AI Benefits Senior Staff? 40% of CEOs Plan to Cut Junior Positions, Young People's Jobs Are More at Risk

marsbitPublicado em 2026-05-18Última atualização em 2026-05-18

Resumo

The traditional assumption that senior employees are first in line during layoffs is being inverted in the AI era. A survey of 415 CEOs by Oliver Wyman and the NYSE reveals 43% plan to cut entry-level positions in the next 1-2 years to shift towards a mid-to-senior talent structure, a sharp rise from 17% last year. The logic is that AI excels at automating routine, cognitive tasks typically handled by junior staff (e.g., coding, data review), while the experience and judgment of senior employees remain harder to replicate. Research indicates this shift primarily manifests as a hiring freeze for junior roles rather than mass layoffs. Goldman Sachs estimates AI currently nets a loss of about 16,000 US jobs monthly, disproportionately impacting Generation Z concentrated in highly automatable white-collar roles. This raises long-term concerns about a broken talent pipeline, as companies risk having no future senior managers trained internally. Despite the dominant trend, a minority of successful AI adopters, like IBM and Salesforce, are expanding junior hiring, arguing these employees are adept at using and building AI tools. However, most companies are still in early AI deployment phases, with 67% in planning/pilot stages and many reporting returns below expectations. The overarching reality is a weakening of job security across all levels, as organizations reshape for an AI-augmented, leaner future.

Author: Claude, Shenchao TechFlow

Shenchao's Insight: A recent survey of 415 global CEOs by Oliver Wyman in partnership with the New York Stock Exchange shows that 43% of CEOs plan to reduce junior positions in the next one to two years, shifting their workforce composition towards mid- to senior-level talent. This figure has more than doubled from 17% last year. AI is systematically replacing routine tasks typically handled by junior employees, while experienced employees become more valuable due to their judgment and expertise. Goldman Sachs previously estimated that AI is eliminating a net of approximately 16,000 US jobs per month, with Generation Z being the most affected.

In past waves of layoffs, older, higher-paid employees were often the first targets. But the logic of the AI era is reversing this trend.

According to a Bloomberg report on May 16th, the 2026 CEO Agenda survey released by management consultancy Oliver Wyman and the New York Stock Exchange reveals that over 40% of CEOs plan to reduce junior positions in the next one to two years, tilting their workforce structure towards more mid- to senior-level employees; only 17% of CEOs indicated they would increase the proportion of junior roles. A year ago, these numbers were almost the opposite.

The survey covered 415 CEOs (266 from public companies, 149 from private companies), with the public company sample representing about 10% of global market capitalization, including 65 Fortune 500 CEOs.

John Romeo, Head of the Oliver Wyman Forum, told Bloomberg in an interview, "The difficulty for junior employees to enter the workforce is indeed increasing. CEOs now place greater emphasis on mid- to senior-level employees to drive productivity."

43% of CEOs Plan to Cut Junior Positions, AI's 'Experience Bias' Effect Emerges

The logic behind this shift is not hard to understand: the tasks that AI agents are currently capable of performing are highly concentrated in the typical scope of work for junior employees. Writing code, evaluating sales leads, reviewing documents, compiling data reports—these routine cognitive tasks previously handled by junior staff are being rapidly replaced by AI systems.

However, what AI currently cannot replicate is the judgment formed through years of industry experience. Future of work advisor Ravin Jesuthasan told Bloomberg that the corporate attitude is shifting to "I need someone who has actually done this, because her experience, judgment, and problem-solving ability make her more valuable than the AI."

This phenomenon has data support in academia. A paper by Harvard University researchers Seyed M. Hosseini and Guy Lichtinger analyzed resume and hiring data covering 62 million employees and 285,000 US companies. The results show that since early 2023, among companies actively adopting generative AI, the number of junior employees decreased by 7.7% over six quarters compared to non-adopting firms, while the number of senior employees was largely unaffected. A key finding is that this decline primarily stems from a hiring slowdown, not large-scale layoffs. In other words, they are not firing people, but simply not hiring them.

