SEC says most crypto assets are not securities in new regulatory framework

ambcryptoPublicado em 2026-03-17Última atualização em 2026-03-17

Resumo

The U.S. SEC, in coordination with the CFTC, issued new guidance on March 17, 2026, clarifying that most crypto assets are not securities. The framework introduces a taxonomy classifying digital assets into five categories: digital commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and digital securities. It emphasizes that a crypto asset itself may not be a security, even if involved in an investment contract, and that its regulatory status can change over time. The guidance also addresses staking, airdrops, mining, and asset wrapping, reducing uncertainty for market participants. This move signals improved regulatory alignment between the SEC and CFTC, providing clearer rules for builders, issuers, and investors.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has issued a sweeping new interpretation clarifying how federal securities laws apply to crypto assets, stating that most crypto assets are not themselves securities.

Announced on 17 March 2026, the guidance marks one of the most significant regulatory developments in the U.S. crypto market in over a decade.

The move was issued in coordination with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, signaling a more unified approach to overseeing digital assets.

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins said the interpretation aims to “draw clear lines in clear terms,” while acknowledging that earlier regulatory approaches had failed to provide sufficient clarity for market participants.

SEC introduces crypto asset taxonomy

At the center of the new framework is a formal classification system for digital assets. The SEC outlined five broad categories:

  • Digital commodities
  • Digital collectibles
  • Digital tools
  • Stablecoins
  • Digital securities

The taxonomy is designed to help market participants better understand how different types of crypto assets are treated under U.S. law, addressing a long-standing lack of consistent definitions across the industry.

Investment contracts can evolve—and end

A key element of the interpretation is the clarification that a crypto asset itself may not be a security, even if it is involved in an investment contract at some stage.

The SEC stated that a “non-security crypto asset” can become subject to securities laws through an investment contract, but that such arrangements can also cease over time.

This distinction introduces a more dynamic view of regulation, where an asset’s legal status may change depending on how it is offered, marketed, and used.

Clarity on staking, airdrops, and mining

The guidance also addresses several core crypto activities that have previously existed in regulatory grey areas.

These include:

  • Airdrops
  • Protocol mining
  • Protocol staking
  • The wrapping of non-security crypto assets

By outlining how securities laws apply to these activities, the SEC is attempting to reduce uncertainty for developers, platforms, and users operating across decentralized networks.

SEC and CFTC align on oversight

The joint nature of the interpretation highlights growing coordination between the SEC and the CFTC, which have historically taken different approaches to crypto regulation.

CFTC Chairman Michael S. Selig said the guidance reflects a shared commitment to creating “workable, harmonized regulations” for the industry.

The alignment is expected to clarify jurisdictional boundaries, particularly between assets treated as commodities and those subject to securities laws.

Market implications

The interpretation is likely to have wide-ranging implications for the crypto industry.

For builders and issuers, the framework provides clearer guidance on structuring projects and token distributions. For investors, it offers greater transparency around how assets may be classified and regulated.

The SEC said the interpretation also serves as a bridge as Congress continues its efforts to establish a comprehensive framework for the crypto market through legislation.


Final Summary

  • The SEC has clarified that most crypto assets are not securities, introducing a formal taxonomy and addressing long-standing regulatory uncertainty.
  • The joint guidance with the CFTC signals a more coordinated and flexible approach to crypto oversight in the United States.

Perguntas relacionadas

QWhat is the main clarification provided by the SEC regarding crypto assets in the new framework?

AThe SEC clarified that most crypto assets are not themselves securities.

QOn what date was this significant regulatory guidance announced?

AThe guidance was announced on 17 March 2026.

QWhat are the five broad categories in the SEC's new classification system for digital assets?

AThe five categories are: Digital commodities, Digital collectibles, Digital tools, Stablecoins, and Digital securities.

QAccording to the guidance, can a crypto asset's legal status change over time?

AYes, the guidance states that an asset's legal status may change depending on how it is offered, marketed, and used, and that an investment contract arrangement can cease over time.

QWhich other U.S. regulatory agency did the SEC coordinate with to issue this joint interpretation?

