Why is the STRC Preferred Stock Unlikely to Return to $100?

Foresight NewsPublicado em 2026-06-29Última atualização em 2026-06-29

Resumo

## Summary **Title: Why is STRC Preferred Stock Struggling to Return to $100?** The article analyzes the challenges facing STRC preferred stock in returning to its designed $100 price level. The original mechanisms to support the $100 price included an adjustable dividend yield, Strategy's right to buy back shares at $101, and a $100 per share liquidation claim in case of bankruptcy. However, these mechanisms are currently failing to function effectively. **Key Points:** * **Dividend Adjustments are Ineffective:** Increasing the dividend rate to attract investors is unlikely to work. It would place a greater financial burden on the issuer, Strategy, and high dividends in a difficult environment can be perceived negatively. Dividend payments are not guaranteed and depend on board discretion, creating significant uncertainty for investors. * **The $100 Claim is Largely Theoretical:** The $100 per share claim in bankruptcy is a key theoretical support, but its practical value is questionable. STRC, as preferred stock, has no maturity date, so investors can only recover principal if Strategy initiates a buyback or goes bankrupt. Strategy's current low leverage (11%) makes bankruptcy highly unlikely unless Bitcoin's price collapses to extreme lows (~$6,600). Even in a bankruptcy scenario, preferred stockholders' claims are subordinate to bondholders, making full recovery of the $100 unlikely. * **No Fundamental Reason for a $100 Price:** Given the weak dividend guarantee...


Written by: @100y_eth

Compiled by: AididiaoJP, Foresight News


Under the current circumstances, there is no reason for STRC to return to $100.


The mechanisms originally designed to keep STRC trading near $100 are as follows: If the STRC price falls below $100, the dividend yield rises due to the price drop, and Strategy Corp. may also increase the nominal dividend rate to above 11.5%. Since Strategy has the right to buy MSTR at $101 per share, price increases beyond that level are suppressed. If Strategy goes bankrupt, STRC holders have a claim for $100 per share plus accumulated unpaid dividends. For STRC to return to $100, these mechanisms need to function normally.


Dividend Rate Adjustments Cannot Be a Fundamental Solution


First, increasing the dividend rate is unlikely to be effective for two reasons. A higher dividend rate becomes a financial burden for Strategy Corp., potentially worsening its financial condition. From an investor's perspective, offering a high dividend rate in a challenging environment could also be a negative psychological factor.


Dividend rate adjustments and payments are not an obligation of STRC but depend on board decisions, creating significant uncertainty from an investor's viewpoint.


Since STRC pays dividends on a per-share fixed amount basis, not as a percentage of principal, it was supposed to be a product that allows dividend investors not to worry too much about their principal. Nevertheless, there remains high uncertainty about whether Strategy can continue to pay dividends to STRC investors at the current level.


Of course, Strategy currently has dollar reserves that can cover bond interest and preferred stock dividends for about 9.8 months; if it sells its Bitcoin holdings, it could sustain for about 30 years. However, this does not completely resolve the uncertainty surrounding dividends.


Dollar reserves covering only 9.8 months is far from a long-term solution. To extend this period using dollar reserves, Strategy would need to continue issuing MSTR via ATM. But at the current mNAV level, this would inevitably dilute book value per share, which is absolutely unsustainable for Strategy.


Even if dollar reserves are exhausted, extending the lifespan of Strategy and STRC by selling Bitcoin fundamentally contradicts the purpose and essence of Strategy as a company. It would reduce the appeal of STRC and MSTR as investment products and accelerate a negative feedback loop.


The $100 Per Share Claim is Meaningless Without Redemption


If STRC price is guided solely by dividend rate adjustments, then the $100 figure has no practical significance. The fundamental reason STRC could be guided to trade near $100 is that, in the event of Strategy's bankruptcy, STRC has a claim on the remaining assets for $100 per share plus accumulated unpaid dividends.


Simply put, STRC currently trading at $75 appears to be selling at a massive 25% discount to its conventional $100 face value. But is this really the case?


The key point is that STRC is not a bond, but a preferred stock. Bonds have maturity dates; if STRC were a bond, investors would receive $100 per share at maturity, and such a significant discount likely wouldn't exist.


Unless Strategy separately announces a buyback of STRC, the only way for STRC investors to get their principal back is for Strategy to go under.


There are two problems here. Contrary to the prevailing view in the community, Strategy is not likely to go bankrupt easily. The company's net leverage ratio is only 11%, and its amplification factor (the ratio of bonds and preferred stock to Bitcoin reserves) is merely 44%. For the company to actually go bankrupt, its leveraged position via bonds would have to collapse. Unless Bitcoin falls to about 11% of its current level (around $6,600), this is difficult to achieve. Even considering price declines from selling pressure, it's unlikely to happen unless Bitcoin approaches around $10,000.