The Oliver Wyman report states the implication of this trend more bluntly: "CEOs with the longest planning horizons are the most likely to plan for headcount reductions. This suggests they anticipate that organizations will become leaner, enhanced by AI, not as a cost-cutting measure, but as an end-state."

Goldman Sachs Estimates: AI Net Eliminates 16,000 US Jobs Monthly, Generation Z Bears the Brunt

Goldman Sachs economist Elsie Peng estimated in an April research report that the AI substitution effect eliminated about 25,000 jobs per month over the past year, while the AI augmentation effect created about 9,000 jobs per month in the same period, resulting in a net elimination of about 16,000 jobs. Frontierbeat

The impact is highly unevenly distributed. In occupations with the highest exposure to AI substitution, the unemployment rate gap between entry-level workers under 30 and experienced workers aged 31 to 50 has widened significantly compared to pre-pandemic levels. The wage gap has also worsened concurrently; Goldman's regression analysis estimates that for every one standard deviation increase in AI substitution exposure, the wage gap between entry-level and experienced workers widens by approximately 3.3 percentage points. Fortune

Generation Z is disproportionately concentrated in routine white-collar roles such as data entry, customer service, legal support, and billing processing—precisely the areas AI is most adept at automating. They lack the experiential buffer that senior employees possess. Fortune

A Stanford University study from last November further confirms this: in fields with the highest AI exposure, young employees are 16% more likely to be unemployed than other groups. Fortune

Long-Term Risks of a Broken Talent Pipeline

While cutting junior positions can lower costs and improve efficiency in the short term, the hidden costs are raising alarms.

Helen Leis, Global Head of Leadership and Change at Oliver Wyman, pointed out to Bloomberg that if companies want to have mid- to senior-level talent to manage AI-driven workflows in the future, "these people need to first learn the job within the company." Not hiring junior employees is akin to cutting off one's own talent pipeline.

Andrew McAfee, co-director of MIT's Initiative on the Digital Economy, previously expressed similar concerns to the Harvard Business Review: "Other than on-the-job learning and apprenticeship training, how are people supposed to learn how to do a job?"

Monster survey data shows that nearly 90% of the class of 2026 are worried that AI or automation will replace entry-level positions, a sharp rise from 64% in 2025. Fortune

These concerns are not unfounded. According to a SignalFire report, from 2023 to 2024, the hiring volume for junior positions at the 15 largest US tech companies fell by 25%. The situation in the UK is more severe, with graduate roles in the tech sector decreasing by 46% in 2024, projected to drop another 53% by 2026. IEEE SpectrumRezi

A Few Companies Go Against the Grain: AI 'Winners' Actually Value Junior Employees More

Interestingly, companies most successful in AI deployment are adopting a different talent strategy.

The Oliver Wyman report points out that "a cohort of contrarian, advanced AI adopters believe this technology is increasing the value of junior talent, not displacing them." Among companies with higher ROI from AI investments, the proportion leaning towards increasing junior positions is higher than among those not yet seeing returns.

IBM announced in February this year its plan to triple its hiring of US junior positions and rewrite job descriptions for the AI era. Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff announced this week the hiring of 1,000 recent graduates and interns to build its AI systems, writing on platform X: "They say AI will kill junior jobs. But these grads & interns are BUILDING AI." Amazon Web Services CEO Matt Garman publicly stated that replacing junior employees with AI is "one of the dumbest decisions a company can make," reasoning that junior employees are often the most proficient users of AI tools.

However, these cases remain the minority in the overall trend. The Oliver Wyman survey shows that 74% of CEOs are freezing or reducing headcount, up from 67% last year. The most aggressive cuts are happening in the technology, media, and telecom industries.

AI's ROI Dilemma: Most Companies Still in the 'Money-Burning Experimentation' Stage

There is a significant gap between CEOs' confidence in AI's ability to change workforce structures and the actual returns AI is delivering.

The Oliver Wyman survey reveals that 67% of corporate AI deployments remain in the planning and pilot stages. 53% of CEOs say it is too early to assess AI investment returns, a figure that has increased from 41% last year. Only 27% of CEOs report that AI investment returns meet or exceed expectations, down from 38% last year. Nearly a quarter say AI has had no impact on revenue whatsoever.

The report describes this as "not a crisis of confidence, but a recognition that redesigning work at scale is slower and more difficult than initial enthusiasm anticipated."

However, the report also notes that companies deploying AI across more than two application areas report cost savings and revenue growth roughly double that of companies with single-scenario deployments. The value curve for AI is non-linear, with real returns concentrated after scaled deployment.

A statement by economist Teresa Ghilarducci of The New School to Bloomberg perhaps sums up the current situation: Even if AI tilts the workplace balance in favor of experienced employees, it does not mean they have gained job security. "Companies are increasingly less committed to their employees."

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the Oliver Wyman survey, what is the key change in CEO hiring plans for junior positions?

AOver 40% of CEOs plan to reduce junior positions over the next one to two years, shifting their workforce structure towards more mid- to senior-level talent. This figure has more than doubled from 17% the previous year, representing a significant reversal in hiring strategy.

QWhat is the 'seniority bias' effect of AI on the workforce mentioned in the article?

AThe 'seniority bias' effect refers to the trend where AI is systematically automating routine, cognitive tasks typically performed by junior employees (e.g., coding, document review, data reporting). Meanwhile, senior employees, whose value lies in experience, judgment, and complex problem-solving abilities that AI cannot yet replicate, are becoming more valuable and less likely to be replaced.

QWhat does the Goldman Sachs research cited in the article say about AI's net impact on US jobs?

AGoldman Sachs economists estimate that AI is currently displacing about 25,000 US jobs per month while simultaneously creating around 9,000 new ones. This results in a net loss of approximately 16,000 jobs per month, with Generation Z workers being disproportionately affected.

QWhat long-term risk does cutting junior positions pose to companies, according to experts in the article?

ACutting junior positions risks severing a company's talent pipeline. Experts warn that future mid- and senior-level leaders, who will need to manage AI-driven workflows, must first learn the business from within the company. By not hiring and training junior employees, companies are undermining their own long-term succession planning and leadership development.

QHow do the most successful AI-adopting companies differ in their approach to hiring junior staff, according to the article?

AA minority of successful, advanced AI adopters are taking a counter-trend approach. Companies like IBM, Salesforce, and Amazon Web Services are expanding hiring for junior roles. They view AI as a tool that enhances the value of junior talent (who often become skilled AI users) rather than simply replacing them, and they are actively recruiting graduates to help build and work with AI systems.

Leituras Relacionadas

Topping GitHub's Trending, the Essential Guide for Claude Code Users

The CLAUDE.md file, trending on GitHub, is a project-level guide for Claude Code designed to dramatically improve its accuracy and efficiency. It addresses key issues like repetitive context explanations, unauthorized code changes, and forgotten decisions across sessions. By placing this plain-text file in a project root, Claude Code reads it automatically at the start of each session. The guide includes rules to eliminate redundant explanations, enforce strict behavioral constraints (e.g., no modifications outside the requested scope without confirmation), and establish a "memory" system using companion files like MEMORY.md and ERRORS.md to log past decisions and failures. It also locks in the project's specific tech stack to prevent inappropriate tool recommendations. Highlighted are four foundational rules from Andrej Karpathy that reportedly increased coding accuracy from 65% to 94%: always ask for clarity first, implement the simplest solution, never touch unrelated code, and explicitly flag uncertainties. The article quantifies significant weekly cost savings for developers and teams by eliminating wasted time on re-explaining context, rolling back unauthorized edits, and re-evaluating previously rejected solutions. The core message is that a small, upfront investment in creating a CLAUDE.md file leads to a more predictable, controlled, and cost-effective AI programming assistant.

marsbitHá 8m

Topping GitHub's Trending, the Essential Guide for Claude Code Users

marsbitHá 8m

With Long-Term Price Targets Ranging From $1 to $5, Ozak AI Is Emerging as a High-Upside Bet for Patient Investors.

