capital firm Krypital Group.

Galactic Holdings owns the crypto wallet TruBit, the trading platform TruBit Pro, and the cross-border payment solution for businesses, TruBit Business. In 2025, the original enterprise-level business, TruBit Business, was officially rebranded as VelaFi.

Currently, starting from Latin America, VelaFi has expanded its business footprint to the United States and Asia. VelaFi states that it has served hundreds of enterprise customers to date, processing billions of dollars in payment transaction volume.

Core Model

VelaFi focuses on the B2B market. To ensure compliance, all corporate customers must pass strict KYC (Know Your Customer) and KYB (Know Your Business) verification before accessing VelaFi's service network.

Its core model can be summarized in three points:

1. Fiat On-Ramp & Off-Ramp Channels

This is VelaFi's foundational business, aiming to solve the industry challenge of free conversion between fiat currency and stablecoins.

On-Ramp: Allows end-users of enterprises to pay using local fiat currency, while the enterprise receives an equivalent amount of stablecoins (like USDT/USDC) or assets like Bitcoin.

Off-Ramp: The enterprise sends stablecoins to VelaFi, and VelaFi utilizes its local banking network to deposit funds into the user's bank account in the form of local fiat currency.

2. Global Payments & Cross-Border Transfers

Another service is global payment services, enabling cross-border fund transfers via a "Fiat A - Fiat B" path. For example, a Mexican company paying a Brazilian vendor. Previously, this involved complex intermediary banks. Now, through VelaFi, the payment is made in Pesos (MXN), and the recipient receives Reais (BRL).

VelaFi acts like an "accelerator" built on top of traditional banking rails.

Its core advantage lies in its deep integration with Latin America's mainstream instant payment systems: Mexico's Interbank Electronic Payment System (SPEI), Brazil's Instant Payment System (PIX), and Colombia's Payment System (PSE). By linking these traditional payment rails with stablecoin liquidity, VelaFi enables cryptocurrency to no longer just float on the chain but to potentially be truly implemented in cross-border e-commerce, labor outsourcing, and international trade.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is VelaFi and what is its core business model?

AVelaFi is a financial infrastructure platform focused on connecting fiat and crypto currencies, specializing in B2B services. Its core model includes fiat on-ramp/off-ramp services (converting local fiat to stablecoins and vice versa) and global cross-border payment solutions that enable instant, low-cost transactions between different fiat currencies using stablecoin technology.

QWhy did Alibaba's investment arm, Alibaba Investment, invest in VelaFi?

AAlibaba Investment invested in VelaFi because Alibaba, as a major global e-commerce platform, faces challenges with high fees, slow settlement times, and exchange rate risks in cross-border payments. VelaFi's stablecoin infrastructure offers instant, low-cost settlements, particularly in Latin America—a key growth market for Alibaba's AliExpress and Alibaba International—potentially optimizing local payment and merchant settlement experiences.

QWhich companies led the Series B funding round for VelaFi?

AThe Series B funding round for VelaFi was co-led by XVC, a Beijing-based dual-currency fund, and Ikuyo, a Tokyo-listed company. Other participants included Alibaba Investment, Planetree, and existing investor BAI Capital.

QWhat regions does VelaFi primarily operate in, and what traditional payment systems has it integrated?

AVelaFi started in Latin America and has expanded to the U.S. and Asia. It has deeply integrated with major local instant payment systems in Latin America, including Mexico's SPEI, Brazil's PIX, and Colombia's PSE, linking these traditional payment rails with stablecoin liquidity to facilitate efficient cross-border transactions.

QHow much funding has VelaFi raised in total, and what is its parent company?

AVelaFi has raised over $40 million in total funding. It is a subsidiary of Galactic Holdings, a company founded by a Chinese team, with CEO Maggie Wu also being the founder of Krypital Group. Galactic Holdings also owns crypto wallet TruBit and exchange TruBit Pro.

Leituras Relacionadas

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

Hyperliquid, a cryptocurrency derivatives platform, is facing formal complaints from two major traditional exchanges, CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and ICE (Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of the New York Stock Exchange). The firms have jointly approached the U.S. Congress and the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission), urging stricter regulatory oversight of Hyperliquid's operations. The action highlights growing tensions between established traditional financial institutions and emerging crypto-native platforms in the derivatives market.

链捕手Há 2h

Hyperliquid Sued by Two Major Traditional Exchanges

链捕手Há 2h

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbitHá 3h

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbitHá 3h

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手Há 3h

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手Há 3h

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

Bitcoin's recent recovery from February lows is approaching a critical supply cluster between $84,000 and $88,000, which holds the largest concentration of Bitcoin supply on the current chart. This zone represents the cost basis for short-term holders (investors who bought within the last 155 days) and is stacked with "trapped" sellers who bought near those levels and are now at breakeven. Technical analysis suggests the rally faces significant resistance in this area. Two primary scenarios are outlined: a direct push into the $84k-$86k zone followed by a rejection and pullback to $70,000 support, or a more volatile path involving a dip before testing the supply cluster. A weekly close above $84,000 would weaken the bearish rejection case, but a decisive break above $86,900-$88,000 is needed for a stronger bullish confirmation. Bitcoin is currently trading around $80,430.

bitcoinistHá 3h

Bitcoin Short-Term Holder Basis Remains High Within Biggest Supply Cluster

bitcoinistHá 3h

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbitHá 5h

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape