After the Fed Hits the Brakes, the Market Experiences 'Icy and Fiery Extremes'!

比推Publicado em 2026-01-29Última atualização em 2026-01-29

Resumo

The Federal Reserve paused its rate-cutting cycle in its first 2026 meeting, keeping the benchmark rate unchanged at 3.5%–3.75%, a move widely anticipated by the market. However, two dissenting votes highlighted internal divisions. The central bank signaled a shift from active policy adjustment to a more cautious, data-dependent stance. Gold emerged as the standout performer, surging past $5,500/oz with a 10% weekly gain, driven by persistent inflation, geopolitical risks, and easing real-rate pressures. In contrast, other major assets—including U.S. stocks, the dollar, Treasuries, and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin—showed limited movement, reflecting market uncertainty. Attention is now turning to potential leadership changes at the Fed, with market-based predictions favoring Rick Rieder (34%), Kevin Warsh (28%), and Christopher Waller (20%) as top contenders to shape future policy. Bitcoin faces caution as on-chain data indicates a rising share of supply in loss, suggesting structural softening though not yet full bearish momentum. The market remains in a wait-and-see mode, balancing macro uncertainty against evolving cycle signals.

After three consecutive interest rate cuts, the Federal Reserve finally pressed the "pause button" at its first policy meeting of 2026.

In the early hours of Thursday Beijing time, the Federal Reserve announced it would keep the benchmark interest rate unchanged in the range of 3.5% to 3.75%. This somewhat "uneventful" decision was in line with market expectations of over 97%, but it also revealed subtle internal policy cracks: two Fed governors voted against the decision, supporting a further 25 basis point rate cut.

The Shoe Has Dropped, But the Direction Remains Unclear

In its policy statement, the Fed maintained a relatively cautious tone: the economy is still "expanding robustly," inflation has "eased somewhat but remains above target," the labor market shows signs of cooling but does not yet constitute a systemic risk. The core message is very clear—monetary policy has transitioned from the "active adjustment" phase to the "observation and verification" phase.

It is worth noting that the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) is not monolithic. Two members voted in favor of continuing rate cuts, showing that policy preferences still diverge between falling inflation and a slowing economy. Overall, however, the Fed is unwilling to make new policy commitments in the current environment, instead choosing to hand the decision-making power back to subsequent data.

This stance sets the tone for the market: there will be no clear directional guidance in the short term, and asset pricing will revolve more around "changes in expectations" rather than "changes in policy."

Current federal funds rate market pricing shows that investors generally expect rates to remain unchanged this quarter, with the first rate cut now re-pointed to June of this year, and the market further expects a possible pause in the rate-cutting cycle by 2027.

However, regarding the interest rate path beyond this quarter, there are still significant differences among institutions: Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, and Goldman Sachs predict successive rate cuts in June and September; Barclays believes cuts are possible in June and December; while JPMorgan maintains its expectation for unchanged rates throughout the year.

Macro Markets: Gold Steals the Spotlight, Other Assets Remain Unfazed

If the Fed's decision itself did not cause waves, then the divergence in asset performance is the signal truly worth watching.

After the interest rate decision was announced, the spot gold price soared, breaking through the $5,500 per ounce mark for the first time. In just four trading days, the gold price rose from just below $5,000, breaking through multiple hundred-dollar thresholds, accumulating a gain of over $500, with a weekly increase of 10%. This speed and magnitude have made gold the undisputed protagonist of the current global market.

Gold's strength is not simply a matter of interest rate trading logic. Although the Fed has paused rate cuts, after successive rounds of easing, policy is nearing the neutral range, and the marginal constraint of real interest rates has eased somewhat; at the same time, resilient inflation, trade frictions, political uncertainty, and global policy games are intertwining, continuously amplifying safe-haven demand. Under the overlay of multiple uncertainties, capital has chosen the most traditional and consensus safe-haven asset.

In stark contrast to gold, other major assets overall reacted with restraint. US stocks maintained narrow fluctuations after the decision, showing no trend breakthrough; the US dollar index had limited volatility; US Treasury yields adjusted slightly but did not evolve into a systemic risk-off rally.

The same goes for crypto assets. After the news was announced, the Bitcoin price briefly dipped from $89,600 to the $89,000 level, then quickly pulling back to around $89,300. The fluctuation was less than 1%. Ethereum (ETH) hovered around the $3,000 mark, and mainstream altcoins like Solana and XRP also remained within their previous consolidation ranges.

The market gave the most intuitive answer: when the direction is unclear, gold is pushed back to the center of the stage, while other assets enter a waiting state.

A Question More Important Than Rate Cuts: Who Will Shape the Next Phase of the Fed?

After the interest rate decision landed, the market's focus quickly shifted. Compared to "whether there will be another rate cut," investors began to discuss another question more frequently: who will lead the next phase of the Federal Reserve?

After the dust settled on the interest rate decision, the market's focus quickly shifted from "whether there will be another rate cut" to a question with longer-term implications—who will become the next Federal Reserve Chair.

This change is not accidental. As monetary policy gradually enters a sensitive range "close to neutral," the policy style for the next few years will largely depend on the leadership's understanding of inflation tolerance, financial stability, and market volatility. Against this backdrop, prediction markets provide a valuable window of reference.

According to the latest data from Polymarket, in the betting on "Who will Trump nominate as Fed Chair," the winning probabilities of several candidates have already formed a hierarchy:

Rick Rieder: The Market's Favorite "Pragmatist" (~34%)

Currently, the highest betting probability is for Rick Rieder, with a support rate of about 34%, which has risen significantly recently.

Rieder is currently BlackRock's Chief Investment Officer of Global Fixed Income, deeply involved in long-term bond market and macro asset allocation decisions, and is seen as one of the very few figures who truly straddles "policy-market-capital structure." His public views often emphasize financial market stability, policy transmission efficiency, and avoiding unnecessary systemic shocks.

From the market's perspective, if Rieder becomes Fed Chair, it would mean that central bank decisions would place greater importance on financial conditions and asset price signals, maintaining policy flexibility within the allowable range of inflation. This expectation explains why he is gaining increasing financial support in prediction markets—it is a bet on "predictability" and "market friendliness."

Kevin Warsh: Representative of Discipline and Credibility (~28%)

Ranked second is former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh, with a current betting probability of about 28%.

Warsh has always been known for his clear stance and tough style, emphasizing central bank credibility and long-term discipline on inflation issues. He has repeatedly expressed concerns about excessively loose policies and is also seen as an important representative of the traditional hawkish camp.

If Warsh ultimately wins, the market generally expects the Fed to be more cautious in its rate-cutting pace, tolerance for asset prices, and policy communication. This style typically helps suppress inflation expectations but also means risk assets need to adapt to a stricter financial environment.

Christopher Waller: The Academic Fed Governor (~20%)

The betting probability for current Fed Governor Christopher Waller is about 20%, placing him third.

Waller has a strong academic background and clear policy logic, and has long been regarded as the most influential "hawk" within the Fed (advocating high interest rates to suppress inflation). However, in this FOMC meeting, he cast a dissenting vote, supporting a continued rate cut, which means he either believes inflation is no longer the main threat or is feeling significant political/economic pressure.

If Waller takes over, the Fed may give more weight to employment and growth targets, with a relatively flexible policy pace, but whether he can maintain central bank independence in a highly politicized environment remains a focus of market attention.

Will Bitcoin Continue Its Bearish Trend?

While macro uncertainties intensify, on-chain data is beginning to release signals worth警惕 (being cautious about).

The latest analysis from CryptoQuant shows that the 365-day moving average of Bitcoin's "Supply in Loss" is starting to rise again. This metric measures the percentage of Bitcoin whose current price is below the price of its last on-chain transfer and is an important tool for observing changes in market structure.

When Bitcoin hit its historical high of $126,000 last October, this indicator once fell to its lowest point this cycle, reflecting a market in a state of high profitability. But as the price fell, Supply in Loss began to rise continuously, showing that losses are gradually spreading from short-term traders to longer-term holders.

Historical experience shows that this directional change often appears in the early stages of bull-to-bear transitions. However, it is important to emphasize that this indicator has not yet reached the typical "capitulation zone"; it is more like a risk signal than a trend confirmation.

This means that Bitcoin's current state is closer to high-level digestion and structural reorganization rather than having already entered a clear main bear market decline phase. Whether it evolves into a deeper adjustment still highly depends on macro liquidity and subsequent capital flows. Gabe Selby, Research Head at CF Benchmarks, said: "Short-term bullish catalysts for Bitcoin still exist, but they are increasingly偏向 (leaning towards) political factors rather than monetary factors."

Summary: Macro Uncertainty, Structural Changes, the Market is Waiting for Answers

Overall, this round of market changes is not driven by a single event but is the result of multiple factors acting together. The Fed's choice to pause sends a signal of "caution rather than a pivot"; capital embraces gold amidst uncertainty, pushing risk aversion to the forefront; Bitcoin, while fluctuating at high levels, gradually reveals structural characteristics of the latter half of the cycle.

Before the direction becomes clear, the market seems more like it is conducting a patience test. Gold has already made its choice, while Bitcoin's next step still needs to wait for further convergence of macro and cyclical signals.

Author: seed.eth

Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7606809

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat did the Federal Reserve decide regarding interest rates in its first meeting of 2026?

AThe Federal Reserve decided to maintain the benchmark interest rate unchanged in the range of 3.5% to 3.75%.

QWhich asset experienced a significant price surge following the Fed's decision, and what was its performance?

ASpot gold prices broke through the $5,500 per ounce mark, rising over $500 in just four trading days with a weekly gain of 10%.

QAccording to the Polymarket betting data, who is the current frontrunner to be nominated as the next Fed Chair, and what is their perceived policy style?

ARick Rieder is the current frontrunner with approximately 34% probability, and he is viewed as a 'pragmatist' whose decisions would place greater emphasis on financial market stability and policy transmission efficiency.

QWhat concerning signal is the Bitcoin on-chain metric 'Supply in Loss' (365-day moving average) currently indicating?

AThe 365-day moving average of Bitcoin 'Supply in Loss' is trending upwards again, signaling that losses are spreading from short-term traders to longer-term holders, which often occurs in the early stages of a bull-to-bear transition.

QHow did other major assets like U.S. stocks, the U.S. dollar, and cryptocurrencies generally react to the Fed's announcement?

AOther major assets reacted with restraint. U.S. stocks traded in a narrow range without a breakout, the U.S. Dollar Index saw limited movement, and major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum experienced minimal volatility, staying within their previous trading ranges.

Leituras Relacionadas

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

The AI boom is facing an unexpected bottleneck: a severe shortage of skilled construction workers and electricians. As tech giants like Meta, OpenAI, and Alphabet race to build massive data centers—such as OpenAI's $16 billion "Stargate" project—they are hitting a critical labor wall. The U.S. needs an estimated 130,000 more electricians, 240,000 construction workers, and 150,000 supervisors by 2030 for AI infrastructure alone, but tens of thousands of electrician jobs go unfilled each year. While AI companies offer high premiums, with electricians earning up to $280,000 annually, worker scarcity still causes massive losses—delays on a single project can cost $14.2 million per month. The complexity of building AI data centers, which require immense power (equivalent to powering hundreds of thousands of homes), sophisticated electrical systems, and advanced liquid cooling solutions, demands highly skilled technicians who are in short supply. To combat this, companies are investing heavily in training. Meta has committed $115 million to a free training school offering tuition, housing, and stipends, targeting 5,000 new workers. OpenAI is partnering with unions to secure skilled labor. These efforts are paying off, with a significant rise in Gen Z interest in trade schools over college. However, the power demands are staggering. AI data centers are driving a rapid surge in electricity consumption, projected to account for up to 12% of U.S. power use by 2028 and raising costs for consumers. Furthermore, the construction boom is project-based, leading to a potential future glut of trained workers once building peaks, which could depress wages industry-wide. The race for AI supremacy now depends as much on skilled hands as on advanced chips.

marsbitHá 55m

Annual Salary of Millions Competing for Electricians, Meta Rushes to Open Its Own Technical School

marsbitHá 55m

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

OpenAI is shifting its business strategy away from promoting its most expensive, flagship models for every task. Recent price cuts—80% for GPT-5.6 Luna and 20% for Terra—signal a deeper change: the company now actively advises users that many tasks don't require the most powerful model. Instead, OpenAI recommends a tiered approach: use the high-end GPT-5.6 Sol for complex planning and analysis, then delegate execution to cheaper models like Luna. This mirrors moves by Anthropic, which recently launched Claude Opus 5 at half the price of its top model, Fable 5. Both companies are de-emphasizing flagship models as primary revenue drivers, using them instead for brand prestige and technological showcases. The industry is entering a "mass-market" phase, similar to automotive, where high-volume, cost-effective models handle daily operations and drive scale. OpenAI's price reductions are partly enabled by AI models themselves optimizing underlying code and infrastructure, creating a self-reinforcing cycle of efficiency gains and cost reduction. Competition is shifting from "who is smartest" to "who offers the best value." The goal is no longer selling individual models but fostering widespread API adoption and ecosystem lock-in. By making AI calls cheap and ubiquitous, companies like OpenAI aim to become the indispensable, utility-like infrastructure powering automated workflows—the "water and electricity" of software, quietly embedded everywhere.