The AI-powered cryptocurrency token Ozak AI is gaining significant attention, with analysts projecting long-term price targets between $1 and $5. Currently in its seventh presale phase and priced at $0.014, the token has already demonstrated strong growth, raising over $7.2 million. Its core technology combines blockchain with predictive AI tools, featuring the Ozak Streaming Network for real-time data analysis and a smart contract execution layer for efficient operations. Strategic partnerships with firms like Dex3 and Spheron aim to enhance its data analytics and computing capabilities. Analysts suggest that early investors in the current presale phase could see substantial returns if the token achieves its projected exchange listing price and subsequent growth, though such investments carry inherent risk.

TheNewsCryptoHá 15m

With Long-Term Price Targets Ranging From $1 to $5, Ozak AI Is Emerging as a High-Upside Bet for Patient Investors.

TheNewsCryptoHá 15m

Bitcoin Surges Then Retreats, CLARITY Act Rally Quickly Fizzles Out: What's Next to Watch?

Bitcoin's price surge following the U.S. Senate Banking Committee's advancement of the CLARITY Act was short-lived, with gains in crypto-related stocks like Coinbase and Bitcoin itself quickly erasing. The primary driver was a dominating macro environment, where rising 10-year Treasury yields (hitting a one-year high of 4.59%) and tightening financial conditions overshadowed the regulatory catalyst. This demonstrates that for sustained positive price action, legislative progress must coincide with favorable macro conditions. The article argues that if passed, the CLARITY Act could most significantly benefit "AI utility tokens"—digital assets tied to sufficiently decentralized networks with real-world use cases, such as those in decentralized computing or verifiable AI data layers. However, it cautions that many projects use "AI" as a marketing label without substantial utility. Looking ahead, key factors to monitor include: the trajectory of the 10-year Treasury yield, ongoing political negotiations (like ethics compromises for the bill's passage), betting market odds on Polymarket for the bill's likelihood, and sustained inflows into spot Bitcoin ETFs to gauge genuine institutional conviction beyond headline-driven trading. The bill still faces a long legislative path before potentially becoming law.

marsbitHá 19m

Bitcoin Surges Then Retreats, CLARITY Act Rally Quickly Fizzles Out: What's Next to Watch?

marsbitHá 19m

When Computing Power Becomes Commoditized, How Long Until a GPU Futures Market Emerges?

"When Will GPU Futures Arrive? A Framework for Assessing Compute as a Commodity" The article explores the potential for a robust futures market for compute power (GPUs), arguing that such a market is not yet mature but may emerge. It analyzes the landscape using a five-part framework developed for new commodity futures markets. The analysis scores the current state: * **Fragmented Supply (Red)**: Supply is highly concentrated among hyperscale cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle), limiting the need for price discovery. * **Price Volatility (Green)**: GPU pricing is already highly volatile due to uncertain supply and surging demand. * **Physical Settlement Infrastructure (Green)**: Early infrastructure exists via OTC brokers and price indices (e.g., Ornn, Silicon Data) standardizing contracts. * **Standardized Unit (Red)**: A lack of standardized, tradable units hinders markets; a GPU instance hour varies by region, configuration, and contract terms. * **Lack of Alternatives (Yellow)**: Large players hedge internally via vertical integration, while smaller players bear spot market risk. Overall, the market shows promise (volatility, early infrastructure) but lacks the fragmented supply and standardization needed for large-scale futures trading. Most activity remains OTC. Key open questions and hypotheses: 1. Supply is expected to fragment moderately in 1-2 years, driven by new cloud providers, cheap power locations, and demand from non-frontier labs and AI startups using open-source models. 2. Standardization is most likely to emerge around inference workloads (forecast to be >65% of AI compute demand by 2029), which have simpler, more homogeneous hardware needs than training. Widespread adoption of open-source model weights could accelerate this by democratizing inference and creating demand for optimized, standardized infrastructure. 3. The primary traded unit will likely be the **"chip instance hour"** (akin to electricity, traded regionally), not the physical chip or the downstream AI output (tokens).

marsbitHá 37m

When Computing Power Becomes Commoditized, How Long Until a GPU Futures Market?