AThe SEC issued the guidance in coordination with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

Leituras Relacionadas

Jensen Huang is Satoshi Nakamoto

Summary: The article draws a compelling parallel between Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA, and Satoshi Nakamoto, the pseudonymous creator of Bitcoin. It argues that both figures, though operating in different eras, fundamentally architected new "token economies" based on a core conversion rule: inputting computational power (electricity) to output a valuable token. Nakamoto's 2008 whitepaper defined a system where Proof-of-Work mining produces scarce cryptographic tokens, creating a decentralized "faith economy" based on speculative value. In 2026, Huang is portrayed as performing a structurally identical act at GTC. Instead of merely selling GPUs, he presented a complete "token economics" framework, segmenting the market into tiers (Free, Medium, High, Premium, Ultra) based on inference speed, model type, and price per million tokens. He defined valuable computation for the AI age. The key distinction lies in the tokens' purpose and resulting scarcity. Crypto tokens derive value from artificial, code-enforced scarcity (e.g., Bitcoin's 21 million cap) and are meant to be held. AI tokens derive value from their immediate consumption for productive tasks (coding, decision-making) and face a natural, physical scarcity governed by the laws of thermodynamics, land, and power grids, which Huang's hardware is designed to maximize. Ultimately, while Nakamoto created a speculative asset, Huang is building an indispensable utility. The AI token economy, powered by NVIDIA ecosystem, is argued to be more resilient and fundamental, as the author concludes, "You don't need to believe the token has value—your credit card bill has already proven it." Huang is presented as the visible, commercial architect of a tangible token future, the successor to Satoshi's anonymous, ideological blueprint.

marsbitHá 16m

Jensen Huang is Satoshi Nakamoto

marsbitHá 16m

IBM Loses $40 Billion, Block Lays Off Half Its Workforce Yet Stock Rises: In the AI Era, What Assets Are Worth Tokenizing?

On February 23, 2026, IBM’s stock plummeted 13.2%, erasing $40 billion in market value, after AI startup Anthropic announced its Claude Code tool could modernize IBM’s legacy COBOL systems—a core profit driver for IBM. In contrast, Block’s stock surged 24% three days later despite announcing a 50% workforce reduction, citing AI-driven efficiency gains. These divergent reactions highlight how AI is redefining asset value. The article argues AI acts as a "repricer" of assets, favoring those with "AI immunity." Key traits include non-codability (e.g., IBM’s hardware-software integration, which AI can’t fully replicate), data moats (exclusive, high-quality data), and AI-augmentability (assets enhanced, not replaced, by AI). Assets vulnerable to AI are those reliant on human intermediation or standardized processes. The framework extends to real-world asset (RWA) tokenization. Assets worth tokenizing are those resilient to AI-driven devaluation, such as energy infrastructure, GPU computing power, exclusive data assets, and hybrid physical-digital assets. The piece cautions against tokenizing assets dependent on human intermediaries or lacking data moats. The conclusion urges executives to stress-test their asset portfolios using the "AI immunity" framework, dynamically manage asset allocation, and carefully evaluate RWA strategies based on AI resilience. It emphasizes that in the AI era, sustainable assets are those that leverage human judgment and possess inherent physical or exclusive value.

marsbitHá 22m

IBM Loses $40 Billion, Block Lays Off Half Its Workforce Yet Stock Rises: In the AI Era, What Assets Are Worth Tokenizing?

marsbitHá 22m

Disney's Olaf Robot Goes Viral, Trump Postpones Visit to China...

Here is a summary of the key discussions from crypto KOLs on X over the past 24 hours: **Disney's Olaf Robot Steals the Show at GTC:** A highly advanced, animatronic Snowman Olaf from Disney became a major talking point at the conference. Users noted its "humanized interaction" capabilities, powered by the Jetson AGX Thor chip, which allows for real-time multi-modal reasoning and complex motion training. This was seen as a significant milestone for AI scaling laws entering the physical world. Some pointed out that the on-stage dialogue was pre-recorded and that a similar robot has existed for years. **Trump Postpones Visit to China:** Former President Donald Trump's decision to delay a planned trip to China was widely discussed. Commentators characterized the move as typical of his unpredictable, "随心所欲" (whimsical) nature. Some speculated he might be "operating a prediction market," with one user quipping, "The first rule of winning: never go where you lose." **Yi Lihua Announces New Fund:** Crypto investor Yi Lihua announced he is preparing a new fund platform. The community response was mixed and skeptical. Replies ranged from praising his good attitude to accusations of market manipulation, suggesting his public statements are often contrary to his actual actions, such as secretly shorting the market or encouraging others to "lift the sedan chair" for his exit. **KOLs on Passive Income:** Several key opinion leaders shared their views and strategies for generating passive income, though specific details of these discussions were not elaborated in the provided text.

比推Há 1h

Disney's Olaf Robot Goes Viral, Trump Postpones Visit to China...

比推Há 1h

Trading

Spot
Futuros
活动图片