marsbitHá 55m

OpenAI No Longer Sells Its Most Expensive Model for Profit

marsbitHá 55m

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

Coldcard hardware wallet users are facing a new wave of coordinated attacks targeting a firmware flaw, with researcher Alex Thorn flagging 218 recent transactions moving approximately 389 Bitcoin from potentially impacted addresses. The attack pattern shows a high rate of transactions targeting unique victim addresses, differing from previous waves. The vulnerability, which causes affected devices to generate weaker wallet seeds, is estimated to have impacted over 1,100 wallets, leading to around $90 million in Bitcoin stolen. Thorn advises affected users who control their keys may attempt to move funds with a higher-fee transaction before the attacker's transactions are confirmed.

cointelegraphHá 1h

Suspected 4th Coldcard attack wave sweeps 389 Bitcoin: Galaxy’s Thorn

cointelegraphHá 1h

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

Bitcoin miners are capitulating as evidenced by a sustained drop in network hash rate and a record-steep 19.9% decline in mining difficulty, signaling the shuttering of unprofitable machines. However, in a significant divergence from historical patterns, the stocks of publicly traded mining companies have soared, with one major player gaining over 430% in the past year, even as BTC's price fell roughly 46%. This surge is largely attributed to these companies pivoting toward the more lucrative AI narrative. Simultaneously, miners face a structural squeeze. Daily block reward revenue in BTC terms has hit a new all-time low following the latest halving, with current dollar-denominated daily revenue around $30 million compared to a longer-term average of ~$40 million. Fee revenue remains negligible, covering less than one block's subsidy over a 28-day average and accounting for only about ten minutes of the network's daily security budget. This capitulation cycle is unique: miner stress and crypto price weakness have decoupled due to alternative revenue streams (AI), while the long-term reliance on increasing bitcoin prices to offset shrinking subsidies continues, with fee income still far from filling the impending gap.

marsbitHá 1h

Bitcoin Miners Are Waving the White Flag, But Their Stocks Are Soaring

marsbitHá 1h

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

The market's expectation for a September Fed rate hike surged dramatically in early August, jumping from under 50% to over 80% within a week. This shift followed a contentious July FOMC meeting, where a 9-3 vote to hold rates revealed growing dissent from hawkish members advocating for an immediate hike to combat persistent inflation. The primary catalyst for this repricing is rising oil prices, driven by renewed geopolitical tensions around the Strait of Hormuz, which threaten global supply. Energy costs directly influence inflation metrics, making the upcoming July CPI report (due August 12th) a critical data point. If it shows inflation reaccelerating, the probability of a September hike will solidify. For Bitcoin and crypto assets, this is typically bearish news. Bitcoin continues to behave as a high-beta, liquidity-sensitive risk asset. A rate hike raises the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding assets and could drive capital toward money markets, pressuring crypto prices in the short term. However, historical patterns suggest that if a hike is perceived as the end of a tightening cycle rather than the start, any negative price impact may be brief. U.S. stocks, particularly crypto-linked equities like Coinbase and growth-oriented tech stocks, are also vulnerable. Higher rates increase discount rates in valuation models, putting pressure on high-multiple companies. This coincides with a pivotal tech earnings season where investor focus has shifted from massive AI capital expenditure to tangible revenue and cash flow generation. Companies with negative cash flow and weak growth narratives could face heightened volatility if borrowing costs rise in September. In summary, a September Fed hike has evolved into a mainstream market scenario. Key factors to watch are oil prices, the July CPI report, and Fed communications, which will determine the final decision and its impact on volatile crypto and equity markets.

marsbitHá 1h

Will the Fed Definitely Raise Interest Rates in September? How Will Crypto and U.S. Stocks Withstand the Pressure?

marsbitHá 1h

Trading

Spot
活动图片

Categorias popularesright-arrow

Etiquetas Popularesright-arrow