Even if bankruptcy does occur, it's still a problem. If Strategy goes bankrupt, it means a leveraged position of just 11% has collapsed. Under such dire circumstances, preferred stock investors, including STRC holders (whose claims are junior to bondholders), would likely struggle to fully obtain the remaining assets.


In other words, for STRC investors to receive $100 per share, two conditions must be met simultaneously: 1) Strategy must go bankrupt; 2) If such a bankruptcy scenario actually occurs, they likely won't be able to get the full $100.


There's No Reason for STRC to Trade Near $100


Strategy set the STRC dividend rate at 11.50% based on a $100 price. But the STRC price is determined by the market. The $100 per share claim on remaining assets seems largely meaningless in the worst-case scenario, and the long-term sustainability of dividend rate adjustments and payments is also questionable.


STRC is currently trading around $75. At this price, the effective annualized dividend yield reaches 15.3%. That is, investors are demanding an additional yield of about 3.8% over the original 11.5% dividend rate due to factors like bankruptcy risk and dividend payment uncertainty.


If investors believe a 20% dividend yield is reasonable given STRC's risks, then STRC might trade at $57.5. Since the fair price depends on market uncertainty and investor psychology, no one can know for sure where it should be.


Under the current circumstances, there is no reason for STRC to trade near $100. Its price will converge to the market price assigned by investors.

Perguntas relacionadas

QAccording to the article, what are the two main reasons why increasing the STRC dividend rate is unlikely to be an effective solution?

AFirst, a higher dividend rate would be a financial burden for Strategy and could worsen its financial health. Second, from an investor perspective, offering a high dividend rate in a challenging environment could act as a negative psychological factor.

QWhy is the $100 per share liquidation claim for STRC holders considered largely meaningless unless a redemption occurs?

ASTRC is a preferred stock, not a bond, so it has no maturity date. The only way for investors to get the $100 principal is if Strategy goes bankrupt. However, Strategy is unlikely to bankrupt unless Bitcoin crashes severely. Even if it does, STRC holders, being junior to bondholders, are unlikely to fully recover the $100 claim amount from the remaining assets.

QWhat is the current effective annualized dividend yield of STRC at its price of around $75, and what does this indicate?

AAt around $75, STRC's effective annualized dividend yield is approximately 15.3%. This indicates that investors are demanding a risk premium of about 3.8% (on top of the stated 11.5% rate) due to perceived risks like bankruptcy and dividend payment uncertainty.

QWhat are the two conditions that must be met for STRC investors to receive the $100 per share claim, and what is problematic about the second condition?

ATwo conditions must be met: 1) Strategy must go bankrupt. 2) If bankruptcy occurs, STRC investors must successfully recover the full $100 from the remaining assets. The problem is that in the scenario where bankruptcy is triggered (e.g., Bitcoin price collapse), STRC holders, as junior claimants, are likely to face significant losses and not receive the full $100.

QWhat mechanism was originally designed to keep STRC trading close to $100, and what is the core argument for why this mechanism is failing?

AThe original mechanism involved: a rising dividend yield if price fell below $100, Strategy's ability to increase the dividend rate above 11.5%, a cap on price above $101 due to Strategy's call option, and a $100 liquidation claim in case of bankruptcy. The core argument is that the mechanism is failing because the dividend adjustment is unsustainable and uncertain, and the $100 bankruptcy claim is practically meaningless unless Strategy is redeemed or liquidated, which is an unlikely and undesirable event.

Leituras Relacionadas

Stock Price Halved in 45 Days, Is Circle Actually the "DeFi Barometer"?

Over a 45-day period, Circle's stock price plummeted by approximately 50% to around $63, coinciding with a significant $70 billion decline in the circulation of its USDC stablecoin from its peak. In contrast, Tether's USDT saw a much smaller reduction. Analyst Ed Engel posits that Circle acts as a barometer for DeFi activity, as a high correlation exists between USDC supply and ETH price movements. The vast majority of USDC is concentrated within crypto exchanges and DeFi protocols for yield generation, rather than for widespread daily use in payments or commerce, unlike USDT which has stronger real-world adoption in various regions. The recent contraction in DeFi Total Value Locked (TVL), following security incidents like the Kelp DAO attack, appears to mirror Circle's declining stock performance. While Circle is actively promoting USDC's use as a settlement asset on platforms like Hyperliquid and in institutional payment corridors—where its organic transfer volume surpasses USDT's—these efforts have not sufficiently driven growth in USDC's overall supply. The company's revenue remains heavily tied to DeFi's expansion. For Circle's investment narrative to change, it must either significantly reduce its reliance on the volatile DeFi sector or demonstrably prove that real-world adoption can substantially and sustainably increase USDC circulation. In the near term, market confidence hinges on DeFi addressing its inherent risk-reward imbalances.

marsbitHá 14m

Stock Price Halved in 45 Days, Is Circle Actually the "DeFi Barometer"?

marsbitHá 14m

Trading

Spot
活动图片