When Compute is Commoditized: How Far Away is a GPU Futures Market? The article explores the potential emergence of a futures market for computing power ("compute"), akin to markets for commodities like oil or electricity. It uses a five-dimension framework to assess the market's maturity for sustaining robust futures trading. **Current Market Assessment (Scorecard):** * **Supply Fragmentation:** 🔴 **Red.** Supply is highly concentrated, dominated by a few hyperscale cloud providers. * **Price Volatility:** 🟢 **Green.** GPU pricing is already highly volatile. * **Physical Settlement Infrastructure:** 🟢 **Green.** Early infrastructure exists at the OTC/broker level. * **Standardization:** 🔴 **Red.** Compute lacks a standardized, tradable unit (e.g., an H100 hour is not uniform). * **Lack of Substitutes:** 🟡 **Yellow.** Vertically integrated players can hedge internally, while others are forced to be long. **Conclusion:** The overall scorecard suggests a robust futures market is premature. The market has volatility and early settlement infrastructure but lacks the necessary supply fragmentation and standardization for large-scale price discovery. Most activity remains OTC. **Key Unanswered Questions & Hypotheses:** The article posits that the market could evolve in the next 1-2 years: 1. **Supply:** May become *moderately more fragmented* due to new cloud providers, cheaper power locations, and demand from long-tail users (e.g., startups running open-source model inference). 2. **Standardization:** Could emerge from the growing **inference** workload (expected to be >65% of AI compute demand by 2029), which has more homogeneous hardware requirements than custom training workloads. Widespread adoption of **open-source model weights** is seen as a key catalyst for democratizing inference and driving infrastructure standardization. 3. **Traded Unit:** The most viable layer for trading is likely the **"chip-instance-hour"** (powered, usable compute time), traded similarly to electricity in regional contracts with spot/futures overlays. Trading at the upstream "chip" layer is unlikely due to supply concentration, while the downstream "token" layer faces challenges due to lack of uniformity across AI models.

链捕手Há 43m

When Computing Power Becomes Commoditized, How Long Until a GPU Futures Market?

链捕手Há 43m

Trading

Spot

Futuros

Artigos em Destaque

Como comprar PEOPLE

Bem-vindo à HTX.com!Tornámos a compra de ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) simples e conveniente.Segue o nosso guia passo a passo para iniciar a tua jornada no mundo das criptos.Passo 1: cria a tua conta HTXUtiliza o teu e-mail ou número de telefone para te inscreveres numa conta gratuita na HTX.Desfruta de um processo de inscrição sem complicações e desbloqueia todas as funcionalidades.Obter a minha contaPasso 2: vai para Comprar Cripto e escolhe o teu método de pagamentoCartão de crédito/débito: usa o teu visa ou mastercard para comprar ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) instantaneamente.Saldo: usa os fundos da tua conta HTX para transacionar sem problemas.Terceiros: adicionamos métodos de pagamento populares, como Google Pay e Apple Pay, para aumentar a conveniência.P2P: transaciona diretamente com outros utilizadores na HTX.Mercado de balcão (OTC): oferecemos serviços personalizados e taxas de câmbio competitivas para os traders.Passo 3: armazena teu ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Depois de comprar o teu ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE), armazena-o na tua conta HTX.Alternativamente, podes enviá-lo para outro lugar através de transferência blockchain ou usá-lo para transacionar outras criptomoedas.Passo 4: transaciona ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE)Transaciona facilmente ConstitutionDAO (PEOPLE) no mercado à vista da HTX.Acede simplesmente à tua conta, seleciona o teu par de trading, executa as tuas transações e monitoriza em tempo real.Oferecemos uma experiência de fácil utilização tanto para principiantes como para traders experientes.

482 Visualizações TotaisPublicado em {updateTime}Atualizado em 2025.03.21

Discussões

Bem-vindo à Comunidade HTX. Aqui, pode manter-se informado sobre os mais recentes desenvolvimentos da plataforma e obter acesso a análises profissionais de mercado. As opiniões dos utilizadores sobre o preço de PEOPLE (PEOPLE) são apresentadas abaixo.